SynGap Missense Server

Table of SynGAP1 Isoform α2 (UniProt Q96PV0-1) Missense Variants.

c.dna Variant SGM Consensus Domain ClinVar gnomAD ESM1b AlphaMissense REVEL FoldX Rosetta Foldetta PremPS PROVEAN PolyPhen-2 HumDiv PolyPhen-2 HumVar FATHMM SIFT PAM Physical SASA Normalized B-factor backbone Normalized B-factor sidechain SynGAP Structural Annotation DOI
Clinical Status Review Subm. ID Allele count Allele freq. LLR score Prediction Pathogenicity Class Optimized Score Prediction Average ΔΔG Prediction StdDev ΔΔG Prediction ΔΔG Prediction ΔΔG Prediction Score Prediction pph2_prob Prediction pph2_prob Prediction Nervous System Score Prediction Prediction Status Conservation Sequences PAM250 PAM120 Hydropathy Δ MW Δ Average Δ Δ StdDev Δ StdDev Secondary Tertiary bonds Inside out GAP-Ras interface At membrane No effect MD Alert Verdict Description
c.467T>G
F156C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F156C is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—all predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus reports it as “Likely Pathogenic.” No Foldetta stability analysis is available for this variant. Overall, the majority of predictions, including the high‑accuracy tools, indicate that F156C is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with its ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-13.658Likely Pathogenic0.988Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.297Likely Benign-3.54Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.990Probably Damaging3.92Benign0.00Affected-4-2-0.3-44.04
c.2719A>T
S907C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S907C is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 1502069.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus also as likely benign; the Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, aligning with the ClinVar classification and indicating no contradiction with the reported status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Benign 1-6.685Likely Benign0.298Likely BenignLikely Benign0.113Likely Benign-2.34Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.988Probably Damaging2.60Benign0.02Affected3.7750-13.316.06
c.401G>A
S134N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S134N is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 2819575.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. The remaining tools—AlphaMissense‑Optimized and the SGM‑Consensus—are inconclusive; the consensus score is “Likely Benign” based on a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) has no available result. Overall, the balance of evidence points to a benign impact, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.534Likely Benign0.813Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.075Likely Benign-1.62Neutral0.001Benign0.002Benign3.90Benign0.00Affected3.61511-2.727.03
c.2291A>G
N764S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N764S is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 1948460.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, consistent with the ClinVar classification, and there is no contradiction between the predictions and the reported ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-3.149Likely Benign0.159Likely BenignLikely Benign0.058Likely Benign-0.84Neutral0.992Probably Damaging0.846Possibly Damaging2.65Benign0.61Tolerated3.646112.7-27.03
c.2294G>A
S765N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S765N (ClinVar ID 2979632.0) is listed as “Uncertain” in ClinVar and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Benign). In contrast, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is also benign. No Foldetta stability prediction is available, so it does not influence the assessment. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification and does not contradict it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.098Likely Benign0.378AmbiguousLikely Benign0.094Likely Benign-0.94Neutral0.985Probably Damaging0.950Probably Damaging4.11Benign0.06Tolerated3.64611-2.727.03
c.2299A>G
I767V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I767V is listed in ClinVar (ID 1402700.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. All evaluated in‑silico predictors classify the substitution as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a “Likely Benign” outcome. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, SGM‑Consensus is likely benign, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the computational evidence strongly supports a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.791Likely Benign0.064Likely BenignLikely Benign0.096Likely Benign0.10Neutral0.072Benign0.029Benign4.21Benign1.00Tolerated3.64643-0.3-14.03
c.2300T>C
I767T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I767T is listed in ClinVar (ID 1044161.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv flags the variant as pathogenic, creating a single discordant prediction. The high‑accuracy consensus from SGM (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a “Likely Benign” classification, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized also reports benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.749Likely Benign0.252Likely BenignLikely Benign0.138Likely Benign-0.78Neutral0.625Possibly Damaging0.249Benign4.12Benign0.46Tolerated3.6460-1-5.2-12.05
c.4008G>C
E1336D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E1336D is listed in ClinVar (ID 3323942.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus result is a majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, yielding a benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, consistent with the ClinVar benign designation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign and does not contradict ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Benign 1-3.344Likely Benign0.596Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.062Likely Benign-1.92Neutral0.001Benign0.003Benign3.30Benign0.00Affected3.775230.0-14.03
c.3G>A
M1I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M1I is listed in ClinVar (ID 833646.0) with an uncertain significance annotation and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM all classify the substitution as benign, while SIFT uniquely predicts it to be pathogenic. The consensus score from the SGM framework, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy predictors are incomplete: AlphaMissense‑Optimized and the Foldetta stability assessment are unavailable for this variant. Taking the collective evidence into account, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not conflict with the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignConflicting 3-5.397Likely Benign0.227Likely Benign-0.17Neutral0.001Benign0.000Benign4.25Benign0.00Affected4.321212.6-18.03
c.2305C>T
L769F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L769F is listed in ClinVar (ID 3617309.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority of the high‑accuracy tools) also indicates benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of predictions—including the high‑accuracy tools—suggest the variant is most likely benign, which is consistent with its ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.044Likely Benign0.146Likely BenignLikely Benign0.060Likely Benign-0.89Neutral0.925Possibly Damaging0.510Possibly Damaging3.94Benign0.02Affected20-1.034.02
c.3977C>T
P1326L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1326L is listed in ClinVar (ID 1004879.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT predict a pathogenic impact. The high‑accuracy consensus from SGM (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) classifies the variant as “Likely Benign,” and AlphaMissense‑Optimized also predicts benign. No Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/ Rosetta) stability result is available for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence—including the high‑confidence SGM consensus and AlphaMissense‑Optimized prediction—supports a benign classification, which does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.541Likely Benign0.115Likely BenignLikely Benign0.117Likely Benign-1.06Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging3.62Benign0.00Affected3.775-3-35.416.04
c.406C>T
R136W
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R136W is listed in ClinVar (ID 1479441.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a deleterious effect, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates Likely Pathogenic. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a pathogenic impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 2-10.453Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.237Likely Benign-4.71Deleterious0.965Probably Damaging0.416Benign3.45Benign0.00Affected3.6152-33.630.03
c.2270G>C
G757A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change G757A is catalogued in ClinVar (ID 3635272.0) with an uncertain significance designation and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction algorithms uniformly classify the variant as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores. No tool in the dataset predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy consensus methods corroborate this view: the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign effect, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized also predicts benign. The Foldetta stability assessment is unavailable for this variant. Taken together, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a benign interpretation, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.626Likely Benign0.091Likely BenignLikely Benign0.066Likely Benign-0.45Neutral0.267Benign0.127Benign2.73Benign0.35Tolerated102.214.03
c.2210A>C
Q737P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q737P is listed in ClinVar (ID 2580571.0) with an uncertain significance designation and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign, while only SIFT indicates a pathogenic effect. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence supports a benign classification for Q737P, which is consistent with its ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.407Likely Benign0.054Likely BenignLikely Benign0.154Likely Benign-1.22Neutral0.005Benign0.013Benign2.78Benign0.04Affected4.073-101.9-31.01
c.458C>A
T153N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T153N is listed in ClinVar (ID 984906.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates a likely benign outcome. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) predict pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign classification, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignConflicting 3-0.739Likely Benign0.226Likely BenignLikely Benign0.161Likely Benign0.88Neutral0.888Possibly Damaging0.537Possibly Damaging4.23Benign0.81Tolerated3.61500-2.813.00
c.2215G>C
E739Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E739Q is listed in ClinVar (ID 2429558.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.846Likely Benign0.161Likely BenignLikely Benign0.071Likely Benign-1.06Neutral0.801Possibly Damaging0.339Benign2.57Benign0.00Affected4.322220.0-0.98
c.2216A>T
E739V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E739V is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM all predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also indicates benign. The Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from both general and high‑accuracy predictors points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.136Likely Benign0.274Likely BenignLikely Benign0.085Likely Benign-1.86Neutral0.891Possibly Damaging0.575Possibly Damaging2.47Pathogenic0.00Affected4.322-2-27.7-29.98
c.2217G>C
E739D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E739D is listed in ClinVar (ID 3661302.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is “Likely Benign.” Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this is not in conflict with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.369Likely Benign0.062Likely BenignLikely Benign0.097Likely Benign-0.49Neutral0.002Benign0.005Benign2.59Benign0.00Affected320.0-14.03
c.453C>A
D151E
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D151E variant is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain,” SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Benign,” and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.662Likely Benign0.886Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.142Likely Benign-2.02Neutral0.984Probably Damaging0.967Probably Damaging3.99Benign0.11Tolerated3.615320.014.03
c.43G>C
A15P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A15P is listed in ClinVar (ID 3688743.0) with an *Uncertain* clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as *Likely Benign*. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; the Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.436Likely Benign0.097Likely BenignLikely Benign0.146Likely Benign-0.23Neutral0.880Possibly Damaging0.123Benign4.09Benign0.00Affected1-1-3.426.04
c.223G>A
E75K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E75K is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 3360083.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and SIFT, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, aligning with the ClinVar classification and not contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign/Likely benign 2-4.020Likely Benign0.358AmbiguousLikely Benign0.134Likely Benign-1.12Neutral0.748Possibly Damaging0.017Benign4.07Benign0.00Affected01-0.4-0.94
c.407G>C
R136P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R136P is listed in ClinVar (ID 579340.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus—predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates pathogenicity. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-11.952Likely Pathogenic0.981Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.277Likely Benign-3.72Deleterious0.910Possibly Damaging0.578Possibly Damaging3.47Benign0.00Affected3.6150-22.9-59.07
c.2249G>A
G750E
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant G750E is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also yields benign, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-2.618Likely Benign0.413AmbiguousLikely Benign0.146Likely Benign-2.27Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.982Probably Damaging2.49Pathogenic0.01Affected3.9950-2-3.172.06
c.2324G>C
R775P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R775P (ClinVar ID 2959355.0) is classified as Benign in ClinVar and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and polyPhen‑2 HumVar; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, consistent with the ClinVar designation, and there is no contradiction with the reported ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-5.072Likely Benign0.452AmbiguousLikely Benign0.168Likely Benign-0.79Neutral0.971Probably Damaging0.944Probably Damaging4.13Benign0.07Tolerated3.646-202.9-59.07
c.3977C>G
P1326R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1326R is listed in ClinVar (ID 2429486.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.097Likely Benign0.240Likely BenignLikely Benign0.133Likely Benign-0.82Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging3.62Benign0.00Affected3.7750-2-2.959.07
c.233G>T
R78L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R78L is listed in ClinVar (ID 3390541.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (which is a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as benign; the Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.389Likely Benign0.635Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.062Likely Benign-1.59Neutral0.385Benign0.021Benign3.84Benign0.00Affected-3-28.3-43.03
c.2408A>G
K803R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K803R is listed in ClinVar (ID 834618.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only two tools—SIFT and FATHMM—predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is “Likely Benign.” Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates the variant is most likely benign, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignSH3-binding motifUncertain 1-2.281Likely Benign0.097Likely BenignLikely Benign0.018Likely Benign-1.52Neutral0.103Benign0.038Benign2.38Pathogenic0.00Affected3.77532-0.628.01
c.2414T>C
L805P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L805P is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic calls are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments give a benign result from AlphaMissense‑Optimized, a pathogenic outcome from the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and no Foldetta data are available. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward pathogenicity, and this conclusion does not conflict with the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
