SynGap Missense Server

Table of SynGAP1 Isoform α2 (UniProt Q96PV0-1) Missense Variants.

c.dna Variant SGM Consensus Domain and Structure information: based on WT protein Annotated databases Deep learning-based pathogenicity predictions Folding stability-based pathogenicity predictions Sequence/structure-based pathogenicity predictions Phase Separation Evolutionary/physical properties Molecular Dynamics-based analysis DOI
Domain IUPred2 ANCHOR2 AlphaFold MobiDB PhosphoSitePlus ClinVar gnomAD ESM1b AlphaMissense FoldX Rosetta Foldetta PremPS REVEL PROVEAN PolyPhen-2 HumDiv PolyPhen-2 HumVar FATHMM SIFT PSMutPred PAM Physical SASA Normalized B-factor backbone Normalized B-factor sidechain SynGAP Structural Annotation
Score Prediction Score Prediction pLDDT disorder disorder LTP HTP KL PTM Clinical Status Review Subm. ID Allele count Allele freq. LLR score Prediction Pathogenicity Class Optimized Average ΔΔG Prediction StdDev ΔΔG Prediction ΔΔG Prediction ΔΔG Prediction Score Prediction Score Prediction pph2_prob Prediction pph2_prob Prediction Nervous System Score Prediction Prediction Status Conservation Sequences IP RF SP RF Prediction PAM250 PAM120 Hydropathy Δ MW Δ Average Δ Δ StdDev Δ StdDev Secondary Tertiary bonds Inside out GAP-Ras interface At membrane No effect MD Alert Verdict Description
c.1667A>G
N556S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N556S (ClinVar ID 941099.0) is listed as Uncertain in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33438910‑A‑G). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split, and Foldetta predicts a benign effect. No other high‑accuracy or folding‑stability methods provide additional evidence. Overall, the majority of predictions support a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar Uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.015078Structured0.008655Uncertain0.9250.2250.000Uncertain 16-33438910-A-G31.86e-6-6.576Likely Benign0.197Likely BenignLikely Benign0.52Ambiguous0.10.14Likely Benign0.33Likely Benign0.16Likely Benign0.449Likely Benign-3.60Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging-1.22Pathogenic0.14Tolerated3.37350.26410.3556112.7-27.03198.831.00.00.0-0.50.2XPotentially BenignAsn556 is located on the outer surface of an α-helix (res. Ala533-Val560). The carboxamide group of Asn556 forms hydrogen bonds with nearby residues such as Lys553 and Cys552. It also forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of Cys552, which weakens the α-helix integrity. In the variant simulations, the hydroxyl group of Ser556 forms a more stable hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl oxygen of the same helix residue, Cys552, compared to Asn556 in the WT. Serine has a slightly lower propensity to reside in an α-helix than asparagine, which may exacerbate the negative effect on the α-helix integrity. However, the residue swap does not cause negative structural effects during the simulations.
c.1667A>T
N556I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N556I is catalogued in ClinVar as benign (ClinVar ID 2692844.0) and is observed in gnomAD (ID 6‑33438910‑A‑T). Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS, while pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score. Two tools report uncertainty: FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (integrating FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Taken together, the majority of predictions favor a pathogenic effect, whereas the ClinVar annotation indicates benign. Thus, the computational evidence contradicts the ClinVar status, suggesting the variant is more likely pathogenic rather than benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.015078Structured0.008655Uncertain0.9250.2250.000Likely Benign 16-33438910-A-T-13.391Likely Pathogenic0.929Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.64Ambiguous0.00.17Likely Benign0.41Likely Benign0.26Likely Benign0.761Likely Pathogenic-7.52Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.02Affected3.37350.07380.3450-3-28.0-0.94
c.1668C>A
N556K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N556K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, and SIFT, whereas the remaining tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of predictions support a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available computational evidence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.015078Structured0.008655Uncertain0.9250.2250.000-10.017Likely Pathogenic0.968Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.10Likely Benign0.10.14Likely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.40Likely Benign0.510Likely Pathogenic-4.48Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.08Pathogenic0.14Tolerated0.20240.224010-0.414.07
c.1668C>G
N556K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N556K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions from FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, and SIFT; pathogenic predictions from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support this dichotomy: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic, whereas Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts a benign effect. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation (i.e., no conflicting benign classification).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.015078Structured0.008655Uncertain0.9250.2250.000-10.017Likely Pathogenic0.968Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.10Likely Benign0.10.14Likely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.40Likely Benign0.510Likely Pathogenic-4.48Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.08Pathogenic0.14Tolerated0.20240.224010-0.414.07
c.1669T>A
S557T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S557T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect comprise REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Predictions that are uncertain (AlphaMissense‑Default and Foldetta) are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM Consensus as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions indicate a pathogenic impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.028107Structured0.010261Uncertain0.9240.2150.000-9.089Likely Pathogenic0.418AmbiguousLikely Benign2.14Destabilizing0.20.40Likely Benign1.27Ambiguous0.21Likely Benign0.744Likely Pathogenic-2.53Deleterious0.826Possibly Damaging0.872Possibly Damaging-1.64Pathogenic0.07Tolerated0.15140.6336110.114.03
c.1669T>C
S557P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S557P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also labels it pathogenic. Based on the uniform predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.028107Structured0.010261Uncertain0.9240.2150.000-15.383Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.91Destabilizing0.48.79Destabilizing7.85Destabilizing1.09Destabilizing0.934Likely Pathogenic-4.60Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging-1.76Pathogenic0.01Affected0.22220.62391-1-0.810.04
c.1669T>G
S557A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S557A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Rosetta, whereas a majority of tools (REVEL, SIFT, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict a pathogenic impact. Uncertain or inconclusive results come from AlphaMissense‑Default, FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.028107Structured0.010261Uncertain0.9240.2150.000-11.044Likely Pathogenic0.421AmbiguousLikely Benign1.26Ambiguous0.00.09Likely Benign0.68Ambiguous0.54Ambiguous0.801Likely Pathogenic-2.70Deleterious0.944Possibly Damaging0.987Probably Damaging-1.69Pathogenic0.05Affected0.46950.4836112.6-16.00
c.166C>A
L56M
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L56M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID = None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT. Two tools, ESM1b and AlphaMissense‑Default, return uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive because it contains two benign and two uncertain calls, and Foldetta data are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence (four benign versus three pathogenic predictions, with two uncertain) suggests the variant is most likely benign. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as the variant has not been reported there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.342579Structured0.476218Uncertain0.4950.6570.000-7.470In-Between0.345AmbiguousLikely Benign0.109Likely Benign-0.51Neutral0.824Possibly Damaging0.910Probably Damaging3.86Benign0.00Affected0.07970.357442-1.918.03
c.166C>G
L56V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L56V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and ESM1b; AlphaMissense‑Default is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also leans benign (2 benign vs 1 pathogenic, 1 uncertain). Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact for the L56V variant, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.342579Structured0.476218Uncertain0.4950.6570.000-8.104Likely Pathogenic0.471AmbiguousLikely Benign0.123Likely Benign-0.99Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.745Possibly Damaging3.90Benign0.00Affected0.16350.3655210.4-14.03
c.1670C>A
S557Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S557Y is not reported in ClinVar and has no gnomAD entry. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: all except premPS (which predicts benign) return pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The high‑accuracy methods reinforce this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels it likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. No tool indicates a benign outcome. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic according to the available computational evidence, and this assessment does not conflict with ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for S557Y.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.028107Structured0.010261Uncertain0.9240.2150.000-13.792Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic18.89Destabilizing1.13.48Destabilizing11.19Destabilizing-0.20Likely Benign0.965Likely Pathogenic-5.45Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging-1.77Pathogenic0.00Affected0.11570.6087-3-2-0.576.10
c.1670C>G
S557C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S557C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) classify the change as pathogenic. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta provide uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicting benign, while the SGM‑Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—predicts pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple pathogenic predictors and the SGM‑Consensus suggests the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because the variant is not yet reported there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.028107Structured0.010261Uncertain0.9240.2150.000-9.845Likely Pathogenic0.577Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.43Ambiguous0.11.74Ambiguous1.59Ambiguous0.49Likely Benign0.923Likely Pathogenic-4.52Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.77Pathogenic0.00Affected0.12870.56780-13.316.06
c.1670C>T
S557F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S557F is not reported in ClinVar and has no gnomAD entry. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: the single benign prediction from premPS versus a consensus of pathogenic predictions from the remaining 13 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized). High‑accuracy methods—AlphaMissense‑Optimized, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta—all indicate pathogenicity. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the aggregate computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.028107Structured0.010261Uncertain0.9240.2150.000-12.523Likely Pathogenic0.985Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic15.55Destabilizing5.29.95Destabilizing12.75Destabilizing0.08Likely Benign0.958Likely Pathogenic-5.38Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging-1.77Pathogenic0.00Affected0.10730.5931-3-23.660.10
c.1672C>A
H558N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 H558N missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Uncertain results come from premPS and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification. Thus, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000-9.523Likely Pathogenic0.257Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.22Likely Benign0.10.82Ambiguous0.30Likely Benign0.98Ambiguous0.433Likely Benign-4.58Deleterious0.388Benign0.327Benign-1.25Pathogenic0.14Tolerated0.14660.128121-0.3-23.04
c.1672C>G
H558D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H558D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: the single benign prediction comes from SIFT, while the remaining tools—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus—indicate pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic”; AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta are “Uncertain.” No evidence suggests a benign outcome. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the preponderance of predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for H558D.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000-14.948Likely Pathogenic0.823Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.54Ambiguous0.11.88Ambiguous1.21Ambiguous1.03Destabilizing0.635Likely Pathogenic-5.90Deleterious0.959Probably Damaging0.905Possibly Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.22330.09081-1-0.3-22.05
c.1672C>T
H558Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 H558Y missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome, while FoldX, premPS, and ESM1b are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a benign result; and Foldetta also predicts benign. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Overall, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000-7.208In-Between0.187Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.58Ambiguous0.0-0.36Likely Benign-0.47Likely Benign-0.56Ambiguous0.359Likely Benign0.55Neutral0.019Benign0.013Benign-1.24Pathogenic1.00Tolerated0.09380.2363021.926.03
c.1673A>C
H558P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H558P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; those that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain predictions come from FoldX and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts Pathogenic. Overall, the majority of tools, including the high‑accuracy ones, indicate a pathogenic effect. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000-13.706Likely Pathogenic0.675Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.63Ambiguous0.26.93Destabilizing3.78Destabilizing0.94Ambiguous0.782Likely Pathogenic-6.28Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.20610.24050-21.6-40.02
c.1673A>G
H558R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant H558R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Rosetta, SIFT, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar, while pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Four tools give inconclusive results: AlphaMissense‑Default, SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign effect, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, which does not conflict with the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000Uncertain 1-14.445Likely Pathogenic0.554AmbiguousLikely Benign-1.14Ambiguous0.1-0.23Likely Benign-0.69Ambiguous1.03Destabilizing0.587Likely Pathogenic-4.94Deleterious0.677Possibly Damaging0.239Benign-1.24Pathogenic0.14Tolerated3.37350.15000.151202-1.319.05
c.1673A>T
H558L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 H558L missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM; FoldX is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. With eight benign versus five pathogenic predictions and two high‑accuracy benign calls, the variant is most likely benign. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for H558L.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000-13.563Likely Pathogenic0.250Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.52Ambiguous0.00.21Likely Benign-0.16Likely Benign0.30Likely Benign0.509Likely Pathogenic-5.40Deleterious0.001Benign0.005Benign-0.98Pathogenic0.29Tolerated0.10020.3141-2-37.0-23.98
c.1674C>A
H558Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H558Q is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include SIFT, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict pathogenicity are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Two tools report uncertainty: AlphaMissense‑Default and premPS. High‑accuracy methods give mixed results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts likely pathogenic, and Foldetta predicts benign. No prediction or folding stability result is missing. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward pathogenicity, but the presence of several benign predictions and conflicting high‑accuracy outputs suggests uncertainty. The variant is most likely pathogenic based on the prevailing evidence, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000-11.483Likely Pathogenic0.496AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.26Likely Benign0.10.05Likely Benign-0.11Likely Benign0.97Ambiguous0.522Likely Pathogenic-4.23Deleterious0.991Probably Damaging0.702Possibly Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.11820.205830-0.3-9.01
c.1674C>G
H558Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H558Q is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include SIFT, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict pathogenicity are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Two tools report uncertainty: AlphaMissense‑Default and premPS. High‑accuracy methods give mixed results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts likely pathogenic, and Foldetta predicts benign. No prediction or folding stability result is missing. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward pathogenicity, but the presence of several benign predictions and conflicting high‑accuracy outputs suggests uncertainty. The variant is most likely pathogenic based on the prevailing evidence, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.011039Uncertain0.8970.2000.000-11.483Likely Pathogenic0.496AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.26Likely Benign0.10.05Likely Benign-0.11Likely Benign0.97Ambiguous0.522Likely Pathogenic-4.23Deleterious0.991Probably Damaging0.702Possibly Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.11820.205830-0.3-9.01
c.1675T>A
C559S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C559S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, SIFT, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The remaining tools, premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as Benign. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic; this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.016021Structured0.010460Uncertain0.8420.2040.000-10.756Likely Pathogenic0.785Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.03Likely Benign0.0-0.31Likely Benign-0.17Likely Benign0.65Ambiguous0.450Likely Benign-7.26Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.58Benign0.64Tolerated0.39400.13190-1-3.3-16.06
c.1675T>C
C559R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C559R is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, Rosetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain or inconclusive results come from FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of tools (six pathogenic vs five benign) lean toward a pathogenic interpretation, and this does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet classified in ClinVar. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictive evidence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.016021Structured0.010460Uncertain0.8420.2040.000-9.509Likely Pathogenic0.779Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-1.03Ambiguous0.1-0.38Likely Benign-0.71Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.498Likely Benign-8.58Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.46Tolerated0.24980.1720-4-3-7.053.05
c.1675T>G
C559G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 C559G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Foldetta, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain calls from Rosetta and premPS are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of predictions (seven pathogenic vs five benign) and the high‑accuracy consensus lean toward a pathogenic effect. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.016021Structured0.010460Uncertain0.8420.2040.000-12.342Likely Pathogenic0.581Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.10.53Ambiguous0.33Likely Benign0.76Ambiguous0.547Likely Pathogenic-8.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.50Benign0.37Tolerated0.24540.2001-3-3-2.9-46.09
c.1676G>A
C559Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant C559Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM. Those that predict pathogenicity are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Because the evidence is split evenly between benign and pathogenic predictions and the high‑accuracy tools disagree, the variant is best classified as of uncertain significance. This assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.016021Structured0.010460Uncertain0.8420.2040.000-11.767Likely Pathogenic0.868Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.37Likely Benign0.0-0.19Likely Benign-0.28Likely Benign0.36Likely Benign0.561Likely Pathogenic-8.39Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.45Benign0.10Tolerated0.20940.21350-2-3.860.04
c.1676G>C
C559S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C559S has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, SIFT, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic impact are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give inconclusive results: premPS (Uncertain) and AlphaMissense‑Optimized (Uncertain). High‑accuracy assessments show SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as Benign, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.016021Structured0.010460Uncertain0.8420.2040.000-10.756Likely Pathogenic0.785Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.03Likely Benign0.0-0.31Likely Benign-0.17Likely Benign0.65Ambiguous0.469Likely Benign-7.26Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.58Benign0.64Tolerated0.39400.13190-1-3.3-16.06
c.1676G>T
C559F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C559F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID = None). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict pathogenicity are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the predictions are split evenly, but the two most reliable tools (AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta) both indicate a benign effect, whereas the consensus pathogenic tool is a single outlier. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on the current computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar claim exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.016021Structured0.010460Uncertain0.8420.2040.000-13.194Likely Pathogenic0.779Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.43Likely Benign0.0-0.04Likely Benign-0.24Likely Benign0.29Likely Benign0.576Likely Pathogenic-8.48Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.43Benign0.09Tolerated0.22340.2653-4-20.344.04
c.1677C>G
C559W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change C559W is not listed in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is Uncertain, SGM Consensus is Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is Benign. Overall, seven of the twelve evaluated tools predict pathogenicity versus six benign, giving a slight majority toward a deleterious effect. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.016021Structured0.010460Uncertain0.8420.2040.000-12.765Likely Pathogenic0.921Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.19Likely Benign0.00.01Likely Benign-0.09Likely Benign0.44Likely Benign0.274Likely Benign-8.54Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.42Benign0.03Affected0.24920.2135-8-2-3.483.07
c.1678G>A
V560M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 V560M missense variant is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is present in gnomAD (ID 6-33440730-G-A). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect are REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Uncertain predictions come from Rosetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence tools predict a benign impact, with only one consensus pathogenic prediction. Therefore, the variant is most likely benign based on current computational evidence, and this does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.021381Structured0.013872Uncertain0.8530.2040.000Uncertain 26-33440730-G-A159.50e-6-9.598Likely Pathogenic0.517AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.33Likely Benign0.10.88Ambiguous0.28Likely Benign0.72Ambiguous0.520Likely Pathogenic-2.42Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.863Possibly Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.14Tolerated3.37350.11610.398021-2.332.06234.9-52.60.00.0-0.10.1XPotentially BenignVal560 is located on the surface at the end of an α-helix (res. Ala533-Val560). The iso-propyl group of Val560 favorably packs against Asp508 of the opposing α-helix (res. Gln503-Glu519). However, in the variant simulations, the bulkier thioether side chain of Met560 does not form equally favorable inter-helix interactions. Regardless, no negative structural effects are observed during the simulations.
c.1678G>C
V560L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V560L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta; pathogenic predictions come from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and FATHMM. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further refine the picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—leans pathogenic (2 pathogenic vs. 1 benign). Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts benign. Overall, the bulk of evidence points to a benign effect, but the SGM Consensus and the presence of pathogenic signals from several high‑confidence tools introduce uncertainty. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on the prevailing predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.021381Structured0.013872Uncertain0.8530.2040.000-10.191Likely Pathogenic0.533AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.44Likely Benign0.00.48Likely Benign0.02Likely Benign0.45Likely Benign0.489Likely Benign-2.45Neutral0.508Possibly Damaging0.209Benign-1.24Pathogenic0.40Tolerated3.37350.14300.416212-0.414.03
c.1678G>T
V560L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 V560L variant has no ClinVar entry (ClinVar status: None) but is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440730‑G‑T). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic impact are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and FATHMM (polyPhen‑2 HumVar is benign, AlphaMissense‑Default is uncertain). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) leaning pathogenic (2 pathogenic vs 1 benign), and Foldetta indicating a benign stability change. Overall, the majority of conventional tools favor a benign classification, yet the high‑accuracy consensus and Foldetta suggest a pathogenic signal. Based on the most reliable predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.021381Structured0.013872Uncertain0.8530.2040.0006-33440730-G-T16.34e-7-10.191Likely Pathogenic0.533AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.44Likely Benign0.00.48Likely Benign0.02Likely Benign0.45Likely Benign0.489Likely Benign-2.45Neutral0.508Possibly Damaging0.209Benign-1.24Pathogenic0.40Tolerated3.37350.14300.416212-0.414.03
c.1679T>A
V560E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V560E is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus—predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. With the majority of evidence pointing to pathogenicity and no ClinVar annotation to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021381Structured0.013872Uncertain0.8530.2040.000-13.331Likely Pathogenic0.932Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.12Ambiguous0.11.41Ambiguous1.27Ambiguous1.61Destabilizing0.711Likely Pathogenic-4.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.990Probably Damaging-1.16Pathogenic0.18Tolerated0.11000.1667-2-2-7.729.98
c.1679T>C
V560A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V560A is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta provide uncertain or inconclusive results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic; Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of predictions (eight pathogenic vs. three benign) indicate that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021381Structured0.013872Uncertain0.8530.2040.000-8.260Likely Pathogenic0.701Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.54Ambiguous0.11.33Ambiguous0.94Ambiguous1.19Destabilizing0.447Likely Benign-3.15Deleterious0.911Possibly Damaging0.657Possibly Damaging-1.20Pathogenic0.31Tolerated0.25490.221200-2.4-28.05
c.1679T>G
V560G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 V560G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the majority of tools (REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. Uncertain results come from FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show that the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and Foldetta is uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that V560G is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.021381Structured0.013872Uncertain0.8530.2040.000-12.485Likely Pathogenic0.799Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.66Ambiguous0.12.12Destabilizing1.39Ambiguous1.80Destabilizing0.753Likely Pathogenic-5.87Deleterious0.981Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.19Tolerated0.17380.2036-1-3-4.6-42.08
c.167T>A
L56Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L56Q is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID = None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, and FATHMM. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive (2 pathogenic vs 2 benign), and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of available predictions (5 pathogenic vs 3 benign) indicate a pathogenic impact. There is no ClinVar entry to contradict this assessment, so the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.342579Structured0.476218Uncertain0.4950.6570.000-11.064Likely Pathogenic0.926Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.293Likely Benign-2.03Neutral0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.79Benign0.00Affected0.10830.0842-2-2-7.314.97
c.167T>C
L56P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L56P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Pathogenic). High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic. No Foldetta stability prediction is available for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of computational evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation, which is currently absent.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Pathogenic0.342579Structured0.476218Uncertain0.4950.6570.000-9.991Likely Pathogenic0.971Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.307Likely Benign-2.62Deleterious0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.77Benign0.00Affected0.38060.1342-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.167T>G
L56R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L56R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID = None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, and FATHMM. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive (2 vs 2), and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of available predictions (5 pathogenic vs 3 benign) indicate a likely pathogenic impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as the variant has no existing ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.342579Structured0.476218Uncertain0.4950.6570.000-10.194Likely Pathogenic0.918Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.264Likely Benign-1.92Neutral0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.79Benign0.00Affected0.11910.0685-3-2-8.343.03
c.1681T>A
F561I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561I is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) but is present in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440733‑T‑A). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT. All other evaluated predictors—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.0006-33440733-T-A16.32e-7-11.708Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.82Destabilizing0.12.13Destabilizing2.98Destabilizing1.46Destabilizing0.710Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.06Pathogenic0.09Tolerated3.37350.18250.1925011.7-34.02
c.1681T>C
F561L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the remaining evaluated algorithms (REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus) all predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome; FoldX is listed as uncertain and is therefore not considered evidence for either side. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenicity. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists for F561L.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.000-8.947Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.72Ambiguous0.22.52Destabilizing2.12Destabilizing1.39Destabilizing0.656Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-0.81Pathogenic0.32Tolerated0.19110.2629201.0-34.02
c.1681T>G
F561V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts Pathogenic. All available evidence points to a pathogenic impact. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.000-11.371Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.11Destabilizing0.12.58Destabilizing2.85Destabilizing1.48Destabilizing0.827Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.04Affected0.19850.1575-1-11.4-48.04
c.1682T>A
F561Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a deleterious effect include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). No tool predicts a benign outcome; the remaining predictions (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) are uncertain or unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Based on the consensus of the majority of evidence‑based predictors, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.000-12.692Likely Pathogenic0.950Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.54Ambiguous0.10.75Ambiguous1.15Ambiguous1.28Destabilizing0.693Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.988Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging-1.34Pathogenic0.01Affected0.13440.112073-4.116.00
c.1682T>C
F561S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess functional impact uniformly indicate a deleterious effect. Benign predictions: none. Pathogenic predictions: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenic. No predictions are inconclusive. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.000-13.515Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.75Destabilizing0.04.54Destabilizing4.65Destabilizing2.08Destabilizing0.803Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.00Affected0.41420.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1682T>G
F561C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561C is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus—predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.000-13.035Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.92Destabilizing0.03.99Destabilizing3.96Destabilizing1.22Destabilizing0.769Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.15Tolerated0.27200.0615-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1683C>A
F561L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and SIFT, whereas the remaining tools (SGM‑Consensus, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict a pathogenic outcome; FoldX is uncertain and therefore not counted as evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta also predicts pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the absence of any benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.000-8.947Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.72Ambiguous0.22.52Destabilizing2.12Destabilizing1.39Destabilizing0.492Likely Benign-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-0.81Pathogenic0.32Tolerated0.19110.2629201.0-34.02
c.1683C>G
F561L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F561L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and SIFT, whereas the remaining tools (SGM‑Consensus, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict a pathogenic outcome; FoldX is uncertain and therefore not counted as evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta also predicts pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the absence of any benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.018013Uncertain0.9030.1960.000-8.947Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.72Ambiguous0.22.52Destabilizing2.12Destabilizing1.39Destabilizing0.493Likely Benign-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-0.81Pathogenic0.32Tolerated0.19110.2629201.0-34.02
c.1684C>A
P562T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P562T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign outcome; the only uncertain predictions come from Foldetta and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of computational evidence indicates that P562T is likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022306Structured0.023606Uncertain0.8930.2000.000-14.747Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.62Destabilizing0.10.51Ambiguous1.57Ambiguous0.81Ambiguous0.697Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging0.58Pathogenic0.00Affected0.18920.34540-10.93.99
c.1684C>G
P562A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P562A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: only premPS classifies it as benign, whereas REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity; Rosetta remains uncertain. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a pathogenic change, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic. This assessment does not contradict ClinVar, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022306Structured0.023606Uncertain0.8930.2000.000-13.554Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.87Destabilizing0.01.28Ambiguous2.08Destabilizing0.39Likely Benign0.633Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.59Pathogenic0.01Affected0.34180.28831-13.4-26.04
c.1684C>T
P562S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P562S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity. The only tools with uncertain outcomes are Rosetta and premPS, which provide inconclusive results. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the collective predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022306Structured0.023606Uncertain0.8930.2000.000-14.293Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.93Destabilizing0.11.59Ambiguous2.26Destabilizing0.70Ambiguous0.708Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.62Pathogenic0.01Affected0.33650.29001-10.8-10.04
c.1685C>A
P562Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P562Q is recorded in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440737‑C‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. All available in silico predictors classify the substitution as pathogenic: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool reports a benign outcome, so the benign group is empty. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the consensus of predictive tools, and this assessment is not contradicted by any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022306Structured0.023606Uncertain0.8930.2000.0006-33440737-C-A-15.705Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.18Destabilizing0.41.22Ambiguous2.70Destabilizing1.24Destabilizing0.778Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.57Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.16340.3184-10-1.931.01
c.1685C>G
P562R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P562R has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, none classify the change as benign; the majority (REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, SGM‑Consensus) predict it to be pathogenic. Two tools (Rosetta and premPS) return uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores it as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates pathogenicity, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic impact. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022306Structured0.023606Uncertain0.8930.2000.000-17.309Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.88Destabilizing1.20.96Ambiguous3.42Destabilizing0.82Ambiguous0.820Likely Pathogenic-8.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.58Pathogenic0.02Affected0.16400.24890-2-2.959.07
c.1685C>T
P562L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P562L is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 41462.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440737‑C‑T). Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Benign predictions are reported only by premPS and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as Uncertain. No other high‑confidence stability or pathogenicity scores are available. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a pathogenic classification, which is consistent with the ClinVar status and does not contradict it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022306Structured0.023606Uncertain0.8930.2000.000Pathogenic/Likely path. 106-33440737-C-T-13.438Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.54Destabilizing0.80.17Likely Benign1.86Ambiguous-0.14Likely Benign0.829Likely Pathogenic-9.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.58Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.22500.4510-3-35.416.04228.8-68.5-0.10.00.10.2XPotentially PathogenicPro562 is located on an α-α loop between two α-helices (res. Ala533-Val560 and res. Arg563-Glu578). The cyclic pyrrolidine side chain of Pro562 hydrophobically packs with other residues in the inter-helix space, such as Leu565, Ile501, and Phe561. In the variant simulations, Leu562 packs more favorably with the nearby hydrophobic residues, and the backbone amide group of Leu562 (absent in proline) does not form any intra-protein hydrogen bonds. However, prolines are well-suited for unstructured regions like loops, and thus, Pro562 in the WT is necessary at the end of the helix to induce a tight turn during folding. Although no negative structural effects are observed during the simulations, the residue swap could potentially cause extensive damage to the protein structure during folding.10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.11.011
c.1687A>G
R563G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R563G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a predominance of pathogenic calls: Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict deleterious effects, while the consensus SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenicity. Benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM. High‑accuracy assessments give an uncertain result from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, a pathogenic outcome from the SGM‑Consensus, and an uncertain outcome from Foldetta (which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability scores). Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic interpretation, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.031987Uncertain0.8760.2090.000-9.549Likely Pathogenic0.848Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.41Ambiguous0.02.01Destabilizing1.71Ambiguous0.89Ambiguous0.253Likely Benign-5.68Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.42Benign0.13Tolerated0.30820.1969-3-24.1-99.14
c.1687A>T
R563W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R563W is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show that AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is also inconclusive. No evidence from the uncertain tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) supports either outcome. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification for R563W, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.031987Uncertain0.8760.2090.000-12.454Likely Pathogenic0.854Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.25Ambiguous0.10.79Ambiguous1.02Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign0.302Likely Benign-6.75Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.42Benign0.01Affected0.13780.20882-33.630.03
c.1688G>A
R563K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 R563K missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b. Predictions that are inconclusive are Rosetta and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign, and Foldetta as benign. Based on the overall consensus of the available predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.039760Structured0.031987Uncertain0.8760.2090.000-10.948Likely Pathogenic0.335Likely BenignLikely Benign0.25Likely Benign0.00.66Ambiguous0.46Likely Benign0.70Ambiguous0.198Likely Benign-2.37Neutral0.990Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.46Benign0.35Tolerated0.44340.2379320.6-28.01
c.1688G>C
R563T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 R563T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta—give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy methods provide the following: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is unavailable; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic; Foldetta is unavailable. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this change.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.039760Structured0.031987Uncertain0.8760.2090.000-7.088In-Between0.913Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.13Ambiguous0.10.77Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.18Likely Benign0.307Likely Benign-4.77Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.49Benign0.23Tolerated0.21150.3148-1-13.8-55.08
c.1688G>T
R563M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R563M is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440740‑G‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, FATHMM, premPS, and Foldetta; pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (integrating FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. No prediction or stability result is missing; all available data are considered. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a pathogenic effect, with a single high‑accuracy tool (Foldetta) suggesting benign stability. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.031987Uncertain0.8760.2090.0006-33440740-G-T-8.910Likely Pathogenic0.934Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.18Likely Benign0.10.70Ambiguous0.26Likely Benign0.17Likely Benign0.311Likely Benign-4.91Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.43Benign0.04Affected3.37350.16360.2230-106.4-24.99
c.1689G>C
R563S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 R563S missense change is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Five tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) return uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments are likewise ambiguous: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is a 2‑to‑2 tie and therefore unavailable; Foldetta also reports an uncertain stability change. Consequently, the evidence does not strongly support either benign or pathogenic status. The variant’s classification is therefore inconclusive and does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.039760Structured0.031987Uncertain0.8760.2090.000-6.503Likely Benign0.949Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.16Ambiguous0.11.46Ambiguous1.31Ambiguous0.69Ambiguous0.251Likely Benign-4.49Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.23Tolerated0.30310.25340-13.7-69.11
c.1689G>T
R563S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R563S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—yield uncertain or inconclusive results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments are likewise inconclusive: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is a 2‑to‑2 tie, and Foldetta is uncertain. Consequently, the evidence does not strongly favor either outcome. Based on the current predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.039760Structured0.031987Uncertain0.8760.2090.000-6.503Likely Benign0.949Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.16Ambiguous0.11.46Ambiguous1.31Ambiguous0.69Ambiguous0.251Likely Benign-4.49Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.23Tolerated0.30310.25340-13.7-69.11
c.1690G>A
E564K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E564K is not reported in ClinVar and is present in the gnomAD database (variant ID 6‑33440742‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls are made by REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while only SIFT predicts a benign outcome. Uncertain results are reported by FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a pathogenic classification, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023534Structured0.038418Uncertain0.8910.2080.0006-33440742-G-A-15.834Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.76Ambiguous0.12.06Destabilizing1.41Ambiguous0.89Ambiguous0.854Likely Pathogenic-3.95Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.987Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.10Tolerated3.37350.19880.528010-0.4-0.94
c.1690G>C
E564Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 E564Q is not reported in ClinVar and has no gnomAD entry. Consensus from standard predictors shows a split: benign calls come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT, while pathogenic calls come from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta predicts benign stability. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward pathogenicity, and the high‑accuracy consensus supports this view. The variant is therefore most likely pathogenic, with no ClinVar annotation to contradict this assessment.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023534Structured0.038418Uncertain0.8910.2080.000-12.077Likely Pathogenic0.927Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.33Likely Benign0.00.27Likely Benign0.30Likely Benign-0.03Likely Benign0.598Likely Pathogenic-2.95Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.12Tolerated0.09820.5119220.0-0.98
c.1691A>C
E564A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E564A is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS and SIFT, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Uncertain results are reported by FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple independent predictors indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023534Structured0.038418Uncertain0.8910.2080.000-14.506Likely Pathogenic0.957Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.64Ambiguous0.11.49Ambiguous1.07Ambiguous0.24Likely Benign0.765Likely Pathogenic-5.91Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.12Tolerated0.32010.49180-15.3-58.04
c.1691A>G
E564G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E564G is listed in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440743‑A‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity are unanimous: REVEL, FoldX (uncertain), Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS (uncertain), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate a pathogenic effect, while no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for E564G.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023534Structured0.038418Uncertain0.8910.2080.0006-33440743-A-G-15.053Likely Pathogenic0.969Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.69Ambiguous0.12.55Destabilizing2.12Destabilizing0.80Ambiguous0.735Likely Pathogenic-6.83Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.23Pathogenic0.04Affected3.37350.27490.4443-203.1-72.06
c.1691A>T
E564V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E564V has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on benign effect include premPS and SIFT, whereas the majority of algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the change as pathogenic. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta give uncertain results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, and the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates pathogenicity; Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E564V, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023534Structured0.038418Uncertain0.8910.2080.000-15.163Likely Pathogenic0.986Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.53Ambiguous0.00.75Ambiguous0.64Ambiguous0.23Likely Benign0.812Likely Pathogenic-6.90Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging-1.37Pathogenic0.11Tolerated0.05710.5503-2-27.7-29.98
c.1692G>C
E564D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E564D is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, premPS, and SIFT, whereas a majority of other in silico predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default) classify the change as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. With the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the lack of benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic; this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023534Structured0.038418Uncertain0.8910.2080.000-10.184Likely Pathogenic0.915Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.47Likely Benign0.11.13Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.26Likely Benign0.637Likely Pathogenic-2.75Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.37Pathogenic0.07Tolerated0.14310.3354320.0-14.03
c.1692G>T
E564D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E564D is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, premPS, and SIFT, whereas a majority of other in silico predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default) classify the change as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. With the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the lack of benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic; this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023534Structured0.038418Uncertain0.8910.2080.000-10.184Likely Pathogenic0.915Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.47Likely Benign0.11.13Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.26Likely Benign0.637Likely Pathogenic-2.75Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.37Pathogenic0.07Tolerated0.14310.3354320.0-14.03
c.1693C>A
L565M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L565M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, SIFT, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools, Rosetta and premPS, give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive because it is a 2‑vs‑2 split. No prediction or folding stability result is missing; the only unavailable result is the SGM Consensus. Overall, the balance of evidence (five benign vs four pathogenic predictions, with two high‑accuracy tools supporting benign) indicates that the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.034884Structured0.045819Uncertain0.9220.2050.000-10.346Likely Pathogenic0.666Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.24Likely Benign0.10.51Ambiguous0.38Likely Benign0.69Ambiguous0.255Likely Benign-1.99Neutral1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.86Benign0.08Tolerated0.09340.261342-1.918.03
c.1693C>G
L565V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L565V has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two consensus groups: benign predictions come from REVEL and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and Foldetta. Two tools (AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Rosetta) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a pathogenic impact on protein stability. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.034884Structured0.045819Uncertain0.9220.2050.000-11.118Likely Pathogenic0.833Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.69Destabilizing0.01.37Ambiguous2.03Destabilizing1.40Destabilizing0.303Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.87Benign0.03Affected0.15580.2488210.4-14.03
c.1694T>A
L565Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L565Q is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic impact; Rosetta is uncertain. High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among pathogenic predictors and the high‑accuracy tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.034884Structured0.045819Uncertain0.9220.2050.000-13.912Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.86Destabilizing0.11.95Ambiguous2.41Destabilizing2.39Destabilizing0.545Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.76Benign0.00Affected0.11490.0972-2-2-7.314.97
c.1694T>C
L565P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L565P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity largely agree: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a pathogenic effect, while only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. No prediction or folding‑stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.034884Structured0.045819Uncertain0.9220.2050.000-13.369Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.59Destabilizing0.46.82Destabilizing5.21Destabilizing2.33Destabilizing0.546Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.74Benign0.00Affected0.38250.0877-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1694T>G
L565R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L565R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) but is present in the gnomAD database (gnomAD ID: 6‑33440746‑T‑G). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Foldetta, and the SGM Consensus—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. The Rosetta stability assessment is inconclusive and is therefore treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy methods all support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar evidence (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.034884Structured0.045819Uncertain0.9220.2050.0006-33440746-T-G-16.070Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.71Destabilizing0.11.88Ambiguous3.30Destabilizing2.66Destabilizing0.547Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.74Benign0.00Affected3.37350.13730.0615-2-3-8.343.03
c.1696A>C
K566Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K566Q has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SIFT and Rosetta, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, premPS, PROVEAN, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Because the preponderance of evidence points to a deleterious effect, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.027463Structured0.047887Uncertain0.9240.2190.000-11.475Likely Pathogenic0.904Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.48Ambiguous0.1-0.35Likely Benign0.57Ambiguous1.25Destabilizing0.762Likely Pathogenic-3.52Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.42Pathogenic0.07Tolerated0.38240.1282110.4-0.04
c.1696A>G
K566E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K566E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Across the evaluated tools, every predictor that returned a definitive call classified the variant as pathogenic: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool reported a benign outcome; the only inconclusive result was from Rosetta, which was labeled “Uncertain.” High‑accuracy assessments—AlphaMissense‑Optimized, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta—each returned a pathogenic prediction. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the consensus of predictive algorithms, and this assessment does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.027463Structured0.047887Uncertain0.9240.2190.000-10.759Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.76Destabilizing0.21.13Ambiguous2.45Destabilizing1.58Destabilizing0.832Likely Pathogenic-3.58Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.38Pathogenic0.04Affected0.32750.0850010.40.94
c.1697A>C
K566T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K566T missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only Rosetta, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated predictors—REVEL, SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS are inconclusive, giving uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for K566T, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.027463Structured0.047887Uncertain0.9240.2190.000-12.866Likely Pathogenic0.986Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.70Ambiguous0.2-0.21Likely Benign0.75Ambiguous0.99Ambiguous0.788Likely Pathogenic-5.37Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.04Affected0.18040.38470-13.2-27.07
c.1697A>G
K566R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K566R missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy methods show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta is unavailable. Overall, predictions are split evenly between benign and pathogenic, with no clear consensus. The variant is therefore most likely of uncertain significance; this assessment does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.027463Structured0.047887Uncertain0.9240.2190.000-8.493Likely Pathogenic0.279Likely BenignLikely Benign1.26Ambiguous0.51.04Ambiguous1.15Ambiguous0.29Likely Benign0.555Likely Pathogenic-2.39Neutral0.996Probably Damaging0.990Probably Damaging-0.79Pathogenic0.43Tolerated0.40930.109932-0.628.01
c.1697A>T
K566M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K566M is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign are Foldetta and premPS, whereas the remaining tools (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict it to be pathogenic; FoldX and Rosetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.027463Structured0.047887Uncertain0.9240.2190.000-13.208Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.80Ambiguous0.2-0.51Ambiguous0.15Likely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.804Likely Pathogenic-5.51Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.47Pathogenic0.01Affected0.09360.38260-15.83.02
c.1698G>C
K566N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K566N is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while Rosetta is uncertain. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.027463Structured0.047887Uncertain0.9240.2190.000-11.255Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.83Destabilizing0.31.33Ambiguous2.08Destabilizing1.32Destabilizing0.683Likely Pathogenic-4.04Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.03Affected3.37350.30420.1567010.4-14.07
c.1698G>T
K566N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K566N is listed in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440750‑G‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. All available in‑silico predictors that provide a definitive call classify the substitution as pathogenic: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The only tool with an inconclusive result is Rosetta (Uncertain), which is treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this assessment: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is reported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.027463Structured0.047887Uncertain0.9240.2190.0006-33440750-G-T-11.255Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.83Destabilizing0.31.33Ambiguous2.08Destabilizing1.32Destabilizing0.683Likely Pathogenic-4.04Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.03Affected3.37350.30420.1567010.4-14.07
c.1699G>A
E567K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E567K is not reported in ClinVar (no entry) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign calls come from REVEL, FoldX, SIFT, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls arise from Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (likely pathogenic). High‑accuracy methods reinforce the pathogenic assessment: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic, whereas Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, remains uncertain. PremPS is likewise inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status or gnomAD presence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021816Structured0.051008Uncertain0.9160.2340.000-15.568Likely Pathogenic0.984Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.18Likely Benign0.02.61Destabilizing1.22Ambiguous0.65Ambiguous0.380Likely Benign-3.75Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging3.45Benign0.16Tolerated0.21150.555201-0.4-0.94
c.1699G>C
E567Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E567Q missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain results come from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Foldetta, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic. Foldetta’s stability prediction is also uncertain. Overall, more tools (7) predict pathogenicity than benign (5), with three inconclusive. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021816Structured0.051008Uncertain0.9160.2340.000-11.302Likely Pathogenic0.897Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.03Likely Benign0.11.50Ambiguous0.77Ambiguous0.33Likely Benign0.345Likely Benign-2.82Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging3.47Benign0.14Tolerated0.10290.5391220.0-0.98
c.169C>A
L57I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L57I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) which classifies the variant as Likely Benign. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns Benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Benign. No Foldetta stability prediction is available. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect for the L57I variant, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.254060Structured0.481044Uncertain0.5540.6420.000-3.681Likely Benign0.275Likely BenignLikely Benign0.024Likely Benign-0.07Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.745Possibly Damaging4.10Benign0.00Affected0.09730.4106220.70.00
c.169C>G
L57V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L57V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) which classifies the variant as Likely Benign. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns Benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Benign. No Foldetta stability prediction is available. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect for the variant, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.254060Structured0.481044Uncertain0.5540.6420.000-3.598Likely Benign0.256Likely BenignLikely Benign0.051Likely Benign-0.14Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.745Possibly Damaging4.17Benign0.00Affected0.15330.4006210.4-14.03
c.169C>T
L57F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L57F (ClinVar ID 1973575.0) is listed as “Uncertain” in ClinVar and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion aligns with the ClinVar “Uncertain” status, as it does not contradict the current classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.254060Structured0.481044Uncertain0.5540.6420.000Uncertain 2-5.096Likely Benign0.459AmbiguousLikely Benign0.051Likely Benign-0.78Neutral0.824Possibly Damaging0.879Possibly Damaging3.96Benign0.00Affected4.3210.06790.335520-1.034.02
c.16G>A
A6T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A6T is reported in gnomAD (variant ID 6-33420280‑G‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. Only SIFT predicts it to be pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also reports likely benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the consensus of the majority of prediction tools and the high‑accuracy methods points to a benign impact. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar pathogenic classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.566480Disordered0.549054Binding0.3770.9200.8756-33420280-G-A-3.711Likely Benign0.130Likely BenignLikely Benign0.089Likely Benign-0.13Neutral0.027Benign0.004Benign4.11Benign0.00Affected4.3210.15210.683601-2.530.03
c.16G>C
A6P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A6P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.566480Disordered0.549054Binding0.3770.9200.875-3.440Likely Benign0.090Likely BenignLikely Benign0.148Likely Benign-0.12Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign4.06Benign0.00Affected0.20930.50071-1-3.426.04
c.16G>T
A6S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A6S is reported in gnomAD (variant ID 6-33420280‑G‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the consensus of the majority of prediction tools and the high‑accuracy methods points to a benign impact. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar pathogenic classification, so there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.566480Disordered0.549054Binding0.3770.9200.8756-33420280-G-T-2.485Likely Benign0.082Likely BenignLikely Benign0.097Likely Benign0.06Neutral0.001Benign0.001Benign4.17Benign0.00Affected4.3210.27200.545711-2.616.00
c.1700A>C
E567A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E567A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, SIFT, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (Foldetta, premPS, Rosetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) yield uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021816Structured0.051008Uncertain0.9160.2340.000-12.854Likely Pathogenic0.902Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.43Likely Benign0.11.79Ambiguous1.11Ambiguous0.63Ambiguous0.418Likely Benign-5.74Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.43Benign0.17Tolerated0.31700.51890-15.3-58.04
c.1700A>G
E567G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E567G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on benign impact include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas those that agree on pathogenic impact include AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, Rosetta, and Foldetta. Predictions that are inconclusive are FoldX, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. Taken together, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021816Structured0.051008Uncertain0.9160.2340.000-13.402Likely Pathogenic0.912Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.47Ambiguous0.03.48Destabilizing2.48Destabilizing0.75Ambiguous0.456Likely Benign-6.67Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.07Tolerated0.25860.47150-23.1-72.06
c.1700A>T
E567V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 E567V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions (REVEL, FoldX, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM) and pathogenic predictions (SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default). High‑accuracy assessments further support a pathogenic bias: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, while Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts benign. Rosetta alone is inconclusive and treated as unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E567V, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021816Structured0.051008Uncertain0.9160.2340.000-15.638Likely Pathogenic0.965Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.27Likely Benign0.10.59Ambiguous0.43Likely Benign0.38Likely Benign0.440Likely Benign-6.77Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.06Tolerated0.05730.6175-2-27.7-29.98
c.1701G>C
E567D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E567D missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain or unavailable results come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; Foldetta’s stability prediction is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021816Structured0.051008Uncertain0.9160.2340.000-8.276Likely Pathogenic0.575Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.87Ambiguous0.11.94Ambiguous1.41Ambiguous0.70Ambiguous0.184Likely Benign-2.72Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.21Tolerated0.16020.3426320.0-14.03
c.1701G>T
E567D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E567D missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic impact are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain or unavailable results come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; Foldetta’s stability prediction is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of pathogenic predictions outweigh the benign ones, suggesting the variant is most likely pathogenic. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.021816Structured0.051008Uncertain0.9160.2340.000-8.276Likely Pathogenic0.575Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.87Ambiguous0.11.94Ambiguous1.41Ambiguous0.70Ambiguous0.184Likely Benign-2.72Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.21Tolerated0.16020.3426320.0-14.03
c.1702G>A
V568M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V568M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus—predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. With the majority of evidence pointing to pathogenicity and no ClinVar annotation to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.053503Uncertain0.9370.2570.000-10.361Likely Pathogenic0.913Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.06Likely Benign0.32.71Destabilizing1.39Ambiguous0.66Ambiguous0.811Likely Pathogenic-2.79Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.924Probably Damaging-1.42Pathogenic0.00Affected0.06970.312421-2.332.06
c.1702G>C
V568L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 V568L variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Foldetta, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar, while those that agree on a pathogenic effect are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (which itself is a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Uncertain predictions come from Rosetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.053503Uncertain0.9370.2570.000-9.503Likely Pathogenic0.921Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.30Likely Benign0.30.57Ambiguous0.14Likely Benign0.56Ambiguous0.651Likely Pathogenic-2.69Deleterious0.511Possibly Damaging0.147Benign-1.23Pathogenic0.04Affected3.37350.09440.331212-0.414.03
c.1702G>T
V568L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V568L is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Among the available in‑silico predictors, eight tools (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict a pathogenic effect, whereas three tools (FoldX, Foldetta, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar) predict a benign outcome; the remaining three (Rosetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs) as benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.053503Uncertain0.9370.2570.000Uncertain 1-9.503Likely Pathogenic0.921Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.30Likely Benign0.30.57Ambiguous0.14Likely Benign0.56Ambiguous0.651Likely Pathogenic-2.69Deleterious0.511Possibly Damaging0.147Benign-1.23Pathogenic0.04Affected3.37350.09440.331212-0.414.03
c.1703T>A
V568E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V568E is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity are unanimous: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect, so the benign‑prediction group is empty. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also reports Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.053503Uncertain0.9370.2570.000-13.835Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.48Destabilizing0.14.62Destabilizing3.55Destabilizing2.03Destabilizing0.940Likely Pathogenic-5.88Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.46Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08910.1495-2-2-7.729.98
c.1703T>C
V568A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 V568A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) but is present in the gnomAD database (gnomAD ID: 6‑33440755‑T‑C). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic). Uncertain or inconclusive results come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (derived from the unanimous pathogenic vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the consensus from high‑accuracy tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status (which has no entry).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.053503Uncertain0.9370.2570.0006-33440755-T-C21.25e-6-10.929Likely Pathogenic0.946Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.90Ambiguous0.11.77Ambiguous1.84Ambiguous2.16Destabilizing0.834Likely Pathogenic-3.82Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.990Probably Damaging-1.38Pathogenic0.06Tolerated3.37350.24130.196100-2.4-28.05
c.1703T>G
V568G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V568G is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) but is present in gnomAD (gnomAD ID 6‑33440755‑T‑G). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. No tools predict a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which simply lacks an entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024826Structured0.053503Uncertain0.9370.2570.0006-33440755-T-G-15.135Likely Pathogenic0.938Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.39Destabilizing0.14.45Destabilizing3.92Destabilizing2.34Destabilizing0.933Likely Pathogenic-6.81Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.46Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.18220.1877-3-1-4.6-42.08
c.1705T>A
F569I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F569I is not listed in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, every tool examined—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classifies the substitution as pathogenic. No predictor reports a benign outcome, so the benign group is empty. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a Likely Pathogenic verdict; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also indicates pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this prediction does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000-15.362Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.75Destabilizing0.24.23Destabilizing3.99Destabilizing1.51Destabilizing0.903Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.31Pathogenic0.01Affected0.19500.1973101.7-34.02
c.1705T>C
F569L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F569L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are none; all available predictors that provide a verdict classify the variant as pathogenic, with the exception of FoldX and Foldetta, whose results are uncertain and therefore treated as unavailable. The high‑accuracy predictors give the following: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain and thus not considered evidence. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the lack of contrary evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000-9.784Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.86Ambiguous0.12.04Destabilizing1.45Ambiguous1.28Destabilizing0.804Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.13Pathogenic0.05Affected0.19770.2476201.0-34.02
c.1705T>G
F569V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F569V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000-14.248Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.74Destabilizing0.25.40Destabilizing5.07Destabilizing1.73Destabilizing0.874Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.29Pathogenic0.00Affected0.20540.1422-1-11.4-48.04
c.1706T>A
F569Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 F569Y missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the majority of tools (REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are inconclusive, providing no definitive evidence for either outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show that the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) strongly supports pathogenicity, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain and Foldetta likewise yields an inconclusive result. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar status, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000-11.101Likely Pathogenic0.938Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.57Ambiguous0.10.82Ambiguous1.20Ambiguous1.29Destabilizing0.824Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging-1.37Pathogenic0.08Tolerated0.13790.117073-4.116.00
c.1706T>C
F569S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F569S is listed in ClinVar (ID 1878965.0) as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, every tool examined (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) classifies the variant as pathogenic; no tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this prediction aligns with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000Likely Pathogenic 2-13.384Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.70Destabilizing0.15.38Destabilizing5.54Destabilizing2.45Destabilizing0.916Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.32Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37340.42750.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10213.767.9-0.10.0-1.00.1XPotentially PathogenicPhe569 is located on an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578). In the WT simulations, the phenyl side chain of Phe569 packs with hydrophobic residues such as Trp572, Leu565, Ile589, Ile667, and Phe561, originating from three different α-helices (res. Ala533-Val560, res. Arg563-Glu578, and res. Ser641-Glu666). In the variant simulations, the acceptor/donor hydroxyl group of Ser569 forms hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl groups of Glu567 and Lys566 on the same α-helix, which could affect the α-helix integrity, although this is not observed in the simulations. While the simulations do not show large-scale effects, the residue swap could have a substantial impact on the protein structure due to the fundamental role of hydrophobic packing during protein folding.