SH3-binding motifUncertain 1-4.661Likely Benign0.444AmbiguousLikely Benign0.272Likely Benign-3.40Deleterious0.975Probably Damaging0.767Possibly Damaging2.36Pathogenic0.00Affected3.775-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.3773A>G
Q1258R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q1258R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3359527.0) and is not observed in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default, while only REVEL predicts a benign outcome. The high‑accuracy predictors give the following results: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely pathogenic classification; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, has no available output for this variant. Based on the preponderance of pathogenic predictions and the SGM Consensus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with its ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilUncertain 1-10.971Likely Pathogenic0.931Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.316Likely Benign-3.19Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.988Probably Damaging2.00Pathogenic0.00Affected11-1.028.06
c.2420A>T
Y807F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y807F is listed in ClinVar (ID 1491782.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All evaluated in‑silico predictors classify the substitution as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates a likely benign effect. No tool in the set predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from the four high‑accuracy predictors) is benign. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the computational evidence strongly supports a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignSH3-binding motifUncertain 1-3.667Likely Benign0.073Likely BenignLikely Benign0.057Likely Benign0.14Neutral0.012Benign0.022Benign2.92Benign0.98Tolerated3.775734.1-16.00
c.373C>T
P125S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P125S is listed in ClinVar (ID 837156.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, and SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; the Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar designation, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.769Likely Benign0.238Likely BenignLikely Benign0.121Likely Benign-3.57Deleterious0.580Possibly Damaging0.140Benign2.86Benign0.02Affected3.6151-10.8-10.04
c.3731G>A
S1244N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1244N is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 931075.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, while the SGM‑Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—indicates pathogenicity. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar designation of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilUncertain 1-9.008Likely Pathogenic0.751Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.154Likely Benign-1.87Neutral0.997Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.10Pathogenic0.15Tolerated3.77511-2.727.03
c.2443C>A
R815S
2D
AISynGAP1 R815S is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ID 3645150.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Two tools report uncertainty: ESM1b and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, SGM Consensus as Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) has no available result. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward pathogenicity, whereas the consensus and high‑accuracy tools suggest benignity. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the prevailing predictions, contradicting its ClinVar benign designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
SH3-binding motifBenign 1-7.324In-Between0.950Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.138Likely Benign-1.86Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging2.67Benign0.02Affected0-13.7-69.11
c.2443C>G
R815G
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant R815G is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on benign effect include REVEL and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain calls are made by ESM1b and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
SH3-binding motifUncertain 1-7.983In-Between0.854Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.146Likely Benign-3.22Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging2.62Benign0.02Affected4.324-3-24.1-99.14
c.3721C>A
L1241M
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant L1241M is listed in ClinVar with an Uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split verdict: benign calls come from REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic calls are made by polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is unresolved (2 benign vs. 2 pathogenic). Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability predictor that combines FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Consequently, the high‑accuracy tools do not converge on a single interpretation. Overall, the predictions are balanced between benign and pathogenic, leaving the variant’s effect uncertain, which aligns with its ClinVar designation of Uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Coiled-coilUncertain 1-5.881Likely Benign0.782Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.167Likely Benign-1.43Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging1.65Pathogenic0.00Affected42-1.918.03
c.2444G>T
R815L
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant R815L is listed in ClinVar (ID 2505666.0) with an uncertain significance annotation and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is uncertain, and the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools indicates a pathogenic effect, which contrasts with the ClinVar uncertain classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicSH3-binding motifUncertain 1-8.546Likely Pathogenic0.865Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.175Likely Benign-3.06Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.997Probably Damaging2.63Benign0.03Affected4.324-2-38.3-43.03
c.3794G>C
R1265T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R1265T is reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 522047.0) and is not found in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly indicate a deleterious effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the variant as pathogenic. No tool in the dataset predicts a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) yields a Likely Pathogenic verdict. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the consensus of all available predictions supports a pathogenic classification, which is consistent with the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilLikely Pathogenic 1-10.129Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.529Likely Pathogenic-4.97Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.994Probably Damaging2.29Pathogenic0.00Affected3.775-1-13.8-55.08
c.2401G>A
G801S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G801S is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors classify the change as benign: SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this benign prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is also Likely Benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no reported result for this variant. Overall, the evidence strongly supports a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignSH3-binding motifUncertain 1-3.665Likely Benign0.087Likely BenignLikely Benign0.039Likely Benign-0.41Neutral0.009Benign0.019Benign2.76Benign0.48Tolerated4.32201-0.430.03
c.2343G>A
M781I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M781I is listed in ClinVar (ID 2802065.0) as Benign and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors classify the substitution as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates Likely Benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the predictions strongly support a benign effect, consistent with the ClinVar designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-2.484Likely Benign0.323Likely BenignLikely Benign0.101Likely Benign0.05Neutral0.000Benign0.001Benign2.89Benign1.00Tolerated3.646122.6-18.03
c.3943T>C
W1315R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant W1315R is listed in ClinVar (ID 1029092.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (which is a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Only AlphaMissense‑Default predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as benign; Foldetta results are not available for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 10.205Likely Benign0.660Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.114Likely Benign1.31Neutral0.000Benign0.001Benign4.37Benign0.91Tolerated3.7752-3-3.6-30.03
c.2350G>A
A784T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A784T is listed in ClinVar (ID 962668.0) as Benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Across the available in‑silico predictors, every tool examined—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently classifies the substitution as benign. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a benign effect, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome. A Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable, so it does not influence the overall interpretation. Based on the unanimous benign predictions and the ClinVar designation, the variant is most likely benign, with no contradiction to the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-3.579Likely Benign0.089Likely BenignLikely Benign0.046Likely Benign1.23Neutral0.001Benign0.006Benign2.92Benign1.00Tolerated3.64610-2.530.03
c.391G>C
G131R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G131R is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split and therefore does not contribute evidence. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence tools predict a pathogenic effect, and the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-6.564Likely Benign0.983Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.099Likely Benign-3.82Deleterious0.983Probably Damaging0.656Possibly Damaging3.92Benign0.00Affected3.615-2-3-4.199.14
c.3907G>A
G1303S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G1303S is listed in ClinVar (ID 1736068.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.271Likely Benign0.125Likely BenignLikely Benign0.155Likely Benign-0.19Neutral0.649Possibly Damaging0.433Benign2.84Benign0.18Tolerated10-0.430.03
c.3906G>C
L1302F
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant L1302F is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic calls are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM. High‑accuracy assessments indicate AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, whereas the SGM consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions (five pathogenic versus four benign) lean toward a pathogenic effect. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that contrasts with its current ClinVar status of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-5.674Likely Benign0.148Likely BenignLikely Benign0.211Likely Benign-2.70Deleterious0.960Probably Damaging0.657Possibly Damaging1.53Pathogenic0.00Affected20-1.034.02
c.3806T>A
V1269E
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense change V1269E is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that flag the variant as benign include only REVEL, whereas the remaining predictors—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently classify it as pathogenic. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a “Likely Pathogenic” outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic and the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic; the Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar designation of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilUncertain 1-11.418Likely Pathogenic0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.403Likely Benign-5.05Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging2.09Pathogenic0.00Affected3.775-2-2-7.729.98
c.2369C>G
T790S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T790S is listed in ClinVar (ID 1020340.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus also as likely benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignSH3-binding motifUncertain 1-3.914Likely Benign0.123Likely BenignLikely Benign0.134Likely Benign-1.83Neutral0.997Probably Damaging0.989Probably Damaging2.39Pathogenic0.33Tolerated3.64611-0.1-14.03
c.37A>G
I13V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 I13V missense variant is listed in ClinVar (ID 3364831.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact for I13V, and this conclusion does not conflict with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.497Likely Benign0.105Likely BenignLikely Benign0.110Likely Benign0.01Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign4.25Benign0.00Affected43-0.3-14.03
c.379C>T
R127W
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant R127W is listed in ClinVar with an Uncertain significance status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is Uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Consequently, the evidence does not favor a clear benign or pathogenic outcome; the predictions are balanced and align with the ClinVar designation of Uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-4.776Likely Benign0.806Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.118Likely Benign-2.98Deleterious0.989Probably Damaging0.420Benign3.88Benign0.00Affected2-33.630.03
c.2458T>A
Y820N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 Y820N variant is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict a pathogenic outcome. AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns an “Uncertain” result. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive (two benign vs. two pathogenic votes). Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the predictions are evenly split between benign and pathogenic, with no high‑confidence pathogenic or benign signal. Thus, the variant is most likely of uncertain significance, which is consistent with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-9.032Likely Pathogenic0.842Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.143Likely Benign-1.53Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.977Probably Damaging2.74Benign0.20Tolerated-2-2-2.2-49.07
c.484C>G
R162G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R162G is listed in ClinVar (ID 2703066.0) with an uncertain significance status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as Likely Benign (three benign votes versus one pathogenic). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions support a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-6.985Likely Benign0.664Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.190Likely Benign-0.73Neutral0.487Possibly Damaging0.272Benign4.09Benign0.78Tolerated3.744-2-34.1-99.14
c.1851G>T
E617D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E617D is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ID 2584916.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score all indicate benign or likely benign. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and FATHMM predict a pathogenic impact, while Rosetta remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is likely benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts benign. Overall, the preponderance of evidence supports a benign classification, which does not contradict the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAPUncertain 1-1.349Likely Benign0.241Likely BenignLikely Benign0.322Likely Benign0.12Likely Benign0.10.80Ambiguous0.46Likely Benign0.07Likely Benign-0.01Neutral0.994Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging-1.35Pathogenic0.88Tolerated3.3735230.0-14.03
c.1964T>A
L655Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L655Q is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all indicate benign or likely benign. Only the two polyPhen‑2 implementations (HumDiv and HumVar) predict pathogenicity, while Rosetta remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts benign stability. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign impact for L655Q, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAPUncertain 1-5.278Likely Benign0.144Likely BenignLikely Benign0.139Likely Benign-0.01Likely Benign0.00.69Ambiguous0.34Likely Benign-0.15Likely Benign0.61Neutral0.955Possibly Damaging0.602Possibly Damaging3.59Benign0.65Tolerated3.3924-2-2-7.314.97229.9-8.60.00.00.40.0XPotentially BenignThe iso-butyl side chain of Leu655, located on the surface of an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), is not involved in any interactions in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the carboxamide side chain of Gln655 dynamically interacts with neighboring residues (e.g., Glu651, Glu656, Arg544) on the protein surface, with no negative structural effects.