c.1706T>G
F569C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F569C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also labels it pathogenic. Based on the uniform predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000-13.237Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.08Destabilizing0.04.45Destabilizing4.27Destabilizing1.20Destabilizing0.867Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-0.96Pathogenic0.04Affected0.27220.0462-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1707T>A
F569L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F569L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are none; all available predictors that provide a verdict classify the variant as pathogenic, with the exception of FoldX and Foldetta, whose results are uncertain and therefore treated as unavailable. The high‑accuracy predictors give the following: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain and thus not considered evidence. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the lack of contrary evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000-9.784Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.86Ambiguous0.12.04Destabilizing1.45Ambiguous1.28Destabilizing0.675Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.13Pathogenic0.05Affected0.19770.2476201.0-34.02
c.1707T>G
F569L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F569L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are none; all available predictors that provide a verdict classify the variant as pathogenic, with the exception of FoldX and Foldetta, whose outputs are uncertain and therefore treated as unavailable. The high‑accuracy predictors give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta, is uncertain. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.024393Structured0.054289Uncertain0.9410.2420.000-9.784Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.86Ambiguous0.12.04Destabilizing1.45Ambiguous1.28Destabilizing0.677Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.13Pathogenic0.05Affected0.19770.2476201.0-34.02
c.1708G>A
A570T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A570T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that provide a definitive call all indicate a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict pathogenicity. No tool reports a benign outcome; the remaining predictions (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) are uncertain and therefore do not influence the overall assessment. High‑accuracy methods specifically show SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, and Foldetta as uncertain. Taken together, the majority of conclusive predictions support a pathogenic effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.054494Uncertain0.9320.2630.000-11.390Likely Pathogenic0.801Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.45Ambiguous0.31.67Ambiguous1.56Ambiguous0.86Ambiguous0.568Likely Pathogenic-3.28Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.05Affected0.13450.387410-2.530.03
c.1708G>C
A570P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A570P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the variant as pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Based on the unanimous pathogenic predictions and the absence of any benign calls, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which simply lacks an entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.054494Uncertain0.9320.2630.000-15.178Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.21Destabilizing0.58.45Destabilizing6.83Destabilizing1.19Destabilizing0.832Likely Pathogenic-4.55Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.31Pathogenic0.02Affected0.19650.25781-1-3.426.04
c.1708G>T
A570S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A570S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. The remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and ESM1b) yield uncertain or inconclusive results and are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also favors benign, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of reliable predictions indicate a benign effect. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.046336Structured0.054494Uncertain0.9320.2630.000-7.893In-Between0.194Likely BenignLikely Benign0.77Ambiguous0.11.68Ambiguous1.23Ambiguous0.51Ambiguous0.399Likely Benign-2.26Neutral0.983Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.19Pathogenic0.17Tolerated0.20910.325611-2.616.00
c.1709C>A
A570D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A570D is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect, so the benign group is empty. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts Pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.054494Uncertain0.9320.2630.000-14.117Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.47Destabilizing1.22.33Destabilizing2.40Destabilizing1.36Destabilizing0.805Likely Pathogenic-5.31Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.28Pathogenic0.03Affected0.20060.22060-2-5.344.01
c.1709C>G
A570G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A570G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and FATHMM. The remaining tools (FoldX, premPS, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) and Foldetta are unavailable due to mixed or uncertain outputs. Overall, the majority of evaluated tools (seven pathogenic vs. two benign) indicate that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.046336Structured0.054494Uncertain0.9320.2630.000-7.509In-Between0.562AmbiguousLikely Benign1.34Ambiguous0.12.12Destabilizing1.73Ambiguous0.99Ambiguous0.607Likely Pathogenic-3.62Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.17000.249910-2.2-14.03
c.1709C>T
A570V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A570V missense variant is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440761‑C‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from premPS and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions are made by REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools report uncertainty: FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently contains no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.054494Uncertain0.9320.2630.0006-33440761-C-T16.22e-7-13.083Likely Pathogenic0.882Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.88Ambiguous0.31.63Ambiguous1.26Ambiguous0.46Likely Benign0.669Likely Pathogenic-3.75Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.988Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.06Tolerated3.37350.10500.3173002.428.05
c.170T>A
L57H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L57H is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls come from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a Likely Benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments further indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized is Uncertain, whereas the SGM‑Consensus remains Likely Benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence tools and the consensus score favor a benign effect, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar assertion.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.254060Structured0.481044Uncertain0.5540.6420.000-6.251Likely Benign0.796Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.173Likely Benign-1.58Neutral0.984Probably Damaging0.971Probably Damaging3.90Benign0.00Affected0.10450.0611-2-3-7.023.98
c.170T>C
L57P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L57P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, and FATHMM. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive (2 pathogenic vs. 2 benign). Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of predictions (six pathogenic vs. three benign) indicate that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.254060Structured0.481044Uncertain0.5540.6420.000-10.724Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.242Likely Benign-1.77Neutral0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.90Benign0.00Affected0.36510.1703-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.170T>G
L57R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L57R is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), which collectively classify the variant as likely benign. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default predict a pathogenic impact. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized result is uncertain, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is not available for this variant. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign interpretation, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.254060Structured0.481044Uncertain0.5540.6420.000-6.034Likely Benign0.810Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.213Likely Benign-1.55Neutral0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.91Benign0.00Affected0.12450.0685-3-2-8.343.03
c.1711T>A
S571T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S571T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of tools (seven) predict pathogenicity, while six predict benignity, and the high‑accuracy subset is split. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the prevailing predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.069024Structured0.045569Uncertain0.9280.2700.000-8.243Likely Pathogenic0.431AmbiguousLikely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.1-0.21Likely Benign0.08Likely Benign0.25Likely Benign0.564Likely Pathogenic-2.76Deleterious0.933Possibly Damaging0.933Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.10Tolerated0.13600.4014110.114.03
c.1711T>C
S571P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S571P is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic, while premPS remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenic. Consequently, the aggregate evidence strongly supports a pathogenic effect for S571P, and this conclusion does not conflict with the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.069024Structured0.045569Uncertain0.9280.2700.000Uncertain 1-14.701Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.18Destabilizing0.24.89Destabilizing4.04Destabilizing0.87Ambiguous0.814Likely Pathogenic-4.68Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.02Affected0.21950.37601-1-0.810.04
c.1711T>G
S571A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S571A is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and FATHMM. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive because it yields a 2‑2 split. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign, and the SGM Consensus remains unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact for S571A, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.069024Structured0.045569Uncertain0.9280.2700.000-6.344Likely Benign0.233Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.44Likely Benign0.1-0.19Likely Benign-0.32Likely Benign0.51Ambiguous0.563Likely Pathogenic-2.69Deleterious0.980Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.22Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.47390.2671112.6-16.00
c.1712C>G
S571W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S571W is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that provide a clear verdict overwhelmingly classify the substitution as pathogenic: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict deleterious effects. No tool in the dataset returned a benign classification; the only non‑conclusive results come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS, which are listed as uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Based on the aggregate predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry (no contradictory status).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.069024Structured0.045569Uncertain0.9280.2700.000-14.025Likely Pathogenic0.961Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-1.13Ambiguous0.1-1.44Ambiguous-1.29Ambiguous0.67Ambiguous0.867Likely Pathogenic-6.64Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.32Pathogenic0.00Affected0.06480.3809-2-3-0.199.14
c.1712C>T
S571L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 S571L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440764‑C‑T). Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while the remaining nine tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—indicate pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments further show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as pathogenic (a majority vote of pathogenic predictions from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain due to conflicting FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.069024Structured0.045569Uncertain0.9280.2700.000Uncertain 16-33440764-C-T16.23e-7-11.651Likely Pathogenic0.660Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-1.53Ambiguous0.1-1.05Ambiguous-1.29Ambiguous0.27Likely Benign0.841Likely Pathogenic-5.61Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.04Affected3.37350.09590.3918-2-34.626.08
c.1714T>A
W572R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W572R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.150080Structured0.039626Uncertain0.9350.2560.000-17.511Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.84Destabilizing0.16.19Destabilizing5.52Destabilizing1.79Destabilizing0.894Likely Pathogenic-12.81Deleterious-1.25Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.40590.02122-3-3.6-30.03312.6-37.60.00.0-1.00.0XXPotentially PathogenicThe indole ring of Trp572, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), lies in a hydrophobic inter-helix space, where it makes extensive hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues such as Met470, Phe569, Leu588, and Ile589. The guanidinium group of Arg572 is similarly sized to the tryptophan it replaced; however, it is also positively charged. In the variant simulations, Arg572 forms hydrogen bonds with other residues in the inter-helix space, such as Ser592 and the backbone carbonyl atom of Leu465. Additionally, Arg572 hydrophobically packs its carbon chain with surrounding residues such as Phe569 and Ile589.However, the introduced residue arginine is too hydrophilic and charged for the hydrophobic space, disrupting the hydrophobic packing of the inter-helix space. Indeed, in the second simulation, Arg572 successfully escapes the hydrophobic niche completely, causing the whole protein to partially unfold.Overall, the residue swap is highly likely to cause critical protein folding problems, as evidenced by the effects seen in the variant simulations.
c.1714T>C
W572R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W572R is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate pathogenicity, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic.” No tool in the dataset predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Based on the unanimous computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with its ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.150080Structured0.039626Uncertain0.9350.2560.000Not provided1-17.511Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.84Destabilizing0.16.19Destabilizing5.52Destabilizing1.79Destabilizing0.894Likely Pathogenic-12.81Deleterious-1.25Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.40590.02122-3-3.6-30.03312.6-37.60.00.0-1.00.0XXPotentially PathogenicThe indole ring of Trp572, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), lies in a hydrophobic inter-helix space, where it makes extensive hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues such as Met470, Phe569, Leu588, and Ile589. The guanidinium group of Arg572 is similarly sized to the tryptophan it replaced; however, it is also positively charged. In the variant simulations, Arg572 forms hydrogen bonds with other residues in the inter-helix space, such as Ser592 and the backbone carbonyl atom of Leu465. Additionally, Arg572 hydrophobically packs its carbon chain with surrounding residues such as Phe569 and Ile589.However, the introduced residue arginine is too hydrophilic and charged for the hydrophobic space, disrupting the hydrophobic packing of the inter-helix space. Indeed, in the second simulation, Arg572 successfully escapes the hydrophobic niche completely, causing the whole protein to partially unfold.Overall, the residue swap is highly likely to cause critical protein folding problems, as evidenced by the effects seen in the variant simulations.
c.1714T>G
W572G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W572G is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all report a pathogenic outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, is pathogenic. Based on the uniform pathogenic predictions from both general and high‑accuracy tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that contradicts its current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.150080Structured0.039626Uncertain0.9350.2560.000Uncertain 1-17.692Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.57Destabilizing0.27.57Destabilizing7.07Destabilizing1.83Destabilizing0.900Likely Pathogenic-11.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.24Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.41280.1285-7-20.5-129.16195.2127.90.00.0-1.00.0XPotentially PathogenicThe introduced residue Gly572, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), is considerably smaller than the tryptophan it replaced. The indole ring of the Trp572 side chain lies in a hydrophobic inter-helix space, where it makes extensive hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues such as Met470, Phe569, Leu588, and Ile589. In the variant simulations, all these favorable packing interactions are completely removed, as the introduced residue Gly572 essentially lacks a side chain altogether. Although not observed in the simulations, the residue swap could also weaken the integrity of the helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), as glycine is known as an “α-helix breaker.” Overall, the residue swap is highly likely to cause critical protein folding problems that are underestimated based on the effects seen in the variant simulations.
c.1715G>C
W572S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W572S is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 1069317.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in silico predictors classify the variant as pathogenic: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this prediction aligns with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.150080Structured0.039626Uncertain0.9350.2560.000Pathogenic 1-17.461Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.78Destabilizing0.23.37Destabilizing4.58Destabilizing1.79Destabilizing0.775Likely Pathogenic-12.74Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.24Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37350.39580.0857-2-30.1-99.14235.176.60.00.0-0.40.1XPotentially PathogenicThe introduced residue Ser572, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), is considerably smaller than the tryptophan it replaced. The indole ring of the Trp572 side chain lies in a hydrophobic inter-helix space, where it makes extensive hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues such as Met470, Phe569, Leu588, and Ile589. In the variant simulations, all these favorable packing interactions are completely removed, as the introduced residue Ser572 is too hydrophilic or small to fill the hydrophobic niche occupied by the indole ring. Moreover, the hydroxyl group of Ser572 forms hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl groups of Glu567 and Val568 within the same α-helix, potentially lowering its integrity. Overall, the residue swap is highly likely to cause critical protein folding problems that are underestimated based on the effects seen in the variant simulations.
c.1715G>T
W572L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W572L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated predictors—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also reports a pathogenic effect. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.150080Structured0.039626Uncertain0.9350.2560.000-15.765Likely Pathogenic0.973Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.62Destabilizing0.13.97Destabilizing3.30Destabilizing0.90Ambiguous0.591Likely Pathogenic-11.52Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-0.91Pathogenic0.31Tolerated0.22460.2837-2-24.7-73.05
c.1716G>C
W572C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W572C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect. Benign predictions: none. Pathogenic predictions: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Pathogenic). High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenic. Based on the unanimous computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.150080Structured0.039626Uncertain0.9350.2560.000-15.589Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.49Destabilizing0.25.59Destabilizing5.54Destabilizing1.72Destabilizing0.861Likely Pathogenic-11.82Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.00Affected0.36480.1304-8-23.4-83.07
c.1716G>T
W572C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W572C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect. Benign predictions: none. Pathogenic predictions: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenic. No inconclusive or missing predictions are present. Based on the consensus of all available computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.150080Structured0.039626Uncertain0.9350.2560.000-15.589Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.49Destabilizing0.25.59Destabilizing5.54Destabilizing1.72Destabilizing0.861Likely Pathogenic-11.82Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.00Affected0.36480.1304-8-23.4-83.07
c.1717C>G
R573G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R573G is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. Based on the uniform predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar annotation exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.134866Structured0.032433Uncertain0.9340.2350.000-15.387Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.71Destabilizing0.73.16Destabilizing3.44Destabilizing1.37Destabilizing0.744Likely Pathogenic-6.01Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.45Pathogenic0.01Affected0.29310.2166-3-24.1-99.14
c.1717C>T
R573W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R573W is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results are Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta yields an uncertain stability change. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.134866Structured0.032433Uncertain0.9340.2350.000Conflicting 8-14.078Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.37Destabilizing0.70.57Ambiguous1.47Ambiguous0.88Ambiguous0.758Likely Pathogenic-6.94Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.48Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.11790.26432-33.630.03257.639.00.10.00.20.0XXPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg573, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate groups of Glu582 and/or Asp586 from a nearby α-helix (res. Glu582-Met603) in the WT simulations. Additionally, the Arg573 side chain stacks planarly with the aromatic phenol ring of Tyr665 and hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of Ser668 from another α-helix (res. Ser641-Ser668). In the variant simulations, the indole ring of the Trp573 side chain is unable to maintain the same level of coordination as the positively charged Arg573 side chain. Indeed, Trp573 is seen hydrogen bonding only briefly with the carboxylate group of Glu582. Consequently, the integrity of the opposing α-helix end (res. Glu582-Met603) is weakened. Overall, the residue swap has the potential to substantially affect the tertiary structure assembly during the protein folding process.
c.1718G>A
R573Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R573Q is reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 1176819.0) and is not present in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default, while only SIFT predicts a benign outcome. Two tools give inconclusive results: Rosetta (Uncertain) and AlphaMissense‑Optimized (Uncertain). High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is Pathogenic. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates the variant is most likely pathogenic, consistent with its ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.134866Structured0.032433Uncertain0.9340.2350.000Likely Pathogenic 1-9.900Likely Pathogenic0.923Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.28Destabilizing0.81.94Ambiguous2.11Destabilizing1.08Destabilizing0.733Likely Pathogenic-3.16Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.31Pathogenic0.12Tolerated3.37350.23900.1651111.0-28.06230.149.90.00.0-0.60.0XXPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg573, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate groups of Glu582 and/or Asp586 from a nearby α-helix (res. Glu582-Met603) in the WT simulations. Additionally, the Arg573 side chain stacks planarly with the aromatic phenol ring of Tyr665 and hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of Ser668 from another α-helix (res. Ser641-Ser668). In the variant simulations, although the carboxamide group of the Gln573 side chain can hydrogen bond with the carboxylate group of Glu582 or the hydroxyl group of Ser668, these interactions are not as coordinated, stable, or strong as those of the positively charged Arg573. Consequently, the integrity of the opposing α-helix end (res. Glu582-Met603) is weakened. Overall, the residue swap has the potential to substantially affect the tertiary structure assembly during the protein folding process.
c.1718G>C
R573P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R573P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts a pathogenic impact. Based on the uniform predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.134866Structured0.032433Uncertain0.9340.2350.000-16.684Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.76Destabilizing1.18.58Destabilizing7.17Destabilizing1.21Destabilizing0.831Likely Pathogenic-5.78Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.47Pathogenic0.01Affected0.19610.32390-22.9-59.07
c.1718G>T
R573L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R573L is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 521291.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that assess sequence conservation and structural impact uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as pathogenic. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign outcome. Predictions that rely on protein‑folding stability (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) are inconclusive and are therefore treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports pathogenic; Foldetta remains uncertain. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.134866Structured0.032433Uncertain0.9340.2350.000Likely Pathogenic 1-13.120Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.30Ambiguous0.61.11Ambiguous1.21Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.833Likely Pathogenic-5.74Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.41Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37350.15030.3083-3-28.3-43.03237.460.70.00.0-0.70.3XXPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg573, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate groups of Glu582 and/or Asp586 from a nearby α-helix (res. Glu582-Met603) in the WT simulations. Additionally, the Arg573 side chain stacks planarly with the aromatic phenol ring of Tyr665 and hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of Ser668 from another α-helix (res. Ser641-Ser668). In the variant simulations, the aliphatic iso-butyl group of the Leu573 side chain fails to establish any of these interactions, which, in turn, lowers the integrity of the opposing α-helix end (res. Glu582-Met603). Overall, the residue swap has the potential to substantially affect the tertiary structure assembly during the protein folding process.10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.11.011
c.1720C>A
L574M
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L574M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and FATHMM; ESM1b is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as benign, and Foldetta as benign. No predictions or stability results are missing or inconclusive. Based on the overall consensus, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.083462Structured0.026427Uncertain0.9270.2460.000-7.195In-Between0.098Likely BenignLikely Benign0.14Likely Benign0.20.34Likely Benign0.24Likely Benign-0.09Likely Benign0.113Likely Benign0.85Neutral0.691Possibly Damaging0.278Benign-1.29Pathogenic0.11Tolerated0.08940.308742-1.918.03
c.1720C>G
L574V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L574V is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yields an uncertain result. No other high‑confidence pathogenic predictions are present. Based on the preponderance of benign predictions and the lack of any ClinVar pathogenic annotation, the variant is most likely benign. This conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.083462Structured0.026427Uncertain0.9270.2460.000-5.559Likely Benign0.105Likely BenignLikely Benign0.78Ambiguous0.10.37Likely Benign0.58Ambiguous0.25Likely Benign0.149Likely Benign-0.40Neutral0.004Benign0.003Benign-1.27Pathogenic0.29Tolerated0.14810.2978210.4-14.03
c.1721T>A
L574Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L574Q resides in the GAP domain. ClinVar contains no entry for this variant, and it is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM; Rosetta’s assessment is uncertain. High‑accuracy methods give a consistent benign signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.083462Structured0.026427Uncertain0.9270.2460.000-3.015Likely Benign0.196Likely BenignLikely Benign0.26Likely Benign0.20.52Ambiguous0.39Likely Benign-0.18Likely Benign0.327Likely Benign2.53Neutral0.998Probably Damaging0.937Probably Damaging-1.17Pathogenic0.65Tolerated0.11070.0888-2-2-7.314.97
c.1721T>C
L574P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L574P is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (6-33440773‑T‑C). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, and SIFT, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: FoldX, Rosetta, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Foldetta, and the SGM Consensus score (likely pathogenic). High‑accuracy methods specifically give a pathogenic verdict: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.083462Structured0.026427Uncertain0.9270.2460.0006-33440773-T-C-13.394Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.95Destabilizing0.59.19Destabilizing6.07Destabilizing0.59Ambiguous0.442Likely Benign-1.05Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.971Probably Damaging-1.29Pathogenic0.26Tolerated3.38320.38110.0953-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1721T>G
L574R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L574R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Two tools remain inconclusive: Rosetta (Uncertain) and AlphaMissense‑Default (Uncertain). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of individual predictors (seven benign vs. three pathogenic) support a benign classification, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.083462Structured0.026427Uncertain0.9270.2460.000-8.702Likely Pathogenic0.563AmbiguousLikely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.20.88Ambiguous0.46Likely Benign-0.12Likely Benign0.322Likely Benign0.30Neutral0.907Possibly Damaging0.292Benign-1.22Pathogenic0.52Tolerated0.14190.0530-3-2-8.343.03
c.1723C>A
R575S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R575S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include only SIFT, whereas the majority—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict pathogenicity. FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS give uncertain results, which are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy methods reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for R575S, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.021362Uncertain0.9160.2590.000-11.124Likely Pathogenic0.957Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.66Ambiguous0.10.55Ambiguous1.11Ambiguous0.76Ambiguous0.582Likely Pathogenic-2.71Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.21Pathogenic0.33Tolerated0.26690.23940-13.7-69.11
c.1723C>G
R575G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R575G is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus—consistently predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Because the majority of evidence points to deleterious impact, the variant is most likely pathogenic; this conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for R575G.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.021362Uncertain0.9160.2590.000-13.104Likely Pathogenic0.914Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.18Destabilizing0.01.15Ambiguous1.67Ambiguous1.23Destabilizing0.772Likely Pathogenic-4.22Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.31Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.28890.1755-3-24.1-99.14
c.1723C>T
R575C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R575C is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 537013.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440775‑C‑T). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include only AlphaMissense‑Optimized. All other evaluated algorithms predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) returned uncertain results and are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of predictions support a pathogenic effect. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.021362Uncertain0.9160.2590.000Conflicting 36-33440775-C-T231.43e-5-11.179Likely Pathogenic0.630Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.39Ambiguous0.20.50Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.73Ambiguous0.715Likely Pathogenic-5.43Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.02Affected3.37350.29690.1692-4-37.0-53.05227.799.20.00.00.00.1XPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg575, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), forms salt bridges with the carboxylate groups of Asp463 and Asp467, and it also hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of Ser466 on an opposing α-helix (res. Ala461-Phe476) in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the thiol group of the Cys575 side chain, which is neither positively charged nor particularly hydrophilic, packs against the hydrophobic Met470 on an opposing α-helix (res. Ala461-Arg475). Additionally, although the thiol group is not an effective hydrogen bonder, the Cys575 side chain rotates to hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of Ser571 in the same α-helix, which could theoretically lower the helix integrity. Overall, the residue swap has the potential to substantially affect the tertiary structure assembly during the protein folding process.
c.1724G>A
R575H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R575H (ClinVar ID 1029088.0) is listed as Uncertain in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440776‑G‑A). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign, Foldetta as Benign, and the SGM Consensus as Pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, which contrasts with the ClinVar designation of Uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.061840Structured0.021362Uncertain0.9160.2590.000Conflicting 46-33440776-G-A2041.27e-4-11.142Likely Pathogenic0.496AmbiguousLikely Benign0.81Ambiguous0.2-0.22Likely Benign0.30Likely Benign1.31Destabilizing0.707Likely Pathogenic-2.34Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.05Affected3.37350.23610.1292201.3-19.05244.780.60.00.00.30.0XPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg575, located in an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), forms salt bridges with the carboxylate groups of Asp463 and Asp467, and it also hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of Ser466 on an opposing α-helix (res. Ala461-Phe476) in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the imidazole ring of His575 (in its neutral epsilon protonated form) cannot form the same salt bridges as the guanidinium group of the non-mutated Arg575. Instead, His575 only forms weak hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups of Ser466 and Ser571. Overall, the residue swap has the potential to substantially affect the tertiary structure assembly during the protein folding process.
c.1724G>C
R575P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R575P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the absence of any benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists for R575P.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.021362Uncertain0.9160.2590.000-16.008Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.50Destabilizing0.14.97Destabilizing4.24Destabilizing1.13Destabilizing0.774Likely Pathogenic-3.69Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.10Tolerated0.20800.26700-22.9-59.07
c.1724G>T
R575L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R575L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include SIFT, FoldX, and Foldetta. Those that predict pathogenicity comprise SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain predictions come from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Rosetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta as Benign. Overall, the majority of tools (10/13) predict pathogenicity, and the high‑accuracy consensus leans toward pathogenic, though Foldetta suggests stability‑preserving benign effects. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.021362Uncertain0.9160.2590.000-12.442Likely Pathogenic0.788Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.04Likely Benign0.1-0.89Ambiguous-0.47Likely Benign0.59Ambiguous0.602Likely Pathogenic-4.42Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.24Pathogenic0.11Tolerated0.15740.2991-3-28.3-43.03
c.1726T>A
C576S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C576S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign predictions from REVEL and FATHMM, while the majority of other in silico methods (premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict pathogenicity. FoldX and Rosetta give uncertain stability changes, and Foldetta likewise reports no definitive effect. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic. Foldetta remains inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple pathogenic‑oriented tools and the high‑accuracy predictions indicates that C576S is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry and gnomAD data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.017684Uncertain0.9130.2450.000-10.474Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.77Ambiguous0.11.57Ambiguous1.17Ambiguous1.61Destabilizing0.414Likely Benign-8.91Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.02Affected0.49680.14640-1-3.3-16.06
c.1726T>C
C576R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant C576R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 2780076.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM. All other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores it pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (derived from the majority of high‑confidence predictors) is pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of computational evidence indicates that C576R is likely pathogenic, a conclusion that is consistent with, but not in conflict with, the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.017684Uncertain0.9130.2450.000Conflicting 2-14.886Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic7.20Destabilizing1.04.09Destabilizing5.65Destabilizing1.64Destabilizing0.579Likely Pathogenic-10.88Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.38Benign0.00Affected3.37350.18870.1279-3-4-7.053.05
c.1726T>G
C576G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C576G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from REVEL, FoldX (uncertain), Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. When high‑accuracy methods are considered, AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) labels it likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) also predicts pathogenicity. No prediction is inconclusive or missing. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the consensus of available computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.017684Uncertain0.9130.2450.000-14.809Likely Pathogenic0.976Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.66Ambiguous0.02.53Destabilizing2.10Destabilizing1.67Destabilizing0.586Likely Pathogenic-10.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.38Benign0.00Affected0.32690.2574-3-3-2.9-46.09
c.1727G>A
C576Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C576Y is not reported in ClinVar and has no gnomAD allele. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: FATHMM is the sole benign predictor, whereas SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports a likely pathogenic outcome; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also indicates pathogenicity. No tool yields an inconclusive result. Based on the consensus of available predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.017684Uncertain0.9130.2450.000-13.891Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic8.77Destabilizing0.53.90Destabilizing6.34Destabilizing0.63Ambiguous0.612Likely Pathogenic-9.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.38Benign0.00Affected0.13980.30090-2-3.860.04
c.1727G>C
C576S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C576S is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect are limited to FATHMM, whereas the remaining 11 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also returns likely pathogenic; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability predictor combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta, is inconclusive. Folding‑stability tools FoldX and Rosetta individually yield uncertain results and are treated as unavailable. Taken together, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD data, so there is no contradiction with existing database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.017684Uncertain0.9130.2450.000-10.474Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.77Ambiguous0.11.57Ambiguous1.17Ambiguous1.61Destabilizing0.523Likely Pathogenic-8.91Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.02Affected0.49680.14640-1-3.3-16.06
c.1727G>T
C576F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C576F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID = None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to FATHMM, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta—consistently predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic impact. Uncertain predictions from Rosetta and premPS are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming agreement among high‑confidence tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.017684Uncertain0.9130.2450.000-13.467Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.04Destabilizing0.51.81Ambiguous3.43Destabilizing0.58Ambiguous0.516Likely Pathogenic-9.93Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.02Affected0.16260.3527-4-20.344.04
c.1728C>G
C576W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C576W is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, while the majority of other in silico predictors (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) indicate a pathogenic impact; premPS is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the absence of benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction to ClinVar status (which has no entry).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.017684Uncertain0.9130.2450.000-14.796Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic13.87Destabilizing1.55.46Destabilizing9.67Destabilizing0.60Ambiguous0.473Likely Benign-10.01Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.38Benign0.00Affected0.18940.3017-8-2-3.483.07
c.1729G>A
A577T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant A577T is listed in ClinVar as benign (ClinVar ID 2195056.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440781‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. No other high‑confidence stability predictions are available. Overall, the consensus of the available predictions indicates that the variant is most likely benign, which aligns with its ClinVar classification and does not contradict the reported status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.113710Structured0.019074Uncertain0.9130.2390.000Benign 16-33440781-G-A63.72e-6-5.311Likely Benign0.322Likely BenignLikely Benign0.86Ambiguous0.10.54Ambiguous0.70Ambiguous0.54Ambiguous0.427Likely Benign-1.47Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.987Probably Damaging-1.31Pathogenic0.47Tolerated3.37340.16570.587510-2.530.03191.9-43.40.00.00.70.1XPotentially BenignAla577 is located near the end and outer surface of an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), where its methyl group does not form any particular interactions in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the hydroxyl group of the Thr577 side chain hydrogen bonds with the backbone atoms of Arg573 and Lys574 within the same helix, which has the potential to weaken the stability of the secondary structure element. Regardless, the residue swap seems to be well tolerated based on the variant simulations.
c.1729G>C
A577P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A577P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the remaining evaluated algorithms (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict a pathogenic outcome; premPS is inconclusive and is therefore not counted. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. Based on the consensus of these predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.019074Uncertain0.9130.2390.000-9.009Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.93Destabilizing0.29.88Destabilizing6.91Destabilizing0.87Ambiguous0.585Likely Pathogenic-2.72Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.34Pathogenic0.20Tolerated0.22560.46001-1-3.426.04
c.1729G>T
A577S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A577S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) all indicate benign or likely benign. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM predict pathogenicity, while Rosetta remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, the SGM‑Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign stability. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign classification, and this is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation; there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.113710Structured0.019074Uncertain0.9130.2390.000-4.417Likely Benign0.151Likely BenignLikely Benign0.10Likely Benign0.00.60Ambiguous0.35Likely Benign0.05Likely Benign0.342Likely Benign-0.30Neutral0.981Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging-1.24Pathogenic0.80Tolerated0.27630.505611-2.616.00
c.172A>C
M58L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as tolerated or benign. Only SIFT predicts a deleterious impact. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, and the SGM‑Consensus result is benign; Foldetta data are not available. Consequently, the aggregate evidence points to a benign effect for M58L, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.000-0.661Likely Benign0.240Likely BenignLikely Benign0.208Likely Benign-0.11Neutral0.006Benign0.039Benign4.77Benign0.00Affected0.15140.4621421.9-18.03
c.172A>G
M58V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58V is listed in ClinVar (ID 2962156.0) with an uncertain significance status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy consensus from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN), and Foldetta (protein‑folding stability) is available only for the first two; Foldetta data are missing. The SGM Consensus, based on a majority of benign predictions, indicates a likely benign outcome. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.000Uncertain 1-2.211Likely Benign0.688Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.160Likely Benign-0.71Neutral0.006Benign0.091Benign4.19Benign0.00Affected4.3210.29510.3917122.3-32.06
c.172A>T
M58L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58L is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation—there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.000-0.661Likely Benign0.240Likely BenignLikely Benign0.208Likely Benign-0.11Neutral0.006Benign0.039Benign4.77Benign0.00Affected0.15140.4621421.9-18.03
c.1730C>A
A577E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A577E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, and SIFT, whereas those that agree on a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is also uncertain; Rosetta and premPS are inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evaluated tools (five pathogenic vs. four benign) and the SGM‑Consensus support a pathogenic classification. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.113710Structured0.019074Uncertain0.9130.2390.000-9.607Likely Pathogenic0.794Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.29Likely Benign0.00.72Ambiguous0.51Ambiguous0.62Ambiguous0.419Likely Benign-1.91Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging-1.12Pathogenic0.76Tolerated0.14870.17990-1-5.358.04
c.1730C>G
A577G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A577G is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 1010280.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440782‑C‑G). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Predictions that are inconclusive (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy methods give a benign verdict: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, the SGM‑Consensus is Likely Benign, and Foldetta is uncertain. Overall, the majority of reliable predictions support a benign impact, which is consistent with the ClinVar status and does not contradict it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.113710Structured0.019074Uncertain0.9130.2390.000Benign/Likely benign 26-33440782-C-G16.20e-7-5.717Likely Benign0.268Likely BenignLikely Benign0.83Ambiguous0.01.02Ambiguous0.93Ambiguous0.86Ambiguous0.443Likely Benign-1.84Neutral0.997Probably Damaging0.990Probably Damaging-1.31Pathogenic0.31Tolerated3.37340.21200.378010-2.2-14.03158.723.60.00.00.00.0XPotentially BenignAla577 is located near the end and outer surface of an α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578), where its methyl group does not form any particular interactions in the WT simulations. The introduced residue, glycine, is known as an “α-helix breaker.” However, the residue swap caused only minor helix shortening in one of the replica simulations for the variant system. Regardless, the residue swap seems to be well tolerated based on the variant simulations.
c.1730C>T
A577V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant A577V is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440782‑C‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign; the SGM consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also reports benign. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive in these key analyses. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.113710Structured0.019074Uncertain0.9130.2390.0006-33440782-C-T21.24e-6-4.265Likely Benign0.432AmbiguousLikely Benign0.69Ambiguous0.10.00Likely Benign0.35Likely Benign0.16Likely Benign0.417Likely Benign-2.11Neutral0.997Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging-1.32Pathogenic0.26Tolerated3.37340.12780.4790002.428.05
c.1732G>A
E578K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E578K is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, and SIFT, whereas polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default predict a pathogenic outcome. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show that the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) classifies the variant as Likely Pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains Uncertain, and Foldetta predicts a benign effect. Overall, the majority of tools (seven benign vs. five pathogenic) suggest a benign impact, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of ClinVar evidence. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on the current predictions, with no conflicting ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.059222Structured0.020971Uncertain0.9020.2400.000-13.391Likely Pathogenic0.870Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.07Likely Benign0.1-0.19Likely Benign-0.06Likely Benign-0.27Likely Benign0.450Likely Benign-1.65Neutral0.996Probably Damaging0.987Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.49Tolerated0.19540.548001-0.4-0.94
c.1732G>C
E578Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E578Q missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus from most in silico predictors indicates a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta all predict benign. Pathogenic predictions come from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessment shows AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—leans pathogenic. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, also predicts benign. Overall, the majority of tools, including the high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta, support a benign classification, and this is consistent with the lack of ClinVar evidence. Thus, the variant is most likely benign and does not contradict ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.059222Structured0.020971Uncertain0.9020.2400.000-9.771Likely Pathogenic0.491AmbiguousLikely Benign0.01Likely Benign0.1-0.12Likely Benign-0.06Likely Benign-0.16Likely Benign0.353Likely Benign-1.21Neutral0.994Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging-1.40Pathogenic0.36Tolerated0.10000.5319220.0-0.98
c.1733A>C
E578A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E578A missense change is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. ESM1b is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessment shows AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) favors pathogenic, and Foldetta also predicts benign. Overall, the majority of conventional tools lean benign, but the high‑accuracy consensus and AlphaMissense‑Optimized suggest a pathogenic effect. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic according to the most reliable predictors, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.059222Structured0.020971Uncertain0.9020.2400.000-7.369In-Between0.604Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.34Likely Benign0.1-0.48Likely Benign-0.07Likely Benign-0.02Likely Benign0.525Likely Pathogenic-2.30Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.40Pathogenic0.44Tolerated0.33260.51180-15.3-58.04
c.1733A>G
E578G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E578G missense change is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect are REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools give uncertain or inconclusive results (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, ESM1b). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—predicts pathogenic. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, yields an uncertain result. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence predictions lean toward pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.059222Structured0.020971Uncertain0.9020.2400.000-7.680In-Between0.601Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.98Ambiguous0.10.63Ambiguous0.81Ambiguous0.08Likely Benign0.589Likely Pathogenic-2.40Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.49Pathogenic0.19Tolerated0.26080.48430-23.1-72.06
c.1733A>T
E578V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 E578V is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. In silico predictors cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results: FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further show that the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts likely pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.059222Structured0.020971Uncertain0.9020.2400.000-11.393Likely Pathogenic0.881Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.72Ambiguous0.10.02Likely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.607Likely Pathogenic-3.74Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.05750.5703-2-27.7-29.98
c.1734G>C
E578D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E578D is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) leans toward benign (2 benign vs 1 pathogenic votes), and Foldetta also predicts benign stability. No prediction or folding result is missing or inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.059222Structured0.020971Uncertain0.9020.2400.000-4.366Likely Benign0.447AmbiguousLikely Benign0.46Likely Benign0.10.15Likely Benign0.31Likely Benign-0.05Likely Benign0.318Likely Benign-0.53Neutral0.989Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.33Tolerated0.15610.3554320.0-14.03
c.1734G>T
E578D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E578D missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) resolves to benign (2 benign vs 1 pathogenic votes), and Foldetta predicts a benign stability change. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.059222Structured0.020971Uncertain0.9020.2400.000-4.366Likely Benign0.447AmbiguousLikely Benign0.46Likely Benign0.10.15Likely Benign0.31Likely Benign-0.05Likely Benign0.318Likely Benign-0.53Neutral0.989Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.33Tolerated0.15610.3554320.0-14.03
c.1735C>G
R579G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R579G is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440787‑C‑G) and has no ClinVar entry. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly favor a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict pathogenic. No tool in the dataset reports a benign outcome; the only uncertain calls are from FoldX, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta remain uncertain. Consequently, the collective evidence indicates that R579G is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which is currently absent.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.053060Structured0.022872Uncertain0.8770.2440.0006-33440787-C-G16.20e-7-14.298Likely Pathogenic0.948Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.43Ambiguous0.02.36Destabilizing1.90Ambiguous1.32Destabilizing0.680Likely Pathogenic-5.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.40Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37340.30780.2554-2-34.1-99.14
c.1736G>A
R579Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R579Q is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3964539) and is present in gnomAD (6‑33440788‑G‑A). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the remaining tools (REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. FoldX and Rosetta individually also return uncertain results. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current computational predictions.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.053060Structured0.022872Uncertain0.8770.2440.000Uncertain 26-33440788-G-A181.12e-5-9.193Likely Pathogenic0.690Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.65Ambiguous0.10.70Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous1.13Destabilizing0.673Likely Pathogenic-3.31Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.34Pathogenic0.06Tolerated3.37340.26770.1334111.0-28.06
c.1736G>C
R579P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R579P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No predictions or stability results are missing or inconclusive. Based on the unanimous pathogenic predictions and the absence of any ClinVar or gnomAD evidence to the contrary, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.053060Structured0.022872Uncertain0.8770.2440.000-14.826Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.00Destabilizing0.26.36Destabilizing4.68Destabilizing0.93Ambiguous0.821Likely Pathogenic-6.26Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.41Pathogenic0.01Affected0.22070.30810-22.9-59.07
c.1736G>T
R579L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R579L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT, whereas those that predict a pathogenic impact are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence (seven pathogenic vs. five benign predictions) points to a pathogenic effect for R579L. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.053060Structured0.022872Uncertain0.8770.2440.000-9.290Likely Pathogenic0.904Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.24Likely Benign0.10.07Likely Benign-0.09Likely Benign0.48Likely Benign0.802Likely Pathogenic-6.39Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.36Pathogenic0.06Tolerated0.17470.3259-3-28.3-43.03
c.1738G>A
G580S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G580S is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 1487029.0) and is present in the gnomAD database (gnomAD ID 6‑33440790‑G‑A). Among the available in‑silico predictors, the majority (REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) indicate a pathogenic effect, whereas only SIFT predicts a benign outcome. Predictions that are inconclusive or uncertain include Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (which is derived from the pathogenic majority of the four contributing tools). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as pathogenic (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain (combining a pathogenic FoldX result with an uncertain Rosetta result). Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which is in contrast to the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.025952Uncertain0.8530.2360.000Uncertain 16-33440790-G-A16.20e-7-10.788Likely Pathogenic0.861Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.84Destabilizing0.20.59Ambiguous1.72Ambiguous0.87Ambiguous0.644Likely Pathogenic-5.73Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.23Pathogenic0.07Tolerated3.37340.25090.308510-0.430.03233.9-49.30.80.00.60.1XPotentially BenignGly580 is located on the outer surface in a short α-α loop turn connecting two α-helices (res. Arg563-Glu578, res. Glu582-Phe608) in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the side chain of Ser580 faces outward, and its hydroxyl group does not make any new or additional interactions compared to Gly580 in the WT simulations that could affect the protein structure.
c.1738G>C
G580R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G580R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all predict a pathogenic outcome. No tool predicts a benign effect. Several methods return uncertain results—Rosetta, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs), and premPS—so these do not influence the overall assessment. High‑accuracy evaluations reinforce the pathogenic prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.025952Uncertain0.8530.2360.000-11.459Likely Pathogenic0.977Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.20Destabilizing0.11.26Ambiguous1.73Ambiguous0.81Ambiguous0.623Likely Pathogenic-7.33Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.03Affected0.10090.3197-3-2-4.199.14
c.1738G>T
G580C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G580C is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic outcome include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results are Rosetta and premPS. High‑accuracy methods all support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No tool predicts benign. **Based on the consensus of available predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status (which is currently unreported).**

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.025952Uncertain0.8530.2360.000-11.608Likely Pathogenic0.962Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.94Destabilizing0.11.18Ambiguous2.06Destabilizing0.60Ambiguous0.755Likely Pathogenic-8.66Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.18Pathogenic0.01Affected0.14220.2146-3-32.946.09
c.1739G>A
G580D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G580D is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Consensus from multiple in silico predictors indicates a pathogenic effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify it as pathogenic, while premPS and Rosetta are uncertain. High‑accuracy tools reinforce this assessment: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No benign predictions are present. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.025952Uncertain0.8530.2360.000-10.086Likely Pathogenic0.965Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.85Destabilizing0.11.39Ambiguous2.12Destabilizing0.83Ambiguous0.712Likely Pathogenic-6.73Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.04Affected0.17930.19711-1-3.158.04
c.1739G>C
G580A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G580A is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity are unanimous: REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus all predict a deleterious effect. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results (Rosetta and premPS) are noted as unavailable for pathogenicity inference. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability predictor that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also classifies the variant as Pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the consensus of predictive tools, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.025952Uncertain0.8530.2360.000-10.841Likely Pathogenic0.956Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.84Destabilizing0.11.55Ambiguous2.20Destabilizing0.64Ambiguous0.646Likely Pathogenic-5.73Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.22Pathogenic0.05Affected0.36570.2862102.214.03
c.1739G>T
G580V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G580V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess functional impact uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the variant as pathogenic. The only inconclusive result is premPS, which is listed as uncertain. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenic. Based on the unanimous pathogenic predictions and the absence of any benign calls, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.025952Uncertain0.8530.2360.000-13.705Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.10Destabilizing0.13.89Destabilizing4.00Destabilizing0.79Ambiguous0.750Likely Pathogenic-8.66Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.18Pathogenic0.04Affected0.12700.2909-1-34.642.08
c.173T>A
M58K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely benign classification. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. There is no ClinVar entry to contradict this assessment, so the variant is most likely benign based on current predictions.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.000-6.059Likely Benign0.939Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.199Likely Benign-1.52Neutral0.018Benign0.184Benign4.08Benign0.00Affected0.16150.11630-1-5.8-3.02
c.173T>C
M58T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58T is listed in gnomAD (ID 6‑33423582‑T‑C) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus remains benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.0006-33423582-T-C16.20e-7-4.308Likely Benign0.980Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.159Likely Benign-1.58Neutral0.018Benign0.184Benign4.09Benign0.00Affected4.3210.19990.2357-1-1-2.6-30.09
c.173T>G
M58R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and no Foldetta stability assessment is available. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments therefore indicate a benign likelihood: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, SGM‑Consensus is benign, and Foldetta data are missing. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.000-5.035Likely Benign0.940Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.237Likely Benign-1.78Neutral0.042Benign0.184Benign4.07Benign0.00Affected0.17450.11130-1-6.424.99
c.1741C>G
R581G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R581G is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts pathogenicity. Uncertain results from Rosetta and premPS are treated as unavailable and do not alter the overall conclusion. **Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).**

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.029544Uncertain0.8290.2360.000-12.097Likely Pathogenic0.985Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.48Destabilizing0.21.70Ambiguous2.09Destabilizing0.90Ambiguous0.581Likely Pathogenic-5.93Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.04Affected0.31020.2566-3-24.1-99.14
c.1741C>T
R581W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R581W is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only Rosetta, whereas the remaining pathogenic‑predicating tools—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus—consistently classify the variant as deleterious. Uncertain or inconclusive results come from FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain”; the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Pathogenic”; and Foldetta remains “Uncertain.” Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, which contrasts with the ClinVar designation of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.029544Uncertain0.8290.2360.000Uncertain 2-12.855Likely Pathogenic0.920Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.32Ambiguous0.1-0.32Likely Benign0.50Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous0.678Likely Pathogenic-6.79Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.37Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37340.11420.30432-33.630.03257.836.00.10.10.10.3XXPotentially PathogenicArg581 is located on a short α-α loop between two α helices (res. Arg563-Glu578 and res. Glu582-Ser604). In the WT simulations, the guanidinium group of Arg581 forms salt bridges with the carboxylate groups of Asp583 within the same helix, as well as with Glu478 and/or Glu480 in a slightly α-helical loop (res. Glu478-Thr488) preceding another α helix (res. Ala461-Phe476).In the variant simulations, the neutral indole ring of the Trp581 side chain cannot form any of these salt bridges. Instead, it packs hydrophobically against Met477 and Ile587 without forming any direct hydrogen bonds. The tendency of the loop (res. Asp477-Thr488) to acquire an α-helical structure seems to marginally increase, potentially due to Trp581's inability to coordinate stable hydrogen bonds with the loop residues (e.g., Glu478-Arg581 salt bridge). Additionally, the residue swap could weaken the tertiary structure assembly and negatively affect the overall protein folding process.
c.1742G>A
R581Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R581Q is reported in ClinVar as benign (ClinVar ID 1388591.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440794‑G‑A). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. No other high‑confidence stability predictions are available. Overall, the predictions are mixed, with a slight bias toward benign outcomes from the majority of tools and the high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta results. Therefore, the variant is most likely benign based on the current computational evidence, which is consistent with its ClinVar benign classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.029544Uncertain0.8290.2360.000Benign 16-33440794-G-A84.96e-6-7.584In-Between0.673Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.31Ambiguous0.1-0.42Likely Benign0.45Likely Benign0.88Ambiguous0.481Likely Benign-2.77Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.21Pathogenic0.11Tolerated3.37340.27420.1851111.0-28.06239.653.5-0.20.2-0.40.1XPotentially PathogenicArg581 is located on a short α-α loop between two α helices (res. Arg563-Glu578 and res. Glu582-Ser604). In the WT simulations, the guanidinium group of Arg581 forms salt bridges with the carboxylate groups of Asp583 within the same helix, as well as with Glu478 and/or Glu480 on a slightly α-helical loop (res. Glu478-Thr488) preceding another α helix (res. Ala461-Phe476).In the variant simulations, the neutral carboxamide group of the Gln581 side chain cannot form any of these salt bridges. Instead, it packs hydrophobically against Met477 and Ile587 or forms hydrogen bonds sporadically with nearby residues (e.g., Asp583, Arg587). Thus, although no drastic changes are observed in the variant simulations, the residue swap could weaken the tertiary structure assembly.