c.59C>T
P20L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P20L (ClinVar ID 1185912.0) is listed as “Uncertain” in ClinVar and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 3-3.289Likely Benign0.464AmbiguousLikely Benign0.100Likely Benign-0.44Neutral0.909Possibly Damaging0.713Possibly Damaging4.27Benign0.00Affected4.321-3-35.416.04
c.196C>G
P66A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 P66A missense variant (ClinVar ID 1303518.0) is listed as “Uncertain” and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on benign impact include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict pathogenicity. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” status. Separately, the high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized result is “Uncertain,” the SGM‑Consensus remains “Likely Benign,” and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the predictions are mixed, but the majority of high‑confidence tools lean toward a benign effect. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current computational evidence, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.845Likely Benign0.891Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.091Likely Benign-1.56Neutral0.805Possibly Damaging0.539Possibly Damaging4.04Benign0.00Affected4.3211-13.4-26.04
c.3250C>G
P1084A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1084A is listed in ClinVar (ID 2827308.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (which itself is “Likely Benign”). In contrast, PROVEAN and polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.928Likely Benign0.066Likely BenignLikely Benign0.114Likely Benign-2.54Deleterious0.649Possibly Damaging0.157Benign4.05Benign0.35Tolerated3.775-113.4-26.04
c.1970G>T
W657L
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant W657L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 2767440.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and FATHMM. Tools that agree on a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain predictions come from Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta predicts a benign folding‑stability change. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic impact, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status but leans toward pathogenic rather than benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-14.411Likely Pathogenic0.960Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.213Likely Benign0.14Likely Benign0.10.73Ambiguous0.44Likely Benign0.87Ambiguous-10.86Deleterious0.277Benign0.078Benign3.52Benign0.14Tolerated3.3924-2-24.7-73.05
c.1971G>C
W657C
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant W657C is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL and FATHMM. Those that predict a deleterious effect are FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; Rosetta reports an uncertain outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a damaging interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that W657C is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-12.035Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.463Likely Benign2.74Destabilizing0.31.69Ambiguous2.22Destabilizing1.30Destabilizing-11.06Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.982Probably Damaging3.43Benign0.03Affected-8-23.4-83.07
c.59C>G
P20R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P20R is listed in ClinVar (ID 566521.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.548Likely Benign0.434AmbiguousLikely Benign0.146Likely Benign-0.15Neutral0.972Probably Damaging0.804Possibly Damaging4.33Benign0.00Affected4.3210-2-2.959.07
c.1976C>T
S659F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S659F is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is absent from gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that provide definitive calls cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, polyPhen2_HumVar, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen2_HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, SGM Consensus predicts pathogenic, and Foldetta (which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) yields an uncertain result and is therefore unavailable. Overall, the majority of reliable tools favor a pathogenic effect. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-10.925Likely Pathogenic0.662Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.194Likely Benign-0.81Ambiguous0.1-0.25Likely Benign-0.53Ambiguous0.32Likely Benign-4.59Deleterious0.806Possibly Damaging0.171Benign3.39Benign0.05Affected3.3828-3-23.660.10221.3-61.20.00.00.60.4XPotentially BenignIn the WT simulations, the hydroxyl group of Ser659, located in a kink in the middle of the long α-helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), forms a hydrogen bond with the carboxylate group of Glu656. However, the phenol ring of the Phe659 side chain cannot form a similar hydrogen bond. Instead, it interacts with the hydrophobic isopropyl side chain of Val555 from the opposing α-helix (res. Ala533-Val560). This residue swap may therefore cause issues during protein folding.
c.597C>A
N199K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant N199K is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the substitution as benign. Only ESM1b and AlphaMissense‑Default predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split. Overall, the preponderance of evidence supports a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
PHUncertain 1-8.198Likely Pathogenic0.686Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.024Likely Benign-0.19Likely Benign0.10.03Likely Benign-0.08Likely Benign0.33Likely Benign-1.48Neutral0.276Benign0.083Benign4.27Benign0.13Tolerated3.47910-0.414.07207.821.5-0.11.50.10.0XUncertainAsn199, located in the N-terminal loop before the first anti-parallel β sheet strand (res. Ile205-Pro208), is replaced by a positively charged lysine. On the protein surface, both the carboxamide group of Asn199 and the amino group of Lys199 side chains can form hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of residues (e.g., Ala249) at the end of an α helix (res. Ala236-Lys251). However, since the model ends abruptly at the N-terminus, no definite conclusions can be drawn from the simulations.
c.583G>C
A195P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A195P is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 375527.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus—predict a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic and the SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence supports a pathogenic classification, which aligns with the ClinVar status and does not contradict it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic 1-9.715Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.152Likely Benign-3.03Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.916Probably Damaging4.00Benign0.04Affected3.5461-1-3.426.04
c.1957C>G
L653V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L653V is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are FoldX, Rosetta, and premPS, while ESM1b is inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) as pathogenic. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification. Thus, based on current predictions, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAPUncertain 1-7.050In-Between0.301Likely BenignLikely Benign0.146Likely Benign3.28Destabilizing0.32.18Destabilizing2.73Destabilizing1.32Destabilizing-2.25Neutral0.227Benign0.039Benign3.28Benign0.08Tolerated210.4-14.03
c.1947G>C
M649I
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M649I is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) report a pathogenic outcome; Rosetta is inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenicity. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for M649I, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-9.361Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.449Likely Benign2.42Destabilizing0.21.96Ambiguous2.19Destabilizing1.01Destabilizing-3.99Deleterious0.672Possibly Damaging0.093Benign3.40Benign0.02Affected3.3827212.6-18.03243.721.50.00.10.00.1XPotentially BenignThe thioether side chain of Met649, located on an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), bridges Phe652, Phe648, and Phe639 in an inter-helix hydrophobic cavity in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the sec-butyl side chain of Ile649 maintains hydrophobic interactions with nearby residues, with no significant effects on the protein structure.However, methionine is known as a bridging motif for aromatic residues, and these Met-aromatic interactions are lost in the variant. Indeed, in the second variant simulation,the bridging of Phe652, Phe648 and Phe639 is completely lost. In reality, the effect could be more severe on the structure during the protein folding.
c.1855A>T
T619S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T619S is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only AlphaMissense‑Optimized. All other evaluated algorithms—SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a benign outcome, whereas the SGM Consensus, derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, indicates pathogenicity. Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, yields an uncertain result. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for T619S, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-8.608Likely Pathogenic0.677Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.602Likely Pathogenic1.09Ambiguous0.21.35Ambiguous1.22Ambiguous0.85Ambiguous-3.42Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging-1.30Pathogenic0.05Affected3.373511-0.1-14.03
c.1873C>G
L625V
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant L625V is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3392716.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Four tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) give inconclusive results. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta as uncertain. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status but suggests a higher likelihood of pathogenicity.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-11.319Likely Pathogenic0.833Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.480Likely Benign1.80Ambiguous0.71.69Ambiguous1.75Ambiguous1.42Destabilizing-2.96Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging3.07Benign0.01Affected210.4-14.03
c.1877T>C
I626T
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant I626T is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3359331.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions are returned by REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only FATHMM predicts a benign outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, SGM‑Consensus indicates likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts pathogenic. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools points to a pathogenic effect, contradicting the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-10.420Likely Pathogenic0.946Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.640Likely Pathogenic2.94Destabilizing0.12.70Destabilizing2.82Destabilizing2.23Destabilizing-4.18Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.04Benign0.00Affected0-1-5.2-12.05
c.187G>A
E63K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 E63K missense variant (ClinVar ID 2830630.0) is listed as “Uncertain” and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default all predict a pathogenic outcome. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. Overall, the high‑accuracy consensus leans toward a benign effect, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.976Likely Benign0.894Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.103Likely Benign-0.70Neutral0.458Possibly Damaging0.678Possibly Damaging3.98Benign0.00Affected4.32110-0.4-0.94
c.187G>C
E63Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E63Q is listed in ClinVar (ID 2132335.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority of the four high‑accuracy tools) also indicates a benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of predictions points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.038Likely Benign0.687Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.078Likely Benign-0.85Neutral0.659Possibly Damaging0.775Possibly Damaging3.90Benign0.00Affected4.321220.0-0.98
c.603T>A
D201E
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 D201E missense variant (ClinVar ID 3004688.0) is classified as **Benign** in ClinVar and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote). Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predicts a pathogenic outcome, while Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Default are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as **Benign**, the SGM‑Consensus as **Likely Benign**, and Foldetta as **Uncertain**. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion aligns with the ClinVar designation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, with no contradiction to its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignPHBenign 1-2.640Likely Benign0.406AmbiguousLikely Benign0.165Likely Benign0.42Likely Benign0.21.99Ambiguous1.21Ambiguous0.23Likely Benign-0.69Neutral0.633Possibly Damaging0.108Benign4.30Benign1.00Tolerated3.469320.014.03258.7-24.80.90.1-0.30.2XUncertainAsp201, an acidic residue located in the N-terminal loop before the first anti-parallel β sheet strand (res. Ile205-Pro208), is replaced by another acidic residue, glutamate. The carboxylate groups of both Asp201 and Glu201 side chains form hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of Ser221 in the simulations. Due to its shorter side chain, Asp201 can also hydrogen bond with the backbone amide groups of neighboring loop residues Ser204 and Asp203. However, since the model ends abruptly at the N-terminus, no definite conclusions can be drawn from the simulations.
c.1898T>C
L633P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L633P (ClinVar ID 858973.0) is listed as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM. All other evaluated tools—SGM‑Consensus, REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict it to be pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores it as Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates Likely Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, predicts Pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions and the ClinVar designation, the variant is most likely pathogenic, with no contradiction to its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPPathogenic/Likely path. 2-15.669Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.693Likely Pathogenic6.60Destabilizing0.210.15Destabilizing8.38Destabilizing2.42Destabilizing-6.97Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.70Benign0.00Affected3.3734-3-3-5.4-16.04193.265.10.00.00.10.0XPotentially PathogenicThe iso-butyl side chain of Leu633, located in the middle of an α helix (res. Glu617-Asn635), packs hydrophobically with nearby residues (e.g., Leu653, Val629, Leu551) in the WT simulations.In the variant simulations, the pyrrolidine side chain of Pro633 is not as optimal for hydrophobic packing as Leu633 in the WT. Additionally, proline lacks a free backbone amide group, so Pro633 cannot form a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of Val629, which disrupts the continuity of the secondary structure element.
c.1913A>G
K638R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K638R is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that uniformly indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus score (Likely Benign). In contrast, PROVEAN and polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predict a pathogenic impact, while premPS remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, is benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAPUncertain 1-2.700Likely Benign0.110Likely BenignLikely Benign0.216Likely Benign0.09Likely Benign0.1-0.04Likely Benign0.03Likely Benign0.53Ambiguous-2.55Deleterious0.649Possibly Damaging0.240Benign3.41Benign0.13Tolerated3.373123-0.628.01
c.1925A>C
K642T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K642T is listed in ClinVar (ID 437411.0) as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools split in a 7‑to‑5 ratio: pathogenic calls come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default, while benign calls come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, and FATHMM; FoldX and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs) as Benign. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, aligning with the ClinVar classification and not contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPLikely Pathogenic 1-12.823Likely Pathogenic0.948Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.484Likely Benign0.53Ambiguous0.10.30Likely Benign0.42Likely Benign0.28Likely Benign-5.88Deleterious0.872Possibly Damaging0.839Possibly Damaging2.86Benign0.00Affected3.37310-13.2-27.07213.5-8.7-0.30.40.30.2XUncertainThe amino side chain of Lys642, located on the surface of an α helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), is not involved in any interactions in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the shorter side chain of Thr642 forms hydrogen bonds with Glu643 and Thr640 on the same α helix.Regardless, Lys642 is positioned directly at the GAP-Ras interface, and in the SynGAP-Ras WT simulations, its amino side chain forms salt bridges with the carboxylate groups of Ras residues Asp33 and Asp38. The shorter Thr642 is more likely to prefer hydrogen bonding with Glu643 and Thr640 on the same α helix, even in the Ras complex. Thus, the effect of the residue swap on the complex formation with the GTPase cannot be explored using solvent-only simulations.