c.1742G>C
R581P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R581P is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440794‑G‑C). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS and SIFT, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, is pathogenic. No predictions are inconclusive or missing. Overall, the evidence strongly favors a pathogenic classification for R581P, and this is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry (no contradiction).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.029544Uncertain0.8290.2360.0006-33440794-G-C16.20e-7-13.309Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.13Destabilizing0.13.80Destabilizing3.97Destabilizing0.44Likely Benign0.562Likely Pathogenic-5.68Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.01Pathogenic0.07Tolerated3.37340.21920.3639-202.9-59.07
c.1742G>T
R581L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R581L is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440794‑G‑T). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT, whereas tools that predict pathogenicity are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is pathogenic. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates pathogenicity. In contrast, the Foldetta stability assessment, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a benign effect. Overall, the majority of computational evidence supports a pathogenic classification for R581L, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.104810Structured0.029544Uncertain0.8290.2360.0006-33440794-G-T31.86e-6-10.134Likely Pathogenic0.958Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.29Likely Benign0.1-0.20Likely Benign0.05Likely Benign0.45Likely Benign0.654Likely Pathogenic-5.93Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.08Tolerated3.37340.15500.3483-2-38.3-43.03
c.1744G>A
E582K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E582K missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta predicts a benign effect on protein stability. Taken together, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available). Thus, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.102787Structured0.033838Uncertain0.8450.2350.000-11.826Likely Pathogenic0.814Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.20Likely Benign0.10.07Likely Benign0.14Likely Benign0.02Likely Benign0.168Likely Benign-1.83Neutral0.994Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging3.31Benign0.33Tolerated0.20380.376201-0.4-0.94
c.1744G>C
E582Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E582Q missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which is a majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments—AlphaMissense‑Optimized, SGM‑Consensus, and Foldetta—all predict a benign impact, with Foldetta combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs. In contrast, the two polyPhen‑2 scores and AlphaMissense‑Default suggest pathogenicity, but these are outnumbered by benign predictions. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools, including the high‑accuracy methods, indicates that the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.102787Structured0.033838Uncertain0.8450.2350.000-3.700Likely Benign0.605Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.17Likely Benign0.10.21Likely Benign0.19Likely Benign-0.24Likely Benign0.138Likely Benign-0.61Neutral0.992Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging3.22Benign0.57Tolerated0.09790.3402220.0-0.98
c.1745A>C
E582A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E582A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools (FoldX and ESM1b) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.102787Structured0.033838Uncertain0.8450.2350.000-7.432In-Between0.661Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.78Ambiguous0.20.15Likely Benign0.47Likely Benign0.27Likely Benign0.263Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.19Benign0.26Tolerated0.32360.40000-15.3-58.04
c.1745A>G
E582G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E582G is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy methods give mixed signals: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta’s stability assessment is uncertain. Overall, six tools predict pathogenicity while five predict benign, and the high‑accuracy consensus is split. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the preponderance of evidence, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.102787Structured0.033838Uncertain0.8450.2350.000-9.621Likely Pathogenic0.630Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.35Ambiguous0.21.24Ambiguous1.30Ambiguous0.37Likely Benign0.224Likely Benign-3.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.13Benign0.13Tolerated0.28350.33250-23.1-72.06
c.1745A>T
E582V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 E582V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Computational predictors show a split: benign calls from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM; pathogenic calls from SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default; and two uncertain calls from FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy methods give a pathogenic consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) is uncertain due to conflicting inputs. Overall, the computational evidence leans toward pathogenicity, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.102787Structured0.033838Uncertain0.8450.2350.000-10.737Likely Pathogenic0.842Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.87Ambiguous0.1-0.13Likely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.24Likely Benign0.251Likely Benign-3.92Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.15Benign0.10Tolerated0.05640.4186-2-27.7-29.98
c.1746G>C
E582D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E582D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two consensus groups: a benign group comprising REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and a pathogenic group containing polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. Remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) yield uncertain results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) leans toward benign, and Foldetta indicates no significant destabilization. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this change.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.102787Structured0.033838Uncertain0.8450.2350.000-7.974In-Between0.520AmbiguousLikely Benign0.57Ambiguous0.20.95Ambiguous0.76Ambiguous0.40Likely Benign0.093Likely Benign-1.63Neutral0.986Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.22Benign0.27Tolerated0.14810.2236320.0-14.03
c.1746G>T
E582D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E582D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two consensus groups: a benign group comprising REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and a pathogenic group consisting of polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. Remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) yield uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive because two of the four inputs are uncertain; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also reports an uncertain stability change. Consequently, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign effect. This conclusion aligns with the absence of a ClinVar assertion, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.102787Structured0.033838Uncertain0.8450.2350.000-7.974In-Between0.520AmbiguousLikely Benign0.57Ambiguous0.20.95Ambiguous0.76Ambiguous0.40Likely Benign0.093Likely Benign-1.63Neutral0.986Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.22Benign0.27Tolerated0.14810.2236320.0-14.03
c.1747G>A
D583N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant D583N is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440799‑G‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign calls come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT, whereas pathogenic calls are made by REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy assessment indicates AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus, derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts benign. Overall, the predictions are split, with a slight tilt toward pathogenicity from the consensus and high‑accuracy tools, while stability‑based methods suggest benign. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the aggregate predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.0006-33440799-G-A31.86e-6-8.048Likely Pathogenic0.856Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.13Likely Benign0.10.00Likely Benign0.07Likely Benign0.21Likely Benign0.632Likely Pathogenic-4.78Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.40Pathogenic0.09Tolerated3.37350.10240.3884120.0-0.98
c.1747G>C
D583H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D583H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include Rosetta and premPS, whereas the majority of tools (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict a pathogenic outcome. FoldX and Foldetta provide uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Based on the overall consensus of the available predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.000-9.191Likely Pathogenic0.983Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.22Ambiguous0.2-0.07Likely Benign0.58Ambiguous-0.22Likely Benign0.713Likely Pathogenic-6.64Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.03Affected0.12170.41821-10.322.05
c.1747G>T
D583Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D583Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect are Foldetta and premPS, whereas the remaining tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict a pathogenic outcome; FoldX and Rosetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.000-12.187Likely Pathogenic0.970Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.75Ambiguous0.2-1.10Ambiguous-0.18Likely Benign0.10Likely Benign0.760Likely Pathogenic-8.50Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.45Pathogenic0.01Affected0.05370.3868-4-32.248.09
c.1748A>C
D583A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D583A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, and ESM1b, while those that agree on a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; FoldX is uncertain and thus not counted. High‑accuracy methods give AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of predictions (10 pathogenic vs. 5 benign) and the two high‑accuracy pathogenic calls outweigh the single high‑accuracy benign call, indicating that the variant is most likely pathogenic. This assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.000-4.545Likely Benign0.967Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.98Ambiguous0.2-0.16Likely Benign0.41Likely Benign0.13Likely Benign0.787Likely Pathogenic-7.64Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.39Pathogenic0.14Tolerated0.30250.37050-25.3-44.01
c.1748A>G
D583G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D583G missense change is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS and ESM1b, whereas the majority of algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—classify it as pathogenic. Uncertain results come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessment shows the SGM Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenicity, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains inconclusive; Foldetta also reports no definitive stability change. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for D583G, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.000-6.765Likely Benign0.953Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.10Ambiguous0.20.56Ambiguous0.83Ambiguous0.10Likely Benign0.850Likely Pathogenic-6.77Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.03Affected0.30720.42841-13.1-58.04
c.1748A>T
D583V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 D583V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; FoldX and ESM1b give uncertain results. High‑accuracy methods give a split view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) predicts benign. Overall, the majority of tools support a pathogenic effect, and this is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation; there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.000-7.796In-Between0.973Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.20Ambiguous0.2-0.31Likely Benign0.45Likely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.839Likely Pathogenic-8.63Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.40Pathogenic0.08Tolerated0.07780.4090-2-37.7-15.96
c.1749C>A
D583E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D583E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, and SIFT. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Benign, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.000-7.861In-Between0.851Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.25Likely Benign0.2-0.36Likely Benign-0.06Likely Benign-0.20Likely Benign0.467Likely Benign-3.52Deleterious0.960Probably Damaging0.969Probably Damaging-1.18Pathogenic0.12Tolerated0.12000.4037320.014.03
c.1749C>G
D583E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D583E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, and SIFT. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Benign, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.116183Structured0.038478Uncertain0.8050.2470.000-7.861In-Between0.851Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.25Likely Benign0.2-0.36Likely Benign-0.06Likely Benign-0.20Likely Benign0.466Likely Benign-3.52Deleterious0.960Probably Damaging0.969Probably Damaging-1.18Pathogenic0.12Tolerated0.12000.4037320.014.03
c.174G>A
M58I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58I is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) but is present in gnomAD (ID = 6‑33423583‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus remains likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward a benign impact, and this is not contradicted by ClinVar status. Thus, based on the available evidence, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.0006-33423583-G-A16.20e-7-2.153Likely Benign0.971Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.078Likely Benign-0.55Neutral0.006Benign0.091Benign4.21Benign0.00Affected4.3210.13970.3848122.6-18.03
c.174G>C
M58I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.000-2.153Likely Benign0.971Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.078Likely Benign-0.55Neutral0.006Benign0.091Benign4.21Benign0.00Affected4.3210.13970.3848122.6-18.03
c.174G>T
M58I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M58I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions (seven benign vs. three pathogenic) suggest the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.188120Structured0.484415Uncertain0.5150.6650.000-2.153Likely Benign0.971Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.078Likely Benign-0.55Neutral0.006Benign0.091Benign4.21Benign0.00Affected4.3210.13970.3848122.6-18.03
c.1750A>C
I584L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I584L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are ESM1b and FATHMM, while premPS is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.059222Structured0.046673Uncertain0.8460.2440.000-8.266Likely Pathogenic0.285Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.18Likely Benign0.1-0.30Likely Benign-0.24Likely Benign0.84Ambiguous0.420Likely Benign-1.74Neutral0.008Benign0.046Benign-1.23Pathogenic0.18Tolerated0.09270.281722-0.70.00
c.1750A>G
I584V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I584V is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440802‑A‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, and FATHMM. Two tools (FoldX and ESM1b) returned uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also favors benign (2 benign vs. 1 pathogenic vote), and Foldetta predicts benign stability. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.059222Structured0.046673Uncertain0.8460.2440.0006-33440802-A-G16.20e-7-7.562In-Between0.234Likely BenignLikely Benign0.67Ambiguous0.10.29Likely Benign0.48Likely Benign1.16Destabilizing0.405Likely Benign-0.95Neutral0.642Possibly Damaging0.349Benign-1.18Pathogenic0.18Tolerated3.37340.10070.265934-0.3-14.03
c.1750A>T
I584F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 I584F missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only Rosetta, whereas the remaining pathogenic‑predicating tools—REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently classify the variant as deleterious. High‑accuracy assessments further support a pathogenic interpretation: the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Pathogenic,” while AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta yield uncertain results and are therefore not used as evidence. No other folding‑stability methods provide definitive support. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.059222Structured0.046673Uncertain0.8460.2440.000-13.582Likely Pathogenic0.833Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.20Destabilizing0.20.28Likely Benign1.74Ambiguous0.66Ambiguous0.618Likely Pathogenic-3.47Deleterious0.980Probably Damaging0.808Possibly Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.04Affected0.06410.215010-1.734.02
c.1751T>A
I584N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I584N is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree that the variant is deleterious: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify it as pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, indicates a pathogenic impact. All available predictions are concordant and supportive. Based on these computational assessments, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.059222Structured0.046673Uncertain0.8460.2440.000-13.153Likely Pathogenic0.962Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.70Destabilizing0.12.13Destabilizing2.42Destabilizing2.08Destabilizing0.706Likely Pathogenic-6.57Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.18Pathogenic0.01Affected0.06930.0470-2-3-8.00.94
c.1751T>C
I584T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I584T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus from most in silico predictors indicates a pathogenic effect: REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all classify it as likely pathogenic. Only AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign outcome, while Rosetta and Foldetta are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. With the overwhelming majority of tools supporting pathogenicity and no ClinVar entry to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.059222Structured0.046673Uncertain0.8460.2440.000-10.413Likely Pathogenic0.765Likely PathogenicLikely Benign2.05Destabilizing0.11.70Ambiguous1.88Ambiguous1.66Destabilizing0.748Likely Pathogenic-4.63Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.11Pathogenic0.02Affected0.09110.06080-1-5.2-12.05
c.1751T>G
I584S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 I584S missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on pathogenicity include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as pathogenic. No contradictory evidence is present. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not conflict with the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.059222Structured0.046673Uncertain0.8460.2440.000-13.379Likely Pathogenic0.945Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.15Destabilizing0.12.53Destabilizing2.84Destabilizing1.70Destabilizing0.710Likely Pathogenic-5.54Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.18Pathogenic0.03Affected0.23910.0858-1-2-5.3-26.08
c.1752C>G
I584M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant I584M is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 1301269.0) and is present in gnomAD (6‑33440804‑C‑G). Consensus from multiple in‑silico predictors shows a split: benign calls come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic calls arise from premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default (uncertain), ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a pathogenic interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, but SGM Consensus is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) predicts benign. Overall, the majority of tools favor pathogenicity, and the high‑accuracy consensus leans pathogenic, indicating the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.059222Structured0.046673Uncertain0.8460.2440.000Uncertain 26-33440804-C-G16.20e-7-10.119Likely Pathogenic0.419AmbiguousLikely Benign0.11Likely Benign0.10.46Likely Benign0.29Likely Benign1.16Destabilizing0.478Likely Benign-2.62Deleterious0.983Probably Damaging0.925Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.12Tolerated3.37340.07770.212721-2.618.03247.5-20.3-0.10.3-0.10.1XPotentially BenignA hydrophobic residue, Ile584, located in an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), is swapped for another hydrophobic residue, Met584. The sec-butyl hydrocarbon side chain of Ile584 packs hydrophobically with residues in an inter-helix hydrophobic space (e.g., Leu588, Met477, Val473, and Ile483).In the variant simulations, the thioether hydrophobic side chain of Met584 maintains similar interactions as Ile584 in the WT, as it is roughly the same size and fits well within the hydrophobic space. Thus, the residue swap does not appear to cause any negative effects on the protein structure.
c.1753G>A
A585T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant A585T is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440805‑G‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic effect for A585T. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no classification for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.055884Uncertain0.8800.2440.0006-33440805-G-A138.05e-6-10.063Likely Pathogenic0.876Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.66Ambiguous0.21.97Ambiguous1.82Ambiguous0.23Likely Benign0.465Likely Benign-1.73Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.26Tolerated3.37350.11320.421201-2.530.03
c.1753G>C
A585P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A585P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools cluster into two groups: the single benign prediction comes from SIFT, while all other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels it “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts a pathogenic outcome. Based on the convergence of these predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.055884Uncertain0.8800.2440.000-10.999Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.44Destabilizing0.15.92Destabilizing5.68Destabilizing0.77Ambiguous0.549Likely Pathogenic-3.09Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.16Tolerated0.18840.29431-1-3.426.04
c.1753G>T
A585S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A585S is not reported in ClinVar (no entry) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy methods give a benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus predicts Likely Benign, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign classification, and this assessment does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.060549Structured0.055884Uncertain0.8800.2440.000-6.332Likely Benign0.246Likely BenignLikely Benign0.91Ambiguous0.21.44Ambiguous1.18Ambiguous0.02Likely Benign0.326Likely Benign0.39Neutral0.993Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging-1.27Pathogenic0.98Tolerated0.21210.338811-2.616.00
c.1754C>A
A585E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant A585E is not reported in ClinVar (status: None) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: the single benign call comes from SIFT, while all other evaluated algorithms—including REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus—label the change as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also reports pathogenic. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the collective predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.055884Uncertain0.8800.2440.000-14.715Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.38Destabilizing0.73.70Destabilizing4.54Destabilizing1.42Destabilizing0.539Likely Pathogenic-2.59Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.28Tolerated0.11600.12120-1-5.358.04
c.1754C>G
A585G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A585G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, whereas the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split, and Foldetta reports an uncertain stability change. No evidence from these high‑confidence tools supports pathogenicity. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a benign effect for A585G, and this conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.060549Structured0.055884Uncertain0.8800.2440.000-3.879Likely Benign0.629Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.62Ambiguous0.01.94Ambiguous1.78Ambiguous0.59Ambiguous0.384Likely Benign-1.16Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.24Tolerated0.17240.229910-2.2-14.03
c.1754C>T
A585V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A585V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and SIFT, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.055884Uncertain0.8800.2440.000-10.843Likely Pathogenic0.970Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.95Ambiguous1.41.12Ambiguous1.04Ambiguous0.51Ambiguous0.420Likely Benign-3.35Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.988Probably Damaging-1.27Pathogenic0.10Tolerated0.10040.3496002.428.05
c.1756G>A
D586N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D586N missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and has no gnomAD entry. Consensus prediction tools that agree on benign impact include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, more tools predict pathogenicity than benign, and the high‑accuracy consensus leans toward pathogenic. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-9.497Likely Pathogenic0.767Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.80.24Likely Benign0.17Likely Benign0.19Likely Benign0.523Likely Pathogenic-2.52Deleterious0.992Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.23Tolerated0.11240.5253210.0-0.98
c.1756G>C
D586H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D586H missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and has no gnomAD entry. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from premPS and SIFT, while the remaining nine tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all indicate pathogenicity. The high‑accuracy methods reinforce this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic, and the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—also predicts pathogenicity. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, yields an uncertain result. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation, as there is no conflicting status to contradict the prediction.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-10.104Likely Pathogenic0.974Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.00Ambiguous0.30.89Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.26Likely Benign0.672Likely Pathogenic-3.44Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.23Pathogenic0.17Tolerated0.13070.55581-10.322.05
c.1756G>T
D586Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D586Y missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, SIFT, and premPS, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic outcome. Rosetta and Foldetta, which assess protein‑folding stability, return uncertain results and are therefore not considered evidence for either direction. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of pathogenic predictions (13 vs. 3 benign) suggests that D586Y is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-12.916Likely Pathogenic0.975Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.37Likely Benign0.41.09Ambiguous0.73Ambiguous-0.49Likely Benign0.712Likely Pathogenic-5.38Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.16Pathogenic0.41Tolerated0.06230.5634-4-32.248.09
c.1757A>C
D586A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant D586A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, SIFT, and premPS, whereas a majority of predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) indicate a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) labels it Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, remains inconclusive. No evidence from the uncertain tools (Rosetta, Foldetta) alters this consensus. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this prediction does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-9.955Likely Pathogenic0.960Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.41Likely Benign0.20.88Ambiguous0.65Ambiguous0.25Likely Benign0.693Likely Pathogenic-4.58Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.22Pathogenic0.31Tolerated0.33970.46730-25.3-44.01
c.1757A>G
D586G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 D586G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include premPS and SIFT, whereas the majority of tools predict it to be pathogenic: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions that are inconclusive are FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (derived from a unanimous vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-8.497Likely Pathogenic0.942Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.37Ambiguous0.32.49Destabilizing1.93Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign0.833Likely Pathogenic-4.67Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.17Tolerated0.33340.50521-13.1-58.04
c.1757A>T
D586V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D586V is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT. Tools that predict pathogenicity include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of predictions (nine pathogenic vs. five benign) indicate a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-12.409Likely Pathogenic0.977Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.40Likely Benign0.20.03Likely Benign0.22Likely Benign0.18Likely Benign0.801Likely Pathogenic-5.58Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.23Pathogenic0.24Tolerated0.08260.5458-2-37.7-15.96
c.1758C>A
D586E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D586E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta. Those that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default; Rosetta is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-3.233Likely Benign0.683Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.42Likely Benign0.10.88Ambiguous0.23Likely Benign0.38Likely Benign0.367Likely Benign-0.12Neutral0.929Possibly Damaging0.969Probably Damaging-1.20Pathogenic1.00Tolerated0.13040.5126320.014.03
c.1758C>G
D586E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D586E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default; Rosetta is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.060549Structured0.066018Uncertain0.8660.2410.000-3.233Likely Benign0.683Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.42Likely Benign0.10.88Ambiguous0.23Likely Benign0.38Likely Benign0.367Likely Benign-0.12Neutral0.929Possibly Damaging0.969Probably Damaging-1.20Pathogenic1.00Tolerated0.13040.5126320.014.03
c.1759A>G
R587G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R587G is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440811‑A‑G). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) classify the change as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a pathogenic interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, but the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—returns pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple independent predictors indicates that R587G is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.054297Structured0.077330Uncertain0.8620.2160.0006-33440811-A-G21.24e-6-13.780Likely Pathogenic0.780Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.55Ambiguous0.22.43Destabilizing1.99Ambiguous1.55Destabilizing0.578Likely Pathogenic-6.07Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.972Probably Damaging-1.28Pathogenic0.07Tolerated3.37350.31830.3401-2-34.1-99.14
c.1759A>T
R587W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R587W is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440811‑A‑T). Functional prediction tools show a split assessment: benign predictions come from FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta, whereas pathogenic predictions are reported by REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results: premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy consensus methods further clarify the picture: the SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates a likely pathogenic effect, whereas Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability predictor combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, classifies the variant as benign. AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not conflict with the ClinVar status, which currently lacks an entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.054297Structured0.077330Uncertain0.8620.2160.0006-33440811-A-T16.20e-7-15.383Likely Pathogenic0.879Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.01Likely Benign0.1-0.44Likely Benign-0.23Likely Benign0.76Ambiguous0.692Likely Pathogenic-7.17Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.985Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37350.13260.3992-323.630.03
c.175C>A
L59M
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L59M is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the majority of evaluated predictors lean toward a benign interpretation. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign based on current computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.212910Structured0.484882Uncertain0.5100.6680.000-3.394Likely Benign0.618Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.088Likely Benign-0.65Neutral0.824Possibly Damaging0.910Probably Damaging3.30Benign0.00Affected0.07720.331142-1.918.03
c.175C>G
L59V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L59V is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact for this variant. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar classification, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.212910Structured0.484882Uncertain0.5100.6680.000-4.465Likely Benign0.588Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.049Likely Benign-1.15Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.745Possibly Damaging3.36Benign0.00Affected0.15080.3217210.4-14.03
c.1760G>A
R587K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 R587K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions from SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and pathogenic predictions from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. The remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—indicates likely pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, which is consistent with the SGM‑Consensus prediction but contradicts the benign calls from SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion aligns with the lack of ClinVar annotation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.054297Structured0.077330Uncertain0.8620.2160.000-10.220Likely Pathogenic0.433AmbiguousLikely Benign0.63Ambiguous0.11.14Ambiguous0.89Ambiguous0.88Ambiguous0.539Likely Pathogenic-2.55Deleterious0.967Probably Damaging0.955Probably Damaging-1.16Pathogenic0.07Tolerated0.53130.3897Weaken320.6-28.01
c.1760G>C
R587T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R587T is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas a majority of tools (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict a pathogenic outcome. Uncertain predictions from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for R587T, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification but suggests that the variant is more likely pathogenic rather than benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.054297Structured0.077330Uncertain0.8620.2160.000Uncertain 1-9.697Likely Pathogenic0.784Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.14Ambiguous0.20.74Ambiguous0.94Ambiguous0.98Ambiguous0.603Likely Pathogenic-4.71Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.847Possibly Damaging-1.19Pathogenic0.08Tolerated3.37350.19580.4578-1-13.8-55.08227.287.40.00.00.50.1XPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg587, located on an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), is constantly rotating and breaking/forming multiple hydrogen bonds and/or salt bridges at the surface intersection of α helices in the WT simulations. The positively charged Arg587 side chain can form a salt bridge with either the carboxylate group of Asp583 or Asp586 in the same helix, or with Glu480 on the opposing short helical loop structure (res. Glu480-Leu482).Importantly, the Arg587 side chain also hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of Ala634 and Asn635, as well as the carboxamide group of Asn635 at the end of another α helix (res. Asp616-Phe636). However, in the variant simulations, the neutral hydroxyl group of the Thr587 side chain is unable to form these salt bridges. Due to its smaller size, it also does not form the hydrogen bonds that the Arg587 side chain could. Instead, the hydroxyl group of Thr587 hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl group of Asp583, which could weaken the integrity of the α helix, although this is not observed in the simulations.Overall, the residue swap could weaken the tertiary structure assembly and negatively affect the overall protein folding process.
c.1760G>T
R587M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R587M is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign calls from FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta; pathogenic calls from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default; and two uncertain calls from premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, predicts pathogenicity; and Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a benign effect. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for R587M, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.054297Structured0.077330Uncertain0.8620.2160.000-15.106Likely Pathogenic0.931Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.23Likely Benign0.0-0.10Likely Benign0.07Likely Benign0.84Ambiguous0.787Likely Pathogenic-5.24Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.02Affected0.17340.39100-16.4-24.99
c.1761G>C
R587S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R587S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: the single benign prediction comes from SIFT, while the remaining tools—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus—indicate pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic”; AlphaMissense‑Optimized is “Uncertain”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is also “Uncertain.” Taken together, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for R587S. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.054297Structured0.077330Uncertain0.8620.2160.000-12.264Likely Pathogenic0.830Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.84Ambiguous0.11.79Ambiguous1.32Ambiguous1.17Destabilizing0.508Likely Pathogenic-4.84Deleterious0.990Probably Damaging0.779Possibly Damaging-1.20Pathogenic0.09Tolerated3.37350.28520.4165-103.7-69.11
c.1761G>T
R587S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 R587S missense variant is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440813‑G‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls come from REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default, while only SIFT predicts a benign outcome. Uncertain results are reported by FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain, but the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—classifies the variant as pathogenic, and Foldetta likewise yields an uncertain stability change. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that R587S is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.054297Structured0.077330Uncertain0.8620.2160.0006-33440813-G-T42.48e-6-12.264Likely Pathogenic0.830Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.84Ambiguous0.11.79Ambiguous1.32Ambiguous1.17Destabilizing0.508Likely Pathogenic-4.84Deleterious0.990Probably Damaging0.779Possibly Damaging-1.20Pathogenic0.09Tolerated3.37350.28520.4165-103.7-69.11
c.1762C>A
L588I
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant L588I has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include PROVEAN. Those that predict pathogenicity are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain results come from Rosetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.082229Uncertain0.8870.2140.000-12.454Likely Pathogenic0.874Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.54Destabilizing1.21.80Ambiguous2.17Destabilizing0.88Ambiguous0.607Likely Pathogenic-1.99Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.27Pathogenic0.04Affected0.09490.2433220.70.00
c.1762C>G
L588V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L588V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: SIFT classifies it as benign, whereas the remaining 13 tools (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict pathogenicity. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for L588V. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical annotations. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction to ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.082229Uncertain0.8870.2140.000-10.374Likely Pathogenic0.897Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.61Destabilizing0.42.81Destabilizing3.21Destabilizing1.24Destabilizing0.533Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging-1.28Pathogenic0.08Tolerated0.14220.2228210.4-14.03
c.1762C>T
L588F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L588F is reported in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440814‑C‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Across the available in‑silico predictors, every tool examined classifies the substitution as pathogenic: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return pathogenic or likely pathogenic scores. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. Because every available prediction converges on a deleterious effect and there is no ClinVar annotation to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.082229Uncertain0.8870.2140.0006-33440814-C-T-14.050Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.90Destabilizing0.22.55Destabilizing2.73Destabilizing1.12Destabilizing0.736Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.38Pathogenic0.04Affected3.38340.08160.200702-1.034.02
c.1763T>A
L588H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L588H is listed in ClinVar (ID 422233.0) as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in silico predictors classify the change as pathogenic: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts Pathogenic. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this prediction aligns with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.082229Uncertain0.8870.2140.000Likely Pathogenic 1-16.947Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.20Destabilizing0.23.69Destabilizing3.95Destabilizing2.26Destabilizing0.939Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.42Pathogenic0.00Affected3.38340.09800.0456-2-3-7.023.98214.320.90.00.00.00.2XXXPotentially PathogenicThe isobutyl group of the Leu588 side chain, located in an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), packs against hydrophobic residues in the inter-helix hydrophobic space (e.g., Ile584, Trp572, Phe484, Met470, Val473, Ile483).In the variant simulations, the imidazole ring of His588 is aromatic but contains polar delta and epsilon nitrogen atoms that are not suited for the hydrophobic niche. The protonated epsilon nitrogen forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of Ala469, which can disrupt the continuity of the opposing α helix (res. Phe476-Lys460).While the residue swap could affect the tertiary assembly and the underlying protein folding process, it is difficult to determine if the mutation would be tolerated based solely on the variant simulations.
c.1763T>C
L588P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L588P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in silico predictors classify the change as pathogenic: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the collective predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.082229Uncertain0.8870.2140.000Uncertain 2-14.771Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.61Destabilizing0.512.91Destabilizing9.26Destabilizing2.33Destabilizing0.932Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.42Pathogenic0.00Affected3.38340.35330.0992-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1763T>G
L588R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L588R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly classify the variant as pathogenic: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. All available evidence points to a deleterious impact. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.082229Uncertain0.8870.2140.000-15.602Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.96Destabilizing0.46.14Destabilizing6.55Destabilizing2.07Destabilizing0.942Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.42Pathogenic0.00Affected0.12090.0530-3-2-8.343.03
c.1765A>C
I589L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I589L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only PROVEAN, whereas the remaining tools (REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus) all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious outcome: the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Pathogenic”; AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta are inconclusive and therefore not considered evidence. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for I589L. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018415Structured0.084536Uncertain0.9270.2140.000-11.337Likely Pathogenic0.850Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.95Ambiguous1.11.44Ambiguous1.20Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.728Likely Pathogenic-1.99Neutral0.955Possibly Damaging0.985Probably Damaging-1.76Pathogenic0.02Affected0.12430.343022-0.70.00
c.1765A>G
I589V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 I589V missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and FATHMM. The remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Default—return uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta is uncertain. Taken together, the majority of evidence, including the high‑accuracy predictions, points to a benign impact. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and does not contradict any existing clinical database.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.018415Structured0.084536Uncertain0.9270.2140.000-6.966Likely Benign0.464AmbiguousLikely Benign0.98Ambiguous0.00.78Ambiguous0.88Ambiguous0.96Ambiguous0.535Likely Pathogenic-1.00Neutral0.969Probably Damaging0.960Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.31Tolerated0.13560.356843-0.3-14.03
c.1765A>T
I589F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I589F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree that the variant is deleterious: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify it as pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, indicates a pathogenic impact. All available predictions are concordant and supportive. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018415Structured0.084536Uncertain0.9270.2140.000-15.300Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic7.38Destabilizing3.42.05Destabilizing4.72Destabilizing1.04Destabilizing0.905Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.98Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08880.257410-1.734.02
c.1766T>A
I589N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I589N is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree that the variant is deleterious: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a pathogenic effect. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. All available predictions are consistent and conclusive. Based on the unanimous computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018415Structured0.084536Uncertain0.9270.2140.000-15.539Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.72Destabilizing0.23.13Destabilizing3.43Destabilizing2.69Destabilizing0.930Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.99Pathogenic0.00Affected0.09680.0742-2-3-8.00.94
c.1766T>C
I589T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I589T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree that the variant is deleterious: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a pathogenic effect. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. All available predictions are consistent and conclusive. Based on the unanimous computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018415Structured0.084536Uncertain0.9270.2140.000-12.128Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.60Destabilizing0.02.54Destabilizing2.57Destabilizing2.07Destabilizing0.935Likely Pathogenic-4.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.97Pathogenic0.02Affected0.11530.12310-1-5.2-12.05
c.1766T>G
I589S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I589S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also labels it pathogenic. Based on the uniform predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018415Structured0.084536Uncertain0.9270.2140.000-15.223Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.62Destabilizing0.14.12Destabilizing3.87Destabilizing2.21Destabilizing0.954Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.99Pathogenic0.00Affected0.27860.1130-1-2-5.3-26.08
c.1767C>G
I589M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I589M is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 964298.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that provide a definitive call overwhelmingly predict a deleterious effect: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default all indicate pathogenicity, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also reports a likely pathogenic outcome. Tools that are inconclusive—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—are listed as uncertain and do not influence the overall assessment. High‑accuracy methods specifically show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Taken together, the majority of available predictions support a pathogenic effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018415Structured0.084536Uncertain0.9270.2140.000Uncertain 1-12.225Likely Pathogenic0.926Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.74Ambiguous0.21.54Ambiguous1.14Ambiguous1.33Destabilizing0.830Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.94Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.09090.255221-2.618.03267.6-24.50.00.0-0.10.1XPotentially BenignA hydrophobic residue, Ile589, located in an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), is swapped for another hydrophobic residue, methionine. The sec-butyl hydrocarbon side chain of Ile589 packs favourably with multiple residues in the inter-helix hydrophobic space (e.g., Phe569, Ile667, and Leu664).Although the S-methyl thioether group of the Met589 side chain in the variant is longer than the branched side chain of isoleucine, it stacks favourably with the aromatic phenol ring. Additionally, the polar sulphur atom forms a weak hydrogen bond with the guanidinium group of Arg573, which in turn forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate group of Asp586.Overall, the hydrophobic packing in the inter-helix space does not appear to be disrupted in the variant simulations.
c.1768A>C
S590R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S590R is not reported in ClinVar (status: None) and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: SGM‑Consensus (likely pathogenic), REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No predictions are inconclusive or missing. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000-18.228Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.69Ambiguous0.63.21Destabilizing2.45Destabilizing1.28Destabilizing0.640Likely Pathogenic-4.88Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging3.11Benign0.01Affected0.09830.33880-1-3.769.11
c.1768A>G
S590G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S590G is listed in ClinVar (ID 1721675.0) with an uncertain significance status and is present in gnomAD (6‑33440820‑A‑G). Functional prediction tools that report a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, AlphaMissense‑Default, and ESM1b. The high‑accuracy consensus (SGM Consensus) derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN yields a pathogenic majority. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is inconclusive, as are FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status but suggests a higher likelihood of pathogenicity.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000Conflicting 26-33440820-A-G148.67e-6-14.277Likely Pathogenic0.574Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.67Ambiguous0.11.28Ambiguous0.98Ambiguous0.71Ambiguous0.379Likely Benign-3.92Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.922Probably Damaging3.42Benign0.06Tolerated3.37350.26270.4118100.4-30.03186.749.40.00.00.10.0XPotentially PathogenicIn the WT simulations, the hydroxyl group of Ser590, located on an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl of Ala634 and/or the carboxamide group of the Asn635 side chain at the end of the opposing α helix (res. Thr619-Ala634).The residue swap could weaken the integrity of the α helix, as glycine is known as an “α helix breaker.” However, no discernible difference was observed between the WT and variant simulations in this regard. Importantly, Gly590 cannot form hydrogen bonds with the opposing helix in the same way that serine can, which could weaken the tertiary structure assembly between the two helices.
c.1768A>T
S590C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S590C has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split assessment: benign predictions come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus. The high‑accuracy subset indicates that AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign effect, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) and Foldetta both support a pathogenic or neutral outcome, respectively. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward a pathogenic interpretation, and this aligns with the SGM‑Consensus designation. Because there is no ClinVar classification, the predictions do not contradict existing clinical data. Thus, based on the available computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000-10.823Likely Pathogenic0.698Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.09Likely Benign0.10.35Likely Benign0.13Likely Benign0.56Ambiguous0.631Likely Pathogenic-4.48Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.968Probably Damaging3.08Benign0.07Tolerated0.10940.53320-13.316.06
c.1769G>A
S590N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S590N is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, while the majority of other in silico predictors (PolyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, PROVEAN, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus) indicate a pathogenic or likely pathogenic impact. FoldX and Foldetta, which assess protein‑folding stability, return uncertain results and are therefore not considered evidence for either outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of pathogenic predictions strongly suggests that S590N is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000-15.149Likely Pathogenic0.957Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.27Ambiguous0.12.10Destabilizing1.69Ambiguous1.48Destabilizing0.411Likely Benign-2.96Deleterious0.921Possibly Damaging0.598Possibly Damaging3.14Benign0.01Affected0.12540.420211-2.727.03
c.1769G>C
S590T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S590T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN and ESM1b. Two tools (premPS and AlphaMissense‑Default) return uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000-12.472Likely Pathogenic0.458AmbiguousLikely Benign0.23Likely Benign0.10.42Likely Benign0.33Likely Benign0.64Ambiguous0.459Likely Benign-2.89Deleterious0.183Benign0.050Benign3.15Benign0.08Tolerated0.14200.5723110.114.03
c.1769G>T
S590I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S590I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include FoldX, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools predict it to be pathogenic: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Two tools give uncertain results: Rosetta and Foldetta. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple independent predictors indicates that S590I is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000-17.956Likely Pathogenic0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.04Likely Benign0.51.15Ambiguous0.56Ambiguous0.31Likely Benign0.686Likely Pathogenic-5.78Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.948Probably Damaging3.05Benign0.02Affected0.09750.5025-1-25.326.08
c.176T>A
L59Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L59Q is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus predictions from multiple in‑silico tools are mixed: benign calls come from SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further highlight this discordance: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a pathogenic effect, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome. No Foldetta stability analysis is available for this residue. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence tools lean toward a pathogenic interpretation, but the presence of several strong benign predictions and the lack of ClinVar evidence suggest uncertainty. The variant is most likely pathogenic based on the prevailing predictions, and this does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.212910Structured0.484882Uncertain0.5100.6680.000-3.841Likely Benign0.977Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.287Likely Benign-2.21Neutral0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.26Benign0.00Affected0.11030.0758-2-2-7.314.97
c.176T>C
L59P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L59P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. ESM1b is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a pathogenic verdict (2 pathogenic vs. 1 benign). Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.212910Structured0.484882Uncertain0.5100.6680.000-7.076In-Between0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.362Likely Benign-2.74Deleterious0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.25Benign0.00Affected0.37870.1382-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.176T>G
L59R
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant L59R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome; Foldetta results are unavailable. The predictions are therefore split, with an equal number of benign and pathogenic calls, and the high‑accuracy tools provide contradictory signals. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the presence of multiple pathogenic predictions and the high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized result, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.212910Structured0.484882Uncertain0.5100.6680.000-4.037Likely Benign0.960Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.266Likely Benign-2.09Neutral0.943Possibly Damaging0.944Probably Damaging3.26Benign0.00Affected0.12980.0600-3-2-8.343.03
c.1770C>A
S590R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S590R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools (AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, SGM‑Consensus, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, Rosetta, and Foldetta) all predict a pathogenic impact; FoldX is uncertain and therefore not counted. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the lack of benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000-18.228Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.69Ambiguous0.63.21Destabilizing2.45Destabilizing1.28Destabilizing0.391Likely Benign-4.88Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging3.11Benign0.01Affected0.09830.33880-1-3.769.11
c.1770C>G
S590R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S590R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools (AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, SGM‑Consensus, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, Rosetta, and Foldetta) all predict a pathogenic impact; FoldX is uncertain and therefore not counted. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the lack of benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.022667Structured0.088943Uncertain0.9180.1990.000-18.228Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.69Ambiguous0.63.21Destabilizing2.45Destabilizing1.28Destabilizing0.389Likely Benign-4.88Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging3.11Benign0.01Affected0.09830.33880-1-3.769.11
c.1771G>A
A591T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A591T is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance designation and is observed in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440823‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions come from premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM Consensus as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. No other folding‑stability metrics are available. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic interpretation, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018787Structured0.093848Uncertain0.8820.1850.000Conflicting 36-33440823-G-A181.12e-5-9.572Likely Pathogenic0.704Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.61Ambiguous0.21.00Ambiguous1.31Ambiguous1.19Destabilizing0.270Likely Benign-3.40Deleterious0.955Possibly Damaging0.209Benign3.48Benign0.01Affected3.37350.12250.415510-2.530.03202.9-43.40.20.00.70.1XPotentially BenignThe methyl group of the Ala591 side chain, located in the middle of an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), packs against hydrophobic residues (e.g., Ile483, Phe484) of an opposing partially helical loop (res. Phe476-Asn487).In the variant simulations, the hydroxyl group of Thr591 can form hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl of Ile843 in the opposing loop or the backbone carbonyl group of Arg587. These interactions could either reinforce the tertiary assembly or weaken the α helix unity. Additionally, the Thr591 side chain can hydrogen bond with the guanidinium group of the Arg587 side chain, potentially strengthening the α helix unity.Overall, the residue swap does not seem to cause any major negative effects on the protein structure.
c.1771G>C
A591P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant A591P is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a pathogenic effect: pathogenic predictions come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic). Benign predictions are limited to REVEL and FATHMM. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also indicates pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that contrasts with its ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018787Structured0.093848Uncertain0.8820.1850.000Uncertain 1-14.479Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.78Destabilizing0.37.29Destabilizing5.54Destabilizing1.45Destabilizing0.404Likely Benign-4.41Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.853Possibly Damaging3.35Benign0.01Affected3.37350.18720.30871-1-3.426.04191.5-10.10.20.10.40.1XPotentially PathogenicThe methyl group of the Ala591 side chain, located in the middle of an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), packs against hydrophobic residues (e.g., Ile483, Phe484) of an opposing partially helical loop (res. Phe476-Asn487).In the variant simulations, Pro591 lacks a free backbone amide group and, therefore, cannot form a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl of Arg587 as Ala591 does in the WT. This notably weakens the α helix integrity and compromises the continuity of the helix. In reality, the effect on the structure during protein folding could be more severe.
c.1771G>T
A591S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A591S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign effect, and the Foldetta stability analysis is inconclusive (unavailable). Consequently, the variant is most likely benign based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.018787Structured0.093848Uncertain0.8820.1850.000-7.535In-Between0.126Likely BenignLikely Benign0.58Ambiguous0.11.21Ambiguous0.90Ambiguous0.49Likely Benign0.083Likely Benign-2.11Neutral0.034Benign0.082Benign3.52Benign0.19Tolerated0.24050.330411-2.616.00
c.1772C>A
A591D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A591D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining evaluated algorithms (AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, premPS, FoldX‑MD, Rosetta, Foldetta, and the SGM Consensus) uniformly predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome; FoldX‑MD is uncertain but does not counter the overall trend. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the absence of benign evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018787Structured0.093848Uncertain0.8820.1850.000-14.747Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.55Ambiguous0.22.77Destabilizing2.16Destabilizing1.40Destabilizing0.414Likely Benign-5.02Deleterious0.919Possibly Damaging0.495Possibly Damaging3.42Benign0.00Affected0.15500.17410-2-5.344.01
c.1772C>G
A591G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A591G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote). Only PROVEAN predicts a pathogenic outcome. Predictions that are inconclusive or unavailable are FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact for A591G, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.018787Structured0.093848Uncertain0.8820.1850.000-6.596Likely Benign0.233Likely BenignLikely Benign1.22Ambiguous0.21.74Ambiguous1.48Ambiguous0.83Ambiguous0.142Likely Benign-2.77Deleterious0.007Benign0.009Benign3.60Benign0.16Tolerated0.21170.222810-2.2-14.03
c.1772C>T
A591V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A591V missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440824‑C‑T). Functional prediction tools show discordant results: benign calls come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is uncertain, and the SGM Consensus remains Likely Pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, and this assessment is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.018787Structured0.093848Uncertain0.8820.1850.0006-33440824-C-T21.24e-6-12.282Likely Pathogenic0.926Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.35Ambiguous0.40.98Ambiguous1.17Ambiguous0.86Ambiguous0.321Likely Benign-3.79Deleterious0.970Probably Damaging0.373Benign3.35Benign0.02Affected3.37350.11280.4228002.428.05
c.1774T>A
S592T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S592T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Foldetta, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) classify the change as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support this dichotomy: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign outcome, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a unanimous pathogenic vote among AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—indicates pathogenicity; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also reports a benign effect. Predictions from FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS are inconclusive and are treated as unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple independent predictors points to a pathogenic effect for S592T, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.012270Structured0.100070Uncertain0.9130.1820.000-11.670Likely Pathogenic0.677Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.86Ambiguous0.1-0.88Ambiguous-0.01Likely Benign0.61Ambiguous0.819Likely Pathogenic-2.79Deleterious0.933Possibly Damaging0.933Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.17Tolerated0.15310.4684110.114.03
c.1774T>C
S592P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S592P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is pathogenic. No predictions are inconclusive or missing. Based on the overwhelming agreement among pathogenic predictors and the absence of benign evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.012270Structured0.100070Uncertain0.9130.1820.000-14.621Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.26Destabilizing0.12.36Destabilizing3.31Destabilizing1.24Destabilizing0.909Likely Pathogenic-4.77Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.29Pathogenic0.11Tolerated0.24120.42591-1-0.810.04
c.1774T>G
S592A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S592A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas a majority (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic outcome. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results are Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.012270Structured0.100070Uncertain0.9130.1820.000-10.902Likely Pathogenic0.572Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.48Likely Benign0.1-0.93Ambiguous-0.71Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.661Likely Pathogenic-2.72Deleterious0.980Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.44Tolerated0.48780.3318112.6-16.00
c.1775C>T
S592L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S592L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus predictions from multiple in‑silico tools show a predominance of pathogenic calls: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict deleterious effects, whereas benign predictions are limited to Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT. Uncertain results are reported only by FoldX and Rosetta. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, SGM Consensus confirms a pathogenic status, and Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, predicts a benign effect. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that S592L is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.012270Structured0.100070Uncertain0.9130.1820.000-12.948Likely Pathogenic0.960Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.94Ambiguous0.3-1.89Ambiguous-0.48Likely Benign0.50Likely Benign0.711Likely Pathogenic-5.57Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.12Pathogenic0.25Tolerated0.10890.4367-3-24.626.08
c.1777C>A
L593I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 L593I missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic outcome are FoldX, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b. Predictions that are uncertain are Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as benign, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect. The variant’s predicted benign status does not contradict its ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.009728Structured0.110534Uncertain0.9410.1510.000-8.617Likely Pathogenic0.448AmbiguousLikely Benign2.16Destabilizing0.30.76Ambiguous1.46Ambiguous0.39Likely Benign0.169Likely Benign-1.59Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.14Benign0.17Tolerated0.10710.3582220.70.00
c.1777C>G
L593V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 L593V missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic impact are FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b. Uncertain or inconclusive results come from Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields a pathogenic prediction; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence (six pathogenic vs. four benign) points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD presence, so there is no contradiction with existing database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.009728Structured0.110534Uncertain0.9410.1510.000-10.327Likely Pathogenic0.551AmbiguousLikely Benign2.81Destabilizing0.21.10Ambiguous1.96Ambiguous1.39Destabilizing0.268Likely Benign-2.59Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging3.04Benign0.12Tolerated0.15990.3577210.4-14.03
c.1777C>T
L593F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L593F is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions that are inconclusive—FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.110534Uncertain0.9410.1510.000-12.723Likely Pathogenic0.954Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.46Ambiguous0.40.24Likely Benign0.85Ambiguous0.62Ambiguous0.304Likely Benign-3.78Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging2.95Benign0.01Affected0.08840.263120-1.034.02
c.1778T>A
L593H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L593H is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not present in gnomAD. In silico predictors that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM. All other evaluated tools—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict a pathogenic effect. High‑accuracy methods further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Overall, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the consensus of predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.110534Uncertain0.9410.1510.000Uncertain 1-16.504Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.52Destabilizing0.22.32Destabilizing2.42Destabilizing2.75Destabilizing0.812Likely Pathogenic-6.77Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.77Benign0.00Affected3.37350.11010.0541-2-3-7.023.98222.020.70.00.00.20.0XXPotentially PathogenicThe iso-propyl side chain of Leu593, located in an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), packs favourably with multiple hydrophobic residues in the inter-helix space (e.g., Leu598, Ile589, Phe594, Phe561).In the variant simulations, His593 retains a similar packing arrangement via its aromatic imidazole ring. However, the polar nitrogen atoms introduce hydrogen bond donors and acceptors into the previously hydrophobic space. The epsilon protonated nitrogen of His593 forms a stable hydrogen bond with the phenol group of the Tyr505 side chain in an α helix (res. Gln503-Tyr518).While the residue swap could affect the tertiary assembly and the underlying protein folding process, it is difficult to determine if the mutation would be tolerated based solely on the variant simulations.
c.1778T>C
L593P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L593P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also classifies the variant as pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that contradicts its current ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.110534Uncertain0.9410.1510.000Uncertain 1-13.961Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.75Destabilizing0.910.77Destabilizing8.26Destabilizing2.43Destabilizing0.777Likely Pathogenic-6.77Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.77Benign0.00Affected0.37830.1274-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1778T>G
L593R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L593R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining 13 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.110534Uncertain0.9410.1510.000-16.139Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.27Destabilizing0.33.39Destabilizing3.83Destabilizing2.11Destabilizing0.740Likely Pathogenic-5.87Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.77Benign0.00Affected0.14400.0615-3-2-8.343.03
c.1780T>A
F594I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594I is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. In silico assessment shows that all evaluated pathogenicity predictors—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—classify the substitution as pathogenic, while FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta provide inconclusive results. High‑accuracy tools further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Consequently, the overwhelming majority of predictions point to a pathogenic impact. The variant is therefore most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-11.271Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.93Ambiguous0.11.67Ambiguous1.80Ambiguous1.61Destabilizing0.935Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.91Pathogenic0.02Affected0.16940.1925101.7-34.02
c.1780T>C
F594L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX (uncertain), Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while only FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. In the high‑accuracy subset, AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta is uncertain. No tools predict a benign outcome. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists for this change.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-11.270Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.50Ambiguous0.12.41Destabilizing1.96Ambiguous1.56Destabilizing0.940Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.98Pathogenic0.03Affected0.17900.2439201.0-34.02
c.1780T>G
F594V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594V lies within the GAP domain. ClinVar has no entry for this variant, and it is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously favor a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity; only Rosetta is uncertain. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) is pathogenic. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which simply lacks an entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-12.648Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.91Destabilizing0.21.90Ambiguous2.41Destabilizing1.80Destabilizing0.931Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.91Pathogenic0.01Affected0.18130.1575-1-11.4-48.04
c.1781T>A
F594Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to Rosetta, which scores the substitution as benign. In contrast, the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, SIFT, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, SGM‑Consensus, and premPS all classify the variant as pathogenic. FoldX and Foldetta are uncertain, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized is also uncertain, so these results are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta remain inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that F594Y is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-13.692Likely Pathogenic0.935Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.30Ambiguous0.20.41Likely Benign0.86Ambiguous1.21Destabilizing0.929Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging-1.98Pathogenic0.01Affected0.12640.073173-4.116.00
c.1781T>C
F594S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors classify it as pathogenic: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenic. With unanimous pathogenic predictions and no ClinVar evidence to contradict, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-15.930Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.70Destabilizing0.35.20Destabilizing4.95Destabilizing2.60Destabilizing0.952Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-2.04Pathogenic0.00Affected0.38040.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1781T>G
F594C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594C is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenicity. All available evidence points to a damaging effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-14.591Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.97Destabilizing0.04.35Destabilizing4.16Destabilizing1.36Destabilizing0.943Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-2.05Pathogenic0.03Affected0.25950.0615-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1782C>A
F594L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX (uncertain), Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while only FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. In the high‑accuracy subset, AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta is uncertain. No tools predict a benign outcome. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists for this change.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-11.270Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.50Ambiguous0.12.41Destabilizing1.96Ambiguous1.56Destabilizing0.893Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.98Pathogenic0.03Affected0.17900.2439201.0-34.02
c.1782C>G
F594L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F594L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity; SGM‑Consensus also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. Stability‑focused methods give mixed results: FoldX is uncertain, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is also uncertain, so these do not provide decisive evidence. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the consensus of available predictions strongly suggests that F594L is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009187Structured0.120166Uncertain0.9460.1470.000-11.270Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.50Ambiguous0.12.41Destabilizing1.96Ambiguous1.56Destabilizing0.893Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.98Pathogenic0.03Affected0.17900.2439201.0-34.02
c.1783C>A
L595M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L595M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Functional prediction tools show a split consensus: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, PROVEAN, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta predicts a benign effect on protein stability. No prediction or folding result is missing; all available outputs are reported. Based on the balanced distribution of benign and pathogenic calls, the variant is most likely benign, but the evidence is conflicting and does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.015344Structured0.128444Uncertain0.9200.1500.000-11.325Likely Pathogenic0.840Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.32Likely Benign0.00.41Likely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.90Ambiguous0.387Likely Benign-1.99Neutral1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.74Benign0.02Affected0.09300.314042-1.918.03
c.1783C>G
L595V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L595V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls are made by premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions marked uncertain include FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy consensus methods give a clearer picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is also inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.015344Structured0.128444Uncertain0.9200.1500.000-13.490Likely Pathogenic0.905Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.29Ambiguous0.10.24Likely Benign0.77Ambiguous1.01Destabilizing0.398Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.78Benign0.01Affected0.14410.3406210.4-14.03
c.1784T>A
L595Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L595Q is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM. All other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict a pathogenic effect, and the SGM‑Consensus score indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns a pathogenic prediction, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also yields a likely pathogenic result, while Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance but suggests a higher likelihood of pathogenicity.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.015344Structured0.128444Uncertain0.9200.1500.000Uncertain 1-15.101Likely Pathogenic0.984Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.79Ambiguous0.11.40Ambiguous1.10Ambiguous1.99Destabilizing0.733Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.75Benign0.00Affected3.37350.10740.1563-2-2-7.314.97
c.1784T>C
L595P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L595P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 3172762.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.015344Structured0.128444Uncertain0.9200.1500.000Uncertain 1-11.856Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.09Destabilizing0.85.88Destabilizing3.99Destabilizing1.78Destabilizing0.747Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.72Benign0.00Affected3.37350.33360.1713-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1784T>G
L595R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L595R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, while the majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic impact; FoldX and Foldetta are uncertain. High‑accuracy methods give a pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the evidence strongly favors a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as no ClinVar record exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.015344Structured0.128444Uncertain0.9200.1500.000-14.601Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.22Ambiguous0.02.20Destabilizing1.71Ambiguous1.52Destabilizing0.707Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.76Benign0.00Affected0.13440.1005-3-2-8.343.03
c.1786C>A
R596S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R596S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. In silico assessment shows a consensus of pathogenicity: all evaluated tools (REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a deleterious effect, while Rosetta remains uncertain. Grouping by agreement, no tool predicts benign; the pathogenic group includes 13 predictions, with Rosetta excluded as inconclusive. High‑accuracy methods further support a damaging outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.017797Structured0.135423Uncertain0.9180.1340.000-13.921Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.51Destabilizing0.21.53Ambiguous2.52Destabilizing1.17Destabilizing0.626Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.42Pathogenic0.00Affected0.31290.26800-13.7-69.11
c.1786C>G
R596G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R596G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity largely agree: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a deleterious effect, while premPS remains uncertain. No tools predict a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. Based on the consensus of these predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.017797Structured0.135423Uncertain0.9180.1340.000-13.525Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.02Destabilizing0.12.36Destabilizing3.19Destabilizing0.81Ambiguous0.629Likely Pathogenic-6.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.41Pathogenic0.00Affected0.32140.2316-3-24.1-99.14
c.1786C>T
R596C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R596C is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440838‑C‑T). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include only premPS. All other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus—classify the variant as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, while Rosetta remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenic. **Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the collective predictions, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.**

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.017797Structured0.135423Uncertain0.9180.1340.000Conflicting 26-33440838-C-T63.72e-6-10.805Likely Pathogenic0.972Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.94Destabilizing0.01.49Ambiguous2.22Destabilizing-0.03Likely Benign0.633Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.41Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.34290.2211-4-37.0-53.05230.797.9-0.10.0-0.30.4XXPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg596, located in an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate group of Glu495 from another α helix (res. Leu489-Glu519). In the WT simulations, the side chain of Arg596 hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of Asn487, Glu486, Arg485, and Phe484. Additionally, Arg596 can hydrogen bond with the carboxamide group of the Asn487 side chain on an opposing loop that links two α helices (res. Ala461-Arg475, res. Leu489-Glu519).In the variant simulations, the thiol group of the Cys596 side chain is unable to form salt bridges or any of the hydrogen bonds that the Arg596 side chain can. Thus, the residue swap could affect the tertiary structure assembly more profoundly than observed in the simulations. Notably, Arg596 plays a key role in positioning the aforementioned loop, which is crucial for the placement of the “arginine finger” or the Arg485 side chain during RasGTPase activation.
c.1787G>A
R596H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R596H is listed in ClinVar as benign (ClinVar ID 1989474.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440839‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus all report pathogenicity, while only Rosetta predicts a benign outcome. Two tools are inconclusive: AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (derived from the four pathogenic votes) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, directly contradicting the ClinVar benign classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.017797Structured0.135423Uncertain0.9180.1340.000Likely Benign 16-33440839-G-A159.29e-6-11.128Likely Pathogenic0.950Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.00Destabilizing0.90.43Likely Benign1.72Ambiguous1.35Destabilizing0.717Likely Pathogenic-4.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging2.43Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.32900.1208201.3-19.05223.580.5-0.10.0-0.10.3XXPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg596, located in an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate group of Glu495 from another α helix (res. Leu489-Glu519). In the WT simulations, the side chain of Arg596 hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of Asn487, Glu486, Arg485, and Phe484. Additionally, Arg596 can hydrogen bond with the carboxamide group of the Asn487 side chain on an opposing loop that links two α helices (res. Ala461-Arg475, res. Leu489-Glu519).In the variant simulations, the imidazole ring of His596 can form hydrogen bonds with the same residues as arginine; however, these interactions are not as coordinated or strong in comparison. Thus, the residue swap could affect the tertiary structure assembly more profoundly than observed in the simulations. Notably, Arg596 plays a key role in positioning the aforementioned loop, which is crucial for the placement of the “arginine finger” or the Arg485 side chain during RasGTPase activation.
c.1787G>C
R596P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R596P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No contradictory evidence is present. Based on the uniform predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.017797Structured0.135423Uncertain0.9180.1340.000-13.786Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.80Destabilizing0.14.78Destabilizing5.79Destabilizing1.15Destabilizing0.780Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.42Pathogenic0.00Affected0.23350.33560-22.9-59.07
c.1787G>T
R596L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 R596L missense variant is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are Foldetta and premPS, whereas the remaining pathogenic‑predicting tools—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—all indicate a deleterious impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (derived from the same four high‑confidence predictors) also indicates likely pathogenic, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts a benign effect. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for R596L, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.017797Structured0.135423Uncertain0.9180.1340.000Uncertain 1-13.197Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.51Ambiguous0.3-0.58Ambiguous0.47Likely Benign-0.02Likely Benign0.756Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.45Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.17550.3433-3-28.3-43.03234.263.4-0.10.0-0.50.6XXPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg596, located in an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate group of Glu495 from another α helix (res. Leu489-Glu519). In the WT simulations, the side chain of Arg596 hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of Asn487, Glu486, Arg485, and Phe484. Additionally, Arg596 can hydrogen bond with the carboxamide group of the Asn487 side chain on an opposing loop that links two α helices (res. Ala461-Arg475, res. Leu489-Glu519).However, in the variant simulations, the branched hydrocarbon side chain of Leu596 cannot form any of the hydrogen bonds or salt bridges maintained by the considerably bulkier and positively charged Arg596 side chain. Instead, Leu596 packs hydrophobically with the phenyl ring of Phe484 in the linker loop or residues from the opposing helix (e.g., Ile494, Thr491).Thus, the residue swap could affect the tertiary structure assembly more profoundly than observed in the simulations. Notably, Arg596 plays a key role in positioning the aforementioned loop, which is crucial for the placement of the “arginine finger” or the Arg485 side chain during RasGTPase activation.10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.11.011
c.1789T>A
F597I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F597I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect. Benign predictions: none. Pathogenic predictions: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. All available evidence points to a pathogenic effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.000-13.674Likely Pathogenic0.986Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.62Destabilizing0.92.15Destabilizing2.89Destabilizing1.45Destabilizing0.951Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-2.18Pathogenic0.01Affected0.20080.1815101.7-34.02
c.1789T>C
F597L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F597L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3658115.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only SIFT, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict it to be pathogenic. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for F597L, which is consistent with its ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.000Uncertain 1-10.173Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.74Ambiguous0.12.12Destabilizing1.43Ambiguous1.20Destabilizing0.929Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-2.06Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.22320.2596201.0-34.02
c.1789T>G
F597V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F597V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect. Benign predictions: none. Pathogenic predictions: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. All available evidence points to a pathogenic effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.000-13.883Likely Pathogenic0.981Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.75Destabilizing0.72.02Destabilizing2.89Destabilizing1.60Destabilizing0.939Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-2.16Pathogenic0.01Affected0.22370.1583-1-11.4-48.04
c.178G>A
D60N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D60N missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not listed in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also as benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-3.610Likely Benign0.577Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.128Likely Benign-0.22Neutral0.805Possibly Damaging0.857Possibly Damaging4.13Benign0.00Affected0.12190.8168210.0-0.98
c.178G>C
D60H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D60H is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain” and the SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Benign”; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign interpretation, with no ClinVar entry to contradict this assessment.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-5.257Likely Benign0.934Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.165Likely Benign-1.59Neutral0.972Probably Damaging0.969Probably Damaging3.91Benign0.00Affected0.14330.84011-10.322.05
c.178G>T
D60Y
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D60Y missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. ESM1b is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a pathogenic verdict (2 pathogenic vs. 1 benign). Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from both general and high‑accuracy predictors indicates that the D60Y variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-7.748In-Between0.971Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.221Likely Benign-2.60Deleterious0.972Probably Damaging0.969Probably Damaging3.90Benign0.00Affected0.05170.7790-4-32.248.09
c.1790T>A
F597Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F597Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include ESM1b and Rosetta, whereas a majority of tools (REVEL, SIFT, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, PROVEAN, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. Predictions that are inconclusive or unavailable are FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, and Foldetta as Uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for F597Y. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.000-5.869Likely Benign0.796Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.41Ambiguous0.10.37Likely Benign0.89Ambiguous1.11Destabilizing0.877Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging-1.99Pathogenic0.02Affected0.14710.149473-4.116.00
c.1790T>C
F597S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F597S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree that the variant is deleterious: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a pathogenic effect. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. All available predictions are consistent and conclusive. Based on the unanimous computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.000-14.943Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.53Destabilizing0.34.90Destabilizing4.22Destabilizing2.18Destabilizing0.953Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-2.19Pathogenic0.00Affected0.40350.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1790T>G
F597C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F597C is reported in gnomAD (variant ID 6-33440842‑T‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. Based on the unanimous pathogenic predictions and the absence of any benign calls, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.0006-33440842-T-G16.19e-7-12.099Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.77Destabilizing0.24.17Destabilizing3.97Destabilizing1.97Destabilizing0.953Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-2.19Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.26180.0783-2-4-0.3-44.04
c.1791C>A
F597L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F597L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: the benign group contains only SIFT, while the pathogenic group includes SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive, providing no definitive evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a damaging effect, SGM‑Consensus concurs with a likely pathogenic classification, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of predictions indicate a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.000-10.173Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.74Ambiguous0.12.12Destabilizing1.43Ambiguous1.20Destabilizing0.879Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-2.06Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.22320.2596201.0-34.02
c.1791C>G
F597L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F597L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: the benign group contains only SIFT, while the pathogenic group includes SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive, providing no definitive evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a damaging effect, SGM‑Consensus concurs with a likely pathogenic classification, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of predictions indicate a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.142961Uncertain0.9440.1510.000-10.173Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.74Ambiguous0.12.12Destabilizing1.43Ambiguous1.20Destabilizing0.879Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-2.06Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.22320.2596201.0-34.02
c.1792C>A
L598I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L598I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and ESM1b. The remaining tools (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as benign, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of reliable predictions indicate a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.007259Structured0.147872Uncertain0.9530.1540.000-9.396Likely Pathogenic0.512AmbiguousLikely Benign0.80Ambiguous0.00.38Likely Benign0.59Ambiguous0.78Ambiguous0.246Likely Benign-1.96Neutral0.988Probably Damaging0.910Probably Damaging3.47Benign0.10Tolerated0.07920.2000220.70.00
c.1792C>G
L598V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L598V is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates a likely pathogenic effect. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, which contrasts with the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.007259Structured0.147872Uncertain0.9530.1540.000Uncertain 1-10.002Likely Pathogenic0.578Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.89Ambiguous0.11.58Ambiguous1.74Ambiguous1.01Destabilizing0.221Likely Benign-2.92Deleterious0.944Possibly Damaging0.786Possibly Damaging3.21Benign0.02Affected3.37350.10820.1795210.4-14.03218.429.60.00.00.80.0XPotentially BenignThe iso-butyl side chain of Leu598, located on an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), packs hydrophobically with other hydrophobic residues in the inter-helix space (e.g., Ile602, Phe594, Ile510).In the variant simulations, Val598, which has similar size and physicochemical properties to leucine, resides in the inter-helix hydrophobic space in a similar manner to Leu598 in the WT. This causes no negative effects on the protein structure.
c.1792C>T
L598F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L598F is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Computational predictors show mixed results: benign calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM; pathogenic calls come from SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized returned uncertain results, which are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy tools give a split view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM‑Consensus majority vote (AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts Likely Pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a benign effect. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward pathogenicity, with six pathogenic versus five benign predictions and no ClinVar entry to contradict this assessment.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.007259Structured0.147872Uncertain0.9530.1540.000-10.649Likely Pathogenic0.820Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.12Ambiguous0.7-0.24Likely Benign0.44Likely Benign0.47Likely Benign0.283Likely Benign-3.91Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.946Probably Damaging3.62Benign0.22Tolerated0.06300.141420-1.034.02
c.1793T>A
L598H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L598H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: FATHMM is the sole benign predictor, while all other evaluated algorithms (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns a pathogenic score; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.007259Structured0.147872Uncertain0.9530.1540.000-17.210Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.52Destabilizing0.22.37Destabilizing2.45Destabilizing2.24Destabilizing0.648Likely Pathogenic-6.87Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.10Benign0.00Affected0.10600.0879-2-3-7.023.98
c.1793T>C
L598P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L598P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce the pathogenic view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates it is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also classifies it as pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the consensus of these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.007259Structured0.147872Uncertain0.9530.1540.000-12.621Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic8.31Destabilizing0.512.04Destabilizing10.18Destabilizing2.02Destabilizing0.705Likely Pathogenic-6.87Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.10Benign0.00Affected0.27420.1192-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1793T>G
L598R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L598R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.007259Structured0.147872Uncertain0.9530.1540.000-17.392Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.70Destabilizing0.53.06Destabilizing2.88Destabilizing2.23Destabilizing0.682Likely Pathogenic-5.87Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.973Probably Damaging3.10Benign0.00Affected0.12970.0679-3-2-8.343.03
c.1795T>A
C599S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C599S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only SIFT, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus—predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as Uncertain. No prediction or folding stability result is missing; all available data are reported. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009865Structured0.151725Uncertain0.9600.1510.000-13.336Likely Pathogenic0.954Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.85Ambiguous0.01.57Ambiguous1.21Ambiguous1.27Destabilizing0.919Likely Pathogenic-9.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.45Pathogenic0.06Tolerated0.34140.14150-1-3.3-16.06
c.1795T>C
C599R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C599R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. In silico prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify it as pathogenic, while FoldX reports an uncertain outcome. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus, derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely pathogenic status; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009865Structured0.151725Uncertain0.9600.1510.000-15.968Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.00Ambiguous0.33.29Destabilizing2.15Destabilizing1.54Destabilizing0.909Likely Pathogenic-11.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.00Affected0.15190.1566-4-3-7.053.05
c.1795T>G
C599G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a deleterious effect include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Overall, the evidence strongly favors a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009865Structured0.151725Uncertain0.9600.1510.000-13.342Likely Pathogenic0.949Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.40Ambiguous0.00.90Ambiguous1.15Ambiguous1.43Destabilizing0.923Likely Pathogenic-11.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.03Affected0.24440.2130-3-3-2.9-46.09
c.1796G>A
C599Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C599Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include only premPS, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is labeled Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among the majority of tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009865Structured0.151725Uncertain0.9600.1510.000-13.563Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.00Destabilizing1.42.80Destabilizing3.40Destabilizing-0.29Likely Benign0.905Likely Pathogenic-10.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.49Pathogenic0.00Affected0.10920.25550-2-3.860.04
c.1796G>C
C599S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C599S is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: the sole benign prediction comes from SIFT, whereas the remaining nine tools—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus—indicate pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus predicts likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is uncertain. FoldX and Rosetta individually report uncertain stability changes. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a deleterious effect, so the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no ClinVar annotation to contradict this assessment.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009865Structured0.151725Uncertain0.9600.1510.000-13.336Likely Pathogenic0.954Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.85Ambiguous0.01.57Ambiguous1.21Ambiguous1.27Destabilizing0.866Likely Pathogenic-9.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.45Pathogenic0.06Tolerated0.34140.14150-1-3.3-16.06
c.1796G>T
C599F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C599F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess the variant’s effect largely agree on a deleterious outcome: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify it as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Only premPS predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding‑stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming majority of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009865Structured0.151725Uncertain0.9600.1510.000-13.969Likely Pathogenic0.985Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.72Destabilizing1.32.70Destabilizing3.21Destabilizing-0.42Likely Benign0.902Likely Pathogenic-10.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.47Pathogenic0.00Affected0.13190.3073-4-20.344.04
c.1797C>G
C599W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant C599W is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only premPS; all other evaluated algorithms (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009865Structured0.151725Uncertain0.9600.1510.000-17.500Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.85Destabilizing0.63.32Destabilizing3.59Destabilizing0.16Likely Benign0.715Likely Pathogenic-10.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.52Pathogenic0.00Affected0.15000.2363-8-2-3.483.07
c.1798C>A
P600T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P600T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include Foldetta, Rosetta, and premPS. Those that predict pathogenicity are REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, while Foldetta indicates a benign effect on protein folding stability. Overall, the majority of computational evidence supports a pathogenic effect for P600T, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.162960Uncertain0.9470.1470.000-11.945Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.61Destabilizing0.1-2.90Stabilizing-0.15Likely Benign0.24Likely Benign0.737Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging1.34Pathogenic0.01Affected0.18710.49540-10.93.99
c.1798C>G
P600A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P600A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign predictions come from Rosetta and premPS, while the remaining 11 tools (REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and SGM Consensus) predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) labels it “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, reports an uncertain result. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates that P600A is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.162960Uncertain0.9470.1470.000-11.385Likely Pathogenic0.974Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.16Destabilizing0.0-3.30Stabilizing-0.57Ambiguous0.39Likely Benign0.581Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging1.38Pathogenic0.03Affected0.36920.41321-13.4-26.04
c.1798C>T
P600S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P600S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include Rosetta and Foldetta, whereas the majority of other in‑silico predictors (REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. No contradictory evidence exists in ClinVar. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.162960Uncertain0.9470.1470.000-12.002Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.54Destabilizing0.1-2.60Stabilizing-0.03Likely Benign0.52Ambiguous0.717Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging1.40Pathogenic0.01Affected0.37440.42001-10.8-10.04
c.1799C>A
P600Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P600Q is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign predictions are limited to Rosetta, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—all classify the variant as pathogenic. Uncertain results come from FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that P600Q is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.162960Uncertain0.9470.1470.000-14.187Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.76Ambiguous0.0-3.09Stabilizing-0.67Ambiguous0.53Ambiguous0.739Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging1.34Pathogenic0.00Affected0.17400.39700-1-1.931.01
c.1799C>G
P600R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P600R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include Rosetta and premPS, whereas the majority of tools—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict a pathogenic outcome; FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy methods give a consistent pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the computational evidence strongly favors a pathogenic classification, and this does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.162960Uncertain0.9470.1470.000-15.304Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.48Ambiguous0.1-2.48Stabilizing-0.50Ambiguous0.37Likely Benign0.756Likely Pathogenic-8.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging1.34Pathogenic0.00Affected0.16040.27340-2-2.959.07
c.1799C>T
P600L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P600L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include Rosetta and premPS, whereas the majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic impact. FoldX and Foldetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy methods specifically show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for P600L, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.009728Structured0.162960Uncertain0.9470.1470.000-13.209Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.36Ambiguous0.1-3.58Stabilizing-1.11Ambiguous-0.49Likely Benign0.734Likely Pathogenic-9.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging1.35Pathogenic0.00Affected0.23910.5555-3-35.416.04
c.179A>C
D60A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D60A missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain” and the SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Benign”; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evaluated tools lean toward a benign interpretation, with no evidence of pathogenicity from the high‑confidence methods. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none exists for this allele.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-4.500Likely Benign0.918Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.167Likely Benign-2.17Neutral0.909Possibly Damaging0.857Possibly Damaging3.96Benign0.00Affected0.38510.74050-25.3-44.01
c.179A>G
D60G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D60G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a Likely Benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-4.423Likely Benign0.775Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.128Likely Benign-1.67Neutral0.805Possibly Damaging0.857Possibly Damaging3.94Benign0.00Affected0.41430.70691-13.1-58.04
c.179A>T
D60V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D60V missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID = None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect comprise PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive (2 vs 2), and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evaluated predictors (7 of 10) indicate pathogenicity, while only three suggest benignity. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-6.576Likely Benign0.980Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.254Likely Benign-2.72Deleterious0.972Probably Damaging0.954Probably Damaging3.91Benign0.00Affected0.07650.7962-2-37.7-15.96
c.17C>A
A6D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A6D is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33420281‑C‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. Only SIFT predicts it to be pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) labels it “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is also likely benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools, including the high‑accuracy methods, indicates that the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.566480Disordered0.549054Binding0.3770.9200.8756-33420281-C-A-3.340Likely Benign0.210Likely BenignLikely Benign0.211Likely Benign0.34Neutral0.117Benign0.010Benign4.07Benign0.00Affected4.3210.19450.2530-20-5.344.01
c.17C>G
A6G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A6G is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.566480Disordered0.549054Binding0.3770.9200.875-2.786Likely Benign0.097Likely BenignLikely Benign0.107Likely Benign0.31Neutral0.052Benign0.004Benign4.08Benign0.00Affected0.21390.436910-2.2-14.03
c.17C>T
A6V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 A6V missense variant is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33420281‑C‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. Only SIFT predicts it to be pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) labels it “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is also benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.566480Disordered0.549054Binding0.3770.9200.8756-33420281-C-T-3.781Likely Benign0.191Likely BenignLikely Benign0.123Likely Benign0.32Neutral0.117Benign0.007Benign4.09Benign0.00Affected4.3210.09870.5799002.428.05
c.1801G>A
A601T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A601T missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are FATHMM and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the remaining pathogenic‑predicting tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently flag the variant as deleterious. Two tools, FoldX and premPS, return uncertain results and are not considered evidence for either side. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as pathogenic. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.008895Structured0.174517Uncertain0.9550.1560.000-10.635Likely Pathogenic0.662Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.55Ambiguous0.12.66Destabilizing2.11Destabilizing0.76Ambiguous0.642Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging2.57Benign0.00Affected0.15640.555410-2.530.03
c.1801G>C
A601P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A601P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: FATHMM is the sole benign predictor, while the remaining 12 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all classify it as pathogenic. The high‑accuracy methods—AlphaMissense‑Optimized, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs)—all report pathogenicity. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.008895Structured0.174517Uncertain0.9550.1560.000-14.584Likely Pathogenic0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.90Destabilizing0.68.84Destabilizing6.87Destabilizing0.87Ambiguous0.713Likely Pathogenic-4.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.56Benign0.01Affected0.21760.43281-1-3.426.04
c.1801G>T
A601S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A601S missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b. The remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS—return uncertain or inconclusive results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is a 2‑vs‑2 tie and thus inconclusive. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also yields an uncertain result. Overall, more tools (six) predict pathogenicity than benign (three), and no ClinVar evidence contradicts this assessment. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.008895Structured0.174517Uncertain0.9550.1560.000-11.248Likely Pathogenic0.136Likely BenignLikely Benign0.79Ambiguous0.11.63Ambiguous1.21Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.541Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.983Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging2.56Benign0.01Affected0.27320.473011-2.616.00
c.1802C>A
A601E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A601E is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity largely agree: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a pathogenic effect, while only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. No predictions or stability results are missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict its current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.008895Structured0.174517Uncertain0.9550.1560.000Conflicting 2-16.752Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.68Destabilizing0.85.76Destabilizing6.22Destabilizing1.24Destabilizing0.588Likely Pathogenic-4.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging2.54Benign0.00Affected3.37350.13460.14440-1-5.358.04240.0-82.30.00.00.70.1XXXPotentially PathogenicThe methyl side chain of Ala601, located on an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), packs hydrophobically against other hydrophobic residues in the inter-helix space (e.g., Phe597, Leu598, Leu506, Phe608).In the variant simulations, the carboxylate group of Glu601 faces the inter-helix space and is forced to shift slightly away from the hydrophobic niche. Additionally, in two of the simulations, Glu601 forms a salt bridge with Arg499, causing the otherwise stable salt bridge between Arg499 and Glu496 at the outer surface of an α helix (res. Leu489-Glu519) to break due to the residue swap.These effects suggest that the protein folding process could be seriously affected. Moreover, due to its location at the GAP-Ras interface, it could also impact the complex formation with the GTPase.
c.1802C>G
A601G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A601G missense variant is listed in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440854‑C‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are FATHMM and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; those that agree on a pathogenic effect are REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b. The high‑accuracy consensus methods give a pathogenic verdict: the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is also pathogenic. AlphaMissense‑Default and premPS are uncertain, and no evidence is available from other folding‑stability tools. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for A601G, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.008895Structured0.174517Uncertain0.9550.1560.0006-33440854-C-G16.19e-7-11.772Likely Pathogenic0.543AmbiguousLikely Benign2.03Destabilizing0.02.31Destabilizing2.17Destabilizing0.94Ambiguous0.511Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging2.55Benign0.01Affected3.37350.23370.437001-2.2-14.03
c.1802C>T
A601V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A601V is listed in ClinVar (ID 968190.0) with an uncertain clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from Rosetta and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score. Four tools (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.008895Structured0.174517Uncertain0.9550.1560.000Uncertain 1-10.447Likely Pathogenic0.853Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.64Ambiguous0.10.35Likely Benign1.00Ambiguous0.81Ambiguous0.535Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging2.74Benign0.03Affected3.37350.13380.5263002.428.05228.5-45.50.00.00.40.5XPotentially BenignThe methyl side chain of Ala601, located on an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603), packs hydrophobically against other hydrophobic residues in the inter-helix space (e.g., Phe597, Leu598, Leu506, Phe608).In the variant simulations, Val601, which has similar size and physicochemical properties to alanine, resides in the inter-helix hydrophobic space in a similar manner to Ala601 in the WT, causing no apparent negative effect on the protein structure. However, the effect of the residue swap on the SynGAP-Ras complex formation or GTPase activation cannot be fully addressed using the SynGAP solvent-only simulations.
c.1804A>C
I602L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I602L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas a majority of tools predict pathogenicity: REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Three tools (Rosetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward pathogenicity, with no conflict with the ClinVar status because the variant is not yet classified in that database. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.010221Structured0.186541Uncertain0.9630.1710.000-9.660Likely Pathogenic0.558AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.15Likely Benign0.11.12Ambiguous0.49Likely Benign0.91Ambiguous0.631Likely Pathogenic-1.99Neutral0.645Possibly Damaging0.718Possibly Damaging-1.54Pathogenic0.04Affected0.10440.319922-0.70.00
c.1804A>G
I602V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 I602V missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the change as benign include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and FATHMM. Uncertain or inconclusive results come from FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts benign, while Foldetta’s stability analysis remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.010221Structured0.186541Uncertain0.9630.1710.000-6.317Likely Benign0.075Likely BenignLikely Benign1.24Ambiguous0.00.78Ambiguous1.01Ambiguous1.01Destabilizing0.309Likely Benign-0.84Neutral0.528Possibly Damaging0.179Benign-1.89Pathogenic0.03Affected0.11730.332643-0.3-14.03
c.1804A>T
I602F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 I602F missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. No tool predicts a benign outcome. Predictions that are uncertain or inconclusive are Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as Uncertain. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010221Structured0.186541Uncertain0.9630.1710.000-13.974Likely Pathogenic0.948Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.47Destabilizing1.1-0.61Ambiguous0.93Ambiguous0.87Ambiguous0.822Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.937Probably Damaging-1.82Pathogenic0.00Affected0.07080.234310-1.734.02
c.1805T>A
I602N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I602N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. All available evidence points to a damaging impact. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010221Structured0.186541Uncertain0.9630.1710.000-16.033Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.94Destabilizing0.23.34Destabilizing3.14Destabilizing2.31Destabilizing0.880Likely Pathogenic-6.89Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-2.01Pathogenic0.00Affected0.07180.0700-2-3-8.00.94
c.1805T>C
I602T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I602T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all classify it as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. No tool reports a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic according to the available computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010221Structured0.186541Uncertain0.9630.1710.000-12.238Likely Pathogenic0.948Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.39Destabilizing0.12.14Destabilizing2.27Destabilizing1.94Destabilizing0.931Likely Pathogenic-4.82Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging-2.00Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08900.09890-1-5.2-12.05
c.1805T>G
I602S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I602S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect. Benign predictions: none. Pathogenic predictions: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenic. No conflicting benign evidence is available. Therefore, based on the consensus of all available predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010221Structured0.186541Uncertain0.9630.1710.000-15.558Likely Pathogenic0.983Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.50Destabilizing0.13.79Destabilizing3.65Destabilizing2.04Destabilizing0.935Likely Pathogenic-5.89Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-2.01Pathogenic0.00Affected0.22130.1087-1-2-5.3-26.08
c.1806T>G
I602M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 I602M variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, the majority of tools predict it to be pathogenic: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show a split: AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta both predict benign, whereas the SGM‑Consensus predicts pathogenic. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010221Structured0.186541Uncertain0.9630.1710.000-10.839Likely Pathogenic0.638Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.10.48Likely Benign0.26Likely Benign1.10Destabilizing0.675Likely Pathogenic-2.91Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.97Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08010.232121-2.618.03
c.1807A>C
M603L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 M603L missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the protein‑folding stability method Foldetta. Those that predict pathogenicity are REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results: Rosetta and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, more evidence supports a benign effect (six benign versus five pathogenic predictions, with two uncertain). Thus, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-7.134In-Between0.590Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.10.86Ambiguous0.45Likely Benign-0.18Likely Benign0.548Likely Pathogenic-2.16Neutral0.484Possibly Damaging0.654Possibly Damaging-0.98Pathogenic0.52Tolerated0.13450.3227421.9-18.03
c.1807A>G
M603V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M603V is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from premPS and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—return uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; Foldetta also remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M603V. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar classification, so there is no contradiction with existing database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-10.442Likely Pathogenic0.800Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.34Ambiguous0.20.62Ambiguous0.98Ambiguous-0.15Likely Benign0.668Likely Pathogenic-3.48Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-0.92Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.26980.2601212.3-32.06
c.1807A>T
M603L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 M603L missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Rosetta and ESM1b give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward a benign interpretation, but the SGM Consensus indicates pathogenicity, leaving the variant’s clinical significance uncertain. This assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists for M603L.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-7.134In-Between0.590Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.10.86Ambiguous0.45Likely Benign-0.18Likely Benign0.548Likely Pathogenic-2.16Neutral0.484Possibly Damaging0.654Possibly Damaging-0.98Pathogenic0.52Tolerated0.13450.3227421.9-18.03
c.1808T>A
M603K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M603K is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls come from REVEL, SGM Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while only FoldX reports a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. No other tools provide a clear benign signal. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-15.561Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.17Likely Benign0.01.19Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous0.67Ambiguous0.933Likely Pathogenic-5.64Deleterious0.923Possibly Damaging0.922Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.00Affected0.12680.04880-1-5.8-3.02
c.1808T>C
M603T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M603T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that provide a clear verdict all classify the substitution as pathogenic: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). No tool in the dataset reports a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus indicates likely pathogenic, while the Foldetta stability analysis is inconclusive and therefore not considered evidence. No contradictory evidence is present in ClinVar. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, with no conflict with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-13.152Likely Pathogenic0.976Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.71Ambiguous0.21.71Ambiguous1.71Ambiguous0.66Ambiguous0.903Likely Pathogenic-5.48Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.985Probably Damaging-1.29Pathogenic0.00Affected0.18830.1495-1-1-2.6-30.09
c.1808T>G
M603R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M603R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FoldX, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated predictors—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus also indicates likely pathogenic, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yields an uncertain result. No other tools provide conflicting evidence. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the absence of benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-14.968Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.08Likely Benign0.01.13Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.65Ambiguous0.935Likely Pathogenic-5.64Deleterious0.963Probably Damaging0.943Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.00Affected0.15160.08370-1-6.424.99
c.1809G>A
M603I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M603I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS, whereas the majority of tools predict it to be pathogenic: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. FoldX reports an uncertain effect. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the balance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M603I, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-10.086Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.81Ambiguous0.60.07Likely Benign0.44Likely Benign-0.07Likely Benign0.699Likely Pathogenic-3.32Deleterious0.833Possibly Damaging0.886Possibly Damaging-1.21Pathogenic0.03Affected0.12080.2350212.6-18.03
c.1809G>C
M603I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M603I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. FoldX reports an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M603I. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-10.086Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.81Ambiguous0.60.07Likely Benign0.44Likely Benign-0.07Likely Benign0.699Likely Pathogenic-3.32Deleterious0.833Possibly Damaging0.886Possibly Damaging-1.21Pathogenic0.03Affected0.12080.2350212.6-18.03
c.1809G>T
M603I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M603I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. FoldX reports an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M603I. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.011342Structured0.197847Uncertain0.9420.1760.000-10.086Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.81Ambiguous0.60.07Likely Benign0.44Likely Benign-0.07Likely Benign0.698Likely Pathogenic-3.32Deleterious0.833Possibly Damaging0.886Possibly Damaging-1.21Pathogenic0.03Affected0.12080.2350212.6-18.03
c.180T>A
D60E
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D60E missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not listed in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also resolves to benign. Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-3.818Likely Benign0.780Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.089Likely Benign-0.90Neutral0.643Possibly Damaging0.785Possibly Damaging4.05Benign0.00Affected0.13420.7869320.014.03
c.180T>G
D60E
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D60E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also resolves to benign. Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.284882Structured0.480942Uncertain0.5210.6760.000-3.818Likely Benign0.780Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.089Likely Benign-0.90Neutral0.643Possibly Damaging0.785Possibly Damaging4.05Benign0.00Affected0.13420.7869320.014.03
c.1810T>A
S604T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S604T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions that are uncertain or inconclusive (FoldX, Rosetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Based on the overall pattern of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.192527Uncertain0.9110.1950.000-9.674Likely Pathogenic0.897Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.64Ambiguous0.1-0.58Ambiguous0.03Likely Benign-0.16Likely Benign0.337Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.826Possibly Damaging0.872Possibly Damaging3.19Benign0.08Tolerated0.16870.4919110.114.03
c.1810T>C
S604P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S604P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include premPS and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods give consistent results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also labels the variant as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of computational evidence supports a pathogenic classification for S604P, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.192527Uncertain0.9110.1950.000-10.953Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.76Destabilizing0.38.40Destabilizing6.08Destabilizing0.04Likely Benign0.512Likely Pathogenic-4.98Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging3.10Benign0.01Affected0.25240.48291-1-0.810.04
c.1810T>G
S604A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S604A has no ClinVar record and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Rosetta is uncertain and does not contribute to a consensus. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. With two of the three high‑accuracy tools indicating benign and no ClinVar evidence to contradict, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.192527Uncertain0.9110.1950.000-10.017Likely Pathogenic0.608Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.02Likely Benign0.1-0.60Ambiguous-0.29Likely Benign0.11Likely Benign0.378Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.944Possibly Damaging0.987Probably Damaging3.25Benign0.08Tolerated0.51980.3530Weaken112.6-16.00
c.1811C>G
S604W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S604W is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls come from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Benign predictions are provided by Rosetta, premPS, and FATHMM. Stability‑based methods give mixed results: FoldX is uncertain, while Foldetta is also uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also favors pathogenic. Foldetta remains inconclusive. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools indicates a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and does not contradict any existing clinical classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.192527Uncertain0.9110.1950.000-19.117Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-1.23Ambiguous0.1-2.05Stabilizing-1.64Ambiguous-0.19Likely Benign0.645Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.00Affected0.08180.4602-2-3-0.199.14
c.1811C>T
S604L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S604L is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 1055027.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440863‑C‑T). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are premPS and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.010926Structured0.192527Uncertain0.9110.1950.000Uncertain 16-33440863-C-T63.72e-6-14.683Likely Pathogenic0.965Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.94Ambiguous0.1-1.24Ambiguous-1.09Ambiguous-0.31Likely Benign0.639Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging3.09Benign0.00Affected3.37350.11770.4518-3-24.626.08234.0-49.60.00.10.30.5XXPotentially PathogenicSer604 is located in a short turn between an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603) and a short α helical section (res. Ser606-Phe608). In the WT simulations, the hydroxyl side chain of Ser604 periodically hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of other α helix residues (e.g., Pro600, Met603). Serine weakens the α helix secondary structure, and thus, Ser604 along with Pro605 breaks the α helix, facilitating the turn in the WT structure.In contrast, in the variant simulations, Leu604 forms a few hydrophobic interactions (e.g., Leu607, Phe608). More importantly, the helix end is more stable than with Ser604 in the WT. The residue swap could have a more profound effect on the actual folding process, for example, by preventing the bending at the α helix end, than what the simulations suggest.Moreover, Ser604 directly hydrogen bonds with Ras residues Ser65 and Ala66 in the WT SynGAP-Ras complex. The hydrophobic leucine cannot maintain these interactions with Ras at the GAP-Ras interface. Thus, the effect of the residue swap on the complex formation with the GTPase cannot be fully explored in the solvent-only simulations.
c.1813C>A
P605T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P605T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods specifically show pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No predictions or stability results are missing or inconclusive. Based on the unanimous pathogenic predictions and the absence of any ClinVar or gnomAD evidence to the contrary, the variant is most likely pathogenic and does not contradict ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023087Structured0.192737Uncertain0.9290.2310.000-11.533Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.87Destabilizing0.42.14Destabilizing2.51Destabilizing0.72Ambiguous0.801Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging0.69Pathogenic0.00Affected0.16260.52280-10.93.99
c.1813C>G
P605A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P605A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as pathogenic, while premPS remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also indicates pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign outcome. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023087Structured0.192737Uncertain0.9290.2310.000-10.085Likely Pathogenic0.962Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.58Destabilizing0.32.42Destabilizing2.50Destabilizing0.91Ambiguous0.744Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.75Pathogenic0.00Affected0.34320.46071-13.4-26.04
c.1813C>T
P605S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P605S is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All evaluated in‑silico predictors classify the change as pathogenic: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is pathogenic. Based on the unanimous pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which contradicts the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023087Structured0.192737Uncertain0.9290.2310.000Uncertain 1-10.830Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.40Destabilizing0.13.34Destabilizing3.37Destabilizing1.00Destabilizing0.718Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.70Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.33970.46761-10.8-10.04213.8-15.4-0.30.20.20.1XXPotentially PathogenicPro605 is located in a short turn between an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603) and a short α helical section (res. Ser606-Phe608). The pyrrolidine side chain of Pro605 packs hydrophobically with nearby hydrophobic residues (e.g., Ile514, Leu623, Leu610) in the inter-helix space. Additionally, proline lacks a free backbone amide group, which breaks the α helix and facilitates the turn in the WT structure.In the variant simulations, the hydroxyl side chain of Ser605 forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of Ala601 and Ile602. Importantly, the helix end is more stable than with Pro605 in the WT. Indeed, proline is a more effective secondary structure breaker compared to serine.Thus, the residue swap could have a more profound effect on the actual folding process, for example, by preventing the bending at the α helix end, than what the simulations suggest. Moreover, due to its location at the GAP-Ras interface, the residue swap could affect the GAP-Ras association.
c.1814C>A
P605H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P605H is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. All available predictions are consistent and indicate a deleterious effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023087Structured0.192737Uncertain0.9290.2310.000-13.846Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic8.80Destabilizing2.76.69Destabilizing7.75Destabilizing0.87Ambiguous0.828Likely Pathogenic-8.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging0.68Pathogenic0.00Affected0.17780.41420-2-1.640.02
c.1814C>G
P605R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P605R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic, while premPS remains inconclusive. Grouping by consensus, the benign category is empty and the pathogenic category contains all available predictions. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also yields pathogenic; and Foldetta, integrating FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, reports a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict its current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023087Structured0.192737Uncertain0.9290.2310.000Uncertain 1-13.745Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic8.71Destabilizing2.56.46Destabilizing7.59Destabilizing0.92Ambiguous0.845Likely Pathogenic-8.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.69Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37350.14580.31310-2-2.959.07281.7-118.1-0.20.00.50.1XXXXPotentially PathogenicPro605 is located in a short turn between an α helix (res. Glu582-Met603) and a short α helical section (res. Ser606-Phe608). The pyrrolidine side chain of Pro605 packs hydrophobically with nearby hydrophobic residues (e.g., Ile514, Leu623, Leu610) in the inter-helix space. Additionally, proline lacks a free backbone amide group, which breaks the α helix and facilitates the turn in the WT structure.In the variant simulations, the guanidinium side chain of Arg605 is bulkier than proline, and its positively charged guanidinium group faces mostly hydrophobic residues (e.g., Ile514, Leu623, Leu610). As a result, it needs to rotate away from the hydrophobic niche. The residue swap could have a more profound effect on the actual folding process, for example, by preventing the bending at the α helix end.Moreover, due to its location at the GAP-Ras interface, the residue swap could affect the GAP-Ras association.
c.1814C>T
P605L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P605L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only premPS. All other evaluated tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, indicates a pathogenic effect. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.023087Structured0.192737Uncertain0.9290.2310.000-12.114Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.65Destabilizing1.12.74Destabilizing2.70Destabilizing-0.10Likely Benign0.814Likely Pathogenic-9.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging0.69Pathogenic0.00Affected0.22320.6158-3-35.416.04
c.1816A>C
S606R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S606R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a separate group predicts pathogenicity: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Tools with uncertain outcomes are Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta remains inconclusive. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence predictions and the consensus vote indicate a pathogenic effect. Because ClinVar contains no entry for this variant, there is no contradiction between the computational evidence and clinical annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-12.900Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.15Likely Benign0.41.80Ambiguous0.98Ambiguous0.82Ambiguous0.252Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.38Benign0.08Tolerated0.08190.27500-1-3.769.11
c.1816A>G
S606G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S606G is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, yields an uncertain result and is treated as unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-12.281Likely Pathogenic0.603Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.43Likely Benign0.11.42Ambiguous0.93Ambiguous0.84Ambiguous0.229Likely Benign-3.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging3.35Benign0.04Affected0.22860.3279100.4-30.03
c.1816A>T
S606C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S606C is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Benign, and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely benign, although the SGM‑Consensus suggests pathogenicity; this does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet classified in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-11.122Likely Pathogenic0.774Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.34Likely Benign0.0-0.31Likely Benign-0.33Likely Benign0.49Likely Benign0.348Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.31Benign0.00Affected0.09860.45800-13.316.06
c.1817G>A
S606N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S606N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, SIFT, FATHMM) and pathogenic predictions (SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default). Two tools give uncertain results: premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Benign. Because the majority of individual predictors lean toward pathogenic and the SGM‑Consensus, a high‑confidence consensus, also indicates pathogenicity, the variant is most likely pathogenic. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-11.352Likely Pathogenic0.919Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.11Likely Benign0.10.20Likely Benign0.16Likely Benign0.76Ambiguous0.136Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.920Possibly Damaging0.955Probably Damaging3.37Benign0.10Tolerated0.11370.321811-2.727.03
c.1817G>C
S606T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S606T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas a pathogenic consensus is reached by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b. Uncertain results come from Rosetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of tools predict pathogenicity, and the SGM Consensus supports this view, while the high‑accuracy methods give mixed results. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-11.052Likely Pathogenic0.554AmbiguousLikely Benign0.06Likely Benign0.1-0.91Ambiguous-0.43Likely Benign0.57Ambiguous0.203Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.826Possibly Damaging0.933Probably Damaging3.34Benign0.03Affected0.12600.4513110.114.03
c.1817G>T
S606I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S606I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; FoldX is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact for S606I. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-14.552Likely Pathogenic0.976Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.60Ambiguous0.1-0.08Likely Benign-0.34Likely Benign0.41Likely Benign0.288Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.31Benign0.01Affected0.08910.4162-1-25.326.08
c.1818T>A
S606R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S606R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a separate group predicts pathogenicity: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Tools with uncertain outcomes are Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta remains inconclusive. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence predictions and the consensus vote indicate a pathogenic effect. Because ClinVar contains no entry for this variant, there is no contradiction between the computational evidence and clinical annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-12.900Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.15Likely Benign0.41.80Ambiguous0.98Ambiguous0.82Ambiguous0.246Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.38Benign0.08Tolerated0.08190.27500-1-3.769.11
c.1818T>G
S606R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S606R is not reported in ClinVar or gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a majority predict pathogenicity: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is labeled Likely Pathogenic, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain. High‑accuracy methods confirm the pathogenic trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, SGM Consensus is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the evidence points to the variant being most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.191720Uncertain0.8750.2470.000-12.900Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.15Likely Benign0.41.80Ambiguous0.98Ambiguous0.82Ambiguous0.246Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.38Benign0.08Tolerated0.08190.27500-1-3.769.11
c.1819C>A
L607I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L607I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default, while benign calls are made by PROVEAN and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Stability predictions from FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS are inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for L607I. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.194229Uncertain0.8690.2500.000-12.061Likely Pathogenic0.644Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.63Ambiguous0.11.25Ambiguous0.94Ambiguous0.82Ambiguous0.727Likely Pathogenic-1.99Neutral0.992Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.54Pathogenic0.01Affected0.10790.3767220.70.00
c.1819C>G
L607V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L607V is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 1450275.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440871‑C‑G). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only AlphaMissense‑Optimized. All other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports benign, whereas the SGM‑Consensus, derived from the majority of pathogenic predictions, indicates pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is inconclusive and therefore not considered evidence. Overall, the preponderance of computational evidence points to a pathogenic effect for L607V, a conclusion that contrasts with the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.194229Uncertain0.8690.2500.000Uncertain 26-33440871-C-G21.24e-6-11.190Likely Pathogenic0.637Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.04Ambiguous0.21.36Ambiguous1.20Ambiguous0.90Ambiguous0.715Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37350.16340.3577210.4-14.03216.328.10.10.00.90.2XPotentially BenignLeu607 is located in a short helical region (res. Ser606-Phe608) within an α-α loop connecting two α helices (res. Glu582-Met603 and res. Glu617-Asn635). In the WT simulations, the iso-butyl side chain of Leu607 does not interact with any other residues, but it could potentially interact directly with Ras due to its location at the GAP domain.In the variant simulations, Val607, which has similar size and physicochemical properties to leucine, does not cause any negative effects on the protein structure. However, due to its location at the GAP-Ras interface, the residue swap could affect the complex formation with the GTPase, but this cannot be investigated using solvent-only simulations.