c.1942T>C
F648L
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant F648L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 3383902.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—FoldX, Rosetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and ESM1b—consistently predict pathogenicity. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic change. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic impact for F648L, which contradicts the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-9.296Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.468Likely Benign2.71Destabilizing0.82.08Destabilizing2.40Destabilizing1.04Destabilizing-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.976Probably Damaging3.45Benign0.08Tolerated201.0-34.02
c.1998G>C
E666D
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 E666D is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ID 587483.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a mixed signal: benign calls come from REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and Rosetta; pathogenic calls come from premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as likely pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments give AlphaMissense‑Optimized a benign prediction, while the SGM Consensus remains pathogenic; Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability outputs, is inconclusive. Overall, the balance of evidence slightly favors a pathogenic interpretation, but the predictions are not unequivocal. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic according to the current computational data, and this does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-8.820Likely Pathogenic0.704Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.197Likely Benign0.88Ambiguous0.00.37Likely Benign0.63Ambiguous1.05Destabilizing-2.69Deleterious0.992Probably Damaging0.603Possibly Damaging3.43Benign0.06Tolerated3.3828320.0-14.03237.216.50.00.0-0.30.1XPotentially PathogenicThe carboxylate group of Glu666, located on the α-helix (res. Ser641-Glu666), is involved in a highly coordinated hydrogen-bonding network between residues from two α-helices (res. Ser641-Glu666 and res. Arg563-Glu578) and from the α-α loop connecting the two α-helices (res. Ser641-Glu666 and res. Leu685-Val699), such as Lys566, Thr672, and Asn669, in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the shorter side chain of Asp666 cannot maintain these interactions as efficiently as Glu666 in the WT, resulting in a less coordinated hydrogen-bond network.
c.2003C>T
S668F
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S668F is reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 1309930.0) and is not found in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: benign predictions come from premPS and FATHMM, while the remaining 12 tools (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus) predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is Pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is also Pathogenic. No predictions are inconclusive. Overall, the computational evidence strongly supports a pathogenic effect, consistent with the ClinVar classification. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the consensus of prediction tools, and this assessment aligns with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPLikely Pathogenic 1-15.047Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.643Likely Pathogenic16.72Destabilizing5.011.07Destabilizing13.90Destabilizing0.00Likely Benign-5.98Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.935Probably Damaging3.18Benign0.00Affected3.3828-3-23.660.10250.9-59.6-0.10.10.00.1XXXPotentially PathogenicIn the WT simulations, the hydroxyl side chain of Ser668, located on an α-α loop connecting the two α-helices (res. Ser641-Glu666 and res. Leu685-Val699), forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl groups of Leu664, Tyr665, and Glu666, as well as the guanidinium group of Arg573 on a nearby α-helix (res. Arg563-Glu578). In the variant simulations, the side chain of Phe668 cannot maintain the same hydrogen-bond network. Due to its larger size, it moves away to avoid steric hindrance. In the WT simulations, a network of hydrogen bonds between several residues (e.g., Asn669, Lys566, and Glu666) keeps both α-helices and the proceeding loop (res. Asn669-Asp684) tightly connected, but this setup is not present in the variant simulations. Additionally, in the variant simulations, the side chain of Arg573 shifts to form a more stable salt bridge with the carboxylate group of Glu582 instead of hydrogen bonding with Ser668 as in the WT simulations.
c.558G>C
L186F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L186F is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and FATHMM. In contrast, tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also indicates likely pathogenic. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-11.861Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.132Likely Benign-3.03Deleterious0.009Benign0.012Benign3.50Benign0.00Affected20-1.034.02
c.2105A>G
Q702R
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Q702R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT. Predictions that remain inconclusive are Rosetta, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, Foldetta as benign, while the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to equal benign and pathogenic signals. Overall, the majority of available predictions lean toward a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAPUncertain 1-7.894In-Between0.348AmbiguousLikely Benign0.294Likely Benign-0.31Likely Benign0.10.63Ambiguous0.16Likely Benign0.13Likely Benign-3.14Deleterious0.909Possibly Damaging0.889Possibly Damaging3.43Benign0.02Affected3.471011-1.028.06270.3-52.90.00.00.00.1XPotentially PathogenicThe carboxamide side chain of Gln702 is located at the end and outer surface of an α-helix (res. Leu685-Gln702), where it does not directly form hydrogen bonds with any residues in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the positively charged guanidinium group of Arg702 forms a salt bridge with the negatively charged carboxylate group of Glu698 on the same helix and/or hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl group of Ala438 on an opposite α-helix (res. Tyr428-Glu436). Consequently, the residue swap could strengthen the tertiary structure assembly, which could have either positive or negative effects on its function.
c.2111G>C
S704T
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S704T is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Consensus from multiple in‑silico predictors shows a predominance of benign calls: REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus. Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predicts a pathogenic effect, while FoldX remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is benign; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, also predicts benign. Overall, the aggregate evidence indicates that S704T is most likely benign, which is consistent with its ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAPUncertain 1-4.930Likely Benign0.265Likely BenignLikely Benign0.071Likely Benign0.80Ambiguous0.00.15Likely Benign0.48Likely Benign0.29Likely Benign-1.72Neutral0.525Possibly Damaging0.107Benign3.45Benign0.07Tolerated3.4710110.114.03201.7-18.00.00.0-0.20.7XPotentially BenignSer704 is located at the end and outer surface of an α-helix (res. Thr704-Gly712), which is connected via a tight turn or loop to another α-helix (res. Asp684-Gln702). The hydroxyl side chain of Ser704 occasionally forms a hydrogen bond with the amide group of Ala707. Similarly, in the variant simulations, the hydroxyl side chain of Thr704 forms hydrogen bonds with the amide groups of Ala707 and Leu708. Thus, the residue swap does not cause any apparent structural change.
c.509G>A
R170Q
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant R170Q is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Computational predictors show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls come from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is Uncertain, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is inconclusive; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Thus, no single method or high‑accuracy consensus strongly supports pathogenicity. The variant is most likely benign according to the current computational evidence, which contradicts the ClinVar pathogenic designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Pathogenic/Likely path. 6-9.021Likely Pathogenic0.798Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.221Likely Benign-2.31Neutral0.947Possibly Damaging0.342Benign3.91Benign0.00Affected3.744111.0-28.0610.1016/j.ajhg.2020.11.011
c.2115G>C
K705N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant K705N is listed in ClinVar (ID 872011.0) as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions (REVEL, Rosetta, premPS, FATHMM) and pathogenic predictions (PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default). Uncertain results come from FoldX, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, but the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—classifies the variant as Likely Pathogenic, and Foldetta also yields an uncertain stability change. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates the variant is most likely pathogenic, which aligns with its ClinVar classification and does not contradict the reported status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPLikely Pathogenic 1-9.767Likely Pathogenic0.925Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.183Likely Benign0.74Ambiguous0.00.37Likely Benign0.56Ambiguous0.44Likely Benign-3.12Deleterious0.996Probably Damaging0.876Possibly Damaging3.37Benign0.02Affected3.4710100.4-14.07221.4-20.20.00.00.00.1XUncertainThe amino side chain of Lys705, located at the end and outer surface of an α-helix (res. Thr704-Gly712), does not form any interactions in the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the carboxamide side chain of Asn705 briefly forms a salt bridge with Glu706. However, there is no apparent difference between the systems. Due to the model ending abruptly at the C-terminus, no definite conclusions can be drawn based on the simulations.
c.2116G>A
E706K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant E706K is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and FATHMM all classify the change as benign. In contrast, ESM1b and AlphaMissense‑Default predict a pathogenic impact. Tools that return uncertain results—FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—do not provide decisive evidence. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive (two pathogenic versus two benign calls). High‑accuracy assessments are likewise ambiguous: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, Foldetta is uncertain, and the SGM Consensus remains inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
GAPUncertain 1-10.519Likely Pathogenic0.833Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.080Likely Benign1.17Ambiguous0.10.51Ambiguous0.84Ambiguous0.08Likely Benign-1.51Neutral0.345Benign0.028Benign4.15Benign0.52Tolerated3.471001-0.4-0.94187.149.20.00.00.40.1XUncertainThe carboxylate side chain of Glu706, located at the end and outer surface of an α-helix (res. Thr704-Gly712), forms a salt bridge with Lys710 and a hydrogen bond with its own backbone amino group at the helix end in the WT simulations. Although Lys706 is unable to make these transient interactions in the variant simulations, there is no apparent negative effect on the protein structure due to the residue swap. However, because the model ends abruptly at the C-terminus, no definite conclusions can be drawn based on the simulations.
c.508C>T
R170W
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R170W is listed in ClinVar (ID 1310195.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN)—all predict a pathogenic or likely pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus indicates it is likely pathogenic; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 2-11.660Likely Pathogenic0.978Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.241Likely Benign-4.28Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.849Possibly Damaging3.84Benign0.00Affected3.7442-33.630.03
c.505G>A
D169N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D169N is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: six methods (REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a benign effect, while three (SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) predict pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments are mixed: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates benign, whereas the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—yields a tie and is therefore inconclusive. No Foldetta stability data are available. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-10.713Likely Pathogenic0.761Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.110Likely Benign-2.04Neutral0.079Benign0.052Benign4.07Benign0.01Affected3.744210.0-0.98
c.2162T>G
I721S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I721S is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that assess the variant’s effect fall into two groups: the single benign prediction comes from REVEL, while all other evaluated algorithms (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy methods reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. No predictions are missing or inconclusive. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict its current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-14.032Likely Pathogenic0.996Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.466Likely Benign3.91Destabilizing0.13.96Destabilizing3.94Destabilizing2.28Destabilizing-5.26Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging2.21Pathogenic0.00Affected3.509-1-2-5.3-26.08203.349.3-0.10.0-1.10.0XUncertainThe sec-butyl side chain of Ile721, located on an α-helix (res. Leu714-Arg726), engages in hydrophobic packing with other residues in the hydrophobic inter-helix space, such as Phe420, Tyr417, His693, and Leu717. In the variant simulations, the hydroxyl side chain of Ser721 forms hydrogen bonds with nearby residues, such as Leu717 and His693. Although no major structural changes are observed during the variant simulations, the hydrophilic residue Ser721 could disrupt the hydrophobic packing during folding. However, because the model ends abruptly at the C-terminus, no definite conclusions can be drawn based on the simulations.
c.2186A>G
N729S
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N729S is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). No tool in the dataset predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus also as benign, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is inconclusive. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAPUncertain 1-1.578Likely Benign0.066Likely BenignLikely Benign0.063Likely Benign0.14Likely Benign0.11.34Ambiguous0.74Ambiguous-0.36Likely Benign-0.42Neutral0.221Benign0.027Benign3.38Benign0.93Tolerated3.597112.7-27.03
c.484C>T
R162C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R162C is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive, and Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the available predictions are split evenly between benign and pathogenic, with no single method providing decisive evidence. Thus, the variant’s pathogenicity remains uncertain based on computational predictions, which contradicts the ClinVar pathogenic classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Pathogenic 2-8.157Likely Pathogenic0.787Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.150Likely Benign-2.05Neutral0.988Probably Damaging0.513Possibly Damaging4.00Benign0.11Tolerated3.744-4-37.0-53.05
c.526A>C
S176R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S176R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, whereas polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized predict a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a likely benign classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus remains likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a benign interpretation, and this assessment does not conflict with the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-6.492Likely Benign0.987Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.247Likely Benign0.94Neutral0.718Possibly Damaging0.168Benign4.16Benign0.87Tolerated0-1-3.769.11
c.2087T>C
L696P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L696P is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 1699350.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM; all other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—report it as pathogenic. The SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a pathogenic effect. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote) is pathogenic, and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability calculations, predicts a destabilizing, pathogenic outcome. Taken together, the overwhelming majority of predictions and the high‑accuracy tools classify the variant as pathogenic, fully consistent with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPLikely Pathogenic 1-16.926Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.678Likely Pathogenic6.66Destabilizing0.210.84Destabilizing8.75Destabilizing2.13Destabilizing-6.58Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging1.000Probably Damaging3.00Benign0.00Affected3.4613-3-3-5.4-16.04180.665.90.10.0-0.60.1XPotentially PathogenicThe isobutyl side chain of Leu696, located in the middle of an α-helix (res. Leu685-Gln702), engages in hydrophobic packing with nearby residues (e.g., Leu441, Leu431, Leu692, Leu714) in the inter-helix space. Prolines lack a free amide group necessary for hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl group of Leu692 in the same manner as Leu696 in the WT. Consequently, the residue swap with proline disrupts the continuity of the secondary structure element in the variant simulations. Additionally, the side chain of Pro696 is not as optimal as Leu696 for hydrophobic packing in the inter-helix space.