c.1819C>T
L607F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L607F is catalogued in gnomAD (6‑33440871‑C‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all report pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Only FoldX predicts a benign outcome, while Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for L607F, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status (none).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.194229Uncertain0.8690.2500.0006-33440871-C-T16.19e-7-13.654Likely Pathogenic0.948Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.23Likely Benign0.11.20Ambiguous0.72Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.758Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.54Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37350.08720.281602-1.034.02
c.181G>A
E61K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 E61K missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two consensus groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. The high‑accuracy consensus, SGM‑Consensus, classifies the variant as Likely Benign, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized also predicts Benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Based on the aggregate evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.352862Structured0.477329Uncertain0.5180.6990.125-4.953Likely Benign0.425AmbiguousLikely Benign0.120Likely Benign-0.22Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.678Possibly Damaging4.34Benign0.00Affected0.27360.569101-0.4-0.94
c.181G>C
E61Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E61Q is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Benign. No Foldetta stability result is available. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect for E61Q, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.352862Structured0.477329Uncertain0.5180.6990.125-5.443Likely Benign0.267Likely BenignLikely Benign0.058Likely Benign-0.41Neutral0.659Possibly Damaging0.775Possibly Damaging4.18Benign0.00Affected0.13440.5617220.0-0.98
c.1820T>A
L607H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L607H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on pathogenicity include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; no tool predicts a benign effect. Uncertain predictions come from FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, while Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.194229Uncertain0.8690.2500.000-14.775Likely Pathogenic0.981Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.76Ambiguous0.11.88Ambiguous1.32Ambiguous1.38Destabilizing0.906Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.48Pathogenic0.01Affected0.11990.0541-2-3-7.023.98
c.1820T>C
L607P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L607P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus score is “Likely Pathogenic.” No tool in the dataset predicts a benign outcome; the only inconclusive result is FoldX, which is listed as uncertain and therefore does not influence the overall assessment. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.194229Uncertain0.8690.2500.000-14.059Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.11Ambiguous0.76.93Destabilizing4.02Destabilizing1.29Destabilizing0.922Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.54Pathogenic0.00Affected0.37100.1274-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1820T>G
L607R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L607R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FoldX, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict a pathogenic impact. Rosetta and Foldetta provide uncertain results and are therefore treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic,” while Foldetta remains uncertain. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the high‑accuracy consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.194229Uncertain0.8690.2500.000-14.234Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.15Likely Benign0.11.48Ambiguous0.67Ambiguous1.24Destabilizing0.920Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.51Pathogenic0.01Affected0.14900.0615-3-2-8.343.03
c.1822T>A
F608I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The only tool with an inconclusive result is FoldX, which is listed as uncertain. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-14.939Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.92Ambiguous0.12.14Destabilizing2.03Destabilizing1.24Destabilizing0.904Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.62Pathogenic0.00Affected0.21150.2361101.7-34.02
c.1822T>C
F608L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, premPS, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic. FoldX and Foldetta report uncertain stability changes, but these are not considered evidence against pathogenicity. When predictions are grouped, no tool predicts a benign outcome; all available evidence supports a harmful effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (derived from the majority of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-12.274Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.86Ambiguous0.22.59Destabilizing1.73Ambiguous1.24Destabilizing0.883Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.01Affected0.22310.2874201.0-34.02
c.1822T>G
F608V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; all of these return a pathogenic or likely pathogenic label. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign outcome. Uncertain results are reported only for Rosetta and Foldetta, which are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of predictions indicate that F608V is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-16.084Likely Pathogenic0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.21Destabilizing0.11.39Ambiguous1.80Ambiguous1.47Destabilizing0.917Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.59Pathogenic0.01Affected0.21930.2199-1-11.4-48.04
c.1823T>A
F608Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a pathogenic effect: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus all predict pathogenicity, while only Rosetta predicts a benign effect. Tools with uncertain outcomes—FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—do not provide decisive evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic, whereas AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta remain inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that F608Y is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-13.249Likely Pathogenic0.812Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.62Ambiguous0.10.41Likely Benign0.52Ambiguous1.05Destabilizing0.747Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging-1.44Pathogenic0.00Affected0.15040.134673-4.116.00
c.1823T>C
F608S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree that the variant is deleterious: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a pathogenic effect. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. All available predictions are consistent and conclusive. Based on the unanimous computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-15.181Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.16Destabilizing0.24.00Destabilizing3.58Destabilizing1.66Destabilizing0.917Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.59Pathogenic0.02Affected0.43660.0400-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1823T>G
F608C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, every tool examined (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) classifies the change as pathogenic; no tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also reports a pathogenic effect. Because all evidence points to a deleterious impact and there is no ClinVar entry to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-14.409Likely Pathogenic0.980Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.46Destabilizing0.23.04Destabilizing2.75Destabilizing1.77Destabilizing0.920Likely Pathogenic-7.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.67Pathogenic0.00Affected0.27380.1050-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1824T>A
F608L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, premPS, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic. FoldX and Foldetta report uncertain stability changes, but these are not considered evidence against pathogenicity. When predictions are grouped, no tool predicts a benign outcome; all available evidence supports a harmful effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (derived from the majority of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-12.274Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.86Ambiguous0.22.59Destabilizing1.73Ambiguous1.24Destabilizing0.747Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.01Affected0.22310.2874201.0-34.02
c.1824T>G
F608L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F608L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX‑MD (uncertain), Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while only FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) labels it likely pathogenic, and Foldetta reports an uncertain stability change. No tool predicts a benign outcome. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.106997Structured0.197190Uncertain0.8910.2470.000-12.274Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.86Ambiguous0.22.59Destabilizing1.73Ambiguous1.24Destabilizing0.747Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.01Affected0.22310.2874201.0-34.02
c.1825G>A
G609R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G609R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. Predictions that remain uncertain are Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evaluated tools (eight pathogenic vs. three benign) predict a pathogenic impact for G609R. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.179055Structured0.203786Uncertain0.8510.2520.000-10.172Likely Pathogenic0.543AmbiguousLikely Benign2.09Destabilizing0.10.37Likely Benign1.23Ambiguous0.60Ambiguous0.520Likely Pathogenic-2.68Deleterious0.974Probably Damaging0.818Possibly Damaging-1.41Pathogenic0.07Tolerated0.11580.4348-3-2-4.199.14
c.1825G>C
G609R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G609R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. Predictions that remain uncertain are Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evaluated tools (eight pathogenic vs. three benign) predict a pathogenic impact for G609R. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.179055Structured0.203786Uncertain0.8510.2520.000-10.172Likely Pathogenic0.543AmbiguousLikely Benign2.09Destabilizing0.10.37Likely Benign1.23Ambiguous0.60Ambiguous0.520Likely Pathogenic-2.68Deleterious0.974Probably Damaging0.818Possibly Damaging-1.41Pathogenic0.07Tolerated0.11580.4348-3-2-4.199.14
c.1825G>T
G609W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant G609W is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the remaining evaluated algorithms (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM) uniformly predict a pathogenic outcome. Two tools report inconclusive results (Foldetta and AlphaMissense‑Default) and are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates a benign change, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) supports pathogenicity, and Foldetta’s stability assessment is inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for G609W, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.179055Structured0.203786Uncertain0.8510.2520.000-13.074Likely Pathogenic0.525AmbiguousLikely Benign3.14Destabilizing0.7-0.87Ambiguous1.14Ambiguous0.28Likely Benign0.566Likely Pathogenic-4.70Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging-1.47Pathogenic0.01Affected0.09350.3181-7-2-0.5129.16
c.1826G>A
G609E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G609E has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect are REVEL, FoldX, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. The remaining tools (Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.179055Structured0.203786Uncertain0.8510.2520.000-10.470Likely Pathogenic0.421AmbiguousLikely Benign2.95Destabilizing0.4-1.65Ambiguous0.65Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.531Likely Pathogenic-2.28Neutral0.916Possibly Damaging0.588Possibly Damaging-1.41Pathogenic0.17Tolerated0.17090.44910-2-3.172.06
c.1826G>C
G609A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G609A is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are FoldX, PROVEAN, and FATHMM. One tool, Foldetta, yields an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as the variant is not yet classified in that database.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.179055Structured0.203786Uncertain0.8510.2520.000-6.790Likely Benign0.153Likely BenignLikely Benign2.38Destabilizing0.30.01Likely Benign1.20Ambiguous0.43Likely Benign0.494Likely Benign-2.65Deleterious0.282Benign0.164Benign-1.43Pathogenic0.10Tolerated0.38120.3896102.214.03
c.1826G>T
G609V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G609V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the remaining 10 tools (SGM Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM) all predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments further highlight the discordance: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a benign effect, whereas the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) both indicate pathogenicity. With the majority of evidence pointing to deleterious impact, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.179055Structured0.203786Uncertain0.8510.2520.000-11.049Likely Pathogenic0.374AmbiguousLikely Benign4.17Destabilizing0.33.77Destabilizing3.97Destabilizing0.34Likely Benign0.734Likely Pathogenic-4.47Deleterious0.974Probably Damaging0.818Possibly Damaging-1.48Pathogenic0.02Affected0.12690.3317-1-34.642.08
c.1828C>A
L610I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L610I is listed in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440880‑C‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and FATHMM. Four tools are uncertain (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default). High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, the SGM consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also favors benign, whereas Foldetta’s stability estimate is unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence points to a benign effect for L610I, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.271506Structured0.209504Uncertain0.8880.2530.0006-33440880-C-A16.19e-7-6.362Likely Benign0.389AmbiguousLikely Benign1.50Ambiguous0.20.18Likely Benign0.84Ambiguous0.76Ambiguous0.544Likely Pathogenic-1.86Neutral0.992Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.34Pathogenic0.15Tolerated3.37350.09990.3219220.70.00
c.1828C>G
L610V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L610V is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440880‑C‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls are made by REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while only AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign outcome. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates benign, whereas the SGM Consensus remains pathogenic and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) is inconclusive. With the overwhelming majority of tools predicting pathogenicity and no ClinVar evidence to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.271506Structured0.209504Uncertain0.8880.2530.0006-33440880-C-G31.86e-6-11.304Likely Pathogenic0.474AmbiguousLikely Benign2.24Destabilizing0.30.76Ambiguous1.50Ambiguous1.21Destabilizing0.740Likely Pathogenic-2.86Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging-1.46Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37350.15150.3039120.4-14.03
c.1828C>T
L610F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L610F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—all of which classify the variant as pathogenic. No tools predict a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a pathogenic effect. Based on the consensus of these predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.271506Structured0.209504Uncertain0.8880.2530.000-13.244Likely Pathogenic0.808Likely PathogenicAmbiguous6.24Destabilizing1.13.40Destabilizing4.82Destabilizing0.68Ambiguous0.782Likely Pathogenic-3.92Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.52Pathogenic0.01Affected0.08340.281620-1.034.02
c.1829T>A
L610H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L610H is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree that the variant is deleterious: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify it as pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, indicates a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. All available predictions are concordant and supportive. Based on these computational assessments, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.271506Structured0.209504Uncertain0.8880.2530.000-14.573Likely Pathogenic0.960Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.83Destabilizing0.54.98Destabilizing4.91Destabilizing2.03Destabilizing0.927Likely Pathogenic-6.91Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.59Pathogenic0.00Affected0.10670.0741-2-3-7.023.98
c.1829T>C
L610P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L610P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, every tool examined (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) classifies the substitution as pathogenic; no tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also reports a pathogenic effect. Because all evidence points to a deleterious impact and there is no ClinVar entry to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.271506Structured0.209504Uncertain0.8880.2530.000-14.863Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.02Destabilizing0.28.15Destabilizing7.09Destabilizing1.99Destabilizing0.934Likely Pathogenic-6.91Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.59Pathogenic0.00Affected0.35990.1113-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1829T>G
L610R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L610R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity are unanimous: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a pathogenic outcome; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, predicts a pathogenic impact. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.271506Structured0.209504Uncertain0.8880.2530.000-13.855Likely Pathogenic0.956Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.14Destabilizing0.54.60Destabilizing4.87Destabilizing1.89Destabilizing0.949Likely Pathogenic-5.94Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.58Pathogenic0.00Affected0.13340.0615-3-2-8.343.03
c.182A>C
E61A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E61A is listed in ClinVar (ID 3767543.0) with an *Uncertain* clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, while Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.352862Structured0.477329Uncertain0.5180.6990.125Uncertain 1-5.235Likely Benign0.453AmbiguousLikely Benign0.074Likely Benign-1.52Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.678Possibly Damaging4.12Benign0.00Affected0.44990.58780-15.3-58.04
c.182A>G
E61G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E61G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. The high‑accuracy consensus methods reinforce the benign assessment: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports “Likely Benign,” and the protein‑folding stability tool Foldetta is not available for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect. There is no ClinVar entry to contradict this conclusion.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.352862Structured0.477329Uncertain0.5180.6990.125-5.574Likely Benign0.469AmbiguousLikely Benign0.072Likely Benign-1.68Neutral0.659Possibly Damaging0.775Possibly Damaging4.08Benign0.00Affected0.35930.49650-23.1-72.06
c.182A>T
E61V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 E61V missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while those that predict a pathogenic impact are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a benign classification, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no record for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.352862Structured0.477329Uncertain0.5180.6990.125-5.723Likely Benign0.769Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.115Likely Benign-1.80Neutral0.824Possibly Damaging0.775Possibly Damaging4.07Benign0.00Affected0.08030.6413-2-27.7-29.98
c.1831A>C
M611L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M611L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote). Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome, while Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists). Thus, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000-6.721Likely Benign0.111Likely BenignLikely Benign0.39Likely Benign0.10.65Ambiguous0.52Ambiguous0.56Ambiguous0.229Likely Benign-1.29Neutral0.059Benign0.017Benign-1.07Pathogenic0.76Tolerated0.11300.3547421.9-18.03
c.1831A>G
M611V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M611V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—yields an inconclusive result (two benign, two pathogenic). Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, reports an uncertain effect, so its result is treated as unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign impact, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000-8.057Likely Pathogenic0.176Likely BenignLikely Benign1.42Ambiguous0.41.56Ambiguous1.49Ambiguous0.66Ambiguous0.315Likely Benign-2.06Neutral0.960Probably Damaging0.474Possibly Damaging-1.04Pathogenic0.49Tolerated0.23240.2721212.3-32.06
c.1831A>T
M611L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M611L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only FATHMM predicts pathogenic, while Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates Likely Benign; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact for M611L, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000-6.721Likely Benign0.111Likely BenignLikely Benign0.39Likely Benign0.10.65Ambiguous0.52Ambiguous0.56Ambiguous0.229Likely Benign-1.29Neutral0.059Benign0.017Benign-1.07Pathogenic0.76Tolerated0.11300.3547421.9-18.03
c.1832T>A
M611K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 M611K variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The majority of other in silico predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) indicate a pathogenic effect; FoldX is uncertain and therefore not considered evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus (derived from the unanimous pathogenic vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) both predict pathogenicity. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the high‑accuracy consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000-13.021Likely Pathogenic0.630Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.86Ambiguous0.62.65Destabilizing2.26Destabilizing1.65Destabilizing0.665Likely Pathogenic-4.10Deleterious0.250Benign0.120Benign-1.26Pathogenic0.03Affected0.11930.06880-1-5.8-3.02
c.1832T>C
M611T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M611T is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440884‑T‑C). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) return uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Benign, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000Uncertain 16-33440884-T-C16.19e-7-5.696Likely Benign0.101Likely BenignLikely Benign1.98Ambiguous0.20.94Ambiguous1.46Ambiguous0.87Ambiguous0.240Likely Benign-2.40Neutral0.034Benign0.038Benign-1.19Pathogenic0.29Tolerated3.37350.16350.1415-1-1-2.6-30.09
c.1832T>G
M611R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M611R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are AlphaMissense‑Optimized, polyPhen2_HumVar, and SIFT. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign outcome, whereas the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is reported as uncertain. No prediction or folding result is missing; all available data are considered. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000-11.050Likely Pathogenic0.642Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.80Ambiguous0.82.00Destabilizing1.90Ambiguous1.58Destabilizing0.644Likely Pathogenic-4.10Deleterious0.779Possibly Damaging0.159Benign-1.21Pathogenic0.21Tolerated0.13990.08370-1-6.424.99
c.1833G>A
M611I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M611I is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440885‑G‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the variant’s likely effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies it as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates pathogenicity, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, yields an uncertain stability change. No folding‑stability method provides definitive evidence. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not conflict with ClinVar status, which lacks an entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.0006-33440885-G-A16.19e-7-8.552Likely Pathogenic0.736Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.45Ambiguous0.41.36Ambiguous1.41Ambiguous0.72Ambiguous0.292Likely Benign-2.10Neutral0.250Benign0.091Benign-1.14Pathogenic0.38Tolerated3.37350.10090.2302122.6-18.03
c.1833G>C
M611I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M611I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions that are inconclusive are FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign outcome, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic classification, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000-8.552Likely Pathogenic0.736Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.45Ambiguous0.41.36Ambiguous1.41Ambiguous0.72Ambiguous0.292Likely Benign-2.10Neutral0.250Benign0.091Benign-1.14Pathogenic0.38Tolerated3.37350.10090.2302122.6-18.03
c.1833G>T
M611I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M611I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. In silico predictors that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Predictors that classify it as pathogenic are SGM‑Consensus, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, and Foldetta) provide uncertain or unavailable results. High‑accuracy assessment shows AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic; Foldetta’s stability output is unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.210791Uncertain0.8700.2530.000-8.552Likely Pathogenic0.736Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.45Ambiguous0.41.36Ambiguous1.41Ambiguous0.72Ambiguous0.292Likely Benign-2.10Neutral0.250Benign0.091Benign-1.14Pathogenic0.38Tolerated3.37350.10090.2302122.6-18.03
c.1834C>A
Q612K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q612K is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and SIFT, whereas pathogenic predictions come from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default; premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the majority of tools predict pathogenicity, and the high‑accuracy consensus also leans pathogenic, while the folding‑stability method suggests benign. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.203988Uncertain0.8220.2630.000-12.393Likely Pathogenic0.849Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.15Likely Benign0.10.48Likely Benign0.32Likely Benign0.81Ambiguous0.619Likely Pathogenic-3.88Deleterious0.931Possibly Damaging0.931Probably Damaging-1.22Pathogenic0.19Tolerated0.18100.364111-0.40.04
c.1834C>G
Q612E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q612E is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). In silico predictors that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Predictors that agree on a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta are inconclusive, with Foldetta specifically yielding an uncertain stability change. High‑accuracy tools give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of consensus‑based and high‑accuracy predictions lean toward pathogenicity. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the current ClinVar status, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.203988Uncertain0.8220.2630.000-12.179Likely Pathogenic0.338Likely BenignLikely Benign0.52Ambiguous0.41.01Ambiguous0.77Ambiguous1.03Destabilizing0.423Likely Benign-2.89Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.981Probably Damaging-1.17Pathogenic0.26Tolerated0.13930.2099220.00.98
c.1835A>C
Q612P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Q612P is listed in ClinVar (ID 3660462.0) with an uncertain significance annotation and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from FoldX, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, PROVEAN, and the SGM Consensus score (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, whereas the SGM Consensus predicts likely pathogenic; Foldetta, a folding‑stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, returns an uncertain result and is therefore not factored into the consensus. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a pathogenic effect, which contrasts with the ClinVar uncertain classification. Thus, based on current predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, contradicting the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.203988Uncertain0.8220.2630.000Uncertain 1-9.684Likely Pathogenic0.673Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.19Likely Benign0.33.06Destabilizing1.44Ambiguous0.56Ambiguous0.671Likely Pathogenic-5.84Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.31Pathogenic0.19Tolerated0.22520.40500-11.9-31.01
c.1835A>G
Q612R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q612R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are SIFT and FoldX. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions that are uncertain or inconclusive are Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show that the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts pathogenicity, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta are uncertain. No high‑accuracy tool provides a benign prediction. Overall, the majority of available evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.203988Uncertain0.8220.2630.000-10.571Likely Pathogenic0.837Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.35Likely Benign0.21.56Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.78Ambiguous0.683Likely Pathogenic-3.85Deleterious0.956Probably Damaging0.969Probably Damaging-1.29Pathogenic0.10Tolerated0.14800.219611-1.028.06
c.1835A>T
Q612L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q612L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and SIFT, whereas those that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain (unavailable), SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as benign. Overall, the majority of conventional tools lean toward pathogenicity, and the SGM Consensus supports this, while the high‑accuracy Foldetta result is contradictory. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the prevailing predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.203988Uncertain0.8220.2630.000-12.076Likely Pathogenic0.799Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.12Likely Benign0.10.12Likely Benign0.00Likely Benign0.44Likely Benign0.730Likely Pathogenic-6.84Deleterious0.971Probably Damaging0.954Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.08Tolerated0.07630.4756-2-27.3-14.97
c.1836G>C
Q612H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q612H is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to Rosetta, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated predictors—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, SGM Consensus confirms a likely pathogenic status, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) remains uncertain. FoldX and premPS are inconclusive, and Foldetta is unavailable for definitive interpretation. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.203988Uncertain0.8220.2630.000-9.733Likely Pathogenic0.956Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.70Ambiguous0.90.39Likely Benign0.55Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.550Likely Pathogenic-4.55Deleterious0.991Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.02Affected0.13790.3084300.39.01
c.1836G>T
Q612H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q612H is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to Rosetta, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated predictors—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, SGM Consensus confirms a likely pathogenic status, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) remains uncertain. FoldX and premPS are inconclusive, and Foldetta is unavailable for definitive interpretation. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.203988Uncertain0.8220.2630.000-9.733Likely Pathogenic0.956Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.70Ambiguous0.90.39Likely Benign0.55Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.550Likely Pathogenic-4.55Deleterious0.991Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.02Affected0.13790.3084300.39.01
c.1837G>A
E613K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E613K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS, whereas pathogenic calls are made by REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is also pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments give AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM Consensus as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. No prediction is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.193489Uncertain0.8160.2540.000-11.892Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.34Likely Benign0.6-0.54Ambiguous-0.10Likely Benign-0.08Likely Benign0.567Likely Pathogenic-3.72Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.987Probably Damaging-1.15Pathogenic0.04Affected0.29790.594201-0.4-0.94
c.1837G>C
E613Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E613Q missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, and SIFT, whereas a majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. Two tools give uncertain results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show that the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts a likely pathogenic outcome, AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a benign effect. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward pathogenicity, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.193489Uncertain0.8160.2540.000-9.245Likely Pathogenic0.887Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.41Likely Benign0.4-0.84Ambiguous-0.22Likely Benign0.11Likely Benign0.495Likely Benign-2.79Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging-1.28Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.16500.6181220.0-0.98
c.1838A>C
E613A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E613A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, premPS, and Foldetta, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, SIFT, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs) as benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence (10 pathogenic vs. 3 benign predictions) indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.193489Uncertain0.8160.2540.000-10.841Likely Pathogenic0.906Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.90Ambiguous0.5-0.17Likely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.32Likely Benign0.688Likely Pathogenic-5.57Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.02Affected0.46960.59290-15.3-58.04
c.1838A>G
E613G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E613G is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only premPS, whereas the remaining tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. The high‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain. No prediction or stability assessment is missing or inconclusive beyond the uncertain labels. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E613G, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.193489Uncertain0.8160.2540.000-12.417Likely Pathogenic0.911Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.49Ambiguous0.31.34Ambiguous1.42Ambiguous0.08Likely Benign0.641Likely Pathogenic-6.56Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.01Affected0.34220.52660-23.1-72.06
c.1838A>T
E613V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 E613V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are Foldetta and premPS, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. FoldX and Rosetta give uncertain results and are not included in the agreement groups. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Because the majority of evidence points to a deleterious effect, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD observation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.193489Uncertain0.8160.2540.000-12.799Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.72Ambiguous0.5-0.76Ambiguous-0.02Likely Benign0.31Likely Benign0.767Likely Pathogenic-6.57Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.03Affected0.09350.6565-2-27.7-29.98
c.1839G>C
E613D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E613D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Three tools—FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—return uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for E613D. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and does not contradict any existing database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.193489Uncertain0.8160.2540.000-8.795Likely Pathogenic0.842Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.67Ambiguous0.30.48Likely Benign0.58Ambiguous0.13Likely Benign0.474Likely Benign-2.79Deleterious0.989Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.27Pathogenic0.15Tolerated0.19980.4000320.0-14.03
c.1839G>T
E613D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E613D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Three tools—FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—return uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for E613D. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and does not contradict any existing database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.275179Structured0.193489Uncertain0.8160.2540.000-8.795Likely Pathogenic0.842Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.67Ambiguous0.30.48Likely Benign0.58Ambiguous0.13Likely Benign0.474Likely Benign-2.79Deleterious0.989Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.27Pathogenic0.15Tolerated0.19980.4000320.0-14.03
c.183G>C
E61D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E61D is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumVar and SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a Likely Benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. The variant’s predicted benign status does not contradict ClinVar, as no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.352862Structured0.477329Uncertain0.5180.6990.125-4.394Likely Benign0.231Likely BenignLikely Benign0.035Likely Benign-0.29Neutral0.267Benign0.585Possibly Damaging4.11Benign0.00Affected0.18950.3851320.0-14.03
c.183G>T
E61D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E61D is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumVar and SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a Likely Benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. The variant’s predicted benign status does not contradict ClinVar, as no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.352862Structured0.477329Uncertain0.5180.6990.125-4.394Likely Benign0.231Likely BenignLikely Benign0.035Likely Benign-0.29Neutral0.267Benign0.585Possibly Damaging4.11Benign0.00Affected0.18950.3851320.0-14.03
c.1840T>A
Y614N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Y614N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) indicate a pathogenic impact; FoldX is inconclusive and is treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for Y614N, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.314870Structured0.182134Uncertain0.8520.2540.000-13.004Likely Pathogenic0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.32Ambiguous0.53.16Destabilizing2.24Destabilizing1.58Destabilizing0.471Likely Benign-8.86Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.42Benign0.06Tolerated0.19440.0573-2-2-2.2-49.07
c.1840T>C
Y614H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y614H is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and Rosetta. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS) are not considered evidence for either side. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.314870Structured0.182134Uncertain0.8520.2540.000-9.678Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.17Ambiguous0.52.38Destabilizing1.78Ambiguous0.91Ambiguous0.397Likely Benign-4.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.58Benign0.27Tolerated0.19480.037302-1.9-26.03
c.1840T>G
Y614D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y614D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: FATHMM predicts it to be benign, whereas the remaining 13 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all classify it as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.314870Structured0.182134Uncertain0.8520.2540.000-15.073Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.14Destabilizing0.64.16Destabilizing3.15Destabilizing1.69Destabilizing0.597Likely Pathogenic-9.83Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.02Affected0.40130.0573-4-3-2.2-48.09
c.1841A>C
Y614S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Y614S is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440893‑A‑C). Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of algorithms—AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), premPS, Rosetta, Foldetta, and the SGM Consensus—indicate pathogenicity; FoldX remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) labels it likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic classification, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.314870Structured0.182134Uncertain0.8520.2540.0006-33440893-A-C16.20e-7-12.709Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.74Ambiguous0.43.25Destabilizing2.50Destabilizing2.05Destabilizing0.482Likely Benign-8.83Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.09Tolerated3.37350.41550.1220-2-30.5-76.10
c.1841A>G
Y614C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y614C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to FATHMM, whereas the remaining 13 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels it likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the collective predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.314870Structured0.182134Uncertain0.8520.2540.000-11.716Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.56Ambiguous0.73.21Destabilizing2.39Destabilizing1.76Destabilizing0.539Likely Pathogenic-8.83Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.02Affected0.30810.16790-23.8-60.04
c.1841A>T
Y614F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y614F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain or unavailable results come from Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive (2 benign vs 2 pathogenic), and Foldetta is unavailable. Overall, the majority of reliable predictors indicate a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.314870Structured0.182134Uncertain0.8520.2540.000-5.584Likely Benign0.630Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.20.98Ambiguous0.54Ambiguous0.78Ambiguous0.364Likely Benign-3.75Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.42Benign0.07Tolerated0.19090.2762734.1-16.00
c.1843C>A
P615T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P615T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Among the evaluated in‑silico predictors, SIFT is the sole tool that predicts a benign effect, whereas the remaining majority—including REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus—predict a pathogenic impact. Predictions from Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS are uncertain and do not provide definitive evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates it is likely pathogenic, while Foldetta’s stability analysis remains inconclusive. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the lack of benign consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.179032Uncertain0.8790.2550.000-13.764Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.02Destabilizing0.30.95Ambiguous1.99Ambiguous0.75Ambiguous0.823Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.26Pathogenic0.06Tolerated0.16020.38060-10.93.99
c.1843C>G
P615A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 P615A variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include SIFT and Rosetta, whereas the majority of predictors (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Pathogenic) all suggest a pathogenic impact. Uncertain results are reported by FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for P615A, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.179032Uncertain0.8790.2550.000-12.156Likely Pathogenic0.979Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.73Ambiguous0.30.35Likely Benign1.04Ambiguous0.85Ambiguous0.693Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.10Tolerated0.31690.32141-13.4-26.04
c.1843C>T
P615S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P615S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not reported) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; the SGM Consensus also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. No tools predict a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, while Foldetta’s stability prediction is uncertain and therefore not taken as evidence. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to the variant being most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction to the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.179032Uncertain0.8790.2550.000-12.566Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.46Destabilizing0.31.28Ambiguous1.87Ambiguous0.98Ambiguous0.780Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.19Pathogenic0.04Affected0.31910.33101-10.8-10.04
c.1844C>A
P615Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change P615Q is not listed in ClinVar and has no allele record in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that assess sequence conservation and structural impact uniformly classify the variant as pathogenic: REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only Rosetta and the combined Foldetta stability assessment are inconclusive. Grouping the predictions, the benign category contains no tools, while the pathogenic category includes all the above. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.179032Uncertain0.8790.2550.000-13.247Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.16Destabilizing0.31.28Ambiguous1.72Ambiguous1.33Destabilizing0.742Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging-1.28Pathogenic0.01Affected0.13950.34450-1-1.931.01
c.1844C>G
P615R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P615R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the variant as pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, indicates a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. No predictions or stability results are missing or inconclusive. Based on the unanimous pathogenic predictions and the absence of any ClinVar or gnomAD evidence to the contrary, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.179032Uncertain0.8790.2550.000-15.628Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.62Destabilizing0.52.69Destabilizing2.66Destabilizing1.14Destabilizing0.871Likely Pathogenic-8.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.29Pathogenic0.01Affected0.14630.26030-2-2.959.07
c.1844C>T
P615L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P615L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS and Rosetta, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, FoldX, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, PROVEAN, and the SGM Consensus—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenicity, and Foldetta yields an uncertain result. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of computational evidence indicates that P615L is likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.236433Structured0.179032Uncertain0.8790.2550.000-11.884Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.03Destabilizing0.4-0.01Likely Benign1.01Ambiguous0.50Likely Benign0.699Likely Pathogenic-9.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.13Pathogenic0.04Affected0.19490.4692-3-35.416.04
c.1846G>A
D616N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D616N missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into benign (REVEL, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) and pathogenic (PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b). Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) favors pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of conventional predictors lean toward a benign effect, whereas the SGM Consensus suggests pathogenicity, leaving the variant’s clinical significance ambiguous. Based on the prevailing evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.000-8.292Likely Pathogenic0.349AmbiguousLikely Benign0.54Ambiguous0.21.05Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.03Likely Benign0.149Likely Benign-3.74Deleterious0.875Possibly Damaging0.581Possibly Damaging3.41Benign0.11Tolerated0.10530.3976210.0-0.98
c.1846G>C
D616H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D616H missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, and FATHMM. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results—Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—so their outputs are treated as unavailable for inference. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) is Pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. The variant’s predicted pathogenicity does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.000-9.815Likely Pathogenic0.904Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.13Destabilizing0.21.89Ambiguous2.01Destabilizing0.45Likely Benign0.316Likely Benign-5.57Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.952Probably Damaging3.30Benign0.03Affected0.13300.42731-10.322.05
c.1846G>T
D616Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D616Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic outcome: SIFT, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also classifies the variant as likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. No evidence from FoldX or Rosetta alone is conclusive. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic interpretation, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.000-12.638Likely Pathogenic0.957Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.70Ambiguous0.31.32Ambiguous1.51Ambiguous0.35Likely Benign0.374Likely Benign-7.43Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.970Probably Damaging3.28Benign0.01Affected0.04650.4069-4-32.248.09
c.1847A>C
D616A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D616A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized model classifies the variant as benign, whereas the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates pathogenicity. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, and this assessment does not conflict with the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.000-11.386Likely Pathogenic0.664Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.76Ambiguous0.22.07Destabilizing1.92Ambiguous0.41Likely Benign0.126Likely Benign-6.13Deleterious0.539Possibly Damaging0.122Benign3.32Benign0.10Tolerated0.35430.42070-25.3-44.01
c.1847A>G
D616G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D616G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results—FoldX, AlphaMissense‑Default, and Foldetta—are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the predictions are split evenly between benign and pathogenic, with no clear consensus. Thus, the variant is most likely of uncertain significance; it does not contradict any ClinVar status because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.000-10.310Likely Pathogenic0.547AmbiguousLikely Benign1.48Ambiguous0.12.13Destabilizing1.81Ambiguous0.49Likely Benign0.144Likely Benign-5.60Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.800Possibly Damaging3.37Benign0.06Tolerated0.34960.43861-13.1-58.04
c.1847A>T
D616V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 D616V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, premPS, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls are made by FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus. Uncertain results are reported by Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments give a pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence, including the high‑accuracy tools, supports a pathogenic effect for D616V. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.000-13.992Likely Pathogenic0.919Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.41Destabilizing0.21.95Ambiguous2.18Destabilizing0.36Likely Benign0.268Likely Benign-7.36Deleterious0.972Probably Damaging0.682Possibly Damaging3.26Benign0.00Affected0.06990.4393-2-37.7-15.96
c.1848T>A
D616E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D616E missense variant is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440900‑T‑A) but has no ClinVar submission. Functional prediction tools show a split assessment: benign calls come from REVEL, both polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic calls arise from PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The remaining predictors (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, ESM1b) are inconclusive. A high‑accuracy consensus (SGM) that aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN yields a pathogenic verdict. AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains benign, and Foldetta, which evaluates protein‑folding stability, is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence leans toward pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not conflict with ClinVar because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.0006-33440900-T-A16.20e-7-7.250In-Between0.695Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.96Ambiguous0.11.52Ambiguous1.24Ambiguous0.58Ambiguous0.092Likely Benign-2.85Deleterious0.421Benign0.232Benign3.32Benign0.03Affected3.37350.12250.4128230.014.03
c.1848T>G
D616E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 D616E is not reported in ClinVar but is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440900‑T‑G). Functional prediction tools that agree on benign impact include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict pathogenicity are PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, ESM1b) are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of conventional predictors lean toward a benign effect, but the high‑accuracy consensus is split, leaving the variant’s clinical significance unresolved. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on the bulk of predictions, and this does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.129801Structured0.166689Uncertain0.8670.2520.0006-33440900-T-G31.86e-6-7.250In-Between0.695Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.96Ambiguous0.11.52Ambiguous1.24Ambiguous0.58Ambiguous0.092Likely Benign-2.85Deleterious0.421Benign0.232Benign3.32Benign0.03Affected3.37350.12250.4128230.014.03
c.1849G>A
E617K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E617K is not reported in ClinVar but is present in gnomAD (6‑33440901‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from FoldX, premPS, and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. A third set of methods (Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Rosetta) yield uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E617K, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.111485Structured0.155123Uncertain0.8770.2400.0006-33440901-G-A16.20e-7-10.702Likely Pathogenic0.910Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.37Likely Benign0.11.19Ambiguous0.78Ambiguous0.17Likely Benign0.534Likely Pathogenic-3.32Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.987Probably Damaging-1.34Pathogenic0.48Tolerated3.37350.19810.628210-0.4-0.94
c.1849G>C
E617Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E617Q missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Foldetta and Rosetta give uncertain results, which are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority of high‑confidence predictors) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. Foldetta’s stability prediction is inconclusive. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a pathogenic impact for E617Q, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.111485Structured0.155123Uncertain0.8770.2400.000-8.650Likely Pathogenic0.747Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.20Likely Benign0.21.01Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.21Likely Benign0.481Likely Benign-2.39Neutral0.996Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging-1.39Pathogenic0.29Tolerated0.10500.5951220.0-0.98
c.184G>A
D62N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D62N is reported in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33423593‑G‑A) but has no ClinVar entry. In silico prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a likely benign status. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools indicates that D62N is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar classification because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.1256-33423593-G-A16.20e-7-4.607Likely Benign0.207Likely BenignLikely Benign0.075Likely Benign-1.08Neutral0.028Benign0.032Benign4.11Benign0.00Affected4.3210.16700.6154120.0-0.98
c.184G>C
D62H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D62H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign, while the only pathogenic call comes from SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports the variant as likely benign. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus indicates likely benign, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Based on the collective predictions, D62H is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.125-5.253Likely Benign0.511AmbiguousLikely Benign0.070Likely Benign-1.53Neutral0.172Benign0.248Benign4.05Benign0.00Affected0.20590.65791-10.322.05
c.184G>T
D62Y
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D62Y is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates Likely Benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.125-6.313Likely Benign0.569Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.109Likely Benign-2.17Neutral0.388Benign0.328Benign4.03Benign0.00Affected0.06570.5588-4-32.248.09
c.1850A>C
E617A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E617A is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, premPS, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas a majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic outcome; Rosetta and Foldetta are uncertain. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic interpretation. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.111485Structured0.155123Uncertain0.8770.2400.000-8.704Likely Pathogenic0.769Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.10.89Ambiguous0.63Ambiguous0.18Likely Benign0.627Likely Pathogenic-4.75Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.37Pathogenic0.46Tolerated0.30330.53170-15.3-58.04
c.1850A>G
E617G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E617G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from premPS, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain results are reported by FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and ESM1b. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.111485Structured0.155123Uncertain0.8770.2400.000-7.984In-Between0.777Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.59Ambiguous0.21.60Ambiguous1.10Ambiguous0.22Likely Benign0.701Likely Pathogenic-4.99Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.41Pathogenic0.18Tolerated0.23440.54420-23.1-72.06
c.1850A>T
E617V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E617V has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into benign (premPS, SIFT) and pathogenic (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default). Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain and Foldetta is also uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E617V. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.111485Structured0.155123Uncertain0.8770.2400.000-10.826Likely Pathogenic0.907Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.60Ambiguous0.10.92Ambiguous0.76Ambiguous0.28Likely Benign0.816Likely Pathogenic-5.71Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging-1.47Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.05870.6503-2-27.7-29.98
c.1851G>C
E617D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change E617D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a “Likely Benign” verdict; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also reports a benign effect. Based on the preponderance of evidence from both general and high‑accuracy predictors, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.111485Structured0.155123Uncertain0.8770.2400.000-1.349Likely Benign0.241Likely BenignLikely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.10.80Ambiguous0.46Likely Benign0.07Likely Benign0.322Likely Benign-0.01Neutral0.994Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.88Tolerated3.37350.18540.3386230.0-14.03
c.1851G>T
E617D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E617D is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ID 2584916.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score all indicate benign or likely benign. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and FATHMM predict a pathogenic impact, while Rosetta remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is likely benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence supports a benign classification, which does not contradict the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.111485Structured0.155123Uncertain0.8770.2400.000Uncertain 1-1.349Likely Benign0.241Likely BenignLikely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.10.80Ambiguous0.46Likely Benign0.07Likely Benign0.322Likely Benign-0.01Neutral0.994Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.88Tolerated3.37350.18540.3386230.0-14.03
c.1852C>A
Q618K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q618K is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) but is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440904‑C‑A). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome, while ESM1b is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields a benign result; and Foldetta also predicts benign stability. No predictions or folding stability results are missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.175930Structured0.138725Uncertain0.9040.2400.0006-33440904-C-A241.49e-5-7.708In-Between0.229Likely BenignLikely Benign0.02Likely Benign0.00.16Likely Benign0.09Likely Benign-0.46Likely Benign0.281Likely Benign-0.05Neutral0.338Benign0.111Benign-1.21Pathogenic0.29Tolerated3.37350.14130.275011-0.40.04
c.1852C>G
Q618E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q618E is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are ESM1b and FATHMM. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD presence, and there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.175930Structured0.138725Uncertain0.9040.2400.000-12.535Likely Pathogenic0.162Likely BenignLikely Benign0.46Likely Benign0.10.50Ambiguous0.48Likely Benign0.33Likely Benign0.233Likely Benign-1.16Neutral0.046Benign0.021Benign-1.17Pathogenic0.26Tolerated0.10030.1469220.00.98
c.1853A>C
Q618P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q618P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are SGM Consensus, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs) as uncertain. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward a benign effect, though a subset of high‑confidence tools suggest pathogenicity. The variant’s status is not contradicted by ClinVar, which has no entry for this change. Based on the collective evidence, Q618P is most likely benign, albeit with some conflicting pathogenic signals from high‑accuracy predictors.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.138725Uncertain0.9040.2400.000-8.273Likely Pathogenic0.248Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.11Likely Benign0.13.41Destabilizing1.65Ambiguous0.23Likely Benign0.449Likely Benign-3.32Deleterious0.261Benign0.246Benign-1.35Pathogenic0.08Tolerated0.19900.40110-11.9-31.01
c.1853A>G
Q618R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q618R is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome, while Rosetta and premPS are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.175930Structured0.138725Uncertain0.9040.2400.000-2.513Likely Benign0.207Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.43Likely Benign0.10.60Ambiguous0.09Likely Benign-0.66Ambiguous0.285Likely Benign1.22Neutral0.005Benign0.009Benign-1.24Pathogenic1.00Tolerated0.12180.116311-1.028.06
c.1853A>T
Q618L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q618L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and FATHMM. AlphaMissense‑Default is uncertain, whereas AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign. High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized – benign; SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) – Likely Pathogenic; Foldetta – benign. Overall, the majority of tools (nine benign vs. five pathogenic) predict a benign impact. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current predictions, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.138725Uncertain0.9040.2400.000-8.561Likely Pathogenic0.423AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.07Likely Benign0.10.20Likely Benign0.07Likely Benign0.31Likely Benign0.479Likely Benign-3.94Deleterious0.712Possibly Damaging0.268Benign-1.28Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.06120.4146-2-27.3-14.97
c.1854G>C
Q618H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Q618H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM. Four tools (FoldX, Foldetta, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive and Foldetta is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation or gnomAD presence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.175930Structured0.138725Uncertain0.9040.2400.000-7.092In-Between0.489AmbiguousLikely Benign0.59Ambiguous0.10.44Likely Benign0.52Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign0.475Likely Benign-1.99Neutral0.946Possibly Damaging0.638Possibly Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.04Affected0.10150.2655300.39.01
c.1854G>T
Q618H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q618H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM. Four tools (FoldX, Foldetta, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta is also uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.175930Structured0.138725Uncertain0.9040.2400.000-7.092In-Between0.489AmbiguousLikely Benign0.59Ambiguous0.10.44Likely Benign0.52Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign0.475Likely Benign-1.99Neutral0.946Possibly Damaging0.638Possibly Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.04Affected0.10150.2655300.39.01
c.1855A>C
T619P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant T619P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from FoldX and SIFT, while pathogenic predictions are made by REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools report uncertainty: premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the variant’s impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates a likely pathogenic effect; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts pathogenicity. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for T619P, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.219301Structured0.119723Uncertain0.9290.2370.000-12.879Likely Pathogenic0.933Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.43Likely Benign0.24.81Destabilizing2.62Destabilizing0.82Ambiguous0.860Likely Pathogenic-5.51Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.39Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.19400.38060-1-0.9-3.99
c.1855A>G
T619A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 T619A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and has no gnomAD entry. Consensus prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain results are reported by FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the change as benign, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—labels it as likely pathogenic; Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.219301Structured0.119723Uncertain0.9290.2370.000-6.341Likely Benign0.672Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.59Ambiguous0.10.62Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.53Ambiguous0.613Likely Pathogenic-4.21Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging-1.27Pathogenic0.17Tolerated0.39150.3109102.5-30.03
c.1855A>T
T619S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T619S is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only AlphaMissense‑Optimized. All other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a benign outcome, whereas the SGM Consensus, derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates pathogenicity. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, yields an uncertain result. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for T619S, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.219301Structured0.119723Uncertain0.9290.2370.000Uncertain 1-8.608Likely Pathogenic0.677Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.09Ambiguous0.21.35Ambiguous1.22Ambiguous0.85Ambiguous0.602Likely Pathogenic-3.42Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.05Affected3.37350.32550.286011-0.1-14.03
c.1856C>A
T619N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T619N has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all lean toward a deleterious effect: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict pathogenic. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is uncertain. Based on the overall consensus of the available predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.219301Structured0.119723Uncertain0.9290.2370.000-11.796Likely Pathogenic0.900Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.61Ambiguous0.10.96Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous1.23Destabilizing0.715Likely Pathogenic-4.61Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.38Pathogenic0.05Affected0.09980.269000-2.813.00
c.1856C>G
T619S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 T619S missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only AlphaMissense‑Optimized. All other evaluated predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains benign, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—labels the variant as Likely Pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, yields an uncertain result. No other high‑confidence stability predictions are available. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is assigned.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.219301Structured0.119723Uncertain0.9290.2370.000-8.608Likely Pathogenic0.677Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.09Ambiguous0.21.35Ambiguous1.22Ambiguous0.85Ambiguous0.523Likely Pathogenic-3.42Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.05Affected3.37350.32550.286011-0.1-14.03
c.1856C>T
T619I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T619I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as pathogenic: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect; the remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) return uncertain or inconclusive results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is uncertain. Based on the consensus of pathogenic predictions and the lack of benign evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.219301Structured0.119723Uncertain0.9290.2370.000-11.760Likely Pathogenic0.975Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-1.06Ambiguous0.1-1.35Ambiguous-1.21Ambiguous0.58Ambiguous0.735Likely Pathogenic-5.54Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.40Pathogenic0.03Affected0.08690.43770-15.212.05
c.1858T>A
S620T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S620T has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Rosetta. Those that predict pathogenicity are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized labeling the variant as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicating likely pathogenic, and Foldetta predicting benign stability. No prediction or folding result is missing or inconclusive. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward a pathogenic effect, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unclassified.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.139895Structured0.100377Uncertain0.9360.2190.000-9.171Likely Pathogenic0.660Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.52Ambiguous0.1-0.40Likely Benign0.06Likely Benign0.30Likely Benign0.551Likely Pathogenic-1.99Neutral0.896Possibly Damaging0.933Probably Damaging-1.25Pathogenic0.14Tolerated0.12880.5199110.114.03
c.1858T>C
S620P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S620P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly favor a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while premPS remains uncertain. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this prediction is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry (no contradiction).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.139895Structured0.100377Uncertain0.9360.2190.000-12.208Likely Pathogenic0.979Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.89Destabilizing0.512.23Destabilizing8.56Destabilizing0.73Ambiguous0.834Likely Pathogenic-3.62Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.02Affected0.21470.47761-1-0.810.04
c.1858T>G
S620A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S620A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as likely benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus as benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. No evidence from these analyses suggests a deleterious effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign based on the aggregate predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.139895Structured0.100377Uncertain0.9360.2190.000-4.637Likely Benign0.088Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.42Likely Benign0.0-0.90Ambiguous-0.66Ambiguous-0.19Likely Benign0.375Likely Benign-0.52Neutral0.968Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.27Pathogenic0.66Tolerated0.49500.3636112.6-16.00
c.1859C>T
S620L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S620L is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only premPS, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently predict pathogenicity. FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious outcome: the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic; AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain; and Foldetta is also uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that S620L is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.139895Structured0.100377Uncertain0.9360.2190.000-13.939Likely Pathogenic0.856Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-1.51Ambiguous0.1-1.08Ambiguous-1.30Ambiguous0.26Likely Benign0.736Likely Pathogenic-3.71Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging-1.33Pathogenic0.02Affected0.09760.4696-3-24.626.08
c.185A>C
D62A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D62A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a Likely Benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.125-3.983Likely Benign0.318Likely BenignLikely Benign0.070Likely Benign-1.67Neutral0.006Benign0.023Benign4.09Benign0.00Affected0.41520.59720-25.3-44.01
c.185A>G
D62G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D62G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.125-4.047Likely Benign0.316Likely BenignLikely Benign0.097Likely Benign-1.76Neutral0.012Benign0.032Benign4.07Benign0.00Affected0.40160.60811-13.1-58.04
c.185A>T
D62V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D62V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus predictions from multiple in‑silico tools cluster around a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate a benign outcome, while the sole pathogenic signal comes from SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain, and no Foldetta stability assessment is available. High‑accuracy methods reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports Likely Benign, and Foldetta data are missing. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence supports a benign classification for D62V, and this assessment does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar entry. Therefore, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.125-4.417Likely Benign0.489AmbiguousLikely Benign0.118Likely Benign-2.04Neutral0.028Benign0.088Benign4.04Benign0.00Affected0.10390.6129-2-37.7-15.96
c.1861C>G
R621G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R621G is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440913‑C‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. In silico predictors largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The only benign prediction is from FATHMM; FoldX and Foldetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.222385Structured0.084420Uncertain0.9450.2160.0006-33440913-C-G16.20e-7-16.611Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.18Ambiguous0.32.07Destabilizing1.63Ambiguous1.17Destabilizing0.558Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.84Benign0.01Affected3.37350.31090.2651-2-34.1-99.14
c.1862G>A
R621Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R621Q is listed in ClinVar (ID 578137.0) as benign and is present in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440914‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. No evidence from FoldX, Rosetta, or Foldetta supports a benign outcome. Overall, the preponderance of predictions indicates a likely pathogenic effect, which contradicts the benign classification reported in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.222385Structured0.084420Uncertain0.9450.2160.000Likely Benign 16-33440914-G-A191.18e-5-14.682Likely Pathogenic0.910Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.81Ambiguous0.11.13Ambiguous0.97Ambiguous1.35Destabilizing0.621Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging2.82Benign0.01Affected3.37350.25900.1963111.0-28.06243.754.30.00.0-0.40.2XXPotentially PathogenicThe guanidinium group of Arg621, located in an α helix (res. Glu617-Asn635), forms a salt bridge with Glu525 in a nearby loop and stacks with Leu635. In the variant simulations, the carboxamide side chain of Gln621, which can act as both a hydrogen bond acceptor and donor, also stacks with Leu635 but can only sporadically hydrogen bond with Glu525.Accordingly, the residue swap could affect the tertiary structure integrity by disrupting the salt bridge formation. Additionally, due to its location at the GAP-Ras interface, the residue swap could impact the complex formation with the GTPase, but this cannot be investigated using solvent-only simulations.
c.1862G>C
R621P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R621P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: FATHMM is the sole benign predictor, whereas the remaining eleven tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the change as pathogenic. The high‑accuracy subset further supports this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also indicates pathogenic. No prediction is inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for R621P.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.222385Structured0.084420Uncertain0.9450.2160.000-17.022Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.94Destabilizing0.49.39Destabilizing7.17Destabilizing0.96Ambiguous0.745Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.81Benign0.01Affected0.21430.36920-22.9-59.07
c.1862G>T
R621L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R621L has no ClinVar entry and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include Rosetta, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas the majority—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus—label it pathogenic or likely pathogenic. FoldX and Foldetta return uncertain results and are not considered evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains inconclusive. Overall, the consensus of the available predictions points to a pathogenic effect for R621L, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.222385Structured0.084420Uncertain0.9450.2160.000-16.055Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.70Ambiguous0.3-0.22Likely Benign0.74Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign0.718Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.83Benign0.00Affected0.14240.3568-3-28.3-43.03
c.1864A>C
T622P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant T622P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess functional impact uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign outcome; the only inconclusive result is premPS, which is listed as uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs) also indicates pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.268042Structured0.071403Uncertain0.9570.1980.000-16.410Likely Pathogenic0.964Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.81Destabilizing0.48.90Destabilizing5.86Destabilizing0.78Ambiguous0.924Likely Pathogenic-5.57Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.57Pathogenic0.01Affected0.17000.38760-1-0.9-3.99
c.1864A>G
T622A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T622A is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FoldX, which scores the variant as benign. In contrast, the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, SIFT, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results—AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS—are treated as unavailable for pathogenicity assessment. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for T622A, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.268042Structured0.071403Uncertain0.9570.1980.000-10.953Likely Pathogenic0.827Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.03Likely Benign0.01.04Ambiguous0.54Ambiguous0.75Ambiguous0.893Likely Pathogenic-4.58Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging-1.52Pathogenic0.01Affected0.31910.3091102.5-30.03
c.1864A>T
T622S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T622S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized labeling the variant as benign, whereas the SGM‑Consensus predicts it to be likely pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, yields an uncertain result. No other folding‑stability tools provide conclusive evidence. Overall, the preponderance of predictions, including the SGM‑Consensus, indicates that T622S is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.268042Structured0.071403Uncertain0.9570.1980.000-9.840Likely Pathogenic0.669Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.78Ambiguous0.11.36Ambiguous1.07Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.705Likely Pathogenic-3.52Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.25230.318311-0.1-14.03
c.1865C>A
T622N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant T622N has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. No prediction or stability result is missing; all available data are considered. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for T622N, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently lacks an entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.268042Structured0.071403Uncertain0.9570.1980.000-7.962In-Between0.693Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.00Ambiguous0.12.37Destabilizing1.69Ambiguous0.94Ambiguous0.564Likely Pathogenic-4.14Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging-1.24Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.09430.284800-2.813.00
c.1865C>G
T622S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T622S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized labeling the variant as benign, whereas the SGM‑Consensus predicts it to be likely pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, yields an uncertain result. No other folding‑stability tools provide conclusive evidence. Overall, the preponderance of predictions, including the SGM‑Consensus, indicates that T622S is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.268042Structured0.071403Uncertain0.9570.1980.000-9.840Likely Pathogenic0.669Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.78Ambiguous0.11.36Ambiguous1.07Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.595Likely Pathogenic-3.52Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.50Pathogenic0.09Tolerated0.25230.318311-0.1-14.03
c.1865C>T
T622I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T622I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign are Foldetta and premPS, whereas the remaining tools (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict it to be pathogenic; FoldX and Rosetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.268042Structured0.071403Uncertain0.9570.1980.000-13.276Likely Pathogenic0.979Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-1.47Ambiguous0.10.67Ambiguous-0.40Likely Benign0.45Likely Benign0.905Likely Pathogenic-5.57Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging-1.57Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08550.49260-15.212.05
c.1867C>A
L623I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L623I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign calls come only from REVEL and PROVEAN, while pathogenic calls are made by FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (which is derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Uncertain results are reported by Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, the SGM‑Consensus is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenicity. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.060667Uncertain0.9620.2110.000-11.952Likely Pathogenic0.911Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.15Destabilizing0.51.90Ambiguous2.53Destabilizing1.13Destabilizing0.398Likely Benign-1.99Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging1.63Pathogenic0.02Affected0.11090.3767220.70.00
c.1867C>G
L623V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L623V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only REVEL, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Optimized give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.060667Uncertain0.9620.2110.000-12.802Likely Pathogenic0.896Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.96Destabilizing0.31.84Ambiguous2.90Destabilizing1.45Destabilizing0.416Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging1.60Pathogenic0.01Affected0.16530.3588210.4-14.03
c.1867C>T
L623F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L623F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only REVEL, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN)—predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus predicts likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yields an uncertain result. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among pathogenic predictions and the lack of a benign signal, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.060667Uncertain0.9620.2110.000-11.655Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.22Ambiguous0.20.92Ambiguous1.07Ambiguous0.57Ambiguous0.440Likely Benign-3.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging1.65Pathogenic0.02Affected0.08380.301620-1.034.02
c.1868T>A
L623H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L623H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all converge on a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, while no tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No contradictory evidence is present. Based on the unanimous computational predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.060667Uncertain0.9620.2110.000-14.631Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.76Destabilizing0.32.22Destabilizing2.49Destabilizing2.40Destabilizing0.793Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging1.55Pathogenic0.00Affected0.10990.0541-2-3-7.023.98
c.1868T>C
L623P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L623P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions are returned by REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the change as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels it likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also reports a pathogenic effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.060667Uncertain0.9620.2110.000-12.385Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.70Destabilizing0.211.18Destabilizing8.94Destabilizing2.26Destabilizing0.788Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging1.56Pathogenic0.00Affected0.39610.1474-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1868T>G
L623R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L623R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. All available evidence points to a pathogenic impact. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction to ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.175930Structured0.060667Uncertain0.9620.2110.000-13.718Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.08Destabilizing1.43.28Destabilizing3.68Destabilizing2.31Destabilizing0.795Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging1.55Pathogenic0.00Affected0.13270.0615-3-2-8.343.03
c.186T>A
D62E
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D62E is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign, while the single pathogenic prediction comes from SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates a benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools and the high‑accuracy predictions point to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.125-2.653Likely Benign0.095Likely BenignLikely Benign0.065Likely Benign-0.19Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign4.49Benign0.00Affected0.18840.5800320.014.03
c.186T>G
D62E
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D62E is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign, while the single pathogenic call comes from SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates a benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools and the high‑accuracy predictions point to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.425610Structured0.476010Uncertain0.5750.7200.125-2.653Likely Benign0.095Likely BenignLikely Benign0.065Likely Benign-0.19Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign4.49Benign0.00Affected0.18840.5800320.014.03
c.1870A>C
T624P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T624P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as pathogenic, while premPS remains uncertain. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenic. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the collective predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.137348Structured0.052894Uncertain0.9620.2170.000-15.681Likely Pathogenic0.972Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.64Destabilizing0.29.04Destabilizing6.34Destabilizing0.83Ambiguous0.914Likely Pathogenic-5.94Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.55Pathogenic0.01Affected0.15000.35690-1-0.9-3.99
c.1870A>G
T624A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 T624A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are FoldX and Foldetta, while the majority of tools—REVEL, SIFT, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus—predict a pathogenic outcome. Uncertain predictions come from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Rosetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for T624A, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.137348Structured0.052894Uncertain0.9620.2170.000-12.967Likely Pathogenic0.902Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.38Likely Benign0.40.51Ambiguous0.07Likely Benign0.80Ambiguous0.895Likely Pathogenic-4.94Deleterious0.962Probably Damaging0.694Possibly Damaging-1.45Pathogenic0.03Affected0.29030.2872102.5-30.03
c.1870A>T
T624S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 T624S missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (status: None) and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Rosetta and premPS are uncertain and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present). Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.137348Structured0.052894Uncertain0.9620.2170.000-13.314Likely Pathogenic0.766Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.10Likely Benign0.10.95Ambiguous0.43Likely Benign0.69Ambiguous0.761Likely Pathogenic-3.93Deleterious0.826Possibly Damaging0.789Possibly Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.01Affected0.23260.281311-0.1-14.03
c.1871C>A
T624N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T624N is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX and Foldetta, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, SIFT, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus (which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Uncertain results come from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Rosetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification for T624N, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar status is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.137348Structured0.052894Uncertain0.9620.2170.000-14.658Likely Pathogenic0.915Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.24Likely Benign0.00.87Ambiguous0.32Likely Benign0.97Ambiguous0.848Likely Pathogenic-4.94Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging-1.53Pathogenic0.00Affected0.07730.269400-2.813.00
c.1871C>G
T624S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 T624S missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (status: None) and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Rosetta and premPS are uncertain and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present). Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.137348Structured0.052894Uncertain0.9620.2170.000-13.314Likely Pathogenic0.766Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.10Likely Benign0.10.95Ambiguous0.43Likely Benign0.69Ambiguous0.734Likely Pathogenic-3.93Deleterious0.826Possibly Damaging0.789Possibly Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.01Affected0.23260.281311-0.1-14.03
c.1871C>T
T624I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T624I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, premPS, and SIFT, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for T624I. This prediction is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and does not contradict any existing ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.137348Structured0.052894Uncertain0.9620.2170.000-10.999Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.74Ambiguous0.1-0.39Likely Benign-0.57Ambiguous0.14Likely Benign0.865Likely Pathogenic-5.95Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.972Probably Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.08Tolerated0.07280.47340-15.212.05
c.1873C>A
L625I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L625I is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools (premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments are likewise inconclusive: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is a 2‑vs‑2 tie, and Foldetta is uncertain. Consequently, the overall evidence leans toward pathogenicity, with no conflict with ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.229226Structured0.045896Uncertain0.9660.2150.000-11.713Likely Pathogenic0.866Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.75Ambiguous0.60.72Ambiguous0.74Ambiguous1.09Destabilizing0.412Likely Benign-1.96Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.06Benign0.01Affected0.08640.3588220.70.00
c.1873C>G
L625V
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant L625V is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3392716.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status but suggests a higher likelihood of pathogenicity.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.229226Structured0.045896Uncertain0.9660.2150.000Uncertain 1-11.319Likely Pathogenic0.833Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.80Ambiguous0.71.69Ambiguous1.75Ambiguous1.42Destabilizing0.480Likely Benign-2.96Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.01Affected0.13060.3427210.4-14.03
c.1873C>T
L625F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L625F is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Predictions that are uncertain or inconclusive are FoldX, premPS, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts Likely Pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is Uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.229226Structured0.045896Uncertain0.9660.2150.000-12.989Likely Pathogenic0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.70Ambiguous1.32.26Destabilizing1.98Ambiguous0.74Ambiguous0.479Likely Benign-3.82Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.01Benign0.01Affected0.05860.299820-1.034.02
c.1874T>A
L625H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L625H is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.229226Structured0.045896Uncertain0.9660.2150.000-14.264Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.85Destabilizing0.32.96Destabilizing2.91Destabilizing2.02Destabilizing0.738Likely Pathogenic-6.87Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.98Benign0.00Affected0.09540.0541-2-3-7.023.98
c.1874T>C
L625P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L625P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining 13 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods give consistent results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.229226Structured0.045896Uncertain0.9660.2150.000-14.819Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.47Destabilizing0.612.49Destabilizing8.98Destabilizing1.98Destabilizing0.746Likely Pathogenic-6.92Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.98Benign0.00Affected0.32940.1313-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1874T>G
L625R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L625R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.229226Structured0.045896Uncertain0.9660.2150.000-14.507Likely Pathogenic0.984Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.31Destabilizing0.74.21Destabilizing3.26Destabilizing1.88Destabilizing0.733Likely Pathogenic-5.93Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.99Benign0.00Affected0.10910.0615-3-2-8.343.03
c.1876A>C
I626L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I626L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default predict a pathogenic outcome. Three tools—Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta—return uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, while the SGM Consensus (a majority vote among AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split, and Foldetta also yields an uncertain stability prediction. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign interpretation, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.109221Structured0.040732Uncertain0.9700.2230.000-10.696Likely Pathogenic0.622Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.32Likely Benign0.11.00Ambiguous0.66Ambiguous0.83Ambiguous0.311Likely Benign-1.86Neutral0.955Possibly Damaging0.985Probably Damaging3.52Benign0.12Tolerated0.07410.246122-0.70.00
c.1876A>G
I626V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I626V is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. Predictions that are uncertain or unavailable are AlphaMissense‑Default, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus also indicates a likely benign outcome, while Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Based on the overall consensus of the available predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.109221Structured0.040732Uncertain0.9700.2230.000-6.636Likely Benign0.398AmbiguousLikely Benign1.24Ambiguous0.01.06Ambiguous1.15Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.182Likely Benign-0.80Neutral0.969Probably Damaging0.960Probably Damaging3.33Benign0.13Tolerated0.10030.289143-0.3-14.03
c.1876A>T
I626F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 I626F is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS (uncertain), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default—predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, but the SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates that I626F is likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.109221Structured0.040732Uncertain0.9700.2230.000-14.483Likely Pathogenic0.952Likely PathogenicAmbiguous4.37Destabilizing0.32.12Destabilizing3.25Destabilizing0.66Ambiguous0.631Likely Pathogenic-3.78Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.00Affected0.04810.196410-1.734.02
c.1877T>A
I626N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I626N is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also classifies the variant as pathogenic. Based on the unanimous agreement of the majority of tools and the corroborating high‑accuracy predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.109221Structured0.040732Uncertain0.9700.2230.000-15.240Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.49Destabilizing0.13.56Destabilizing3.53Destabilizing2.36Destabilizing0.621Likely Pathogenic-6.41Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.03Benign0.00Affected0.08800.0270-2-3-8.00.94
c.1877T>C
I626T
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant I626T is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3359331.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions are returned by REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, SGM‑Consensus indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools points to a pathogenic effect, contradicting the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.109221Structured0.040732Uncertain0.9700.2230.000Uncertain 1-10.420Likely Pathogenic0.946Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.94Destabilizing0.12.70Destabilizing2.82Destabilizing2.23Destabilizing0.640Likely Pathogenic-4.18Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.04Benign0.00Affected0.10000.08400-1-5.2-12.05
c.1877T>G
I626S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I626S is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.109221Structured0.040732Uncertain0.9700.2230.000-14.449Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.80Destabilizing0.04.54Destabilizing4.17Destabilizing2.16Destabilizing0.706Likely Pathogenic-5.41Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.04Benign0.00Affected0.23080.0858-1-2-5.3-26.08
c.1878T>G
I626M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I626M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS give uncertain results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicts likely pathogenic; Foldetta’s stability prediction is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.109221Structured0.040732Uncertain0.9700.2230.000-11.407Likely Pathogenic0.618Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.72Ambiguous0.11.78Ambiguous1.25Ambiguous0.92Ambiguous0.405Likely Benign-2.76Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.06Benign0.02Affected0.06610.195921-2.618.03
c.1879G>A
A627T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A627T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. Two tools, premPS and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, return uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a pathogenic verdict, and Foldetta also predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that A627T is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.037862Uncertain0.9700.2100.000-8.613Likely Pathogenic0.937Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.27Destabilizing0.32.33Destabilizing2.30Destabilizing0.80Ambiguous0.505Likely Pathogenic-3.95Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.807Possibly Damaging2.56Benign0.01Affected0.10690.540310-2.530.03
c.1879G>C
A627P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant A627P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools were grouped by consensus: Benign – none; Pathogenic – SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy methods specifically: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. All available evidence points to a deleterious effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.037862Uncertain0.9700.2100.000-15.404Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.78Destabilizing0.37.84Destabilizing6.81Destabilizing1.13Destabilizing0.740Likely Pathogenic-4.96Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.982Probably Damaging2.43Pathogenic0.01Affected0.17520.34221-1-3.426.04
c.1879G>T
A627S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A627S missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are Rosetta, PROVEAN, and ESM1b. The remaining tools—FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS—return uncertain or inconclusive results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split, and Foldetta is uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions lean toward a benign impact. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.100716Structured0.037862Uncertain0.9700.2100.000-10.782Likely Pathogenic0.329Likely BenignLikely Benign1.11Ambiguous0.22.05Destabilizing1.58Ambiguous0.71Ambiguous0.316Likely Benign-2.94Deleterious0.411Benign0.387Benign2.78Benign0.11Tolerated0.22660.422411-2.616.00
c.187G>A
E63K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 E63K missense variant (ClinVar ID 2830630.0) is listed as “Uncertain” and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict a pathogenic outcome. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. Overall, the high‑accuracy consensus leans toward a benign effect, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.429200Structured0.474807Uncertain0.4940.7390.125Uncertain 1-4.976Likely Benign0.894Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.103Likely Benign-0.70Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.678Possibly Damaging3.98Benign0.00Affected4.3210.19950.726110-0.4-0.94
c.187G>C
E63Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E63Q is listed in ClinVar (ID 2132335.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority of the four high‑accuracy tools) also indicates a benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of predictions points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.429200Structured0.474807Uncertain0.4940.7390.125Uncertain 1-4.038Likely Benign0.687Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.078Likely Benign-0.85Neutral0.659Possibly Damaging0.775Possibly Damaging3.90Benign0.00Affected4.3210.09700.6787220.0-0.98
c.1880C>A
A627D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A627D is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts pathogenic. All available evidence points to a damaging impact. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.037862Uncertain0.9700.2100.000-16.603Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.09Destabilizing1.35.83Destabilizing5.96Destabilizing1.58Destabilizing0.726Likely Pathogenic-5.93Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.961Probably Damaging2.43Pathogenic0.00Affected0.15020.18160-2-5.344.01
c.1880C>G
A627G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A627G is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic. Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.037862Uncertain0.9700.2100.000-11.716Likely Pathogenic0.640Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.38Ambiguous0.12.07Destabilizing1.73Ambiguous1.25Destabilizing0.458Likely Benign-3.96Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.876Possibly Damaging2.51Benign0.01Affected0.19210.299010-2.2-14.03
c.1880C>T
A627V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A627V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity unanimously classify the variant as deleterious: REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. Two tools return uncertain results: Rosetta and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta is pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.037862Uncertain0.9700.2100.000-12.150Likely Pathogenic0.984Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.64Destabilizing1.51.59Ambiguous2.12Destabilizing0.74Ambiguous0.549Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.900Possibly Damaging2.47Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08560.4551002.428.05
c.1882A>C
K628Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K628Q is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta, all of which score the variant as benign. In contrast, the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus (which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). The premPS tool yields an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.035486Uncertain0.9570.2290.000-12.263Likely Pathogenic0.983Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.46Likely Benign0.0-0.16Likely Benign0.15Likely Benign0.95Ambiguous0.587Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.46Pathogenic0.00Affected0.34440.1358110.4-0.04
c.1882A>G
K628E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K628E missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entries in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that are inconclusive or uncertain are FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as Uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a deleterious effect. The variant is most likely pathogenic based on these predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.035486Uncertain0.9570.2290.000-14.658Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.04Ambiguous0.20.52Ambiguous0.78Ambiguous1.06Destabilizing0.652Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.37Pathogenic0.00Affected0.29090.0810010.40.94
c.1883A>C
K628T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K628T is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: the majority—including REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus—label the change as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Only Rosetta predicts a benign outcome, while FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence indicates that K628T is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.035486Uncertain0.9570.2290.000-14.675Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.08Ambiguous0.10.07Likely Benign0.58Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.661Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.36Pathogenic0.00Affected0.16220.35410-13.2-27.07
c.1883A>G
K628R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant K628R is reported in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440935‑A‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools show a split assessment: benign calls come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic calls are made by REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Two tools remain inconclusive (premPS and AlphaMissense‑Default). The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, yields a likely pathogenic verdict, while the high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that combines FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts benign. Overall, the majority of evidence leans toward pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not conflict with ClinVar status, which is currently absent.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.035486Uncertain0.9570.2290.0006-33440935-A-G16.20e-7-11.324Likely Pathogenic0.476AmbiguousLikely Benign0.22Likely Benign0.1-0.11Likely Benign0.06Likely Benign0.94Ambiguous0.592Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.990Probably Damaging2.49Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37340.38730.087323-0.628.01
c.1883A>T
K628M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K628M missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX and premPS, whereas the majority of tools—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yields an inconclusive result, which is treated as unavailable evidence. Overall, the preponderance of predictions points to a pathogenic effect for K628M, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.035486Uncertain0.9570.2290.000-14.949Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.41Likely Benign0.2-0.76Ambiguous-0.59Ambiguous0.37Likely Benign0.669Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.34Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08020.38750-15.83.02
c.1884G>C
K628N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K628N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only REVEL, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated algorithms—premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—classify the variant as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta provide uncertain or inconclusive stability predictions and are therefore treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments specifically show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicting pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus indicating a likely pathogenic status, and Foldetta yielding an uncertain result. Based on the overwhelming agreement among the majority of prediction tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.035486Uncertain0.9570.2290.000-12.284Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.78Ambiguous0.10.59Ambiguous0.69Ambiguous1.11Destabilizing0.403Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.37Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37340.27400.1254010.4-14.07
c.1884G>T
K628N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K628N is catalogued in gnomAD (6‑33440936‑G‑T) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: a single benign prediction from REVEL, and a consensus of nine pathogenic predictions from premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also labels the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus confirms a likely pathogenic status, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, yields an uncertain result and therefore does not alter the overall interpretation. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic according to the available computational evidence, and this assessment is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.035486Uncertain0.9570.2290.0006-33440936-G-T16.20e-7-12.284Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.78Ambiguous0.10.59Ambiguous0.69Ambiguous1.11Destabilizing0.403Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.37Pathogenic0.00Affected3.37340.27400.1254010.4-14.07
c.1885G>A
V629I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V629I is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT, with ESM1b also indicating pathogenicity. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) resolves to benign, and Foldetta also predicts a benign outcome. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence supports a benign classification for V629I, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.040537Structured0.034796Uncertain0.9700.2360.000-9.876Likely Pathogenic0.462AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.22Likely Benign0.10.37Likely Benign0.08Likely Benign0.21Likely Benign0.305Likely Benign-1.00Neutral0.975Probably Damaging0.958Probably Damaging3.26Benign0.04Affected0.06500.2919430.314.03
c.1885G>C
V629L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V629L has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of algorithms predict a pathogenic outcome: Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Two tools report uncertainty: Foldetta and premPS. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus also indicates likely pathogenic, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.040537Structured0.034796Uncertain0.9700.2360.000-12.785Likely Pathogenic0.972Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.06Likely Benign0.22.26Destabilizing1.16Ambiguous0.54Ambiguous0.391Likely Benign-2.79Deleterious0.975Probably Damaging0.958Probably Damaging3.22Benign0.02Affected0.08050.333621-0.414.03
c.1885G>T
V629F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V629F is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact; premPS is uncertain and is not counted as evidence. High‑accuracy methods further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta is pathogenic. No prediction is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the absence of any ClinVar annotation, the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction from ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.040537Structured0.034796Uncertain0.9700.2360.000-13.484Likely Pathogenic0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.41Destabilizing0.54.40Destabilizing3.91Destabilizing0.64Ambiguous0.642Likely Pathogenic-4.68Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.00Affected0.05600.2915-1-1-1.448.04
c.1886T>A
V629D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V629D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return pathogenic or likely pathogenic calls, whereas only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) predicts pathogenic. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.040537Structured0.034796Uncertain0.9700.2360.000-17.143Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.85Destabilizing0.13.82Destabilizing3.84Destabilizing2.17Destabilizing0.713Likely Pathogenic-6.37Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.06Benign0.00Affected0.12840.0541-2-3-7.715.96
c.1886T>C
V629A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 V629A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results: Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta as Pathogenic (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs). Overall, the majority of predictions (8 pathogenic vs. 3 benign) indicate that V629A is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.040537Structured0.034796Uncertain0.9700.2360.000-8.652Likely Pathogenic0.926Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.24Destabilizing0.11.96Ambiguous2.10Destabilizing1.58Destabilizing0.492Likely Benign-3.58Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.18Benign0.11Tolerated0.25180.212400-2.4-28.05
c.1886T>G
V629G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 V629G missense change is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining eleven tools (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) uniformly predict a pathogenic outcome; AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) is pathogenic. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates that V629G is likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.040537Structured0.034796Uncertain0.9700.2360.000-13.150Likely Pathogenic0.871Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.81Destabilizing0.04.52Destabilizing4.17Destabilizing1.94Destabilizing0.678Likely Pathogenic-6.47Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.00Affected0.19030.2240-1-3-4.6-42.08
c.1888A>C
I630L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I630L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) but is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440940‑A‑C). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are ESM1b and FATHMM. The SGM Consensus, which takes a majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive (two benign vs. two pathogenic). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign; the SGM Consensus remains unavailable. Based on the overall predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.040537Structured0.036106Uncertain0.9660.2360.0006-33440940-A-C-8.949Likely Pathogenic0.277Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.39Likely Benign0.00.23Likely Benign-0.08Likely Benign0.33Likely Benign0.165Likely Benign-1.30Neutral0.102Benign0.108Benign-0.81Pathogenic0.27Tolerated3.37340.06880.246122-0.70.00
c.1888A>G
I630V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I630V is listed in ClinVar as Benign and is present in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33440940‑A‑G). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome; all other tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, ESM1b) return uncertain or inconclusive results. The high‑accuracy consensus (SGM Consensus) derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN yields a benign majority (2 benign vs. 1 pathogenic, 1 uncertain). AlphaMissense‑Optimized also predicts benign. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, is uncertain. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of predictions support a benign effect, and this conclusion aligns with the ClinVar designation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, with no contradiction to the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.040537Structured0.036106Uncertain0.9660.2360.000Benign/Likely benign 46-33440940-A-G593.66e-5-7.264In-Between0.145Likely BenignLikely Benign1.33Ambiguous0.00.94Ambiguous1.14Ambiguous0.64Ambiguous0.143Likely Benign-0.38Neutral0.018Benign0.011Benign-1.37Pathogenic0.35Tolerated3.37340.09600.289143-0.3-14.03235.026.2-0.10.0-0.30.1XPotentially BenignThe sec-butyl side chain of Ile630, located in an α helix (res. Glu617-Asn635), packs with hydrophobic residues (e.g., Phe594, Leu633, Ile626, Ile602) in the hydrophobic inter-helix space between two α helices (res. Glu617-Asn635 and res. Glu582-Met603).In the variant simulations, the iso-propyl side chain of Val630, which shares a similar size and physicochemical properties with Ile630 in the WT, maintains similar interactions in the inter-helix space. Although no negative structural effects are observed during the simulations, the implications of the residue swap on the complex formation with the GTPase, due to its location, cannot be investigated using solvent-only simulations.
c.1888A>T
I630F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 I630F is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that agree on a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain results are reported by Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicting benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicting likely pathogenic, and Foldetta yielding an uncertain stability change. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for I630F. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.040537Structured0.036106Uncertain0.9660.2360.000-13.669Likely Pathogenic0.705Likely PathogenicLikely Benign2.52Destabilizing0.30.76Ambiguous1.64Ambiguous0.75Ambiguous0.782Likely Pathogenic-3.12Deleterious0.935Possibly Damaging0.473Possibly Damaging-1.46Pathogenic0.01Affected0.04430.196410-1.734.02
c.1889T>A
I630N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I630N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect. Benign predictions: none. Pathogenic predictions: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts pathogenic. Based on the consensus of all available predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.040537Structured0.036106Uncertain0.9660.2360.000-14.259Likely Pathogenic0.979Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.96Destabilizing0.02.55Destabilizing2.76Destabilizing2.39Destabilizing0.825Likely Pathogenic-4.86Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging-1.49Pathogenic0.00Affected0.08530.0270-2-3-8.00.94
c.1889T>C
I630T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I630T has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic impact are REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default; ESM1b remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates benign, whereas the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a pathogenic majority, and Foldetta also predicts pathogenic. No prediction is missing or inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for I630T, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.040537Structured0.036106Uncertain0.9660.2360.000-7.780In-Between0.754Likely PathogenicLikely Benign2.77Destabilizing0.12.27Destabilizing2.52Destabilizing1.94Destabilizing0.734Likely Pathogenic-2.15Neutral0.997Probably Damaging0.961Probably Damaging-1.46Pathogenic0.35Tolerated0.09850.06400-1-5.2-12.05
c.1889T>G
I630S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I630S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as pathogenic. No contradictory evidence is present. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not conflict with the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.040537Structured0.036106Uncertain0.9660.2360.000-12.527Likely Pathogenic0.952Likely PathogenicAmbiguous3.61Destabilizing0.13.74Destabilizing3.68Destabilizing2.25Destabilizing0.851Likely Pathogenic-3.86Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.981Probably Damaging-1.44Pathogenic0.00Affected0.23630.0858-1-2-5.3-26.08
c.188A>C
E63A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E63A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on benign impact include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict pathogenicity are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a Likely Benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign effect, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.429200Structured0.474807Uncertain0.4940.7390.125-3.426Likely Benign0.850Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.120Likely Benign-1.84Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.678Possibly Damaging3.90Benign0.00Affected0.32810.66490-15.3-58.04
c.188A>G
E63G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E63G is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Benign. AlphaMissense‑Optimized yields an uncertain result, and no Foldetta stability assessment is available. Overall, the majority of individual predictors and the SGM‑Consensus lean toward a benign interpretation, with no conflicting evidence from ClinVar. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current computational predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.429200Structured0.474807Uncertain0.4940.7390.125-3.450Likely Benign0.898Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.150Likely Benign-2.24Neutral0.659Possibly Damaging0.775Possibly Damaging3.87Benign0.00Affected0.27050.57860-23.1-72.06
c.188A>T
E63V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 E63V missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not present in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on benign impact include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict pathogenicity are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Benign. AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns an Uncertain result, and no Foldetta stability data are available. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign effect, with several high‑confidence predictors supporting pathogenicity, leaving the assessment inconclusive. The predictions do not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is assigned. Based on the aggregate predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.429200Structured0.474807Uncertain0.4940.7390.125-3.588Likely Benign0.921Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.143Likely Benign-2.15Neutral0.824Possibly Damaging0.775Possibly Damaging3.85Benign0.00Affected0.05590.7584-2-27.7-29.98
c.1890C>G
I630M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I630M is listed in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440942‑C‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic calls come from REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. FoldX is uncertain, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments give AlphaMissense‑Optimized benign, Foldetta benign, and an inconclusive SGM Consensus. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.040537Structured0.036106Uncertain0.9660.2360.0006-33440942-C-G16.20e-7-10.586Likely Pathogenic0.259Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.55Ambiguous0.10.32Likely Benign-0.12Likely Benign1.06Destabilizing0.508Likely Pathogenic-1.90Neutral0.833Possibly Damaging0.700Possibly Damaging-1.38Pathogenic0.02Affected3.37340.06180.175912-2.618.03
c.1891C>A
Q631K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Q631K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from FoldX, Foldetta, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score. Uncertain or inconclusive results are reported by Rosetta, premPS, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a benign effect; the SGM‑Consensus, a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, and this assessment does not conflict with the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.038963Uncertain0.9480.2300.000-15.194Likely Pathogenic0.953Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.37Likely Benign0.11.13Ambiguous0.38Likely Benign0.88Ambiguous0.596Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.958Probably Damaging0.931Probably Damaging2.79Benign0.01Affected0.12880.215711-0.40.04
c.1891C>G
Q631E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q631E is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) classifying it as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yielding an uncertain result. Overall, the majority of evidence (eight pathogenic predictions versus three benign) points to a pathogenic impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which is currently unavailable.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.038963Uncertain0.9480.2300.000-15.628Likely Pathogenic0.782Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.11.55Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.532Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.981Probably Damaging2.78Benign0.01Affected0.10680.1264220.00.98
c.1892A>C
Q631P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q631P is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: FATHMM is the sole benign predictor, while the remaining eleven tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) all classify the change as pathogenic. The high‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also indicates pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.038963Uncertain0.9480.2300.000-16.914Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.98Destabilizing0.311.18Destabilizing8.08Destabilizing0.56Ambiguous0.641Likely Pathogenic-5.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.75Benign0.00Affected0.19990.29820-11.9-31.01
c.1892A>G
Q631R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q631R is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign predictions come from FoldX, Foldetta, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; Rosetta and premPS are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for Q631R, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.038963Uncertain0.9480.2300.000-14.881Likely Pathogenic0.958Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.34Likely Benign0.10.83Ambiguous0.25Likely Benign0.77Ambiguous0.627Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.973Probably Damaging0.969Probably Damaging2.77Benign0.01Affected0.11930.065311-1.028.06
c.1892A>T
Q631L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q631L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD status: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FATHMM and Foldetta, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: SGM‑Consensus (likely pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign; these results are reported but not used as definitive evidence when inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from consensus and individual predictors indicates a pathogenic effect for Q631L. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.038963Uncertain0.9480.2300.000-14.727Likely Pathogenic0.901Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-1.23Ambiguous0.00.95Ambiguous-0.14Likely Benign0.51Ambiguous0.619Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious0.982Probably Damaging0.954Probably Damaging2.85Benign0.05Affected0.06270.3150-2-27.3-14.97
c.1893G>C
Q631H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q631H is reported in gnomAD (6‑33440945‑G‑C) but has no ClinVar entry. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Pathogenic) all indicate a pathogenic impact. Uncertain results come from FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.038963Uncertain0.9480.2300.0006-33440945-G-C21.24e-6-13.282Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.84Ambiguous0.22.21Destabilizing1.53Ambiguous0.84Ambiguous0.475Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging2.75Benign0.00Affected3.37340.08340.1757030.39.01
c.1893G>T
Q631H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q631H is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign predictions come from REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of algorithms—including AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, Rosetta, and the SGM Consensus—classify the change as pathogenic. Predictions from FoldX, Foldetta, and premPS are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic, while Foldetta’s stability analysis is uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for Q631H, which is consistent with the absence of a benign ClinVar annotation and the lack of population data in gnomAD.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.038963Uncertain0.9480.2300.000-13.282Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.84Ambiguous0.22.21Destabilizing1.53Ambiguous0.84Ambiguous0.475Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging2.75Benign0.00Affected3.37340.08340.1757030.39.01
c.1894A>C
N632H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N632H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta, whereas the remaining pathogenic‑oriented tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently predict a deleterious impact. FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS give uncertain results and are therefore not considered evidence for either side. High‑accuracy assessments further support this dichotomy: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a benign outcome, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a pathogenic verdict, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a benign effect. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic classification for N632H, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.000-14.273Likely Pathogenic0.587Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.55Ambiguous0.3-0.58Ambiguous-0.02Likely Benign0.59Ambiguous0.827Likely Pathogenic-4.48Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.937Probably Damaging-1.53Pathogenic0.00Affected0.14670.6406210.323.04
c.1894A>G
N632D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N632D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity largely agree: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict a pathogenic effect, while SGM‑Consensus also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus remains likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is uncertain. Because the majority of evidence points to deleterious impact and there is no ClinVar annotation to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.000-14.117Likely Pathogenic0.921Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.84Ambiguous0.41.50Ambiguous1.67Ambiguous1.09Destabilizing0.827Likely Pathogenic-4.31Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.776Possibly Damaging-1.53Pathogenic0.01Affected0.17910.3854210.00.98
c.1894A>T
N632Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N632Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from FoldX and premPS, while pathogenic calls are made by SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain results are reported by Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is also inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.000-15.245Likely Pathogenic0.840Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.05Likely Benign0.7-1.02Ambiguous-0.54Ambiguous0.28Likely Benign0.844Likely Pathogenic-7.04Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.960Probably Damaging-1.55Pathogenic0.00Affected0.06980.5959-2-22.249.07
c.1895A>C
N632T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N632T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, PROVEAN, and FATHMM. The remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, and AlphaMissense‑Default—return uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward a benign impact, and this does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available). Thus, based on the current computational evidence, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.000-6.797Likely Benign0.371AmbiguousLikely Benign1.14Ambiguous0.2-0.58Ambiguous0.28Likely Benign0.39Likely Benign0.541Likely Pathogenic-4.48Deleterious0.214Benign0.062Benign-1.49Pathogenic0.13Tolerated0.12950.6809002.8-13.00
c.1895A>G
N632S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N632S is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and polyPhen2_HumVar. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, and FATHMM. The remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and ESM1b—return uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions (six benign vs. three pathogenic) support a benign classification, and this does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current computational evidence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.000-7.677In-Between0.291Likely BenignLikely Benign0.81Ambiguous0.10.78Ambiguous0.80Ambiguous0.41Likely Benign0.469Likely Benign-3.85Deleterious0.718Possibly Damaging0.086Benign-1.37Pathogenic0.12Tolerated0.33020.6486112.7-27.03
c.1895A>T
N632I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N632I is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS and Foldetta, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: SGM‑Consensus (likely pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, remains likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, indicates a benign effect. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic classification for N632I, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar entry.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.000-12.620Likely Pathogenic0.881Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.33Ambiguous0.3-1.24Ambiguous0.05Likely Benign0.20Likely Benign0.839Likely Pathogenic-7.76Deleterious0.987Probably Damaging0.887Possibly Damaging-1.56Pathogenic0.02Affected0.07120.5973-2-38.0-0.94
c.1896C>A
N632K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N632K is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) classify it as pathogenic; premPS is uncertain. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) predicts benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for N632K, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.0006-33440948-C-A-13.266Likely Pathogenic0.974Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.06Likely Benign0.20.12Likely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.95Ambiguous0.766Likely Pathogenic-5.14Deleterious0.983Probably Damaging0.714Possibly Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37340.23750.489701-0.414.07
c.1896C>G
N632K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N632K is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta, whereas the majority of other in‑silico predictors (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict a pathogenic outcome; premPS is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Based on the overall consensus of the majority of tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.042364Structured0.041437Uncertain0.9380.2540.000-13.266Likely Pathogenic0.974Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.06Likely Benign0.20.12Likely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.95Ambiguous0.766Likely Pathogenic-5.14Deleterious0.983Probably Damaging0.714Possibly Damaging-1.43Pathogenic0.01Affected3.37340.23750.489701-0.414.07
c.1897C>A
L633M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L633M has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split, and Foldetta is also inconclusive. Overall, the majority of definitive predictions (5 pathogenic vs. 4 benign) lean toward a pathogenic impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.045352Structured0.045407Uncertain0.9520.2520.000-10.300Likely Pathogenic0.718Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.61Ambiguous0.11.47Ambiguous1.04Ambiguous0.90Ambiguous0.355Likely Benign-1.99Neutral1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.77Benign0.01Affected0.09840.268342-1.918.03
c.1897C>G
L633V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L633V is not reported in ClinVar and is present in the gnomAD database (ID 6‑33440949‑C‑G). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect comprise FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, SGM‑Consensus, and Foldetta; the Rosetta score is uncertain and therefore not considered. High‑accuracy methods give a pathogenic consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, but the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) and Foldetta both predict pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a pathogenic impact for L633V, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.045407Uncertain0.9520.2520.0006-33440949-C-G16.20e-7-9.992Likely Pathogenic0.760Likely PathogenicLikely Benign2.32Destabilizing0.21.71Ambiguous2.02Destabilizing1.32Destabilizing0.327Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.86Benign0.03Affected3.37340.15170.2766120.4-14.03
c.1898T>A
L633Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L633Q is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.045407Uncertain0.9520.2520.000-14.303Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.98Destabilizing0.12.97Destabilizing2.98Destabilizing2.23Destabilizing0.712Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.69Benign0.00Affected0.13330.0876-2-2-7.314.97
c.1898T>C
L633P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L633P (ClinVar ID 858973.0) is listed as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM. All other evaluated tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores it as Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts Pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the ClinVar designation, the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction to its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.045407Uncertain0.9520.2520.000Pathogenic/Likely path. 2-15.669Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.60Destabilizing0.210.15Destabilizing8.38Destabilizing2.42Destabilizing0.693Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.70Benign0.00Affected3.37340.35280.0953-3-3-5.4-16.04193.265.10.00.00.10.0XPotentially PathogenicThe iso-butyl side chain of Leu633, located in the middle of an α helix (res. Glu617-Asn635), packs hydrophobically with nearby residues (e.g., Leu653, Val629, Leu551) in the WT simulations.In the variant simulations, the pyrrolidine side chain of Pro633 is not as optimal for hydrophobic packing as Leu633 in the WT. Additionally, proline lacks a free backbone amide group, so Pro633 cannot form a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of Val629, which disrupts the continuity of the secondary structure element.
c.1898T>G
L633R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L633R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenicity. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the absence of any benign signal, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.045407Uncertain0.9520.2520.000-14.360Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.41Destabilizing0.24.85Destabilizing4.63Destabilizing2.15Destabilizing0.667Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.70Benign0.00Affected0.16740.0518-3-2-8.343.03
c.189G>C
E63D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E63D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also reports it as likely benign. The Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.429200Structured0.474807Uncertain0.4940.7390.125-3.821Likely Benign0.594Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.066Likely Benign-0.83Neutral0.267Benign0.585Possibly Damaging3.98Benign0.00Affected0.15240.4130320.0-14.03
c.189G>T
E63D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E63D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions come from polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority of the high‑accuracy tools) also indicates benign. Foldetta results are unavailable, so they do not influence the assessment. Overall, the collective evidence points to a benign effect for E63D, and this conclusion does not conflict with ClinVar, which currently has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.429200Structured0.474807Uncertain0.4940.7390.125-3.821Likely Benign0.594Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.066Likely Benign-0.83Neutral0.267Benign0.585Possibly Damaging3.98Benign0.00Affected0.15240.4130320.0-14.03
c.1900G>A
A634T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A634T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus from multiple in‑silico predictors indicates a pathogenic effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict pathogenicity, while only FATHMM predicts benign. Two tools give uncertain results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessment shows that the SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) supports a pathogenic classification, whereas AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Foldetta remain inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for A634T, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.085092Structured0.052058Uncertain0.9320.2420.000-12.451Likely Pathogenic0.946Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.56Destabilizing0.11.11Ambiguous1.84Ambiguous1.34Destabilizing0.603Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging2.51Benign0.01Affected0.13970.524010-2.530.03
c.1900G>C
A634P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A634P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign predictions are limited to FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the consensus of these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.085092Structured0.052058Uncertain0.9320.2420.000-15.372Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.17Destabilizing0.27.72Destabilizing5.95Destabilizing1.39Destabilizing0.745Likely Pathogenic-4.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging2.50Benign0.01Affected0.20900.34291-1-3.426.04
c.1900G>T
A634S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 A634S variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are FATHMM and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; those that agree on a pathogenic effect are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b. The remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which simply lacks an entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.085092Structured0.052058Uncertain0.9320.2420.000-9.706Likely Pathogenic0.434AmbiguousLikely Benign0.91Ambiguous0.11.28Ambiguous1.10Ambiguous0.77Ambiguous0.506Likely Pathogenic-2.99Deleterious0.953Possibly Damaging0.985Probably Damaging2.67Benign0.05Affected0.26070.423111-2.616.00
c.1901C>A
A634D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A634D is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity all agree on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the variant as pathogenic. No tool predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates pathogenicity; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, reports a pathogenic effect. No predictions or stability results are missing or inconclusive. Based on the unanimous computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.085092Structured0.052058Uncertain0.9320.2420.000-16.727Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.26Destabilizing0.54.24Destabilizing4.75Destabilizing1.79Destabilizing0.731Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging2.49Pathogenic0.00Affected0.17900.18160-2-5.344.01
c.1901C>G
A634G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant A634G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic calls are made by Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, both polyPhen‑2 versions, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX and Foldetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments indicate AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, whereas the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic. Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward pathogenicity, and the high‑accuracy consensus also supports a pathogenic interpretation. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.085092Structured0.052058Uncertain0.9320.2420.000-10.685Likely Pathogenic0.613Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.63Ambiguous0.12.27Destabilizing1.95Ambiguous1.09Destabilizing0.418Likely Benign-3.98Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.990Probably Damaging2.69Benign0.15Tolerated0.21820.318710-2.2-14.03
c.1901C>T
A634V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A634V is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls are made by REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score, while only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome; Rosetta remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence supports a pathogenic effect for A634V, which is in contrast to its current ClinVar classification of uncertain significance. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, contradicting its ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.085092Structured0.052058Uncertain0.9320.2420.000Uncertain 1-12.612Likely Pathogenic0.971Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.67Destabilizing0.21.44Ambiguous2.06Destabilizing1.14Destabilizing0.631Likely Pathogenic-3.98Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging2.55Benign0.01Affected0.12150.4371002.428.05
c.1903A>C
N635H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N635H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b. Three tools (FoldX, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy methods give the following: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta predicts benign. No prediction or folding‑stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the available evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000-12.507Likely Pathogenic0.419AmbiguousLikely Benign1.07Ambiguous0.2-0.10Likely Benign0.49Likely Benign0.91Ambiguous0.429Likely Benign-4.78Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.879Possibly Damaging2.90Benign0.00Affected0.11840.3720210.323.04
c.1903A>G
N635D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N635D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Pathogenic). Predictions that are inconclusive are Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy methods give an uncertain result for AlphaMissense‑Optimized, a Likely Pathogenic verdict from the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and an uncertain outcome from Foldetta. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this assessment is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000-14.453Likely Pathogenic0.799Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.47Likely Benign0.10.73Ambiguous0.60Ambiguous1.26Destabilizing0.432Likely Benign-4.71Deleterious0.955Possibly Damaging0.628Possibly Damaging2.92Benign0.01Affected0.17250.1937210.00.98
c.1903A>T
N635Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N635Y has no ClinVar record and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Rosetta. Those that predict a pathogenic impact are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX is uncertain and therefore treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicating likely pathogenic, and Foldetta predicting a benign outcome. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward a benign interpretation, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000-14.931Likely Pathogenic0.662Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.73Ambiguous0.3-0.11Likely Benign0.31Likely Benign-0.16Likely Benign0.554Likely Pathogenic-7.64Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.922Probably Damaging2.88Benign0.00Affected0.07500.3632-2-22.249.07
c.1904A>C
N635T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N635T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and ESM1b; polyPhen‑2 HumVar, however, classifies it as benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain, and FoldX and premPS also yield uncertain results. Overall, the majority of evidence (five benign vs. four pathogenic) supports a benign classification. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD presence, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000-11.705Likely Pathogenic0.256Likely BenignLikely Benign1.50Ambiguous0.10.44Likely Benign0.97Ambiguous0.81Ambiguous0.240Likely Benign-5.58Deleterious0.536Possibly Damaging0.184Benign2.98Benign0.04Affected0.12060.4032002.8-13.00
c.1904A>G
N635S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N635S is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is present in gnomAD (ID 6-33440956-A-G). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, SIFT, and ESM1b. Predictions that are inconclusive or unavailable are FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta is also inconclusive. Overall, the majority of available predictions lean toward a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000Conflicting 46-33440956-A-G106.20e-6-9.002Likely Pathogenic0.101Likely BenignLikely Benign0.80Ambiguous0.10.67Ambiguous0.74Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.104Likely Benign-4.45Deleterious0.261Benign0.044Benign3.06Benign0.05Affected3.37340.28160.4279112.7-27.03196.030.90.10.0-0.30.2XUncertainIn the WT simulations, the carboxamide side chain of Asn635, located on the outer surface of an α helix (res. Glu617-Asn635), forms hydrogen bonds with Gln631 on the same α helix and with the hydroxyl side chain of Ser590 on an opposing α helix (res. Glu582-Met603).In the variant simulations, the side chain of Ser635 is shorter than asparagine and thus prefers to hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of Gln631 on the same helix and, to a lesser extent, with Ser590 compared to Asn635 in the WT. Ser635 forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone atoms of the same helix, which may destabilize the helix, although this is not clearly evident in the simulations. The weakening of the hydrogen bond between Ser635 and Ser590 in the variant may also weaken the tertiary structure assembly between the helices.Additionally, Asn635 is at the GTPase interface. However, the implication of the residue swap on the complex formation with the GTPase cannot be investigated using solvent-only simulations.
c.1904A>T
N635I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N635I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign effect, while the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—classifies the variant as pathogenic. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts a benign impact. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward a pathogenic interpretation, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000-15.012Likely Pathogenic0.608Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.94Ambiguous0.1-0.05Likely Benign0.45Likely Benign-0.35Likely Benign0.363Likely Benign-8.56Deleterious0.980Probably Damaging0.889Possibly Damaging2.88Benign0.00Affected0.07360.3776-2-38.0-0.94
c.1905C>A
N635K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N635K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict pathogenicity: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely pathogenic outcome. Predictions from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS are uncertain and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for N635K, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000-13.144Likely Pathogenic0.967Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.60Ambiguous0.10.75Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous0.85Ambiguous0.332Likely Benign-5.64Deleterious0.949Possibly Damaging0.550Possibly Damaging2.92Benign0.00Affected0.21250.251010-0.414.07
c.1905C>G
N635K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N635K is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also classifies the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Pathogenic and the SGM Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yields an uncertain result. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple in silico predictors indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.039760Structured0.060246Uncertain0.9000.2520.000-13.144Likely Pathogenic0.967Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.60Ambiguous0.10.75Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous0.85Ambiguous0.332Likely Benign-5.64Deleterious0.949Possibly Damaging0.550Possibly Damaging2.92Benign0.00Affected0.21250.251010-0.414.07
c.1906T>A
F636I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F636I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) reports pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among both general and high‑accuracy tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.000-14.031Likely Pathogenic0.983Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.96Destabilizing0.24.57Destabilizing3.77Destabilizing1.10Destabilizing0.501Likely Pathogenic-5.78Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.977Probably Damaging3.44Benign0.03Affected0.16600.2153101.7-34.02
c.1906T>C
F636L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F636L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic, the SGM Consensus confirms Likely Pathogenic, and the Foldetta stability analysis is inconclusive. Other stability tools (FoldX, Rosetta, premPS) are uncertain. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the consensus from high‑accuracy methods, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.000-11.871Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.88Ambiguous0.10.69Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.71Ambiguous0.478Likely Benign-5.78Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.952Probably Damaging3.60Benign0.22Tolerated0.18530.3024201.0-34.02
c.1906T>G
F636V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F636V is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.000-14.603Likely Pathogenic0.975Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.06Destabilizing0.15.13Destabilizing4.10Destabilizing1.07Destabilizing0.533Likely Pathogenic-6.74Deleterious0.991Probably Damaging0.985Probably Damaging3.44Benign0.04Affected0.18410.2030-1-11.4-48.04
c.1907T>A
F636Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F636Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, favors a pathogenic outcome (3/4 votes). High‑accuracy assessments further reveal AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as inconclusive. Stability‑based tools FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS are uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.000-9.638Likely Pathogenic0.695Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.84Ambiguous0.10.51Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous0.90Ambiguous0.394Likely Benign-2.89Deleterious0.927Possibly Damaging0.836Possibly Damaging3.40Benign0.08Tolerated0.12970.186673-4.116.00
c.1907T>C
F636S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F636S is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, while the remaining 13 tools (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus) all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is pathogenic. No prediction or folding‑stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among the majority of tools and the high‑accuracy methods, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.000-14.290Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.08Destabilizing0.12.66Destabilizing2.37Destabilizing1.51Destabilizing0.559Likely Pathogenic-7.50Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.03Affected0.38770.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1907T>G
F636C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F636C is reported in gnomAD (ID 6‑33440959‑T‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic). Only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome; FoldX is uncertain and therefore not counted as evidence. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming majority of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.0006-33440959-T-G31.86e-6-13.287Likely Pathogenic0.972Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.74Ambiguous0.12.65Destabilizing2.20Destabilizing1.22Destabilizing0.612Likely Pathogenic-7.67Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.04Affected3.37340.23010.0830-2-4-0.3-44.04
c.1908T>A
F636L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F636L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic, the SGM Consensus confirms Likely Pathogenic, and the Foldetta stability analysis is inconclusive. Other stability tools (FoldX, Rosetta, premPS) are uncertain. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the consensus from high‑accuracy methods, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.000-11.871Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.88Ambiguous0.10.69Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.71Ambiguous0.268Likely Benign-5.78Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.952Probably Damaging3.60Benign0.22Tolerated0.18530.3024201.0-34.02
c.1908T>G
F636L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F636L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus confirms a Likely Pathogenic status, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, yields an uncertain result. No evidence from FoldX‑MD, Rosetta, or premPS is available to alter this view. Overall, the majority of reliable predictors indicate a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.041405Structured0.071525Uncertain0.9130.2640.000-11.871Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.88Ambiguous0.10.69Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.71Ambiguous0.268Likely Benign-5.78Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.952Probably Damaging3.60Benign0.22Tolerated0.18530.3024201.0-34.02
c.1909T>A
S637T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S637T is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome; the only inconclusive result is from Rosetta, which is treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.076542Structured0.083482Uncertain0.9200.2530.000-4.116Likely Benign0.092Likely BenignLikely Benign0.36Likely Benign0.1-0.91Ambiguous-0.28Likely Benign-0.39Likely Benign0.067Likely Benign-0.19Neutral0.086Benign0.019Benign3.45Benign0.19Tolerated0.16750.4572110.114.03
c.1909T>C
S637P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S637P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls arise from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments give a pathogenic signal: the SGM Consensus predicts likely pathogenic, Foldetta predicts destabilizing pathogenic effects, whereas AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic interpretation, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.076542Structured0.083482Uncertain0.9200.2530.000-11.455Likely Pathogenic0.793Likely PathogenicAmbiguous6.73Destabilizing0.16.36Destabilizing6.55Destabilizing0.44Likely Benign0.192Likely Benign-3.12Deleterious0.946Possibly Damaging0.360Benign3.36Benign0.03Affected0.23740.40941-1-0.810.04
c.1909T>G
S637A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S637A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, SIFT, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), REVEL, FoldX, and premPS. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Benign,” and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, is inconclusive (Uncertain). Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates a benign effect. The variant’s status is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.076542Structured0.083482Uncertain0.9200.2530.000-4.186Likely Benign0.137Likely BenignLikely Benign0.31Likely Benign0.10.99Ambiguous0.65Ambiguous0.22Likely Benign0.078Likely Benign-0.64Neutral0.120Benign0.182Benign3.41Benign1.00Tolerated0.48530.2996112.6-16.00
c.190A>C
I64L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I64L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Benign, SGM‑Consensus indicates Likely Benign, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact for I64L, and this conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.422041Structured0.475481Uncertain0.4780.7470.125-2.498Likely Benign0.437AmbiguousLikely Benign0.087Likely Benign-0.27Neutral0.010Benign0.001Benign4.13Benign0.00Affected0.06280.303022-0.70.00
c.190A>G
I64V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I64V is reported as “Likely Benign” in ClinVar and is not listed in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates likely benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of computational evidence supports a benign classification, and this is consistent with the ClinVar status (no conflicting pathogenic annotation).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.422041Structured0.475481Uncertain0.4780.7470.125-2.616Likely Benign0.154Likely BenignLikely Benign0.086Likely Benign0.12Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign4.24Benign0.00Affected0.09940.330243-0.3-14.03
c.190A>T
I64L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I64L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Benign, SGM‑Consensus indicates Likely Benign, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.422041Structured0.475481Uncertain0.4780.7470.125-2.498Likely Benign0.437AmbiguousLikely Benign0.087Likely Benign-0.27Neutral0.010Benign0.001Benign4.13Benign0.00Affected0.06280.303022-0.70.00
c.1910C>A
S637Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S637Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of individual predictors (seven versus five) lean toward pathogenicity, and the consensus‑based SGM‑Consensus also supports a likely pathogenic classification. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.076542Structured0.083482Uncertain0.9200.2530.000-12.633Likely Pathogenic0.770Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.13Likely Benign0.11.52Ambiguous0.83Ambiguous0.50Likely Benign0.209Likely Benign-3.78Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.681Possibly Damaging3.35Benign0.00Affected0.09680.4071-3-2-0.576.10
c.1910C>G
S637C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S637C is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and ESM1b. High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign; Foldetta predicts benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign impact, and this assessment does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.076542Structured0.083482Uncertain0.9200.2530.000-10.040Likely Pathogenic0.138Likely BenignLikely Benign0.25Likely Benign0.00.54Ambiguous0.40Likely Benign0.22Likely Benign0.169Likely Benign-2.83Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.533Possibly Damaging3.34Benign0.01Affected0.13270.44390-13.316.06
c.1910C>T
S637F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant S637F is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain results are reported by Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The high‑accuracy consensus (SGM‑Consensus) aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN and yields a pathogenic verdict. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a benign effect. AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, and this assessment does not contradict the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.076542Structured0.083482Uncertain0.9200.2530.000-13.266Likely Pathogenic0.831Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.01Likely Benign0.10.96Ambiguous0.49Likely Benign0.49Likely Benign0.222Likely Benign-3.92Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.681Possibly Damaging3.35Benign0.01Affected0.07800.4126-3-23.660.10
c.1912A>C
K638Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K638Q missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.045352Structured0.098064Uncertain0.9370.2600.000-9.561Likely Pathogenic0.556AmbiguousLikely Benign0.45Likely Benign0.00.37Likely Benign0.41Likely Benign0.22Likely Benign0.421Likely Benign-3.60Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging3.42Benign0.12Tolerated0.36230.0920110.4-0.04
c.1912A>G
K638E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K638E is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are uncertain or unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification; this conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.098064Uncertain0.9370.2600.000-13.390Likely Pathogenic0.927Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.57Ambiguous0.01.00Ambiguous0.79Ambiguous0.32Likely Benign0.363Likely Benign-3.70Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.947Probably Damaging3.50Benign0.12Tolerated0.30360.0790010.40.94
c.1913A>C
K638T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K638T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus from standard in silico predictors shows a split: benign calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic calls arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default; FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments give AlphaMissense‑Optimized a benign score, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic effect for K638T. This prediction is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.098064Uncertain0.9370.2600.000-8.856Likely Pathogenic0.775Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.87Ambiguous0.00.23Likely Benign0.55Ambiguous0.07Likely Benign0.404Likely Benign-5.39Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.52Benign0.03Affected0.16320.26190-13.2-27.07
c.1913A>G
K638R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K638R is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that uniformly indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Benign). In contrast, PROVEAN and polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predict a pathogenic impact, while premPS remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, is benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.045352Structured0.098064Uncertain0.9370.2600.000Uncertain 1-2.700Likely Benign0.110Likely BenignLikely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.1-0.04Likely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.53Ambiguous0.216Likely Benign-2.55Deleterious0.649Possibly Damaging0.240Benign3.41Benign0.13Tolerated3.37310.40260.097523-0.628.01
c.1913A>T
K638M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K638M missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FoldX, FATHMM, premPS, and Foldetta. Those that predict a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized and Rosetta give uncertain results, which are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion is not contradicted by the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.098064Uncertain0.9370.2600.000-9.702Likely Pathogenic0.882Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-0.21Likely Benign0.00.61Ambiguous0.20Likely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.526Likely Pathogenic-5.19Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.01Affected0.09290.28960-15.83.02
c.1914G>C
K638N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K638N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. Predictions that are inconclusive or unavailable are FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification; this conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.098064Uncertain0.9370.2600.000-9.420Likely Pathogenic0.947Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.74Ambiguous0.10.90Ambiguous0.82Ambiguous0.40Likely Benign0.256Likely Benign-4.59Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.02Affected0.28750.1126100.4-14.07
c.1914G>T
K638N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K638N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default) predict a pathogenic impact. Predictions that are inconclusive or unavailable are FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification; this conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.045352Structured0.098064Uncertain0.9370.2600.000-9.420Likely Pathogenic0.947Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.74Ambiguous0.10.90Ambiguous0.82Ambiguous0.40Likely Benign0.256Likely Benign-4.59Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.02Affected0.28750.1126100.4-14.07
c.1915T>A
F639I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include FATHMM and Rosetta, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-12.548Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.32Destabilizing0.30.47Likely Benign2.40Destabilizing1.44Destabilizing0.545Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.659Possibly Damaging3.08Benign0.01Affected0.20700.1755101.7-34.02
c.1915T>C
F639L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen2_HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are returned by SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Rosetta and Foldetta provide uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic, while Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Based on the majority of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD absence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-11.660Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.12Destabilizing0.71.15Ambiguous1.64Ambiguous1.43Destabilizing0.499Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.380Benign3.12Benign0.03Affected0.23470.2726201.0-34.02
c.1915T>G
F639V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: FATHMM is the sole benign predictor, while the remaining 12 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) all predict pathogenicity; Rosetta is uncertain and is therefore not counted. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the consensus of these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-12.910Likely Pathogenic0.965Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.17Destabilizing0.11.18Ambiguous2.68Destabilizing1.47Destabilizing0.560Likely Pathogenic-6.97Deleterious0.992Probably Damaging0.756Possibly Damaging3.08Benign0.02Affected0.20740.1583-1-11.4-48.04
c.1916T>A
F639Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639Y is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions are returned by SGM‑Consensus, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments give a mixed signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the change as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward pathogenicity, and this assessment does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-11.762Likely Pathogenic0.670Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.92Ambiguous0.10.99Ambiguous1.46Ambiguous1.20Destabilizing0.330Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.930Possibly Damaging0.263Benign3.06Benign0.03Affected0.15300.163573-4.116.00
c.1916T>C
F639S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639S is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-11.511Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.92Destabilizing0.33.08Destabilizing4.00Destabilizing1.87Destabilizing0.561Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious0.965Probably Damaging0.457Possibly Damaging3.12Benign0.04Affected0.38130.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1916T>G
F639C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (both HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b all indicate pathogenicity, while only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the change as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts a pathogenic effect. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-12.532Likely Pathogenic0.984Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.02Destabilizing0.22.80Destabilizing3.41Destabilizing1.38Destabilizing0.615Likely Pathogenic-7.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.935Probably Damaging3.05Benign0.01Affected0.24510.0783-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1917T>A
F639L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen2_HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are returned by SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Rosetta and Foldetta provide uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic, while Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive. Based on the majority of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD absence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-11.660Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.12Destabilizing0.71.15Ambiguous1.64Ambiguous1.43Destabilizing0.336Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.380Benign3.12Benign0.03Affected0.23470.2726201.0-34.02
c.1917T>G
F639L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F639L is not reported in ClinVar or gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict pathogenicity: SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Uncertain results come from Rosetta and Foldetta. High‑accuracy methods specifically show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as inconclusive. Overall, the balance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for F639L, and this assessment does not conflict with any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.038042Structured0.117665Uncertain0.9420.2840.000-11.660Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.12Destabilizing0.71.15Ambiguous1.64Ambiguous1.43Destabilizing0.336Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.380Benign3.12Benign0.03Affected0.23470.2726201.0-34.02
c.1918A>C
T640P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T640P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. In silico predictors uniformly favor a benign effect: REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, polyPhen2_HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense-Default, and AlphaMissense-Optimized all indicate benign. No tool predicts pathogenicity. FoldX and ESM1b were inconclusive. High‑accuracy methods corroborate this: AlphaMissense-Optimized is benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense-Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) also predicts benign. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for T640P.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.137043Uncertain0.8930.2840.000-7.594In-Between0.077Likely BenignLikely Benign0.98Ambiguous0.3-0.38Likely Benign0.30Likely Benign0.31Likely Benign0.313Likely Benign-0.91Neutral0.004Benign0.002Benign3.47Benign0.14Tolerated0.21790.47220-1-0.9-3.99
c.1918A>G
T640A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T640A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a benign effect: AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, REVEL, FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and SIFT all score the substitution as benign. No tool predicts pathogenicity; only Rosetta yields an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this benign trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is labeled likely benign, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) remains uncertain. Taken together, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a benign classification for T640A, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.137043Uncertain0.8930.2840.000-3.068Likely Benign0.074Likely BenignLikely Benign0.14Likely Benign0.10.93Ambiguous0.54Ambiguous-0.17Likely Benign0.078Likely Benign0.51Neutral0.009Benign0.001Benign3.51Benign0.42Tolerated0.38340.3202102.5-30.03
c.1918A>T
T640S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T640S is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 2980241.0) and is present in the gnomAD database (gnomAD ID 6‑33441177‑A‑T). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome; the only inconclusive result is from FoldX, which is treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments confirm benignity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is benign. Overall, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion is consistent with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.137043Uncertain0.8930.2840.000Benign 16-33441177-A-T16.20e-7-2.371Likely Benign0.062Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.78Ambiguous0.10.43Likely Benign-0.18Likely Benign-0.30Likely Benign0.088Likely Benign0.92Neutral0.000Benign0.001Benign3.60Benign0.33Tolerated3.37300.34060.348411-0.1-14.03
c.1919C>A
T640N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T640N is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a benign effect: REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as tolerated or benign. Only the protein‑stability predictors FoldX and Rosetta returned uncertain results, which are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate the benign prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also reports a benign effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.137043Uncertain0.8930.2840.000-4.258Likely Benign0.107Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.50Ambiguous0.20.53Ambiguous0.02Likely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.097Likely Benign0.51Neutral0.229Benign0.084Benign3.45Benign0.25Tolerated0.15180.407900-2.813.00
c.1919C>G
T640S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T640S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a benign effect: AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, premPS, Foldetta, Rosetta, REVEL, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Benign) all classify the change as tolerated. No tool predicts pathogenicity; the only inconclusive result is from FoldX, which is listed as Uncertain. High‑accuracy methods corroborate the benign assessment: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) reports Benign. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this change.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.137043Uncertain0.8930.2840.000-2.371Likely Benign0.062Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.78Ambiguous0.10.43Likely Benign-0.18Likely Benign-0.30Likely Benign0.109Likely Benign0.92Neutral0.000Benign0.001Benign3.60Benign0.33Tolerated3.37300.34060.348411-0.1-14.03
c.1919C>T
T640I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T640I is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only PROVEAN predicts a pathogenic outcome. The remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and Foldetta) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is unavailable due to a tie, and Foldetta also yields an uncertain stability change. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.066181Structured0.137043Uncertain0.8930.2840.000-7.256In-Between0.358AmbiguousLikely Benign0.70Ambiguous0.10.66Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous0.28Likely Benign0.193Likely Benign-2.75Deleterious0.322Benign0.022Benign3.46Benign0.12Tolerated0.10300.47930-15.212.05
c.191T>A
I64K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I64K is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus remains benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which contains no report for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.422041Structured0.475481Uncertain0.4780.7470.125-3.206Likely Benign0.964Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.159Likely Benign-0.47Neutral0.334Benign0.029Benign4.07Benign0.00Affected0.08780.0740-2-3-8.415.01
c.191T>C
I64T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I64T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) but is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33425799‑T‑C). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a Likely Benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign, and the Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.422041Structured0.475481Uncertain0.4780.7470.1256-33425799-T-C16.20e-7-3.183Likely Benign0.943Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.075Likely Benign-0.51Neutral0.092Benign0.007Benign4.08Benign0.00Affected4.3210.09780.0851-10-5.2-12.05
c.191T>G
I64R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I64R is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), which classifies the variant as “Likely Benign.” Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is uncertain, and the Foldetta protein‑folding stability assessment is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar assertion, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.422041Structured0.475481Uncertain0.4780.7470.125-2.108Likely Benign0.936Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.165Likely Benign-0.54Neutral0.842Possibly Damaging0.068Benign4.05Benign0.00Affected0.11030.0940-2-3-9.043.03
c.1921T>A
S641T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S641T is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a benign effect: REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all score the variant as benign. Rosetta also predicts a benign outcome, while FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive (marked “Uncertain”). No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign; Foldetta remains uncertain. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.125101Structured0.157322Uncertain0.7860.2700.000-6.637Likely Benign0.087Likely BenignLikely Benign0.83Ambiguous0.30.41Likely Benign0.62Ambiguous0.13Likely Benign0.043Likely Benign-1.50Neutral0.008Benign0.003Benign3.39Benign0.09Tolerated0.15050.5888110.114.03
c.1921T>C
S641P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S641P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN and SIFT. The remaining tools (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) leaning toward benign, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of reliable predictions indicate a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current computational evidence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.125101Structured0.157322Uncertain0.7860.2700.000-6.907Likely Benign0.378AmbiguousLikely Benign1.73Ambiguous1.30.07Likely Benign0.90Ambiguous0.59Ambiguous0.205Likely Benign-3.05Deleterious0.000Benign0.000Benign3.34Benign0.04Affected0.22890.57911-1-0.810.04
c.1921T>G
S641A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S641A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, every tool examined (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly classifies the substitution as benign. No pathogenic predictions are present. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields “Likely Benign”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also reports a benign effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign based on current predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.125101Structured0.157322Uncertain0.7860.2700.000-6.103Likely Benign0.092Likely BenignLikely Benign0.37Likely Benign0.2-0.28Likely Benign0.05Likely Benign0.27Likely Benign0.067Likely Benign-2.07Neutral0.000Benign0.001Benign3.43Benign0.17Tolerated0.48730.4680112.6-16.00
c.1922C>T
S641L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S641L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive because it yields an equal split of benign and pathogenic calls. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.125101Structured0.157322Uncertain0.7860.2700.000-9.501Likely Pathogenic0.237Likely BenignLikely Benign0.33Likely Benign0.3-0.14Likely Benign0.10Likely Benign0.32Likely Benign0.103Likely Benign-4.33Deleterious0.115Benign0.014Benign3.39Benign0.07Tolerated0.12480.5376-3-24.626.08
c.1924A>C
K642Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 K642Q is not reported in ClinVar and has no allele in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar; pathogenic predictions come from SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy assessment shows AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as Benign. No other high‑confidence predictions are available. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign effect, with the single high‑accuracy pathogenic signal from SGM‑Consensus not contradicting the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not conflict with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.181468Uncertain0.8060.2890.000-12.186Likely Pathogenic0.862Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.08Likely Benign0.00.17Likely Benign0.13Likely Benign0.42Likely Benign0.380Likely Benign-3.88Deleterious0.576Possibly Damaging0.383Benign2.87Benign0.02Affected0.44770.1253110.4-0.04
c.1924A>G
K642E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant K642E is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM) and pathogenic predictions (SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized). High‑accuracy methods give a mixed signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic, whereas Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign stability. No prediction is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward pathogenicity, and this is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation; there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.181468Uncertain0.8060.2890.000-11.287Likely Pathogenic0.968Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.26Likely Benign0.1-0.13Likely Benign0.07Likely Benign0.40Likely Benign0.404Likely Benign-3.92Deleterious0.116Benign0.011Benign2.96Benign0.03Affected0.38650.1013010.40.94
c.1925A>C
K642T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K642T is listed in ClinVar (ID 437411.0) as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools split in a 7‑to‑5 ratio: pathogenic calls come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default, while benign calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM; FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs) as Benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, aligning with the ClinVar classification and not contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.181468Uncertain0.8060.2890.000Likely Pathogenic 1-12.823Likely Pathogenic0.948Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.53Ambiguous0.10.30Likely Benign0.42Likely Benign0.28Likely Benign0.484Likely Benign-5.88Deleterious0.872Possibly Damaging0.839Possibly Damaging2.86Benign0.00Affected3.37310.18990.32700-13.2-27.07213.5-8.7-0.30.40.30.2XUncertainThe amino side chain of Lys642, located on the surface of an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), is not involved in any interactions in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the shorter side chain of Thr642 forms hydrogen bonds with Glu643 and Thr640 on the same α helix.Regardless, Lys642 is positioned directly at the GAP-Ras interface, and in the SynGAP-Ras WT simulations, its amino side chain forms salt bridges with the carboxylate groups of Ras residues Asp33 and Asp38. The shorter Thr642 is more likely to prefer hydrogen bonding with Glu643 and Thr640 on the same α helix, even in the Ras complex. Thus, the effect of the residue swap on the complex formation with the GTPase cannot be explored using solvent-only simulations.