c.2015C>A
T672K
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant T672K is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, FoldX, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are SGM‑Consensus, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Uncertain predictions come from Foldetta, premPS, and Rosetta. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as pathogenic, and Foldetta as inconclusive. Overall, the majority of tools lean toward a benign interpretation, but the high‑accuracy consensus is split, leaving the variant’s impact uncertain. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on the bulk of predictions, and this does not contradict its ClinVar status of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-12.192Likely Pathogenic0.698Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.065Likely Benign0.20Likely Benign0.51.21Ambiguous0.71Ambiguous0.72Ambiguous-4.31Deleterious0.745Possibly Damaging0.051Benign3.40Benign0.07Tolerated3.40250-1-3.227.07195.17.00.40.70.40.1XXPotentially PathogenicThe hydroxyl group of Thr672, located in an entangled α-α loop connecting the two α-helices (res. Ser641-Glu666 and res. Leu685-Val699), is involved in a highly coordinated hydrogen-bonding network between residues from two α-helices (res. Ser641-Glu666 and res. Arg563-Glu578) and from the α-α loop itself, such as Lys566, Glu666, and Asn669. In the variant simulations, Lys672 can only form a hydrogen bond with the amino group of the Lys566 side chain via its backbone carbonyl group. Consequently, it cannot maintain the Lys566-Glu666 salt bridge through hydrogen bonding. However, the amino group of Lys periodically forms a salt bridge with the carboxylate group of Glu666, which prevents a drastic disruption of the hydrogen-bond network that keeps the loop close to the helices.
c.2029A>T
S677C
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S677C is reported in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 2825814.0) and is not present in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, and ESM1b predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy predictors all support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is Likely Benign, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is benign. No prediction or folding‑stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment aligns with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignGAPBenign 1-8.496Likely Pathogenic0.076Likely BenignLikely Benign0.153Likely Benign-0.51Ambiguous0.3-0.30Likely Benign-0.41Likely Benign0.15Likely Benign-2.41Neutral0.932Possibly Damaging0.222Benign3.25Benign0.04Affected3.4123-103.316.06
c.2050G>A
D684N
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D684N is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, premPS, and FATHMM, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic outcome: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus also reports it as likely pathogenic, and the Foldetta stability analysis is inconclusive. Protein‑stability predictors FoldX and Rosetta likewise return uncertain results. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which contradicts the current ClinVar designation of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-13.155Likely Pathogenic0.985Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.382Likely Benign1.47Ambiguous0.81.76Ambiguous1.62Ambiguous0.37Likely Benign-4.99Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.746Possibly Damaging3.39Benign0.01Affected210.0-0.98
c.2050G>C
D684H
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D684H is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only FATHMM; all other evaluated algorithms (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) predict a pathogenic impact, and the SGM‑Consensus score is “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No predictions are inconclusive or missing. Based on the overwhelming majority of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-14.194Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.613Likely Pathogenic3.36Destabilizing1.02.95Destabilizing3.16Destabilizing0.55Ambiguous-6.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.972Probably Damaging3.36Benign0.00Affected3.4217-110.322.05
c.2060G>A
R687Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant R687Q is annotated in ClinVar as benign (ClinVar ID 2693600.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, Rosetta, Foldetta, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized labeling the variant as benign, SGM‑Consensus indicating pathogenicity, and Foldetta (integrating FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) classifying it as benign. With three high‑accuracy tools giving benign or uncertain results and only one (SGM‑Consensus) suggesting pathogenicity, the overall evidence leans toward a benign effect. This prediction aligns with the ClinVar benign classification, indicating no contradiction.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPLikely Benign 1-10.002Likely Pathogenic0.575Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.401Likely Benign0.92Ambiguous0.1-0.37Likely Benign0.28Likely Benign1.55Destabilizing-3.37Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.844Possibly Damaging3.91Benign0.03Affected3.4217111.0-28.06
c.2068T>C
S690P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S690P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect are REVEL and FATHMM, whereas the remaining tools (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus) all predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as pathogenic; the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta stability predictions, also classifies the variant as pathogenic. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple independent predictors indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-14.568Likely Pathogenic0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.431Likely Benign4.84Destabilizing0.34.40Destabilizing4.62Destabilizing1.42Destabilizing-4.77Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.790Possibly Damaging3.44Benign0.01Affected3.42171-1-0.810.04207.515.10.10.0-0.10.2XXPotentially PathogenicThe hydroxyl side chain of Ser690, located in an α-helix (res. Leu696-Leu685), forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl group of Ser410 in an anti-parallel β-sheet of the C2 domain (res. Ile411-Ala399). In the variant simulations, the pyrrolidine side chain of Pro690 cannot form hydrogen bonds with the C2 domain residue, resulting in the loss of this inter-domain connection. Additionally, prolines lack a free amide group necessary for hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl group of Gly686, introducing a slight bend in the α-helix and compromising its integrity.
c.2071A>C
T691P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T691P is listed in ClinVar (ID 648126.0) as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Across the broad panel of in‑silico predictors, three tools (REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM) classify the change as benign, whereas the remaining 11 predictors (FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus score) report it as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious effect: the AlphaMissense‑Optimized model is inconclusive, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) is pathogenic, and the Foldetta stability analysis (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence indicates that T691P is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with its ClinVar classification and does not contradict the database status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPLikely Pathogenic 1-13.801Likely Pathogenic0.905Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.214Likely Benign5.04Destabilizing0.46.09Destabilizing5.57Destabilizing1.27Destabilizing-3.43Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.952Probably Damaging3.43Benign0.06Tolerated3.43140-1-0.9-3.99188.933.00.10.0-0.60.0XXPotentially PathogenicThe hydroxyl side chain of Thr691, located in an α-helix (res. Leu696-Leu685), can form hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyl and the side chain guanidinium group of Arg687. This interaction facilitates the simultaneous formation of salt bridges between Arg687 and Glu688 on the same α-helix. Additionally, Thr691 occasionally interacts with the thioether side chain of Met409 in an anti-parallel β-sheet of the C2 domain (res. Ile411-Ala399), although this interaction is not consistently maintained throughout the WT simulations. In the variant simulations, the pyrrolidine side chain of Pro691 lacks hydrogen bond donors, making a similar setup impossible. Moreover, proline lacks a free amide group necessary for hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl group of Arg687, introducing a slight bend in the α-helix and compromising its integrity.
c.2075T>A
L692Q
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L692Q is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 2714634.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include only FATHMM. All other evaluated algorithms—REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—predict a pathogenic effect. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is pathogenic; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, is pathogenic. No prediction or stability result is missing or inconclusive. Based on the consensus of these tools, the variant is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion aligns with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPPathogenic 1-13.873Likely Pathogenic0.998Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.596Likely Pathogenic3.24Destabilizing0.13.27Destabilizing3.26Destabilizing2.76Destabilizing-5.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging3.06Benign0.00Affected3.4217-2-2-7.314.97
c.2075T>C
L692P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L692P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 847082.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect are limited to FATHMM, while the remaining tools (REVEL, FoldX, Rosetta, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic; the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Pathogenic”; and Foldetta, which integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, also predicts pathogenic. Based on the overwhelming consensus of pathogenic predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict its current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-16.447Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.668Likely Pathogenic9.19Destabilizing0.113.20Destabilizing11.20Destabilizing1.69Destabilizing-6.98Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.06Benign0.00Affected3.4217-3-3-5.4-16.04186.262.8-0.20.1-0.70.3XPotentially PathogenicThe isobutyl side chain of Leu692, located in the middle of an α-helix (res. Leu685-Gln702), engages in hydrophobic packing with nearby residues (e.g., Leu441, Leu431, Leu696) in the inter-helix space. Prolines lack a free amide group necessary for hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl group of Glu688 in the same manner as Leu692 in the WT. Consequently, the residue swap with proline disrupts the continuity of the secondary structure element in the variant simulations. Additionally, the side chain of Pro692 is not as optimal as Leu692 for hydrophobic packing in the inter-helix space.
c.2086C>G
L696V
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AIThe SynGAP1 L696V variant is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include REVEL, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas the majority of other in silico predictors (FoldX, Foldetta, premPS, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default) report a pathogenic outcome; Rosetta remains inconclusive. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, but the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—leans pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) also predicts pathogenic. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for the variant, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-11.909Likely Pathogenic0.745Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.351Likely Benign2.35Destabilizing0.11.85Ambiguous2.10Destabilizing1.46Destabilizing-2.79Deleterious0.992Probably Damaging0.970Probably Damaging3.16Benign0.00Affected3.4613120.4-14.03
c.2195G>C
R732T
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant R732T is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign (REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized) and pathogenic (polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b). AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign effect, and the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—also favors a benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from both general and high‑accuracy predictors points to a benign impact, which does not contradict the current ClinVar designation of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-8.545Likely Pathogenic0.434AmbiguousLikely Benign0.075Likely Benign-1.96Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.892Possibly Damaging2.59Benign0.12Tolerated3.597-1-13.8-55.08
c.2459A>G
Y820C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y820C is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence—including the SGM‑Consensus—suggests the variant is most likely pathogenic, a conclusion that does not contradict the current ClinVar uncertain classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-8.797Likely Pathogenic0.744Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.113Likely Benign-3.16Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.983Probably Damaging2.68Benign0.06Tolerated3.7750-23.8-60.04
c.3287A>C
E1096A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E1096A is listed in ClinVar (ID 2579889.0) with an uncertain significance annotation and is not reported in gnomAD. Consensus from multiple in‑silico predictors shows a predominance of benign calls: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv assigns a pathogenic label, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates likely benign; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the aggregate evidence points to a benign effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.504Likely Benign0.510AmbiguousLikely Benign0.164Likely Benign-1.37Neutral0.626Possibly Damaging0.184Benign2.77Benign0.16Tolerated3.775-105.3-58.04
c.3209_3210delinsCA
R1070T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R1070T is listed in ClinVar (ID 2759838.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (which aggregates these three benign calls with the pathogenic AlphaMissense‑Default to yield a Likely Benign verdict). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns an uncertain result. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Benign, and no Foldetta stability data is available. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign impact, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” status and does not contradict it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.093Likely Benign0.860Likely PathogenicAmbiguous-2.35Neutral0.948Possibly Damaging0.507Possibly Damaging3.78Benign0.01Affected3.775-1-13.8-55.08
c.3209G>A
R1070K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R1070K is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All evaluated in‑silico predictors agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy tools reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is also benign. Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the unanimous benign predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignConflicting 2-5.093Likely Benign0.326Likely BenignLikely Benign0.104Likely Benign-1.42Neutral0.049Benign0.048Benign3.86Benign0.09Tolerated3.775320.6-28.01
c.2822C>T
P941L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P941L is listed in ClinVar (ID 3451960.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). The only tool that predicts a pathogenic outcome is SIFT. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates “Likely Benign.” No Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/Rosetta) stability result is available, so it does not influence the assessment. Overall, the majority of predictions, including the high‑accuracy tools, point to a benign effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 2-5.692Likely Benign0.066Likely BenignLikely Benign0.054Likely Benign-0.44Neutral0.144Benign0.039Benign2.76Benign0.01Affected-3-35.416.04
c.3196C>T
P1066S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1066S is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 1343237.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, which contradicts the ClinVar pathogenic classification. Thus, based on current predictions, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Pathogenic 1-4.746Likely Benign0.070Likely BenignLikely Benign0.145Likely Benign-2.47Neutral0.972Probably Damaging0.850Possibly Damaging2.74Benign0.00Affected4.3221-10.8-10.04
c.3192G>C
Q1064H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q1064H is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also indicates benign. The Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence—including high‑accuracy tools—points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.576Likely Benign0.162Likely BenignLikely Benign0.063Likely Benign-0.66Neutral0.938Possibly Damaging0.596Possibly Damaging4.15Benign0.05Affected300.39.01
c.3181G>A
G1061S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G1061S is listed in ClinVar (ID 3571724.0) with an uncertain significance designation and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign, while only SIFT indicates a pathogenic effect. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the consensus of the majority of prediction tools and the high‑accuracy methods supports a benign classification for G1061S, which is consistent with its ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.891Likely Benign0.079Likely BenignLikely Benign0.283Likely Benign-0.68Neutral0.004Benign0.004Benign4.00Benign0.00Affected10-0.430.03
c.3170G>A
S1057N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1057N is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors classify the change as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Benign.” No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, SGM‑Consensus is likely benign, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the computational evidence overwhelmingly supports a benign effect, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-6.386Likely Benign0.117Likely BenignLikely Benign0.218Likely Benign-0.41Neutral0.451Benign0.129Benign5.25Benign0.28Tolerated11-2.727.03
c.3161G>A
G1054D
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant G1054D is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and ESM1b, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also yields benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates the variant is most likely benign, which does not contradict the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-10.385Likely Pathogenic0.351AmbiguousLikely Benign0.279Likely Benign-0.26Neutral0.818Possibly Damaging0.266Benign4.07Benign0.37Tolerated3.7751-1-3.158.04
c.3154G>A
G1052R
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant G1052R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions from REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized; pathogenic predictions from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and ESM1b; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign, and the SGM consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also favors benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status but provides additional support toward a likely benign classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-9.050Likely Pathogenic0.383AmbiguousLikely Benign0.497Likely Benign-0.41Neutral0.990Probably Damaging0.798Possibly Damaging3.90Benign0.10Tolerated3.775-2-3-4.199.14
c.2852A>G
H951R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H951R is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 1003739.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly classify the variant as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also indicates a likely benign effect. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign. The Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, which contradicts its ClinVar pathogenic classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Pathogenic 1-4.964Likely Benign0.125Likely BenignLikely Benign0.185Likely Benign-1.08Neutral0.048Benign0.029Benign5.46Benign0.24Tolerated3.77520-1.319.05
c.2812G>A
G938R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G938R is listed in ClinVar (ID 1019898.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence (seven benign versus three pathogenic predictions) supports a benign classification. This consensus does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation, which remains unresolved.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.271Likely Benign0.732Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.141Likely Benign-1.11Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.985Probably Damaging2.74Benign0.36Tolerated3.775-3-2-4.199.14
c.2809G>C
D937H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 D937H missense variant (ClinVar ID 2825773.0) is listed as “Uncertain” and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are PolyPhen‑2 HumDiv, PolyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) is benign, and Foldetta (protein‑folding stability analysis combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) data are unavailable. Based on the preponderance of evidence from both general and high‑accuracy predictors, the variant is most likely benign, which is consistent with its ClinVar “Uncertain” status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-0.733Likely Benign0.677Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.150Likely Benign-1.74Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.975Probably Damaging2.68Benign0.13Tolerated3.775-110.322.05
c.3262A>G
S1088G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1088G is listed in ClinVar (ID 2742833.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus also as Likely Benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.034Likely Benign0.285Likely BenignLikely Benign0.163Likely Benign-1.83Neutral0.979Probably Damaging0.973Probably Damaging2.63Benign0.03Affected3.775010.4-30.03
c.3260C>T
S1087F
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant S1087F is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic calls come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and SIFT; AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce the benign trend: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also yields benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of reliable predictors and the two high‑accuracy tools suggest a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-3.843Likely Benign0.497AmbiguousLikely Benign0.105Likely Benign-2.75Deleterious0.990Probably Damaging0.796Possibly Damaging2.56Benign0.03Affected3.775-2-33.660.10
c.272A>G
E91G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E91G is listed in ClinVar (ID 436922.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) also indicating a likely benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, aligning with the ClinVar designation and not contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Benign 1-3.226Likely Benign0.783Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.110Likely Benign-2.18Neutral0.947Possibly Damaging0.727Possibly Damaging3.86Benign0.00Affected4.3210-23.1-72.06
c.2735C>A
T912N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T912N is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 2337624.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as likely benign. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates likely benign. No Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/Rosetta) stability result is available, so it does not influence the overall assessment. Based on the preponderance of evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.260Likely Benign0.190Likely BenignLikely Benign0.116Likely Benign-1.15Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.977Probably Damaging3.96Benign0.00Affected3.77500-2.813.00
c.2741A>T
D914V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D914V is listed in ClinVar (ID 2582846.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) as benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.260Likely Benign0.723Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.187Likely Benign-2.24Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.986Probably Damaging2.64Benign0.01Affected3.775-3-27.7-15.96
c.3237C>G
S1079R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1079R is listed in ClinVar (ID 1047537.0) as Benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and no Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/Rosetta stability) result is available. High‑accuracy assessments therefore show a benign consensus (SGM‑Consensus) with one uncertain AlphaMissense‑Optimized prediction and no destabilizing Foldetta evidence. Overall, the majority of predictions support a benign classification, which is consistent with the ClinVar status and does not contradict it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-4.579Likely Benign0.955Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.124Likely Benign-1.81Neutral0.177Benign0.075Benign3.86Benign0.00Affected3.7750-1-3.769.11
c.3233T>A
V1078D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V1078D is listed in ClinVar (ID 2993122.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, SGM‑Consensus as likely benign, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation; there is no contradiction with the existing ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.155Likely Benign0.979Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.158Likely Benign-1.45Neutral0.003Benign0.008Benign3.84Benign0.00Affected3.775-3-2-7.715.96
c.3223C>A
Q1075K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q1075K (ClinVar ID 2762879.0) is listed as “Uncertain” in ClinVar and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign” because three of the four contributing tools predict benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) as benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.135Likely Benign0.728Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.134Likely Benign-0.67Neutral0.963Probably Damaging0.959Probably Damaging2.75Benign1.00Tolerated3.77511-0.40.04
c.2768T>A
I923N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I923N (ClinVar ID 647043.0) is listed as “Uncertain” and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign” because the majority of its constituent tools (three benign, one pathogenic) favor a benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as benign, and the Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the collective predictions point to a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-0.733Likely Benign0.712Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.108Likely Benign-1.16Neutral0.991Probably Damaging0.793Possibly Damaging2.70Benign0.13Tolerated3.775-2-3-8.00.94
c.277C>G
R93G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R93G is listed in ClinVar (ID 2504251.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from the same set of predictors) labels it “Likely Benign”; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that R93G is most likely benign, which does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.674Likely Benign0.400AmbiguousLikely Benign0.093Likely Benign-1.69Neutral0.103Benign0.019Benign3.99Benign0.00Affected4.321-2-34.1-99.14
c.3151G>T
G1051C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G1051C is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split assessment: benign calls come from REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic calls come from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. High‑accuracy methods give a benign result from AlphaMissense‑Optimized; the SGM Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is tied (2 benign vs. 2 pathogenic) and therefore inconclusive, and Foldetta’s stability prediction is unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions lean toward a benign effect, which contradicts the ClinVar pathogenic classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely Pathogenic 1-9.050Likely Pathogenic0.122Likely BenignLikely Benign0.497Likely Benign-0.90Neutral0.971Probably Damaging0.750Possibly Damaging-0.74Pathogenic0.10Tolerated3.775-3-32.946.09
c.2855G>T
G952V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G952V is listed in ClinVar (ID 2055482.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome, while ESM1b remains uncertain. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that G952V is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar status of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-7.074In-Between0.078Likely BenignLikely Benign0.231Likely Benign-0.33Neutral0.000Benign0.000Benign3.20Benign0.02Affected3.775-1-34.642.08
c.2858C>A
P953Q
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P953Q is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 1176820.0) and is not found in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly classify the substitution as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all report benign effects, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also reports likely benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the consensus of all available predictions points to a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-6.038Likely Benign0.079Likely BenignLikely Benign0.086Likely Benign-0.78Neutral0.058Benign0.015Benign2.78Benign0.29Tolerated3.7750-1-1.931.01
c.2932C>T
P978S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P978S is listed in ClinVar (ID 3379672.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv indicates a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of predictions points to a benign effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.913Likely Benign0.151Likely BenignLikely Benign0.085Likely Benign-1.07Neutral0.481Possibly Damaging0.220Benign4.22Benign0.48Tolerated1-10.8-10.04
c.2935T>C
F979L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F979L (ClinVar ID 1000410.0, status Uncertain, not found in gnomAD) has been evaluated by multiple in silico predictors. Benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are reported by polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is classified as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, whereas the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) supports a benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status of Uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.341Likely Benign0.870Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.228Likely Benign-1.00Neutral0.625Possibly Damaging0.430Benign4.22Benign0.73Tolerated4.322201.0-34.02
c.3020G>A