c.1925A>G
K642R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K642R is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign. In contrast, PROVEAN, SIFT, and ESM1b predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, Foldetta is benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a benign classification, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.061840Structured0.181468Uncertain0.8060.2890.000-10.562Likely Pathogenic0.192Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.13Likely Benign0.10.39Likely Benign0.13Likely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.319Likely Benign-2.79Deleterious0.001Benign0.001Benign2.91Benign0.02Affected0.49620.126232-0.628.01
c.1925A>T
K642M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K642M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that assess the variant’s effect fall into two broad groups: benign predictions come from FoldX, premPS, and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Two tools give uncertain results: Rosetta and Foldetta. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments are as follows: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus also predicts pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple independent predictors indicates that K642M is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.181468Uncertain0.8060.2890.000-13.557Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.43Likely Benign0.10.62Ambiguous0.53Ambiguous0.21Likely Benign0.510Likely Pathogenic-5.88Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.941Probably Damaging2.81Benign0.00Affected0.12560.35890-15.83.02
c.1926G>C
K642N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 K642N missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy methods give a pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is benign. With two of the three high‑accuracy tools supporting pathogenicity and an overall balance of predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic. This assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.181468Uncertain0.8060.2890.000-11.423Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.25Likely Benign0.00.05Likely Benign0.15Likely Benign0.48Likely Benign0.273Likely Benign-4.88Deleterious0.958Probably Damaging0.392Benign2.88Benign0.00Affected0.35530.1590100.4-14.07
c.1926G>T
K642N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K642N is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic impact are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar (benign). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta as benign. Overall, seven tools favor pathogenicity versus six favoring benign, and the high‑accuracy predictions are mixed. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the preponderance of evidence, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.061840Structured0.181468Uncertain0.8060.2890.000-11.423Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.25Likely Benign0.00.05Likely Benign0.15Likely Benign0.48Likely Benign0.274Likely Benign-4.88Deleterious0.958Probably Damaging0.392Benign2.88Benign0.00Affected0.35530.1590100.4-14.07
c.1927G>A
E643K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E643K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split opinion: benign calls come from REVEL, FoldX, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls arise from SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Rosetta) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments focus on AlphaMissense‑Optimized (Uncertain), SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), and Foldetta (Uncertain). Because the consensus of the most reliable predictors leans toward pathogenicity, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.215915Uncertain0.8710.3150.000-14.318Likely Pathogenic0.868Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.39Likely Benign0.21.44Ambiguous0.92Ambiguous0.82Ambiguous0.449Likely Benign-3.79Deleterious0.042Benign0.004Benign2.95Benign0.04Affected0.29610.626901-0.4-0.94
c.1927G>C
E643Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E643Q is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign outcome, while premPS is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as benign. Overall, the majority of predictions (8 benign vs. 5 pathogenic) and the two of three high‑accuracy tools favor a benign classification. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.215915Uncertain0.8710.3150.000-12.404Likely Pathogenic0.688Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.49Likely Benign0.60.15Likely Benign0.32Likely Benign0.83Ambiguous0.341Likely Benign-2.86Deleterious0.446Benign0.038Benign2.94Benign0.01Affected0.16030.6308220.0-0.98
c.1928A>C
E643A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E643A is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and has no entry in gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX and Foldetta give uncertain results. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward a benign interpretation, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.215915Uncertain0.8710.3150.000-12.562Likely Pathogenic0.733Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.80Ambiguous0.20.39Likely Benign0.60Ambiguous0.21Likely Benign0.469Likely Benign-5.81Deleterious0.771Possibly Damaging0.233Benign2.92Benign0.01Affected0.40740.60960-15.3-58.04
c.1928A>G
E643G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E643G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic impact comprise SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default; FoldX and Foldetta are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic. Foldetta’s stability prediction is uncertain. Overall, the majority of reliable tools predict pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current computational evidence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.215915Uncertain0.8710.3150.000-12.503Likely Pathogenic0.707Likely PathogenicLikely Benign1.45Ambiguous0.32.06Destabilizing1.76Ambiguous1.01Destabilizing0.520Likely Pathogenic-6.81Deleterious0.983Probably Damaging0.390Benign2.94Benign0.00Affected0.28210.53190-23.1-72.06
c.1928A>T
E643V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E643V missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from Rosetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Three tools (FoldX, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show that the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic (3 pathogenic vs. 1 benign). AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain, and Foldetta also yields an uncertain stability change. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E643V, and this conclusion does not contradict any existing ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.033407Structured0.215915Uncertain0.8710.3150.000-12.975Likely Pathogenic0.893Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.13Ambiguous0.1-0.06Likely Benign0.54Ambiguous-0.28Likely Benign0.554Likely Pathogenic-6.85Deleterious0.727Possibly Damaging0.145Benign2.89Benign0.00Affected0.09480.6637-2-27.7-29.98
c.1929G>C
E643D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E643D is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, FATHMM, and polyPhen2_HumVar. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, SIFT, and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split. Overall, the majority of predictions (8 benign vs. 5 pathogenic) support a benign classification. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.033407Structured0.215915Uncertain0.8710.3150.000-8.083Likely Pathogenic0.223Likely BenignLikely Benign0.46Likely Benign0.2-0.34Likely Benign0.06Likely Benign1.09Destabilizing0.292Likely Benign-2.96Deleterious0.694Possibly Damaging0.064Benign2.98Benign0.01Affected0.20400.4276320.0-14.03
c.1929G>T
E643D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E643D is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, FATHMM, and polyPhen2_HumVar. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, SIFT, and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split. Overall, the majority of predictions (8 benign vs. 5 pathogenic) support a benign classification. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.033407Structured0.215915Uncertain0.8710.3150.000-8.083Likely Pathogenic0.223Likely BenignLikely Benign0.46Likely Benign0.2-0.34Likely Benign0.06Likely Benign1.09Destabilizing0.292Likely Benign-2.96Deleterious0.694Possibly Damaging0.064Benign2.98Benign0.01Affected0.20400.4276320.0-14.03
c.192A>G
I64M
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I64M is listed in gnomAD (ID 6‑33425800‑A‑G) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and SIFT, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.422041Structured0.475481Uncertain0.4780.7470.1256-33425800-A-G21.24e-6-4.327Likely Benign0.523AmbiguousLikely Benign0.047Likely Benign-0.05Neutral0.637Possibly Damaging0.047Benign4.04Benign0.00Affected4.3210.05680.231012-2.618.03
c.1930G>A
D644N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D644N is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM—all classifying the substitution as benign. No tool predicts pathogenicity. The only inconclusive result is AlphaMissense‑Default, which is listed as uncertain and therefore does not influence the overall assessment. High‑accuracy methods further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also reports benign. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-4.389Likely Benign0.360AmbiguousLikely Benign0.06Likely Benign0.3-0.28Likely Benign-0.11Likely Benign0.02Likely Benign0.124Likely Benign-2.28Neutral0.007Benign0.001Benign3.45Benign0.25Tolerated0.13680.6261210.0-0.98
c.1930G>C
D644H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D644H missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and polyPhen2_HumVar. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and Foldetta as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑vs‑2 split. No other high‑accuracy predictions are available. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-6.786Likely Benign0.771Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.34Likely Benign0.1-0.83Ambiguous-0.25Likely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.284Likely Benign-2.93Deleterious0.789Possibly Damaging0.158Benign3.43Benign0.07Tolerated0.16560.63061-10.322.05
c.1930G>T
D644Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 D644Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict pathogenicity are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default; the SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports it as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Uncertain. The remaining tools, FoldX, REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, support a benign effect, while PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default support a pathogenic effect. Overall, the majority of evidence leans toward pathogenicity, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-10.143Likely Pathogenic0.721Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.1-1.18Ambiguous-0.58Ambiguous-0.04Likely Benign0.318Likely Benign-4.93Deleterious0.968Probably Damaging0.311Benign3.44Benign0.02Affected0.06790.6094-4-32.248.09
c.1931A>C
D644A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D644A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, FoldX, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, Foldetta, and premPS. Only PROVEAN predicts it as pathogenic, while Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Default are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) resolves to benign; and Foldetta also predicts benign stability. Based on the aggregate evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-3.358Likely Benign0.502AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.14Likely Benign0.1-0.83Ambiguous-0.49Likely Benign-0.18Likely Benign0.274Likely Benign-3.90Deleterious0.311Benign0.032Benign3.51Benign0.39Tolerated0.38830.54810-25.3-44.01
c.1931A>G
D644G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D644G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, and AlphaMissense‑Default (polyPhen‑2 HumVar is benign). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-4.496Likely Benign0.602Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.13Likely Benign0.0-0.18Likely Benign-0.03Likely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.271Likely Benign-4.38Deleterious0.456Possibly Damaging0.069Benign3.46Benign0.14Tolerated0.40350.56101-13.1-58.04
c.1931A>T
D644V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D644V missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive because it yields a 2‑to‑2 split. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-6.230Likely Benign0.636Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.50Ambiguous0.0-0.35Likely Benign0.08Likely Benign-0.03Likely Benign0.347Likely Benign-4.96Deleterious0.198Benign0.052Benign3.49Benign0.11Tolerated0.09510.6267-2-37.7-15.96
c.1932C>A
D644E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D644E is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome; the only inconclusive result is from Rosetta, which is treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments confirm a benign impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, SGM‑Consensus is likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is benign. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-1.778Likely Benign0.178Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.17Likely Benign0.1-0.51Ambiguous-0.34Likely Benign-0.47Likely Benign0.132Likely Benign1.31Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign3.55Benign1.00Tolerated0.15280.6186320.014.03
c.1932C>G
D644E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D644E is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome; the only inconclusive result is from Rosetta, which is treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments confirm a benign impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, SGM‑Consensus is likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is benign. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.066181Structured0.248888Uncertain0.8830.3200.000-1.778Likely Benign0.178Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.17Likely Benign0.1-0.51Ambiguous-0.34Likely Benign-0.47Likely Benign0.132Likely Benign1.31Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign3.55Benign1.00Tolerated0.15280.6186320.014.03
c.1933T>A
F645I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F645I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are given by premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) report uncertain or inconclusive outcomes. High‑accuracy assessments indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and Foldetta is uncertain. Overall, the majority of evaluated predictors (five pathogenic vs four benign) lean toward a pathogenic effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for F645I.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-13.055Likely Pathogenic0.878Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.12Ambiguous0.21.68Ambiguous1.40Ambiguous1.01Destabilizing0.299Likely Benign-4.24Deleterious0.190Benign0.019Benign3.44Benign0.04Affected0.19200.2891101.7-34.02
c.1933T>C
F645L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F645L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. No evidence from FoldX, Rosetta, or premPS is available to alter this view. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a pathogenic impact for F645L, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-10.624Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.98Ambiguous0.11.25Ambiguous1.12Ambiguous0.99Ambiguous0.264Likely Benign-4.24Deleterious0.116Benign0.008Benign3.44Benign0.03Affected0.22140.3873201.0-34.02
c.1933T>G
F645V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F645V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect are premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy assessments give an uncertain result from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, a pathogenic outcome from the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and an uncertain outcome from Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta). No definitive folding‑stability change is reported. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for F645V, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-12.175Likely Pathogenic0.810Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.98Ambiguous0.11.70Ambiguous1.84Ambiguous1.02Destabilizing0.316Likely Benign-4.41Deleterious0.036Benign0.018Benign3.40Benign0.02Affected0.21630.2919-1-11.4-48.04
c.1934T>A
F645Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F645Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools with inconclusive results are FoldX (Uncertain) and premPS (Uncertain). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicting Benign, the SGM‑Consensus indicating Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicting Benign. No tool predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign based on the collective predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as the variant is not currently classified in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-3.544Likely Benign0.131Likely BenignLikely Benign0.52Ambiguous0.20.21Likely Benign0.37Likely Benign-0.61Ambiguous0.141Likely Benign2.40Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign3.61Benign1.00Tolerated0.15060.218973-4.116.00
c.1934T>C
F645S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F645S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign calls come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, while both the SGM Consensus and Foldetta predict pathogenicity. No evidence from ClinVar contradicts these findings. Overall, the preponderance of predictions supports a pathogenic classification for F645S.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-9.748Likely Pathogenic0.947Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.49Destabilizing0.22.30Destabilizing2.40Destabilizing1.57Destabilizing0.326Likely Benign-5.34Deleterious0.755Possibly Damaging0.112Benign3.37Benign0.03Affected0.38990.0547-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1934T>G
F645C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F645C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic outcome: FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is also pathogenic. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the high‑accuracy consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-9.182Likely Pathogenic0.828Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.25Destabilizing0.12.44Destabilizing2.35Destabilizing1.38Destabilizing0.286Likely Benign-5.41Deleterious0.967Probably Damaging0.389Benign3.35Benign0.01Affected0.24210.1372-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1935T>A
F645L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F645L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. No evidence from FoldX, Rosetta, or premPS is available to alter this view. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a pathogenic impact for F645L, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-10.624Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.98Ambiguous0.11.25Ambiguous1.12Ambiguous0.99Ambiguous0.159Likely Benign-4.24Deleterious0.116Benign0.008Benign3.44Benign0.03Affected0.22140.3873201.0-34.02
c.1935T>G
F645L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F645L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that assess sequence conservation and structural impact fall into two groups: benign predictions are made by REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, yields an uncertain result. No evidence from FoldX‑MD, Rosetta, or premPS is available to alter this conclusion. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a pathogenic impact for F645L, and this assessment is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar entry, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical annotations.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.276445Uncertain0.9210.3250.000-10.624Likely Pathogenic0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.98Ambiguous0.11.25Ambiguous1.12Ambiguous0.99Ambiguous0.159Likely Benign-4.24Deleterious0.116Benign0.008Benign3.44Benign0.03Affected0.22140.3873201.0-34.02
c.1936C>A
L646M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L646M is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome. Predictions that are inconclusive are FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely benign, while Foldetta’s stability analysis remains uncertain. Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a benign classification for this variant, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.048328Structured0.303751Uncertain0.9410.3440.000-1.911Likely Benign0.152Likely BenignLikely Benign0.70Ambiguous0.11.66Ambiguous1.18Ambiguous-1.10Stabilizing0.106Likely Benign1.86Neutral0.211Benign0.055Benign3.57Benign1.00Tolerated0.20410.342742-1.918.03
c.1936C>G
L646V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L646V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split assessment: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions arise from FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, SIFT, and ESM1b. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, resolves to “Likely Benign” (3 benign vs 1 pathogenic votes). High‑accuracy assessments further indicate AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of tools, including the high‑accuracy methods, lean toward a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.048328Structured0.303751Uncertain0.9410.3440.000-8.995Likely Pathogenic0.332Likely BenignLikely Benign3.82Destabilizing0.22.01Destabilizing2.92Destabilizing1.41Destabilizing0.125Likely Benign-1.40Neutral0.040Benign0.021Benign3.21Benign0.03Affected0.22000.3767210.4-14.03
c.1937T>A
L646Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change L646Q lies in the GAP domain. ClinVar has no entry for this variant, and it is not present in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. All other evaluated algorithms—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.303751Uncertain0.9410.3440.000-12.735Likely Pathogenic0.752Likely PathogenicLikely Benign3.23Destabilizing0.13.04Destabilizing3.14Destabilizing2.12Destabilizing0.462Likely Benign-2.78Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.790Possibly Damaging3.17Benign0.00Affected0.20900.1963-2-2-7.314.97
c.1937T>C
L646P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L646P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.303751Uncertain0.9410.3440.000-12.956Likely Pathogenic0.970Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic7.34Destabilizing0.512.08Destabilizing9.71Destabilizing2.72Destabilizing0.604Likely Pathogenic-4.55Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.926Probably Damaging3.17Benign0.00Affected0.34810.1874-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1937T>G
L646R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L646R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, labels the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM Consensus is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a pathogenic impact. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for L646R, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.303751Uncertain0.9410.3440.000-12.393Likely Pathogenic0.920Likely PathogenicAmbiguous4.44Destabilizing0.23.94Destabilizing4.19Destabilizing2.75Destabilizing0.455Likely Benign-3.56Deleterious0.014Benign0.002Benign3.17Benign0.03Affected0.23040.1405-3-2-8.343.03
c.1939G>A
G647S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G647S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome; the only inconclusive results come from Rosetta and premPS, which are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign stability. Overall, the evidence strongly favors a benign classification, and this is consistent with its absence from ClinVar. The variant is most likely benign, and this is consistent with its absence from ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.048328Structured0.325524Uncertain0.9360.3560.000-2.175Likely Benign0.082Likely BenignLikely Benign0.05Likely Benign0.1-0.75Ambiguous-0.35Likely Benign-0.56Ambiguous0.037Likely Benign0.65Neutral0.002Benign0.004Benign3.48Benign0.89Tolerated0.24090.395910-0.430.03
c.1939G>C
G647R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant G647R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all indicate benign or likely benign. In contrast, AlphaMissense‑Default and polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus as likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) is inconclusive. No evidence from FoldX or Rosetta alone is available. Overall, the preponderance of evidence supports a benign classification, and this is consistent with the lack of a ClinVar pathogenic annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.048328Structured0.325524Uncertain0.9360.3560.000-6.590Likely Benign0.636Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.51Ambiguous0.1-0.97Ambiguous-0.74Ambiguous0.29Likely Benign0.097Likely Benign-1.81Neutral0.787Possibly Damaging0.349Benign3.49Benign0.17Tolerated0.10200.3712-3-2-4.199.14
c.1939G>T
G647C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G647C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, the majority (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus “Likely Benign”) uniformly predict a benign effect, whereas only SIFT classifies the change as pathogenic. High‑accuracy tools give consistent benign results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) reports a benign stability change. No prediction or folding‑stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.048328Structured0.325524Uncertain0.9360.3560.000-2.955Likely Benign0.112Likely BenignLikely Benign0.41Likely Benign0.0-0.20Likely Benign0.11Likely Benign0.05Likely Benign0.112Likely Benign-1.63Neutral0.003Benign0.004Benign3.44Benign0.02Affected0.11940.3250-3-32.946.09
c.193C>A
H65N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H65N is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID = None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID = None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are AlphaMissense‑Default and SIFT. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign and does not contradict ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.125-2.788Likely Benign0.771Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.038Likely Benign-1.42Neutral0.273Benign0.107Benign4.18Benign0.00Affected0.12800.220021-0.3-23.04
c.193C>G
H65D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 H65D missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not listed in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy consensus from SGM (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is Likely Benign, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized is classified as Uncertain. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.125-2.240Likely Benign0.937Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.126Likely Benign-1.78Neutral0.462Possibly Damaging0.227Benign4.17Benign0.00Affected0.21420.18281-1-0.3-22.05
c.193C>T
H65Y
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H65Y has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar pathogenic designation and the lack of population frequency data. The variant is most likely benign based on predictions, and this does not contradict ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.125-3.644Likely Benign0.852Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.037Likely Benign-1.11Neutral0.273Benign0.152Benign4.15Benign0.00Affected0.07880.3628021.926.03
c.1940G>A
G647D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant G647D is reported in ClinVar as having no entry and is present in gnomAD (6‑33441199‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only AlphaMissense‑Default predicts pathogenic, while FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, and ESM1b are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields benign; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is uncertain. Overall, the consensus of most tools and the high‑accuracy predictions indicate that G647D is most likely benign, and this is consistent with the absence of a pathogenic ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.048328Structured0.325524Uncertain0.9360.3560.0006-33441199-G-A16.20e-7-7.643In-Between0.582Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.68Ambiguous0.10.33Likely Benign0.51Ambiguous0.56Ambiguous0.098Likely Benign-1.63Neutral0.282Benign0.128Benign3.45Benign0.24Tolerated3.37300.16300.1372-11-3.158.04
c.1940G>C
G647A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G647A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome. Predictions that are inconclusive are Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Benign, and Foldetta as Uncertain. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates a benign effect for G647A, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar pathogenic classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.048328Structured0.325524Uncertain0.9360.3560.000-0.266Likely Benign0.078Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.18Likely Benign0.0-0.99Ambiguous-0.59Ambiguous-0.69Ambiguous0.037Likely Benign0.48Neutral0.000Benign0.002Benign3.55Benign0.81Tolerated0.35580.4136102.214.03
c.1940G>T
G647V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G647V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that assess sequence conservation and structural impact uniformly classify the substitution as benign: SIFT, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a tolerated change. No tool predicts pathogenicity; only FoldX and Rosetta report uncertain stability effects, which are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus, derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts a benign effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.048328Structured0.325524Uncertain0.9360.3560.000-4.713Likely Benign0.126Likely BenignLikely Benign0.85Ambiguous0.1-0.59Ambiguous0.13Likely Benign-0.13Likely Benign0.115Likely Benign-1.77Neutral0.178Benign0.073Benign3.52Benign0.12Tolerated0.13180.3946-1-34.642.08
c.1942T>A
F648I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F648I resides in the GAP domain. ClinVar contains no entry for this change, and it is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM. All other evaluated algorithms—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—report a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) also yields a pathogenic prediction. Taken together, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a pathogenic classification for F648I, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.000-11.912Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.49Destabilizing0.12.49Destabilizing2.49Destabilizing1.05Destabilizing0.472Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.04Affected0.16730.1955101.7-34.02
c.1942T>C
F648L
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant F648L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3383902.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and ESM1b—consistently predict pathogenicity. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic change. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for F648L, which contradicts the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.000Uncertain 1-9.296Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.71Destabilizing0.82.08Destabilizing2.40Destabilizing1.04Destabilizing0.468Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging3.45Benign0.08Tolerated0.19610.3126201.0-34.02
c.1942T>G
F648V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F648V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include SIFT and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus—predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods give consistent results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenicity; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic effect. No prediction is missing or inconclusive. Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a pathogenic classification, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.000-11.574Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.11Destabilizing0.12.80Destabilizing2.96Destabilizing1.14Destabilizing0.514Likely Pathogenic-6.98Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging3.49Benign0.06Tolerated0.18480.1983-1-11.4-48.04
c.1943T>A
F648Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F648Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not listed) but is present in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: 6‑33441202‑T‑A). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, AlphaMissense‑Default, and ESM1b. Predictions that are inconclusive or unavailable are FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic classification for F648Y. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.0006-33441202-T-A42.48e-6-8.632Likely Pathogenic0.889Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.74Ambiguous0.10.94Ambiguous0.84Ambiguous1.11Destabilizing0.407Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.984Probably Damaging0.913Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.11Tolerated3.37300.13070.139637-4.116.00
c.1943T>C
F648S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F648S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: benign calls are limited to SIFT and FATHMM, whereas the remaining 12 predictors—including REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, both polyPhen‑2 versions, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the substitution as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports a likely pathogenic outcome, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also indicates a pathogenic effect. No prediction is inconclusive or missing. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation, as none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.000-10.356Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.36Destabilizing0.03.23Destabilizing3.30Destabilizing1.35Destabilizing0.604Likely Pathogenic-7.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.06Tolerated0.36800.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1943T>G
F648C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F648C is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: all evaluated algorithms except FATHMM predict pathogenicity, while FATHMM alone predicts benign. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also reports a pathogenic effect. In summary, the overwhelming consensus from both general and high‑accuracy predictors is that F648C is pathogenic. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of any ClinVar annotation, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.000-10.547Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.28Destabilizing0.13.35Destabilizing3.32Destabilizing1.22Destabilizing0.621Likely Pathogenic-7.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.03Affected0.22830.0783-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1944C>A
F648L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F648L is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, while the remaining 12 tools—including FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict a pathogenic effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is pathogenic; and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic. Because the majority of evidence points to a deleterious impact and there is no ClinVar annotation to contradict this, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.000-9.296Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.71Destabilizing0.82.08Destabilizing2.40Destabilizing1.04Destabilizing0.319Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging3.45Benign0.08Tolerated0.19610.3126201.0-34.02
c.1944C>G
F648L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F648L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM. In contrast, the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and ESM1b all indicate pathogenicity, and the SGM Consensus score is “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.346782Uncertain0.9430.3390.000-9.296Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.71Destabilizing0.82.08Destabilizing2.40Destabilizing1.04Destabilizing0.319Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging3.45Benign0.08Tolerated0.19610.3126201.0-34.02
c.1945A>C
M649L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M649L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN and AlphaMissense‑Default, while premPS remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split, and Foldetta predicts benign stability. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign effect. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar assertion, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-5.210Likely Benign0.745Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.19Likely Benign0.40.26Likely Benign0.23Likely Benign0.64Ambiguous0.294Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.009Benign0.007Benign3.73Benign0.15Tolerated0.13610.4025421.9-18.03
c.1945A>G
M649V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M649V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. With 8 pathogenic versus 3 benign predictions, the overall evidence favors a deleterious effect. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-9.907Likely Pathogenic0.887Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.84Destabilizing0.32.55Destabilizing2.70Destabilizing1.05Destabilizing0.370Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.735Possibly Damaging3.40Benign0.06Tolerated0.23890.3121212.3-32.06
c.1945A>T
M649L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M649L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN and AlphaMissense‑Default, while premPS remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-5.210Likely Benign0.745Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.19Likely Benign0.40.26Likely Benign0.23Likely Benign0.64Ambiguous0.294Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.009Benign0.007Benign3.73Benign0.15Tolerated0.13610.4025421.9-18.03
c.1946T>A
M649K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M649K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Benign calls are limited to polyPhen‑2 (HumVar) and FATHMM. High‑accuracy methods reinforce the pathogenic consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-14.533Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.42Destabilizing0.06.19Destabilizing4.81Destabilizing1.79Destabilizing0.614Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.968Probably Damaging0.382Benign3.34Benign0.01Affected0.14380.10790-1-5.8-3.02
c.1946T>C
M649T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M649T is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also classifies the variant as pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-11.916Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.19Destabilizing0.23.45Destabilizing3.32Destabilizing1.92Destabilizing0.531Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.779Possibly Damaging3.35Benign0.00Affected0.17320.1615-1-1-2.6-30.09
c.1946T>G
M649R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M649R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also reports a pathogenic effect. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-14.827Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic5.02Destabilizing0.15.97Destabilizing5.50Destabilizing2.09Destabilizing0.595Likely Pathogenic-5.98Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.464Possibly Damaging3.33Benign0.00Affected0.16350.12280-1-6.424.99
c.1947G>A
M649I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M649I has no ClinVar entry and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic impact; Rosetta is inconclusive and is not counted. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence supports a pathogenic classification for M649I, and this conclusion does not conflict with ClinVar status, which is currently unavailable.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-9.361Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.42Destabilizing0.21.96Ambiguous2.19Destabilizing1.01Destabilizing0.449Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.672Possibly Damaging0.093Benign3.40Benign0.02Affected3.38270.12150.2980212.6-18.03243.721.50.00.10.00.1XPotentially BenignThe thioether side chain of Met649, located on an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), bridges Phe652, Phe648, and Phe639 in an inter-helix hydrophobic cavity in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the sec-butyl side chain of Ile649 maintains hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues, with no significant effects on the protein structure.However, methionine is known as a bridging motif for aromatic residues, and these Met-aromatic interactions are lost in the variant. Indeed, in the second variant simulation,the bridging of Phe652, Phe648 and Phe639 is completely lost. In reality, the effect could be more severe on the structure during the protein folding.
c.1947G>C
M649I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M649I is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) report a pathogenic outcome; Rosetta is inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenicity. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M649I, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000Uncertain 1-9.361Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.42Destabilizing0.21.96Ambiguous2.19Destabilizing1.01Destabilizing0.449Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.672Possibly Damaging0.093Benign3.40Benign0.02Affected3.38270.12150.2980212.6-18.03243.721.50.00.10.00.1XPotentially BenignThe thioether side chain of Met649, located on an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), bridges Phe652, Phe648, and Phe639 in an inter-helix hydrophobic cavity in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the sec-butyl side chain of Ile649 maintains hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues, with no significant effects on the protein structure.However, methionine is known as a bridging motif for aromatic residues, and these Met-aromatic interactions are lost in the variant. Indeed, in the second variant simulation,the bridging of Phe652, Phe648 and Phe639 is completely lost. In reality, the effect could be more severe on the structure during the protein folding.
c.1947G>T
M649I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M649I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, votes strongly for pathogenicity (3/4 pathogenic). High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenic. Rosetta alone is uncertain and is treated as unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.051831Structured0.360413Uncertain0.9620.3450.000-9.361Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.42Destabilizing0.21.96Ambiguous2.19Destabilizing1.01Destabilizing0.449Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.672Possibly Damaging0.093Benign3.40Benign0.02Affected3.38270.12150.2980212.6-18.03243.721.50.00.10.00.1XPotentially BenignThe thioether side chain of Met649, located on an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), bridges Phe652, Phe648, and Phe639 in an inter-helix hydrophobic cavity in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the sec-butyl side chain of Ile649 maintains hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues, with no significant effects on the protein structure.However, methionine is known as a bridging motif for aromatic residues, and these Met-aromatic interactions are lost in the variant. Indeed, in the second variant simulation,the bridging of Phe652, Phe648 and Phe639 is completely lost. In reality, the effect could be more severe on the structure during the protein folding.
c.1948A>C
N650H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N650H lies in the GAP domain. ClinVar has no entry for this variant, and it is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect include PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, FoldX, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote). Uncertain or inconclusive results come from Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM‑Consensus also indicates likely pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is inconclusive. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the high‑accuracy tools’ results, the variant is most likely pathogenic. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.000-14.187Likely Pathogenic0.986Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.14Destabilizing0.31.79Ambiguous1.97Ambiguous0.55Ambiguous0.465Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.929Probably Damaging3.01Benign0.05Affected0.19900.4784210.323.04
c.1948A>G
N650D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N650D is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Stability‑based methods (FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, Foldetta) yield uncertain or inconclusive results and are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as Uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions support a pathogenic impact. The variant is most likely pathogenic based on the consensus of predictive tools, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.000-14.267Likely Pathogenic0.971Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.14Ambiguous0.30.61Ambiguous0.88Ambiguous0.91Ambiguous0.389Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.591Possibly Damaging0.185Benign2.99Benign0.03Affected0.23200.2973210.00.98
c.1948A>T
N650Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N650Y is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include premPS and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic impact; FoldX, Rosetta, and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the evidence strongly favors a pathogenic classification for the variant, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently contains no entry for this mutation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.000-16.923Likely Pathogenic0.994Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.56Ambiguous0.31.32Ambiguous1.44Ambiguous0.16Likely Benign0.587Likely Pathogenic-7.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.984Probably Damaging3.03Benign0.03Affected0.08520.3865-2-22.249.07
c.1949A>C
N650T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N650T is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, and FATHMM, whereas a larger group predicts pathogenicity: SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Uncertain results come from Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.000-13.626Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.31Likely Benign0.10.73Ambiguous0.52Ambiguous0.69Ambiguous0.471Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.986Probably Damaging0.710Possibly Damaging3.04Benign0.01Affected0.17000.4843002.8-13.00
c.1949A>G
N650S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N650S lies in the GAP domain. ClinVar has no entry for this variant, and it is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Pathogenic). Uncertain or inconclusive results come from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and premPS. For high‑accuracy methods, AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta is uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions support a pathogenic effect. The variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently absent.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.000-11.291Likely Pathogenic0.916Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.79Ambiguous0.21.43Ambiguous1.11Ambiguous0.77Ambiguous0.395Likely Benign-4.98Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.606Possibly Damaging3.06Benign0.02Affected0.37910.5090112.7-27.03
c.1949A>T
N650I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N650I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split assessment: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. FoldX reports an uncertain outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, whereas Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts benign. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a pathogenic effect for the variant, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.000-15.940Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.50Ambiguous0.20.21Likely Benign0.36Likely Benign0.21Likely Benign0.485Likely Benign-8.97Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.955Probably Damaging3.02Benign0.00Affected0.09070.4339-2-38.0-0.94
c.194A>C
H65P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H65P is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default is uncertain, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact for H65P, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.125-1.732Likely Benign0.479AmbiguousLikely Benign0.103Likely Benign-1.47Neutral0.676Possibly Damaging0.227Benign4.16Benign0.00Affected0.19150.37010-21.6-40.02
c.194A>G
H65R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H65R is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33425802‑A‑G). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, whereas the SGM‑Consensus remains benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.125Uncertain 16-33425802-A-G16.20e-7-1.980Likely Benign0.967Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.073Likely Benign-1.60Neutral0.462Possibly Damaging0.227Benign4.19Benign0.00Affected4.3210.14830.167120-1.319.05
c.194A>T
H65L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 H65L missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not listed in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy consensus from SGM (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is “Likely Benign.” AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns an uncertain result, and Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.125-1.889Likely Benign0.836Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.159Likely Benign-1.65Neutral0.462Possibly Damaging0.227Benign4.22Benign0.00Affected0.07180.4760-2-37.0-23.98
c.1950T>A
N650K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N650K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Uncertain results are reported by Rosetta and premPS. High‑accuracy assessments give a pathogenic verdict from AlphaMissense‑Optimized and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), while Foldetta predicts a benign effect on protein stability. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.000-13.078Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.33Likely Benign0.10.66Ambiguous0.17Likely Benign0.92Ambiguous0.269Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.807Possibly Damaging3.02Benign0.03Affected3.37300.30280.336001-0.414.07
c.1950T>G
N650K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N650K is not reported in ClinVar and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33441209‑T‑G). Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, FATHMM, and Foldetta, whereas a majority of tools predict pathogenicity: SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Two tools (premPS and Rosetta) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward pathogenicity, indicating the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this is consistent with the lack of a ClinVar entry; there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.086953Structured0.361944Uncertain0.9610.3570.0006-33441209-T-G-13.078Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.33Likely Benign0.10.66Ambiguous0.17Likely Benign0.92Ambiguous0.269Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.807Possibly Damaging3.02Benign0.03Affected3.37300.30280.336001-0.414.07
c.1951G>A
E651K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 E651K missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign calls (REVEL, FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM) and pathogenic calls (PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default). Three tools (Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—labels the variant as likely pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.365409Uncertain0.9550.3400.000-8.714Likely Pathogenic0.818Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.11Likely Benign0.41.15Ambiguous0.63Ambiguous0.08Likely Benign0.211Likely Benign-2.92Deleterious0.921Possibly Damaging0.303Benign3.39Benign0.17Tolerated0.27680.580301-0.4-0.94
c.1951G>C
E651Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E651Q is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM—all classifying the change as benign. No tool predicts a pathogenic outcome. The high‑accuracy assessments are consistent: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign effect; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also reports a benign result. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is present).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.088832Structured0.365409Uncertain0.9550.3400.000-6.308Likely Benign0.476AmbiguousLikely Benign0.13Likely Benign0.10.15Likely Benign0.14Likely Benign-0.13Likely Benign0.158Likely Benign-1.23Neutral0.244Benign0.075Benign3.34Benign0.58Tolerated0.14380.5893220.0-0.98
c.1952A>C
E651A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E651A missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Rosetta is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) predicting it as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicting a benign impact. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign classification, and this conclusion does not contradict the absence of a ClinVar record.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.365409Uncertain0.9550.3400.000-8.694Likely Pathogenic0.610Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.38Likely Benign0.10.52Ambiguous0.45Likely Benign0.23Likely Benign0.396Likely Benign-4.54Deleterious0.986Probably Damaging0.875Possibly Damaging3.33Benign0.13Tolerated0.39260.55510-15.3-58.04
c.1952A>G
E651G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E651G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Predictions that are uncertain or unavailable are FoldX, Rosetta, ESM1b, and Foldetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as unavailable. Overall, the majority of tools (five benign vs. four pathogenic) lean toward a benign interpretation, and this does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation. Thus, based on the available predictions, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.088832Structured0.365409Uncertain0.9550.3400.000-7.596In-Between0.591Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.66Ambiguous0.11.61Ambiguous1.14Ambiguous0.32Likely Benign0.444Likely Benign-4.78Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.935Probably Damaging3.31Benign0.06Tolerated0.29080.44880-23.1-72.06
c.1952A>T
E651V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E651V missense change is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools split in their assessment: benign‑predicted scores include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, while pathogenic‑predicted scores come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized and FoldX give uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, leans pathogenic (3 pathogenic vs. 1 benign); Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts a benign effect. Overall, the majority of tools (including the high‑accuracy SGM Consensus) suggest a pathogenic impact, whereas Foldetta and several other predictors indicate benign. The variant is most likely pathogenic based on the prevailing predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.088832Structured0.365409Uncertain0.9550.3400.000-10.025Likely Pathogenic0.865Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.63Ambiguous0.10.25Likely Benign0.44Likely Benign0.21Likely Benign0.467Likely Benign-5.53Deleterious0.988Probably Damaging0.734Possibly Damaging3.27Benign0.05Affected0.08240.6136-2-27.7-29.98
c.1953G>C
E651D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E651D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. Only polyPhen2_HumDiv predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign effect; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also reports a benign prediction. No prediction tool or stability analysis is inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.088832Structured0.365409Uncertain0.9550.3400.000-3.220Likely Benign0.231Likely BenignLikely Benign0.16Likely Benign0.10.33Likely Benign0.25Likely Benign-0.29Likely Benign0.153Likely Benign-0.13Neutral0.906Possibly Damaging0.429Benign3.48Benign0.53Tolerated0.18130.3762320.0-14.03
c.1953G>T
E651D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E651D is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as benign. Only polyPhen2_HumDiv predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign effect; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also reports a benign prediction. No prediction tool or stability analysis is inconclusive or missing. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.088832Structured0.365409Uncertain0.9550.3400.000-3.220Likely Benign0.231Likely BenignLikely Benign0.16Likely Benign0.10.33Likely Benign0.25Likely Benign-0.29Likely Benign0.153Likely Benign-0.13Neutral0.906Possibly Damaging0.429Benign3.48Benign0.53Tolerated0.18130.3762320.0-14.03
c.1954T>A
F652I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F652I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining 13 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenic. No prediction or stability assessment is missing or inconclusive. Based on the consensus of the available tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-12.085Likely Pathogenic0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.15Destabilizing0.13.40Destabilizing2.78Destabilizing1.40Destabilizing0.574Likely Pathogenic-5.71Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.776Possibly Damaging3.06Benign0.00Affected0.15530.1955101.7-34.02
c.1954T>C
F652L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F652L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions are made by REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining evaluated algorithms (premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) all indicate pathogenicity. Stability‑based assessments from FoldX and Rosetta are inconclusive, and Foldetta likewise yields an uncertain result. High‑accuracy methods give a clearer picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) labels the variant as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for F652L. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-9.026Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.31Ambiguous0.11.88Ambiguous1.60Ambiguous1.35Destabilizing0.467Likely Benign-5.65Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.619Possibly Damaging3.09Benign0.00Affected0.17500.2926201.0-34.02
c.1954T>G
F652V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant F652V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, whereas only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. The high‑accuracy subset confirms this trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none exists).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-11.576Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.66Destabilizing0.13.21Destabilizing2.94Destabilizing1.49Destabilizing0.595Likely Pathogenic-6.71Deleterious0.995Probably Damaging0.885Possibly Damaging3.05Benign0.00Affected0.16560.1783-1-11.4-48.04
c.1955T>A
F652Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F652Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that agree on a pathogenic effect are premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Three tools (FoldX, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give uncertain results. High‑accuracy methods provide no definitive verdict: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is a tie (2 pathogenic, 2 benign) and thus inconclusive; Foldetta is uncertain. Consequently, the overall prediction landscape is balanced, with an equal number of benign and pathogenic calls and several uncertain results. The variant is therefore most likely **inconclusive** in terms of pathogenicity, and this lack of consensus does not contradict any ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-5.437Likely Benign0.890Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.05Ambiguous0.20.27Likely Benign0.66Ambiguous1.24Destabilizing0.363Likely Benign-2.92Deleterious0.957Probably Damaging0.390Benign3.13Benign0.00Affected0.10850.158473-4.116.00
c.1955T>C
F652S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F652S is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-13.679Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.16Destabilizing0.24.92Destabilizing4.04Destabilizing2.16Destabilizing0.665Likely Pathogenic-7.78Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.948Probably Damaging3.05Benign0.00Affected0.37770.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1955T>G
F652C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F652C is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all indicate pathogenicity, whereas only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the change as pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts a pathogenic effect. No prediction is inconclusive or missing. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-12.023Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.27Destabilizing0.14.35Destabilizing3.81Destabilizing2.54Destabilizing0.695Likely Pathogenic-7.74Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.983Probably Damaging2.99Benign0.00Affected0.22930.0783-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1956T>A
F652L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F652L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions are made by REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining evaluated algorithms (premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) all indicate pathogenicity. Stability‑based assessments from FoldX and Rosetta are inconclusive, and Foldetta likewise yields an uncertain result. High‑accuracy methods give a clearer picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) labels the variant as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for F652L. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-9.026Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.31Ambiguous0.11.88Ambiguous1.60Ambiguous1.35Destabilizing0.306Likely Benign-5.65Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.619Possibly Damaging3.09Benign0.00Affected0.17500.2926201.0-34.02
c.1956T>G
F652L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F652L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) indicate a pathogenic impact. FoldX and Rosetta give uncertain results, and Foldetta likewise reports an uncertain stability change. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) labeling it Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta remaining uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple pathogenic‑predicting tools and the high‑accuracy methods points to a likely pathogenic effect for F652L, with no conflict from ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.098513Structured0.356594Uncertain0.9660.3380.000-9.026Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.31Ambiguous0.11.88Ambiguous1.60Ambiguous1.35Destabilizing0.305Likely Benign-5.65Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.619Possibly Damaging3.09Benign0.00Affected0.17500.2926201.0-34.02
c.1957C>A
L653M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L653M has no ClinVar record and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while those that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Tools with uncertain or missing results (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) are not considered evidence for either side. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive (two pathogenic vs. two benign votes), and Foldetta is also inconclusive. Overall, the majority of standard predictors lean toward pathogenicity, but the most reliable high‑accuracy tool indicates a benign effect, leaving the variant’s impact uncertain. No ClinVar entry exists, so there is no contradiction with clinical annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.049374Structured0.335213Uncertain0.9630.3320.000-8.838Likely Pathogenic0.713Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.99Ambiguous0.21.70Ambiguous1.35Ambiguous0.94Ambiguous0.259Likely Benign-1.76Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging3.13Benign0.01Affected0.09350.322742-1.918.03
c.1957C>G
L653V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L653V is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS, while ESM1b is inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification. Thus, based on current predictions, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.049374Structured0.335213Uncertain0.9630.3320.000Uncertain 1-7.050In-Between0.301Likely BenignLikely Benign3.28Destabilizing0.32.18Destabilizing2.73Destabilizing1.32Destabilizing0.146Likely Benign-2.25Neutral0.227Benign0.039Benign3.28Benign0.08Tolerated0.14360.3557210.4-14.03
c.1958T>A
L653Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L653Q is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess pathogenicity largely agree: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (both HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a deleterious effect. Only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) is pathogenic. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Based on the consensus of these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.049374Structured0.335213Uncertain0.9630.3320.000-14.347Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.71Destabilizing0.13.26Destabilizing2.99Destabilizing1.98Destabilizing0.614Likely Pathogenic-5.65Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging3.09Benign0.01Affected0.11950.1363-2-2-7.314.97
c.1958T>C
L653P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L653P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.049374Structured0.335213Uncertain0.9630.3320.000-17.675Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.02Destabilizing0.89.20Destabilizing7.61Destabilizing2.56Destabilizing0.700Likely Pathogenic-6.51Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.09Benign0.00Affected0.32510.1874-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1958T>G
L653R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change L653R lies in the GAP domain. ClinVar has no entry for this variant, and it is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to FATHMM, whereas the remaining 13 tools (SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts a pathogenic effect. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar claim exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.049374Structured0.335213Uncertain0.9630.3320.000-16.078Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic6.92Destabilizing1.15.84Destabilizing6.38Destabilizing2.55Destabilizing0.649Likely Pathogenic-5.75Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.806Possibly Damaging3.09Benign0.00Affected0.15010.0805-3-2-8.343.03
c.195C>A
H65Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H65Q is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) but is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33425803‑C‑A). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain,” SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Benign,” and Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status (which has no entry).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.1256-33425803-C-A16.20e-7-2.966Likely Benign0.953Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.035Likely Benign-1.46Neutral0.462Possibly Damaging0.227Benign4.19Benign0.00Affected4.3210.10590.290003-0.3-9.01
c.195C>G
H65Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 H65Q missense variant has no ClinVar record and is not listed in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy consensus from SGM (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is benign, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for H65Q.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.411940Structured0.476188Uncertain0.4580.7580.125-2.966Likely Benign0.953Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.035Likely Benign-1.46Neutral0.462Possibly Damaging0.227Benign4.19Benign0.00Affected4.3210.10590.290003-0.3-9.01
c.1960G>A
E654K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E654K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic). The high‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, Foldetta predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence predictions lean toward pathogenicity, and the variant is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation. Thus, based on the available computational evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.026892Structured0.303029Uncertain0.9570.3110.000-12.587Likely Pathogenic0.968Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.12Likely Benign0.30.53Ambiguous0.33Likely Benign-0.17Likely Benign0.435Likely Benign-3.80Deleterious0.921Possibly Damaging0.303Benign3.44Benign0.11Tolerated0.23650.422401-0.4-0.94
c.1960G>C
E654Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E654Q missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic outcome are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicating likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicting a benign effect. Overall, the majority of tools (nine benign vs. five pathogenic) suggest the variant is most likely benign. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.026892Structured0.303029Uncertain0.9570.3110.000-10.368Likely Pathogenic0.699Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.00Likely Benign0.00.18Likely Benign0.09Likely Benign-0.12Likely Benign0.298Likely Benign-2.79Deleterious0.244Benign0.075Benign3.33Benign0.02Affected0.11400.3913220.0-0.98
c.1961A>C
E654A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E654A has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as Benign. Overall, the balance of evidence favors pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.026892Structured0.303029Uncertain0.9570.3110.000-10.797Likely Pathogenic0.873Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.49Likely Benign0.10.20Likely Benign0.35Likely Benign0.25Likely Benign0.512Likely Pathogenic-5.70Deleterious0.986Probably Damaging0.875Possibly Damaging3.34Benign0.02Affected0.33670.39710-15.3-58.04
c.1961A>G
E654G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E654G missense variant is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on benign impact are premPS and FATHMM, while the majority (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus) predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E654G. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation, so there is no contradiction with existing clinical database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.026892Structured0.303029Uncertain0.9570.3110.000-12.487Likely Pathogenic0.898Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.29Ambiguous0.21.62Ambiguous1.46Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign0.547Likely Pathogenic-6.73Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.935Probably Damaging3.26Benign0.01Affected0.28180.31090-23.1-72.06
c.1961A>T
E654V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E654V missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, while those that agree on a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are inconclusive. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta predicts benign. Overall, the majority of tools (8 pathogenic vs. 4 benign) and the SGM‑Consensus result support a pathogenic classification. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.026892Structured0.303029Uncertain0.9570.3110.000-12.306Likely Pathogenic0.950Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.55Ambiguous0.0-0.33Likely Benign0.11Likely Benign0.21Likely Benign0.540Likely Pathogenic-6.66Deleterious0.988Probably Damaging0.734Possibly Damaging3.31Benign0.01Affected0.06860.4757-2-27.7-29.98
c.1962G>C
E654D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E654D missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools give uncertain results: Rosetta and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. Overall, the predictions are mixed, with a slight majority leaning toward benign, but the high‑accuracy tools conflict. The variant is most likely benign based on the aggregate predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.026892Structured0.303029Uncertain0.9570.3110.000-10.454Likely Pathogenic0.886Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.44Likely Benign0.00.52Ambiguous0.48Likely Benign0.29Likely Benign0.166Likely Benign-2.87Deleterious0.906Possibly Damaging0.429Benign3.38Benign0.11Tolerated0.16780.2583320.0-14.03
c.1962G>T
E654D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E654D has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show that AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain (treated as unavailable), SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a benign effect. No other folding‑stability results are available. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign interpretation, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, which currently contains no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.026892Structured0.303029Uncertain0.9570.3110.000-10.454Likely Pathogenic0.886Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.44Likely Benign0.00.52Ambiguous0.48Likely Benign0.29Likely Benign0.166Likely Benign-2.87Deleterious0.906Possibly Damaging0.429Benign3.38Benign0.11Tolerated0.16780.2583320.0-14.03
c.1963C>A
L655M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L655M is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors classify the change as benign: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments are consistent: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign; the SGM Consensus indicates “Likely Benign”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts benign. Based on the unanimous benign predictions and the absence of any pathogenic calls, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status (which has no entry).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.015344Structured0.268808Uncertain0.9610.2740.000-3.077Likely Benign0.083Likely BenignLikely Benign0.21Likely Benign0.00.25Likely Benign0.23Likely Benign-0.22Likely Benign0.076Likely Benign0.58Neutral0.048Benign0.037Benign3.43Benign0.18Tolerated0.09790.325242-1.918.03
c.1963C>G
L655V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L655V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a benign effect: REVEL, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as benign. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus indicates likely benign, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, yields an uncertain result. No tools predict pathogenicity, and the uncertain stability assessment does not alter the overall benign inference. Therefore, based on the available predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar pathogenic annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.015344Structured0.268808Uncertain0.9610.2740.000-6.743Likely Benign0.127Likely BenignLikely Benign0.78Ambiguous0.00.58Ambiguous0.68Ambiguous0.38Likely Benign0.058Likely Benign-0.62Neutral0.008Benign0.003Benign3.45Benign0.44Tolerated0.15510.3190210.4-14.03
c.1964T>A
L655Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L655Q is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all indicate benign or likely benign. Only the two polyPhen‑2 implementations (HumDiv and HumVar) predict pathogenicity, while Rosetta remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign stability. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign impact for L655Q, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.015344Structured0.268808Uncertain0.9610.2740.000Uncertain 1-5.278Likely Benign0.144Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.01Likely Benign0.00.69Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign-0.15Likely Benign0.139Likely Benign0.61Neutral0.955Possibly Damaging0.602Possibly Damaging3.59Benign0.65Tolerated3.39240.12480.0972-2-2-7.314.97229.9-8.60.00.00.40.0XPotentially BenignThe iso-butyl side chain of Leu655, located on the surface of an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), is not involved in any interactions in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the carboxamide side chain of Gln655 dynamically interacts with neighboring residues (e.g., Glu651, Glu656, Arg544) on the protein surface, with no negative structural effects.
c.1964T>C
L655P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant L655P is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33441223‑T‑C) but has no ClinVar entry. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by Rosetta, Foldetta, both polyPhen‑2 versions, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; FoldX and premPS are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments give AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, Foldetta as pathogenic, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect. This conclusion is consistent with the absence of a ClinVar classification, so there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.015344Structured0.268808Uncertain0.9610.2740.0006-33441223-T-C16.20e-7-9.771Likely Pathogenic0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.33Ambiguous0.56.52Destabilizing3.93Destabilizing0.57Ambiguous0.126Likely Benign-1.36Neutral0.981Probably Damaging0.772Possibly Damaging3.47Benign0.32Tolerated3.39240.35980.1274-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.1964T>G
L655R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L655R is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a benign effect: SIFT, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), REVEL, PROVEAN, premPS, FoldX, and the majority of consensus methods (AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all score the variant as benign. The only inconclusive result comes from Rosetta, which is treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this benign prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Benign,” and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts benign. Thus, based on the available predictions, the variant is most likely benign, with no conflict with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.015344Structured0.268808Uncertain0.9610.2740.000-4.848Likely Benign0.284Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.40Likely Benign0.00.54Ambiguous0.07Likely Benign-0.09Likely Benign0.160Likely Benign0.46Neutral0.006Benign0.001Benign3.50Benign0.60Tolerated0.15890.0615-3-2-8.343.03
c.1966G>A
E656K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E656K has no ClinVar entry and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include Rosetta, premPS, and FATHMM. Those that predict pathogenicity are REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; the SGM‑Consensus score is “Likely Pathogenic.” FoldX and Foldetta return uncertain results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates likely pathogenic, while Foldetta’s stability prediction is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this assessment does not conflict with the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.032017Structured0.242242Uncertain0.9630.2640.000-13.833Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-1.06Ambiguous0.00.02Likely Benign-0.52Ambiguous0.16Likely Benign0.502Likely Pathogenic-3.49Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.553Possibly Damaging3.44Benign0.03Affected0.30010.640601-0.4-0.94
c.1966G>C
E656Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E656Q is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33441225‑G‑C). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default; Rosetta reports an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑2 split. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.032017Structured0.242242Uncertain0.9630.2640.000Uncertain 16-33441225-G-C16.20e-7-9.145Likely Pathogenic0.766Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.14Likely Benign0.0-0.81Ambiguous-0.48Likely Benign0.25Likely Benign0.249Likely Benign-2.29Neutral0.980Probably Damaging0.528Possibly Damaging3.46Benign0.02Affected3.39240.17390.6645220.0-0.98224.31.70.00.10.10.0XPotentially BenignThe carboxylate side chain of Glu656, located on an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), frequently forms a hydrogen bond with the nearby residue Ser659 on the same α helix. In the variant simulations, the carboxamide side chain of Gln656 alternatively forms a hydrogen bond with either Ser659 or Glu548 on an opposing helix (res. Ala533-Val560).Although the frequent interaction between Gln656 and Glu548 may strengthen or stabilize the tertiary structure assembly, the effect is likely to be marginal.
c.1967A>C
E656A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E656A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further reveal that AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus also indicates likely pathogenic, whereas Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts benign. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overall evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic; this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.032017Structured0.242242Uncertain0.9630.2640.000-14.373Likely Pathogenic0.974Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.12Likely Benign0.00.10Likely Benign0.11Likely Benign-0.13Likely Benign0.499Likely Benign-5.38Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.755Possibly Damaging3.46Benign0.03Affected0.42440.62710-15.3-58.04
c.1967A>G
E656G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E656G missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Pathogenic). Only premPS and FATHMM predict a benign outcome, while FoldX and Foldetta are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates pathogenicity; Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for E656G, and this conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, which currently lacks an entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.032017Structured0.242242Uncertain0.9630.2640.000-14.112Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.96Ambiguous0.12.02Destabilizing1.49Ambiguous0.22Likely Benign0.534Likely Pathogenic-6.28Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.941Probably Damaging3.44Benign0.05Affected0.32160.52080-23.1-72.06
c.1967A>T
E656V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E656V has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts benign. Overall, the majority of tools (8 of 13) indicate a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.032017Structured0.242242Uncertain0.9630.2640.000-15.252Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic-0.26Likely Benign0.0-0.10Likely Benign-0.18Likely Benign-0.77Ambiguous0.509Likely Pathogenic-6.38Deleterious0.784Possibly Damaging0.223Benign3.46Benign0.02Affected0.09900.7057-2-27.7-29.98
c.1968A>C
E656D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E656D has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus confirms Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is Uncertain. No evidence from Foldetta or Rosetta is available to refute pathogenicity. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence tools predict a pathogenic impact, and this is consistent with the absence of ClinVar annotation; there is no contradiction with ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.032017Structured0.242242Uncertain0.9630.2640.000-11.992Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.22Likely Benign0.11.02Ambiguous0.62Ambiguous0.39Likely Benign0.275Likely Benign-2.72Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.426Benign3.41Benign0.06Tolerated0.20520.4120320.0-14.03
c.1968A>T
E656D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 E656D missense variant has no ClinVar entry and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign calls (REVEL, FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM) and pathogenic calls (PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized). The SGM‑Consensus score is “Likely Pathogenic,” while Foldetta and Rosetta outputs are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates pathogenicity, and Foldetta remains inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.032017Structured0.242242Uncertain0.9630.2640.000-11.992Likely Pathogenic0.990Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.22Likely Benign0.11.02Ambiguous0.62Ambiguous0.39Likely Benign0.273Likely Benign-2.72Deleterious0.985Probably Damaging0.426Benign3.41Benign0.06Tolerated0.20520.4120320.0-14.03
c.1969T>A
W657R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W657R is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic calls are made by premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus score, which is labeled Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates Likely Pathogenic, and the Foldetta stability analysis is inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for W657R, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of a ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.030611Structured0.208729Uncertain0.9410.2450.000-13.391Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.56Ambiguous0.21.64Ambiguous1.60Ambiguous1.29Destabilizing0.461Likely Benign-11.96Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.964Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.07Tolerated0.46840.00002-3-3.6-30.03
c.1969T>C
W657R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W657R is not reported in ClinVar and has no entry in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority of the four high‑accuracy tools) is pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is inconclusive. FoldX and Rosetta individually report uncertain effects on protein stability. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from both general and high‑accuracy predictors indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.030611Structured0.208729Uncertain0.9410.2450.000-13.391Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.56Ambiguous0.21.64Ambiguous1.60Ambiguous1.29Destabilizing0.461Likely Benign-11.96Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.964Probably Damaging3.48Benign0.07Tolerated0.46840.00002-3-3.6-30.03
c.1969T>G
W657G
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W657G is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM. In contrast, the majority of other in silico predictors (AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, Foldetta) all classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts pathogenicity. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because the variant is not yet catalogued there.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.030611Structured0.208729Uncertain0.9410.2450.000-12.559Likely Pathogenic0.968Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.04Destabilizing0.22.80Destabilizing2.92Destabilizing1.28Destabilizing0.389Likely Benign-11.16Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.941Probably Damaging3.46Benign0.15Tolerated0.44700.0885-7-20.5-129.16
c.196C>A
P66T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P66T is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), which classifies the variant as Likely Benign. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized result is uncertain, and the Foldetta protein‑folding stability assessment is unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign impact, with one high‑accuracy tool (SGM‑Consensus) supporting this view and no ClinVar entry to contradict it. Thus, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.394753Structured0.474132Uncertain0.4550.7620.125-3.373Likely Benign0.954Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.139Likely Benign-1.81Neutral0.909Possibly Damaging0.641Possibly Damaging4.00Benign0.00Affected0.17470.58660-10.93.99
c.196C>G
P66A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 P66A missense variant (ClinVar ID 1303518.0) is listed as “Uncertain” and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on benign impact include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict pathogenicity. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” status. Separately, the high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized result is “Uncertain,” the SGM‑Consensus remains “Likely Benign,” and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the predictions are mixed, but the majority of high‑confidence tools lean toward a benign effect. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.394753Structured0.474132Uncertain0.4550.7620.125Uncertain 1-2.845Likely Benign0.891Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.091Likely Benign-1.56Neutral0.805Possibly Damaging0.539Possibly Damaging4.04Benign0.00Affected4.3210.34670.51381-13.4-26.04
c.196C>T
P66S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P66S is listed in ClinVar (ID 1915017.0) as benign and is present in gnomAD (variant ID 6‑33425804‑C‑T). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, while the SGM‑Consensus remains likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a benign interpretation, which is consistent with the ClinVar designation and does not contradict the reported status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.394753Structured0.474132Uncertain0.4550.7620.125Benign 16-33425804-C-T21.24e-6-2.760Likely Benign0.929Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.081Likely Benign-1.69Neutral0.909Possibly Damaging0.641Possibly Damaging4.01Benign0.00Affected4.3210.34170.54631-10.8-10.04
c.1970G>C
W657S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W657S is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas a majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Foldetta) predict a pathogenic impact; Rosetta remains uncertain. High‑accuracy methods all support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.030611Structured0.208729Uncertain0.9410.2450.000-11.817Likely Pathogenic0.986Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.27Destabilizing0.21.87Ambiguous2.07Destabilizing1.26Destabilizing0.334Likely Benign-11.82Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.947Probably Damaging3.52Benign0.09Tolerated0.42990.0489-2-30.1-99.14
c.1970G>T
W657L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant W657L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 2767440.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and FATHMM. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain predictions come from Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta predicts a benign folding‑stability change. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status but leans toward pathogenic rather than benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.030611Structured0.208729Uncertain0.9410.2450.000Uncertain 1-14.411Likely Pathogenic0.960Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.14Likely Benign0.10.73Ambiguous0.44Likely Benign0.87Ambiguous0.213Likely Benign-10.86Deleterious0.277Benign0.078Benign3.52Benign0.14Tolerated3.39240.23020.2049-2-24.7-73.05
c.1971G>C
W657C
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant W657C is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL and FATHMM. Those that predict a deleterious effect are FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; Rosetta reports an uncertain outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a damaging interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that W657C is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.030611Structured0.208729Uncertain0.9410.2450.000Uncertain 1-12.035Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.74Destabilizing0.31.69Ambiguous2.22Destabilizing1.30Destabilizing0.463Likely Benign-11.06Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.982Probably Damaging3.43Benign0.03Affected0.38340.0766-8-23.4-83.07
c.1971G>T
W657C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 W657C missense variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools (SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic impact; Foldetta also supports pathogenicity, while Rosetta remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further reinforce a deleterious outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts a pathogenic effect. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to the variant being most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion is not contradicted by any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.030611Structured0.208729Uncertain0.9410.2450.000-12.035Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.74Destabilizing0.31.69Ambiguous2.22Destabilizing1.30Destabilizing0.463Likely Benign-11.06Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.982Probably Damaging3.43Benign0.03Affected0.38340.0766-8-23.4-83.07
c.1972G>A
G658S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G658S is reported in gnomAD (variant ID 6-33441231‑G‑A) but has no entry in ClinVar. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. No tool predicts pathogenicity; the only inconclusive result comes from Rosetta, which is treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts benign. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.029376Structured0.180299Uncertain0.9420.2510.0006-33441231-G-A84.96e-6-3.445Likely Benign0.077Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.12Likely Benign0.0-0.50Ambiguous-0.31Likely Benign-0.11Likely Benign0.070Likely Benign-0.97Neutral0.209Benign0.087Benign3.58Benign0.43Tolerated3.39240.27830.357601-0.430.03
c.1972G>C
G658R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G658R is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, ESM1b) return uncertain results. High‑accuracy methods give a mixed signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta is uncertain. Because the majority of conventional predictors lean benign and no ClinVar evidence contradicts this, the variant is most likely benign, though the conflicting high‑accuracy predictions leave some uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.029376Structured0.180299Uncertain0.9420.2510.000-7.725In-Between0.618Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-1.17Ambiguous0.1-0.46Likely Benign-0.82Ambiguous0.64Ambiguous0.120Likely Benign-3.11Deleterious0.955Possibly Damaging0.591Possibly Damaging3.40Benign0.19Tolerated0.11570.3888-3-2-4.199.14
c.1972G>T
G658C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G658C is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT. One tool, ESM1b, yields an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also favors benign (2 benign vs. 1 pathogenic, 1 uncertain), and Foldetta predicts a benign impact on protein stability. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.029376Structured0.180299Uncertain0.9420.2510.000-7.577In-Between0.170Likely BenignLikely Benign0.05Likely Benign0.00.04Likely Benign0.05Likely Benign0.46Likely Benign0.146Likely Benign-3.49Deleterious0.989Probably Damaging0.544Possibly Damaging3.37Benign0.04Affected0.15090.3141-3-32.946.09
c.1973G>A
G658D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant G658D is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is present in gnomAD (ID 6-33441232‑G‑A). Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only PROVEAN predicts a pathogenic outcome, while Rosetta, Foldetta, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta, is also inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign effect, and this does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.029376Structured0.180299Uncertain0.9420.2510.000Uncertain 16-33441232-G-A31.86e-6-7.786In-Between0.442AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.40Likely Benign0.1-0.59Ambiguous-0.50Ambiguous0.46Likely Benign0.144Likely Benign-2.64Deleterious0.008Benign0.005Benign3.53Benign0.38Tolerated3.39240.21060.23331-1-3.158.04219.8-84.30.00.00.20.1XPotentially PathogenicGly658, located on the outer surface of an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), weakens the helix integrity at that spot, which is necessary for the kink in the middle of the long helix. In the variant simulations, the carboxylic acid side chain of Asp658 is on the surface of the α helix and is not involved in any interactions. However, aspartate is not as effective a breaker of the secondary structure element as glycine, which may lead to misfolding.
c.1973G>C
G658A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G658A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly classify the substitution as benign: REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict a neutral effect, and the SGM‑Consensus score indicates a likely benign outcome. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns a benign prediction, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also reports a likely benign result, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, yields an uncertain outcome. Taken together, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a benign impact for G658A, and this conclusion does not conflict with the absence of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.029376Structured0.180299Uncertain0.9420.2510.000-4.303Likely Benign0.083Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.34Likely Benign0.0-0.75Ambiguous-0.55Ambiguous-0.18Likely Benign0.072Likely Benign-0.93Neutral0.002Benign0.001Benign3.47Benign0.36Tolerated0.39370.3352102.214.03
c.1973G>T
G658V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G658V is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN and polyPhen‑2 HumDiv; Rosetta’s output is uncertain and therefore not used as evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign, the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) as Benign. Taken together, the majority of reliable predictors indicate a benign impact. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.029376Structured0.180299Uncertain0.9420.2510.000-6.815Likely Benign0.166Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.07Likely Benign0.0-0.71Ambiguous-0.39Likely Benign0.34Likely Benign0.117Likely Benign-3.23Deleterious0.841Possibly Damaging0.264Benign3.38Benign0.13Tolerated0.13370.3330-1-34.642.08
c.1975T>A
S659T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S659T is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: SIFT, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), REVEL, PROVEAN, premPS, FoldX, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all classify the change as benign. Only Rosetta reports an uncertain outcome, which is treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, the SGM Consensus is “Likely Benign,” and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is benign. No tool predicts pathogenicity. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.067594Structured0.154597Uncertain0.9540.2830.000-5.693Likely Benign0.157Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.15Likely Benign0.0-0.74Ambiguous-0.45Likely Benign0.42Likely Benign0.106Likely Benign-2.04Neutral0.069Benign0.011Benign3.41Benign0.39Tolerated0.15050.5976110.114.03
c.1975T>C
S659P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S659P is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic outcome are SGM‑Consensus, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results—FoldX, premPS, and Foldetta—are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy methods give mixed signals: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a benign change, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta’s stability assessment is uncertain. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a pathogenic effect, but the presence of a strong benign prediction from AlphaMissense‑Optimized and the lack of ClinVar annotation means the variant’s clinical significance remains uncertain and does not contradict existing database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.067594Structured0.154597Uncertain0.9540.2830.000-10.461Likely Pathogenic0.609Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.73Ambiguous0.32.98Destabilizing1.13Ambiguous0.73Ambiguous0.224Likely Benign-3.26Deleterious0.932Possibly Damaging0.245Benign3.39Benign0.18Tolerated0.22070.55531-1-0.810.04
c.1975T>G
S659A
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S659A is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as benign, while ESM1b remains uncertain. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also reports a benign effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.067594Structured0.154597Uncertain0.9540.2830.000-7.066In-Between0.117Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.31Likely Benign0.00.02Likely Benign-0.15Likely Benign0.14Likely Benign0.088Likely Benign-2.22Neutral0.097Benign0.114Benign3.50Benign0.64Tolerated0.48420.3813112.6-16.00
c.1976C>A
S659Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S659Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: none) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: none). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default; FoldX is uncertain and therefore not considered evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of individual predictors lean toward a benign impact, and there is no ClinVar entry to contradict this assessment. Thus, based on the available predictions, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.067594Structured0.154597Uncertain0.9540.2830.000-10.832Likely Pathogenic0.600Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.64Ambiguous0.10.00Likely Benign-0.32Likely Benign0.29Likely Benign0.173Likely Benign-4.24Deleterious0.084Benign0.014Benign3.38Benign0.04Affected0.09930.5962-3-2-0.576.10
c.1976C>G
S659C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S659C is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, and SIFT. Two tools (Rosetta and ESM1b) return uncertain results and are not counted as evidence for either side. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields a benign majority; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts benign. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.067594Structured0.154597Uncertain0.9540.2830.000-7.133In-Between0.161Likely BenignLikely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.00.69Ambiguous0.39Likely Benign0.36Likely Benign0.173Likely Benign-4.12Deleterious0.981Probably Damaging0.397Benign3.36Benign0.04Affected0.11300.53840-13.316.06
c.1976C>T
S659F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S659F is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that provide definitive calls cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, polyPhen2_HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM Consensus predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta (which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yields an uncertain result and is therefore unavailable. Overall, the majority of reliable tools favor a pathogenic effect. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.067594Structured0.154597Uncertain0.9540.2830.000Uncertain 1-10.925Likely Pathogenic0.662Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.81Ambiguous0.1-0.25Likely Benign-0.53Ambiguous0.32Likely Benign0.194Likely Benign-4.59Deleterious0.806Possibly Damaging0.171Benign3.39Benign0.05Affected3.38280.08970.5828-3-23.660.10221.3-61.20.00.00.60.4XPotentially BenignIn the WT simulations, the hydroxyl group of Ser659, located in a kink in the middle of the long α-helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), forms a hydrogen bond with the carboxylate group of Glu656. However, the phenol ring of the Phe659 side chain cannot form a similar hydrogen bond. Instead, it interacts with the hydrophobic isopropyl side chain of Val555 from the opposing α-helix (res. Ala533-Val560). This residue swap may therefore cause issues during protein folding.
c.1978A>C
M660L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M660L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, FATHMM, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign classification, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-12.576Likely Pathogenic0.766Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.16Likely Benign0.0-0.10Likely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.97Ambiguous0.330Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.596Possibly Damaging0.101Benign3.56Benign0.03Affected0.13370.3891421.9-18.03
c.1978A>G
M660V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M660V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Functional prediction tools cluster into three groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM; pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default; the remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evaluated predictors lean toward a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar status is available. Thus, based on the current computational evidence, the M660V variant is most likely pathogenic.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-11.006Likely Pathogenic0.836Likely PathogenicAmbiguous1.83Ambiguous0.10.77Ambiguous1.30Ambiguous1.05Destabilizing0.419Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.927Probably Damaging3.56Benign0.13Tolerated0.26140.2937212.3-32.06
c.1978A>T
M660L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M660L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, FATHMM, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as benign. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign classification, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-12.576Likely Pathogenic0.766Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.16Likely Benign0.0-0.10Likely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.97Ambiguous0.330Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.596Possibly Damaging0.101Benign3.56Benign0.03Affected0.13370.3891421.9-18.03
c.1979T>A
M660K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M660K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are polyPhen‑2 HumVar and FATHMM. All other evaluated predictors—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicates pathogenicity; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, reports a pathogenic effect. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the corroborating high‑accuracy tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-14.123Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.13Destabilizing0.14.46Destabilizing3.80Destabilizing2.36Destabilizing0.604Likely Pathogenic-5.99Deleterious0.862Possibly Damaging0.216Benign3.34Benign0.00Affected0.13890.08560-1-5.8-3.02
c.1979T>C
M660T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M660T is catalogued in gnomAD (ID 6‑33441238‑T‑C) but has no ClinVar entry, so its clinical status is currently unreported. In silico prediction tools largely agree that the substitution is deleterious: pathogenic predictions come from SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only FATHMM predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No prediction or folding result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the consensus of these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because none is available.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.0006-33441238-T-C16.20e-7-9.791Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.62Destabilizing0.12.05Destabilizing2.84Destabilizing1.91Destabilizing0.561Likely Pathogenic-5.99Deleterious0.967Probably Damaging0.633Possibly Damaging3.36Benign0.02Affected3.38280.18110.1630-1-1-2.6-30.09
c.1979T>G
M660R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M660R is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict pathogenicity, whereas only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No prediction is inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because none exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-15.985Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.95Destabilizing0.23.52Destabilizing3.24Destabilizing1.96Destabilizing0.588Likely Pathogenic-5.99Deleterious0.976Probably Damaging0.464Possibly Damaging3.34Benign0.00Affected0.16120.09570-1-6.424.99
c.197C>A
P66H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P66H is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, and the SGM‑Consensus result is benign; Foldetta predictions are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign interpretation, with no conflict with ClinVar status because no ClinVar assertion exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.394753Structured0.474132Uncertain0.4550.7620.125-4.134Likely Benign0.941Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.239Likely Benign-2.26Neutral0.992Probably Damaging0.893Possibly Damaging3.89Benign0.00Affected0.19140.46750-2-1.640.02
c.197C>G
P66R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P66R is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain” and the SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Benign”; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a benign impact, and there is no ClinVar entry to contradict this assessment. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current predictive data.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.394753Structured0.474132Uncertain0.4550.7620.125-2.708Likely Benign0.940Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.221Likely Benign-2.23Neutral0.972Probably Damaging0.804Possibly Damaging3.92Benign0.00Affected0.16360.39280-2-2.959.07
c.197C>T
P66L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P66L is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized calling the variant pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome; Foldetta results are not available. Overall, the predictions are split evenly between benign and pathogenic, with high‑accuracy tools providing opposing conclusions. Consequently, the variant’s impact remains uncertain and does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is currently assigned.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Benign0.394753Structured0.474132Uncertain0.4550.7620.125-2.437Likely Benign0.972Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.194Likely Benign-2.48Neutral0.909Possibly Damaging0.713Possibly Damaging3.92Benign0.00Affected0.24120.6687-3-35.416.04
c.1980G>A
M660I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M660I is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions arise from SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the pathogenic signal: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is labeled Likely Pathogenic, and the protein‑folding stability method Foldetta returns an uncertain result. Stability predictions from FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS are also inconclusive. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M660I. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-11.150Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.15Ambiguous0.10.71Ambiguous0.93Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.464Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.887Possibly Damaging0.289Benign3.52Benign0.04Affected0.11700.2878212.6-18.03
c.1980G>C
M660I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M660I (GAP domain) is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Those that predict pathogenicity are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is inconclusive. No other stability predictions are available. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M660I. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-11.150Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.15Ambiguous0.10.71Ambiguous0.93Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.464Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.887Possibly Damaging0.289Benign3.52Benign0.04Affected0.11700.2878212.6-18.03
c.1980G>T
M660I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant M660I (GAP domain) is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify it as benign include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Those that predict pathogenicity are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is inconclusive. No other stability predictions are available. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M660I. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar, which contains no entry for the variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.047319Structured0.134270Uncertain0.9440.2890.000-11.150Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.15Ambiguous0.10.71Ambiguous0.93Ambiguous0.95Ambiguous0.464Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.887Possibly Damaging0.289Benign3.52Benign0.04Affected0.11700.2878212.6-18.03
c.1981C>A
Q661K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q661K is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM. Only ESM1b predicts a pathogenic outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a benign majority (2 benign vs. 1 pathogenic, with one uncertain), and Foldetta also predicts benign stability. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the lack of ClinVar annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.048328Structured0.117089Uncertain0.9240.3090.000-10.581Likely Pathogenic0.400AmbiguousLikely Benign-0.01Likely Benign0.0-0.18Likely Benign-0.10Likely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.108Likely Benign-1.89Neutral0.098Benign0.030Benign3.59Benign0.42Tolerated0.17560.359211-0.40.04
c.1981C>G
Q661E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q661E is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b. Four tools (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain or inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as benign, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions lean toward a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which currently has no classification for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.048328Structured0.117089Uncertain0.9240.3090.000-12.121Likely Pathogenic0.370AmbiguousLikely Benign0.64Ambiguous0.10.35Likely Benign0.50Ambiguous0.61Ambiguous0.141Likely Benign-2.15Neutral0.988Probably Damaging0.619Possibly Damaging3.42Benign0.03Affected0.11990.2439220.00.98
c.1982A>C
Q661P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q661P is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign predictions come from premPS and FATHMM, whereas the remaining 12 tools (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score) all classify the change as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also reports a pathogenic effect. No prediction is inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.117089Uncertain0.9240.3090.000-17.549Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.11Destabilizing0.15.97Destabilizing5.04Destabilizing0.45Likely Benign0.531Likely Pathogenic-4.58Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging3.41Benign0.01Affected0.18110.38500-11.9-31.01
c.1982A>G
Q661R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q661R is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and polyPhen2_HumVar. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen2_HumDiv and ESM1b. FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Default are inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also yields a benign prediction, while Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of available evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict ClinVar status, as no ClinVar assertion exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.048328Structured0.117089Uncertain0.9240.3090.000-10.386Likely Pathogenic0.479AmbiguousLikely Benign-1.12Ambiguous0.0-0.59Ambiguous-0.86Ambiguous-0.15Likely Benign0.281Likely Benign-2.06Neutral0.812Possibly Damaging0.251Benign3.52Benign0.18Tolerated0.15020.219611-1.028.06
c.1982A>T
Q661L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q661L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect comprise SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as uncertain, so it is not used as evidence. Overall, the majority of predictions support a pathogenic impact, and this is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction from ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.117089Uncertain0.9240.3090.000-9.003Likely Pathogenic0.613Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.19Likely Benign0.1-1.12Ambiguous-0.66Ambiguous0.36Likely Benign0.391Likely Benign-5.11Deleterious0.976Probably Damaging0.567Possibly Damaging3.49Benign0.02Affected0.08340.4675-2-27.3-14.97
c.1983G>C
Q661H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Q661H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are reported by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain calls are made by FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments indicate that the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, predicts a pathogenic effect, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts a benign outcome. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a pathogenic interpretation, and this assessment does not conflict with ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.117089Uncertain0.9240.3090.000-9.938Likely Pathogenic0.886Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.78Ambiguous0.10.07Likely Benign0.43Likely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.282Likely Benign-3.78Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.819Possibly Damaging3.42Benign0.02Affected0.12760.3424300.39.01
c.1983G>T
Q661H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Q661H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show mixed results: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are reported by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain calls are made by FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments indicate that the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, predicts a pathogenic effect, while Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, predicts a benign outcome. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a pathogenic interpretation, and this assessment does not conflict with ClinVar status, which currently has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.048328Structured0.117089Uncertain0.9240.3090.000-9.938Likely Pathogenic0.886Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.78Ambiguous0.10.07Likely Benign0.43Likely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.282Likely Benign-3.78Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.819Possibly Damaging3.42Benign0.02Affected0.12760.3424300.39.01
c.1984C>A
Q662K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q662K is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as benign, while only ESM1b predicts pathogenicity. When high‑accuracy methods are considered separately, AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields a Likely Benign verdict, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also reports a benign effect. No conflicting evidence is present. Therefore, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.046336Structured0.103446Uncertain0.9320.3230.000-8.892Likely Pathogenic0.309Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.02Likely Benign0.20.03Likely Benign0.01Likely Benign-0.04Likely Benign0.108Likely Benign-0.80Neutral0.321Benign0.030Benign3.49Benign0.37Tolerated0.23910.319811-0.40.04
c.1984C>G
Q662E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q662E is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and ESM1b. High‑accuracy methods all support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta is benign. No prediction or folding‑stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.046336Structured0.103446Uncertain0.9320.3230.000-12.750Likely Pathogenic0.191Likely BenignLikely Benign0.32Likely Benign0.00.64Ambiguous0.48Likely Benign0.24Likely Benign0.083Likely Benign-1.25Neutral0.876Possibly Damaging0.147Benign3.52Benign0.27Tolerated0.16600.1823220.00.98
c.1985A>C
Q662P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q662P is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, premPS, SIFT, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy methods give a consistent pathogenic signal: the SGM‑Consensus score (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts a pathogenic effect. AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns an uncertain result, which is treated as unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for Q662P, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation because no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.046336Structured0.103446Uncertain0.9320.3230.000-13.174Likely Pathogenic0.922Likely PathogenicAmbiguous2.15Destabilizing0.09.37Destabilizing5.76Destabilizing0.36Likely Benign0.268Likely Benign-3.42Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.962Probably Damaging3.40Benign0.08Tolerated0.26210.43640-11.9-31.01
c.1985A>G
Q662R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q662R is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that assess sequence conservation, structural impact, or functional effect all converge on a benign outcome: SIFT, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), REVEL, PROVEAN, FATHMM, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, premPS, FoldX, and Rosetta all predict benign. No tool in the dataset indicates pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Benign”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, also predicts benign. Thus, based on the available predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none reported).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.046336Structured0.103446Uncertain0.9320.3230.000-6.678Likely Benign0.300Likely BenignLikely Benign-0.41Likely Benign0.00.10Likely Benign-0.16Likely Benign-0.42Likely Benign0.159Likely Benign0.49Neutral0.428Benign0.095Benign3.48Benign1.00Tolerated0.20230.139111-1.028.06
c.1985A>T
Q662L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q662L is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, polyPhen2_HumVar, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and Foldetta as benign; the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive (2 benign vs 2 pathogenic). Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign impact. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of ClinVar annotation and gnomAD presence, so there is no contradiction with existing database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.046336Structured0.103446Uncertain0.9320.3230.000-10.291Likely Pathogenic0.300Likely BenignLikely Benign0.04Likely Benign0.00.12Likely Benign0.08Likely Benign0.17Likely Benign0.186Likely Benign-4.09Deleterious0.699Possibly Damaging0.057Benign3.42Benign0.10Tolerated0.10700.5255-2-27.3-14.97
c.1986G>C
Q662H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q662H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus predictions from multiple in‑silico tools overwhelmingly indicate a benign effect: REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign, while the single pathogenic call comes from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” status. High‑accuracy assessments are consistent: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) predicts likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign. FoldX alone is uncertain, but this does not alter the overall consensus. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.046336Structured0.103446Uncertain0.9320.3230.000-6.357Likely Benign0.331Likely BenignLikely Benign0.53Ambiguous0.00.18Likely Benign0.36Likely Benign-0.11Likely Benign0.159Likely Benign-2.00Neutral0.891Possibly Damaging0.243Benign3.42Benign0.15Tolerated0.16740.3186300.39.01
c.1986G>T
Q662H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q662H is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Consensus predictions from multiple in‑silico tools overwhelmingly indicate a benign effect: REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as benign, while the single pathogenic call comes from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” status, and FoldX is inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) is likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts benign. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAP0.046336Structured0.103446Uncertain0.9320.3230.000-6.357Likely Benign0.331Likely BenignLikely Benign0.53Ambiguous0.00.18Likely Benign0.36Likely Benign-0.11Likely Benign0.159Likely Benign-2.00Neutral0.891Possibly Damaging0.243Benign3.42Benign0.15Tolerated0.16740.3186300.39.01
c.1987T>A
F663I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663I is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-15.006Likely Pathogenic0.992Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic2.63Destabilizing0.14.51Destabilizing3.57Destabilizing1.60Destabilizing0.641Likely Pathogenic-5.99Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging3.06Benign0.00Affected0.17400.1955101.7-34.02
c.1987T>C
F663L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663L is not reported in ClinVar and has no entries in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to FATHMM, which scores the variant as benign. All other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenicity, while Foldetta’s stability analysis is inconclusive and therefore unavailable. FoldX and Foldetta are treated as unavailable due to uncertain outputs. Based on the overwhelming agreement among pathogenic predictors and the lack of benign evidence, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-11.996Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.91Ambiguous0.12.01Destabilizing1.46Ambiguous1.51Destabilizing0.540Likely Pathogenic-5.99Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.01Affected0.19730.2936201.0-34.02
c.1987T>G
F663V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663V is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b all indicate pathogenicity, while only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the change as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports it as likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts a pathogenic effect. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-14.196Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.04Destabilizing0.13.31Destabilizing3.18Destabilizing1.75Destabilizing0.655Likely Pathogenic-6.98Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.993Probably Damaging3.02Benign0.00Affected0.18440.1983-1-11.4-48.04
c.1988T>A
F663Y
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663Y is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID: None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID: None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect comprise premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as Benign. Overall, the majority of tools and the SGM‑Consensus lean toward pathogenicity, while a minority suggest benign impact. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status, as none is currently assigned.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-12.749Likely Pathogenic0.853Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.37Likely Benign0.10.19Likely Benign0.28Likely Benign1.03Destabilizing0.424Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.984Probably Damaging0.913Probably Damaging3.11Benign0.05Affected0.12430.158473-4.116.00
c.1988T>C
F663S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663S is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy methods further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming agreement among both general and high‑accuracy predictors, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-14.800Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic4.15Destabilizing0.04.69Destabilizing4.42Destabilizing2.50Destabilizing0.800Likely Pathogenic-7.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.98Benign0.00Affected0.39650.0200-3-2-3.6-60.10
c.1988T>G
F663C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663C is not reported in ClinVar (no ClinVar ID) and is absent from gnomAD (no gnomAD ID). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM, whereas all other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the variant as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. No prediction or folding stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar status because no ClinVar classification exists.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-13.544Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.83Destabilizing0.14.54Destabilizing4.19Destabilizing1.91Destabilizing0.772Likely Pathogenic-7.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.96Benign0.00Affected0.23430.0783-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.1989T>A
F663L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (PolyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, SGM Consensus, premPS, and Rosetta) indicate a pathogenic impact. FoldX‑MD and Rosetta‑based stability calculations are inconclusive, yielding an uncertain Foldetta result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence from consensus and high‑accuracy tools points to a pathogenic effect for F663L. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar entry exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-11.996Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.91Ambiguous0.12.01Destabilizing1.46Ambiguous1.51Destabilizing0.423Likely Benign-5.99Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.01Affected0.19730.2936201.0-34.02
c.1989T>G
F663L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F663L is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (PolyPhen‑2 HumDiv/HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, premPS, and the SGM Consensus) indicate a pathogenic impact. FoldX‑MD and Rosetta give conflicting stability results, with FoldX uncertain and Rosetta pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates both, is also uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, the SGM Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for F663L. This conclusion is not contradicted by ClinVar status, as no ClinVar classification exists for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.056825Structured0.093963Uncertain0.9440.3550.000-11.996Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.91Ambiguous0.12.01Destabilizing1.46Ambiguous1.51Destabilizing0.423Likely Benign-5.99Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.01Affected0.19730.2936201.0-34.02
c.1990T>A
L664M
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L664M is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, PROVEAN, and FATHMM, while those that agree on a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is also uncertain due to a 2‑vs‑2 split; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is uncertain. Overall, the majority of conventional tools predict a pathogenic impact, whereas the high‑accuracy methods do not provide a definitive verdict. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the available predictions, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.100716Structured0.089318Uncertain0.9370.3390.000-11.819Likely Pathogenic0.807Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.49Likely Benign0.11.35Ambiguous0.92Ambiguous0.96Ambiguous0.429Likely Benign-2.00Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging2.92Benign0.01Affected0.06200.254142-1.918.03
c.1990T>G
L664V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L664V is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Rosetta and Foldetta are uncertain, providing no definitive evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) predicts pathogenic (3 pathogenic vs 1 benign). Foldetta’s stability prediction is uncertain. Overall, the majority of reliable tools predict a pathogenic impact. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.089318Uncertain0.9370.3390.000-11.515Likely Pathogenic0.755Likely PathogenicLikely Benign2.01Destabilizing0.11.13Ambiguous1.57Ambiguous1.37Destabilizing0.378Likely Benign-2.99Deleterious0.993Probably Damaging0.776Possibly Damaging2.91Benign0.01Affected0.09840.2628210.4-14.03
c.1991T>C
L664S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L664S is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 2429773.0) and is present in gnomAD (ID 6‑33441250‑T‑C). Prediction tools that report a benign effect include only FATHMM; all other evaluated algorithms (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic impact, and the SGM‑Consensus score is “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy methods give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also yields Pathogenic; and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts Pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming majority of pathogenic predictions—including the high‑accuracy tools—the variant is most likely pathogenic, which contradicts its ClinVar benign classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.089318Uncertain0.9370.3390.000Likely Benign 16-33441250-T-C16.20e-7-16.498Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic3.75Destabilizing0.23.63Destabilizing3.69Destabilizing2.77Destabilizing0.543Likely Pathogenic-5.99Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging2.85Benign0.00Affected3.38280.20910.0896-3-2-4.6-26.08215.550.10.00.0-0.20.2XPotentially BenignThe iso-butyl side chain of L664, located on an α-helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), hydrophobically interacts with residues in the inter-helix space between three helices (res. Glu617-Asn635, res. Glu582-Met603, and res. Ser641-Glu666), such as Ile589, Phe663, and Met660. In the variant simulations, the hydroxyl group of Ser664 forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl oxygen of another helix residue, such as Met660 or Gln661. This interaction is known to destabilize hydrogen bonding in the α-helix, but this effect was not observed in the simulations. Additionally, Ser664 occasionally forms hydrogen bonds with the carboxylate group of Asp586 on another α-helix (res. Glu582-Met603), which could minimally influence the tertiary structure assembly. Despite these interactions, no major negative effects on the protein structure were observed during the simulations.
c.1991T>G
L664W
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L664W is not reported in ClinVar and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely converge on a deleterious effect: benign calls are made only by REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining 13 predictors—including FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—classify the substitution as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates likely pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, reports a pathogenic effect. Consequently, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this assessment does not contradict any ClinVar annotation (none is available).

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.089318Uncertain0.9370.3390.000-17.438Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic7.81Destabilizing0.53.17Destabilizing5.49Destabilizing1.57Destabilizing0.479Likely Benign-5.99Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.984Probably Damaging2.84Benign0.00Affected0.05430.2272-2-2-4.773.05
c.1992G>C
L664F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L664F resides in the GAP domain. ClinVar lists no entry for this variant, and it is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Predictions that are uncertain (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as Uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions support a pathogenic impact. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.089318Uncertain0.9370.3390.000-12.834Likely Pathogenic0.984Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.98Ambiguous0.31.03Ambiguous1.51Ambiguous0.55Ambiguous0.355Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.895Possibly Damaging3.05Benign0.03Affected0.05370.231120-1.034.02
c.1992G>T
L664F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L664F resides in the GAP domain. ClinVar lists no entry for this variant, and it is absent from gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Predictions that are uncertain (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS) are treated as unavailable. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta as Uncertain. Overall, the majority of available predictions support a pathogenic impact. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which is currently unreported.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAP0.100716Structured0.089318Uncertain0.9370.3390.000-12.834Likely Pathogenic0.984Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic1.98Ambiguous0.31.03Ambiguous1.51Ambiguous0.55Ambiguous0.355Likely Benign-3.99Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.895Possibly Damaging3.05Benign0.03Affected0.05370.231120-1.034.02
c.1993T>A
Y665N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 Y665N variant is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar ID None) and is absent from gnomAD (gnomAD ID None). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Default) give uncertain results and are treated as unavailable evidence. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of conventional predictors lean toward a benign impact, and this assessment does not contradict ClinVar status (none). Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on the prevailing predictions.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.098513Structured0.086641Uncertain0.9220.3610.000-11.189Likely Pathogenic0.470AmbiguousLikely Benign1.11Ambiguous0.11.43Ambiguous1.27Ambiguous0.50Likely Benign0.219Likely Benign-3.03Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.50Benign0.88Tolerated0.19290.0573-2-2-2.2-49.07
c.1993T>C
Y665H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y665H is not reported in ClinVar (ClinVar status: not reported) but is present in gnomAD (gnomAD ID: 6‑33441252‑T‑C). Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are premPS, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b. Tools with uncertain or inconclusive results are FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy methods give a benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) resolves to benign, and Foldetta remains uncertain. Overall, the majority of predictions (7 benign vs. 4 pathogenic) and the high‑accuracy consensus support a benign classification. This conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which has no entry for this variant.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAP0.098513Structured0.086641Uncertain0.9220.3610.0006-33441252-T-C21.24e-6-9.303Likely Pathogenic0.389AmbiguousLikely Benign0.85Ambiguous0.00.28Likely Benign0.57Ambiguous1.12Destabilizing0.129Likely Benign-2.00Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging3.45Benign0.48Tolerated3.38280.21220.051320-1.9-26.03

Found 8751 rows. Show 800 rows per page. Page 3/11 « Previous | Next »