S1007N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1007N is listed in ClinVar (ID 2759915.0) as Benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of high‑accuracy predictors (including the SGM‑Consensus) indicate a benign impact, and the single uncertain AlphaMissense‑Optimized result does not overturn this consensus. Therefore, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion is consistent with its ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-5.113Likely Benign0.803Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.075Likely Benign-1.54Neutral0.997Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.65Benign0.01Affected3.77511-2.727.03
c.3009C>G
S1003R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1003R (ClinVar ID 1798770.0) is listed as Uncertain in ClinVar and is not present in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, and ESM1b, while pathogenic predictions are reported by polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessment shows AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as pathogenic; the SGM Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive (two benign, two pathogenic), and Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, which contrasts with the ClinVar designation of Uncertain. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic, contradicting the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-5.113Likely Benign0.991Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.141Likely Benign-1.88Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.996Probably Damaging2.48Pathogenic0.00Affected3.7750-1-3.769.11
c.2954G>A
S985N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S985N is listed in ClinVar (ID 2087879.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while those that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. Separately, the high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized result is “Uncertain,” and the Foldetta protein‑folding stability assessment is unavailable. Based on the overall distribution of predictions, the variant is most likely benign; this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-6.979Likely Benign0.845Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.088Likely Benign-1.68Neutral0.991Probably Damaging0.988Probably Damaging2.65Benign0.00Affected4.32111-2.727.03
c.2960A>G
D987G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant D987G (ClinVar ID 1061058.0) is listed as ClinVar status Uncertain and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and ESM1b, whereas pathogenic predictions are reported by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates majority votes from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, classifies the variant as Likely Pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, while Foldetta data are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, aligning with the SGM‑Consensus but contradicting the ClinVar Uncertain designation. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on current predictions, and this assessment is in conflict with the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-4.782Likely Benign0.849Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.234Likely Benign-2.79Deleterious0.943Possibly Damaging0.808Possibly Damaging2.45Pathogenic0.07Tolerated4.3221-13.1-58.04
c.3002T>C
L1001P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L1001P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also indicates benign. The Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence—including high‑accuracy tools—points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.071Likely Benign0.209Likely BenignLikely Benign0.113Likely Benign-1.02Neutral0.966Probably Damaging0.690Possibly Damaging2.65Benign0.00Affected4.324-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.2983C>T
P995S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P995S is listed in ClinVar (ID 436929.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). The only tool that predicts a pathogenic outcome is SIFT. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates “Likely Benign.” No Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/Rosetta) stability result is available, so it does not influence the assessment. Overall, the majority of predictions, including the high‑accuracy tools, point to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.457Likely Benign0.071Likely BenignLikely Benign0.042Likely Benign-1.03Neutral0.011Benign0.015Benign4.24Benign0.00Affected4.3211-10.8-10.04
c.2987C>G
P996R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P996R is listed in ClinVar (ID 2808854.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools, including the high‑accuracy methods, indicates a benign impact. This prediction aligns with the ClinVar benign classification and does not contradict the existing clinical annotation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-4.457Likely Benign0.141Likely BenignLikely Benign0.040Likely Benign-1.04Neutral0.144Benign0.085Benign4.26Benign0.01Affected4.324-20-2.959.07
c.2989G>A
A997T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A997T is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from the four high‑accuracy predictors) is benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Taken together, the majority of computational evidence indicates a benign effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.102Likely Benign0.071Likely BenignLikely Benign0.085Likely Benign-0.62Neutral0.224Benign0.120Benign4.17Benign0.00Affected4.32410-2.530.03
c.2928T>G
F976L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F976L is listed in ClinVar (ID 624245.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Only AlphaMissense‑Default predicts a pathogenic outcome. The high‑accuracy consensus predictor SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is inconclusive, and no Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/Rosetta stability) result is available. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar designation of uncertainty rather than a definitive pathogenic claim. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, and its predictions do not contradict the current ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.432Likely Benign0.825Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.212Likely Benign-0.87Neutral0.264Benign0.102Benign4.20Benign0.53Tolerated4.322201.0-34.02
c.3026A>C
E1009A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E1009A is listed in ClinVar (ID 2238288.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which is a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, SGM‑Consensus as likely pathogenic, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta) results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of predictions (six pathogenic vs. three benign) lean toward a pathogenic impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar status, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-3.118Likely Benign0.679Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.109Likely Benign-3.06Deleterious0.980Probably Damaging0.630Possibly Damaging2.39Pathogenic0.01Affected3.7750-15.3-58.04
c.3142G>C
G1048R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G1048R is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates a likely benign outcome; the Foldetta protein‑folding stability assessment is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.305Likely Benign0.435AmbiguousLikely Benign0.503Likely Pathogenic-0.54Neutral0.919Possibly Damaging0.728Possibly Damaging2.54Benign0.10Tolerated3.775-2-3-4.199.14
c.313T>C
S105P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S105P is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all classify the change as benign. Only two tools—polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and SIFT—predict a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as likely benign. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also indicates likely benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.631Likely Benign0.166Likely BenignLikely Benign0.204Likely Benign0.03Neutral0.808Possibly Damaging0.212Benign4.00Benign0.00Affected4.321-11-0.810.04
c.3103C>A
P1035T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1035T is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic outcome are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and polyPhen‑2 HumVar. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain, and no Foldetta stability assessment is available. High‑accuracy evidence from AlphaMissense‑Optimized and the SGM‑Consensus both support a benign classification, while the absence of a Foldetta result does not alter this view. Overall, the majority of predictions indicate a benign effect, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.447Likely Benign0.426AmbiguousLikely Benign0.087Likely Benign-0.96Neutral0.901Possibly Damaging0.537Possibly Damaging2.72Benign0.23Tolerated3.7750-10.93.99
c.3100C>G
P1034A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1034A is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 1901716.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome, representing the sole discordant signal. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the consensus of the majority of tools, including the high‑accuracy methods, indicates a benign impact. This prediction aligns with the ClinVar status, with no contradiction.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-4.174Likely Benign0.178Likely BenignLikely Benign0.060Likely Benign-2.44Neutral0.059Benign0.061Benign2.47Pathogenic0.06Tolerated3.7751-13.4-26.04
c.3059G>T
R1020L
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant R1020L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is uncertain, and the SGM consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, which contrasts with the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-6.031Likely Benign0.907Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.216Likely Benign-4.03Deleterious0.990Probably Damaging0.921Probably Damaging2.50Benign0.00Affected3.775-3-28.3-43.03
c.3059G>C
R1020P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R1020P is listed in ClinVar (ID 3700393.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL and ESM1b, while pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, resolves as “Likely Pathogenic” (3 pathogenic vs. 1 benign votes). High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain,” SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-3.491Likely Benign0.902Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.205Likely Benign-3.50Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.977Probably Damaging2.46Pathogenic0.00Affected0-22.9-59.07
c.2909A>G
E970G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E970G is listed in ClinVar (ID 2013677.0) as Benign and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors classify the change as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments reinforce this view: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign effect, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no reported result for this variant. Overall, the computational evidence overwhelmingly supports a benign classification, which is consistent with the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-0.167Likely Benign0.139Likely BenignLikely Benign0.139Likely Benign-0.93Neutral0.144Benign0.058Benign4.09Benign0.10Tolerated4.3220-23.1-72.06
c.3049T>C
F1017L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant F1017L is listed in ClinVar (ID 3719654.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus score (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) is benign. No Foldetta stability prediction is available for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact, aligning with the ClinVar classification and showing no contradiction.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-2.048Likely Benign0.934Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.157Likely Benign-2.38Neutral0.798Possibly Damaging0.373Benign2.65Benign0.72Tolerated3.775021.0-34.02
c.3041G>T
G1014V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G1014V is listed in ClinVar (ID 809922.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv indicates a pathogenic outcome, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) classifies the variant as Likely Benign. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign and the SGM‑Consensus is Likely Benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.612Likely Benign0.181Likely BenignLikely Benign0.053Likely Benign-2.47Neutral0.818Possibly Damaging0.377Benign2.72Benign0.06Tolerated3.775-1-34.642.08
c.2924C>G
T975S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T975S is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool in the dataset predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized scores the variant as benign, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Benign.” Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, did not provide a result for this variant. Overall, the available predictions strongly suggest that T975S is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.743Likely Benign0.068Likely BenignLikely Benign0.109Likely Benign-0.57Neutral0.059Benign0.061Benign4.16Benign0.20Tolerated11-0.1-14.03
c.2998A>G
I1000V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I1000V is listed in ClinVar (ID 2572013.0) with an “Uncertain” clinical significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that assess evolutionary conservation and structural impact (REVEL, SIFT, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN, AlphaMissense‑Default) all converge on a benign outcome. No tool in the dataset predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy predictors reinforce this consensus: AlphaMissense‑Optimized reports a benign effect, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates a likely benign classification. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Based on the collective evidence, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar status, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 2-4.102Likely Benign0.098Likely BenignLikely Benign0.086Likely Benign-0.20Neutral0.437Benign0.170Benign2.76Benign0.81Tolerated4.32434-0.3-14.03
c.3290C>T
P1097L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1097L is listed in ClinVar as Benign (ClinVar ID 2060978.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv and SIFT. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign impact, and this conclusion is consistent with the ClinVar designation. Thus, the variant is most likely benign and does not contradict ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-4.410Likely Benign0.145Likely BenignLikely Benign0.131Likely Benign-2.07Neutral0.611Possibly Damaging0.198Benign2.64Benign0.05Affected3.775-3-35.416.04
c.3705G>A
M1235I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M1235I is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic effect. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Benign”; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignCoiled-coilUncertain 1-4.312Likely Benign0.310Likely BenignLikely Benign0.027Likely Benign-1.44Neutral0.139Benign0.056Benign2.69Benign0.04Affected3.775122.6-18.03
c.2557G>C
G853R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G853R is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default is uncertain, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. High‑accuracy predictions therefore point to a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, SGM‑Consensus is likely benign, and no Foldetta data is available. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign classification, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.749Likely Benign0.366AmbiguousLikely Benign0.091Likely Benign-1.27Neutral0.846Possibly Damaging0.624Possibly Damaging4.18Benign0.00Affected-3-2-4.199.14
c.3635C>T
S1212F
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1212F is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include only REVEL, whereas the remaining tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) score—predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also reports it as likely pathogenic. No Foldetta stability prediction is available for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from multiple independent predictors indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, which is consistent with its ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilConflicting 2-14.445Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.271Likely Benign-4.52Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.03Pathogenic0.00Affected3.775-3-23.660.10
c.502C>T
H168Y
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H168Y is listed in ClinVar (ID 956914.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and ESM1b. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; the Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion is consistent with the ClinVar benign classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-8.914Likely Pathogenic0.264Likely BenignLikely Benign0.065Likely Benign-1.53Neutral0.192Benign0.062Benign4.18Benign0.01Affected4.323021.926.03
c.3632T>A
M1211K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M1211K is listed in ClinVar (ID 834052.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from FATHMM and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while the remaining seven tools—REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default—classify the change as pathogenic. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the picture: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign effect, whereas the SGM Consensus (a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates a likely pathogenic outcome; Foldetta data are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from standard predictors and the SGM Consensus supports a pathogenic interpretation, which contradicts the benign classification reported in ClinVar.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilLikely Benign 1-9.013Likely Pathogenic0.662Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.595Likely Pathogenic-2.95Deleterious0.987Probably Damaging0.979Probably Damaging5.59Benign0.01Affected3.7750-1-5.8-3.02
c.256G>A
V86I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V86I is listed in ClinVar (ID 588267.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) all classify the variant as benign or likely benign. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is “Likely Benign.” No Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/Rosetta stability) result is available, so it does not influence the assessment. Overall, the majority of predictions indicate that V86I is most likely benign, which is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.726Likely Benign0.338Likely BenignLikely Benign0.076Likely Benign-0.31Neutral0.267Benign0.097Benign3.94Benign0.00Affected4.321430.314.03
c.3614T>C
L1205P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L1205P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in silico predictors classify the change as pathogenic: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool predicts a benign effect. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious impact: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is “Likely Pathogenic.” Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the computational evidence strongly indicates that the variant is pathogenic, which contradicts the current ClinVar designation of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilUncertain 1-16.878Likely Pathogenic1.000Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.536Likely Pathogenic-5.91Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging1.45Pathogenic0.00Affected-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.3607C>G
H1203D
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant H1203D is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predicts a pathogenic outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Benign”; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact. This conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar designation, which remains uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignCoiled-coilUncertain 1-6.729Likely Benign0.525AmbiguousLikely Benign0.403Likely Benign-1.89Neutral0.473Possibly Damaging0.265Benign5.51Benign0.24Tolerated3.7751-1-0.3-22.05
c.3574C>G
L1192V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L1192V is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (both HumDiv and HumVar models) predict a pathogenic impact. The high‑accuracy AlphaMissense‑Optimized score is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus also indicates a likely benign outcome; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it. Thus, based on current predictions, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignCoiled-coilUncertain 1-4.132Likely Benign0.471AmbiguousLikely Benign0.041Likely Benign-0.89Neutral0.779Possibly Damaging0.527Possibly Damaging2.69Benign0.16Tolerated210.4-14.03
c.3529G>A
E1177K
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant E1177K is listed in ClinVar with an Uncertain significance status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments give AlphaMissense‑Optimized as Uncertain, SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) as Likely Benign, and Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar designation of Uncertain.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignCoiled-coilUncertain 1-3.413Likely Benign0.944Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.560Likely Pathogenic-1.75Neutral0.905Possibly Damaging0.637Possibly Damaging5.44Benign0.11Tolerated4.32201-0.4-0.94
c.3511_3512delinsTG
A1171C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A1171C (ClinVar ID 1723483.0) is listed as “Uncertain” in ClinVar and is not present in gnomAD. Prediction tools that converge on a benign outcome include PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, all of which report a benign or neutral effect. In contrast, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT uniformly predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign,” reinforcing the benign signal. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) as benign, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignCoiled-coilUncertain 1-5.363Likely Benign0.496AmbiguousLikely Benign-1.16Neutral0.978Probably Damaging0.825Possibly Damaging5.32Benign0.02Affected4.324-200.732.06
c.2548G>A
G850R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant G850R is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 2042462.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote). Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic effect, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized labeling the variant as benign and the SGM‑Consensus indicating a likely benign outcome; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method, did not provide a result for this substitution. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact, which aligns with the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.082Likely Benign0.398AmbiguousLikely Benign0.194Likely Benign-0.07Neutral0.010Benign0.010Benign4.30Benign0.01Affected3.775-3-2-4.199.14
c.2525C>A
S842Y
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S842Y is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 624244.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only REVEL, whereas the remaining tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized returns a pathogenic score, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is labeled Likely Pathogenic. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, in agreement with its ClinVar classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic 1-16.124Likely Pathogenic0.995Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.191Likely Benign-4.28Deleterious0.944Possibly Damaging0.676Possibly Damaging1.97Pathogenic0.00Affected3.775-3-2-0.576.10
c.2485G>A
E829K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant E829K is listed in ClinVar as Pathogenic (ClinVar ID 1721258.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a deleterious effect: pathogenic predictions come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only REVEL predicts a benign outcome, while ESM1b and AlphaMissense‑Optimized are uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Pathogenic, AlphaMissense‑Optimized as uncertain, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates that E829K is most likely pathogenic, and this conclusion aligns with the ClinVar pathogenic classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicPathogenic 1-7.527In-Between0.807Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.194Likely Benign-2.65Deleterious0.994Probably Damaging0.900Possibly Damaging2.27Pathogenic0.00Affected3.77501-0.4-0.94
c.249A>T
R83S
2D
AISynGAP1 R83S is listed in ClinVar (ID 537001.0) with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that classify the variant as benign include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict pathogenicity are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) indicates likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the predictions are split, with an equal number of benign and pathogenic calls, and the high‑accuracy tools are discordant. Thus, the variant is most likely pathogenic based on the predominance of pathogenic predictions, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.550Likely Benign0.999Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.094Likely Benign-1.87Neutral0.909Possibly Damaging0.587Possibly Damaging3.19Benign0.00Affected4.3210-13.7-69.11
c.2502G>C
M834I
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M834I is listed in ClinVar (ID 3007819.0) with an uncertain significance designation and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only SIFT classifies the change as pathogenic. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a likely benign outcome. High‑accuracy assessments confirm this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority‑vote) is likely benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, did not provide a result for this variant. Overall, the collective predictions indicate that M834I is most likely benign, which is consistent with its ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.377Likely Benign0.291Likely BenignLikely Benign0.055Likely Benign-1.21Neutral0.026Benign0.009Benign2.56Benign0.00Affected4.324122.6-18.03
c.2503C>A
L835M
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L835M is listed in ClinVar (ID 2731331.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PolyPhen‑2 HumDiv and PolyPhen‑2 HumVar. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifying the variant as benign, the SGM‑Consensus also indicating a likely benign outcome, while Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence—including the high‑accuracy tools—supports a benign classification, which is consistent with the ClinVar status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignBenign 1-4.153Likely Benign0.121Likely BenignLikely Benign0.068Likely Benign-0.45Neutral0.999Probably Damaging0.977Probably Damaging2.67Benign0.12Tolerated3.77524-1.918.03
c.3686A>C
Q1229P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Q1229P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL and SIFT, whereas the majority of tools predict a pathogenic impact: PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (which is a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). High‑accuracy assessments further support pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus is “Likely Pathogenic.” No Foldetta stability prediction is available for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilUncertain 1-10.397Likely Pathogenic0.980Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.422Likely Benign-3.69Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging1.75Pathogenic0.12Tolerated3.7750-11.9-31.01
c.250C>G
R84G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant R84G is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, ESM1b, and FATHMM, whereas those that predict a pathogenic outcome are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive (two pathogenic versus two benign votes). Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Based on the majority of available predictions, the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict the current ClinVar status of “Uncertain.”

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-6.627Likely Benign0.989Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.139Likely Benign-2.64Deleterious0.962Probably Damaging0.726Possibly Damaging3.68Benign0.00Affected4.321-3-24.1-99.14
c.2514C>A
N838K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant N838K is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status (ClinVar ID 1377909.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas those that predict a pathogenic effect are PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Pathogenic.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain,” SGM‑Consensus as “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the balance of evidence leans toward a pathogenic interpretation, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 2-8.470Likely Pathogenic0.862Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.097Likely Benign-2.78Deleterious0.997Probably Damaging0.995Probably Damaging2.69Benign0.16Tolerated3.77510-0.414.07
c.2518A>T
S840C
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S840C is listed in ClinVar (ID 2089808.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include only REVEL, whereas the majority of algorithms—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default—consistently predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as “Uncertain,” SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) as “Likely Pathogenic,” and Foldetta results are unavailable. Taken together, the preponderance of evidence points to a pathogenic effect for S840C. This conclusion aligns with the ClinVar designation of uncertainty rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicUncertain 1-8.799Likely Pathogenic0.904Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.376Likely Benign-3.96Deleterious0.999Probably Damaging0.975Probably Damaging1.50Pathogenic0.00Affected3.7750-13.316.06
c.3655T>C
Y1219H
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant Y1219H is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that indicate a benign effect include only REVEL, whereas the remaining tools—PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Pathogenic)—all predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments further support a deleterious outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized classifies the variant as pathogenic, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also reports it as Likely Pathogenic. No Foldetta stability prediction is available for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence from both general and high‑accuracy tools indicates that the variant is most likely pathogenic, which does not contradict its current ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilUncertain 1-9.511Likely Pathogenic0.997Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.363Likely Benign-3.62Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging2.15Pathogenic0.00Affected3.77502-1.9-26.03
c.3653A>T
E1218V
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant E1218V is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 1015602.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split opinion: benign predictions come from REVEL and ESM1b, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Default. When the high‑accuracy consensus is considered, AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, but the SGM‑Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—labels the variant as likely pathogenic. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this change. Overall, the majority of evidence points toward a pathogenic effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar designation of uncertain significance rather than a benign classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicCoiled-coilUncertain 2-5.647Likely Benign0.936Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.418Likely Benign-5.68Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.998Probably Damaging2.21Pathogenic0.00Affected3.775-2-27.7-29.98
c.3511G>A
A1171T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A1171T is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors classify the change as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, also reports a “Likely Benign” outcome. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments confirm the benign prediction: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignCoiled-coilUncertain 1-3.658Likely Benign0.149Likely BenignLikely Benign0.201Likely Benign-0.48Neutral0.245Benign0.138Benign5.45Benign0.07Tolerated4.32410-2.530.03
c.2608C>G
L870V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L870V is listed in ClinVar (ID 946946.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). In contrast, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; the Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not conflict with the ClinVar designation of uncertainty.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.123Likely Benign0.300Likely BenignLikely Benign0.111Likely Benign-1.19Neutral0.997Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.64Benign0.12Tolerated3.883210.4-14.03
c.3508A>G
S1170G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1170G is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on benign impact include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. No tool in the dataset predicts pathogenicity, so the pathogenic group is empty. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, the SGM Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also predicts benign, while Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the collective predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignCoiled-coilUncertain 1-4.288Likely Benign0.221Likely BenignLikely Benign0.349Likely Benign-0.81Neutral0.241Benign0.229Benign5.31Benign0.54Tolerated4.324100.4-30.03
c.266C>T
P89L
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant P89L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls are made by PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, SIFT, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. High‑accuracy assessments indicate that AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenicity, whereas the SGM Consensus (derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) is inconclusive due to a 2‑to‑2 split, and Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of tools favor a pathogenic effect, but the evidence is not unanimous. Therefore, the variant is most likely pathogenic according to the current predictions, and this assessment does not contradict its ClinVar status of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 2-6.775Likely Benign0.982Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.119Likely Benign-3.29Deleterious0.889Possibly Damaging0.058Benign3.73Benign0.00Affected4.321-3-35.416.04
c.3386T>C
L1129P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L1129P is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT all predict a pathogenic impact. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates the majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports the variant as “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign classification: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also indicates benign. The Foldetta protein‑folding stability analysis is unavailable for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence—including high‑accuracy tools—points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 2-2.991Likely Benign0.154Likely BenignLikely Benign0.432Likely Benign0.27Neutral0.971Probably Damaging0.773Possibly Damaging5.44Benign0.00Affected4.324-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.2684G>A
S895N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S895N is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) also leans benign. No Foldetta (protein‑folding stability) result is available, so it does not influence the assessment. Overall, the preponderance of predictions indicates the variant is most likely benign, which is consistent with its ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-6.399Likely Benign0.604Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.118Likely Benign-0.85Neutral0.991Probably Damaging0.988Probably Damaging2.64Benign0.30Tolerated4.32411-2.727.03
c.2690C>T
S897L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S897L is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). In contrast, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar) and SIFT predict a pathogenic impact. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus (derived from the same four high‑accuracy tools) also as benign. No Foldetta stability prediction is available for this variant. Overall, the majority of computational evidence points to a benign effect, and this conclusion does not conflict with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.034Likely Benign0.299Likely BenignLikely Benign0.028Likely Benign-1.71Neutral0.901Possibly Damaging0.636Possibly Damaging2.66Benign0.01Affected-3-24.626.08
c.3377G>A
G1126D
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant G1126D is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split opinion: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, whereas pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, and ESM1b. The AlphaMissense‑Default result is uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments further support a benign interpretation: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts benign, and the SGM Consensus—derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN—also yields benign. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method that integrates FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign effect, which is consistent with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-8.888Likely Pathogenic0.432AmbiguousLikely Benign0.376Likely Benign-0.65Neutral0.906Possibly Damaging0.473Possibly Damaging4.82Benign0.02Affected3.7751-1-3.158.04
c.269T>A
V90E
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V90E is listed in ClinVar (ID 971665.0) with an uncertain significance status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools largely agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all predict benign. Only two tools—SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default—suggest a pathogenic outcome. When the high‑accuracy consensus is considered, AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains benign, and the SGM Consensus (derived from the majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) also indicates a likely benign effect. No Foldetta stability assessment is available for this variant. Overall, the preponderance of evidence points to a benign impact, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-4.079Likely Benign0.703Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.108Likely Benign-0.38Neutral0.001Benign0.000Benign4.00Benign0.00Affected4.321-2-2-7.729.98
c.3354C>A
S1118R
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1118R (ClinVar ID 2656489.0) is listed as ClinVar status Uncertain and is not present in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic effect, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as Likely Benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar Uncertain designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.670Likely Benign0.553AmbiguousLikely Benign0.166Likely Benign-0.74Neutral0.034Benign0.023Benign5.17Benign0.05Affected4.322-10-3.769.11
c.3328A>G
S1110G
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1110G is listed in ClinVar (ID 1722210.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion aligns with the ClinVar benign classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Benign 1-4.674Likely Benign0.079Likely BenignLikely Benign0.035Likely Benign-2.26Neutral0.036Benign0.026Benign2.19Pathogenic0.08Tolerated4.322100.4-30.03
c.3326T>C
L1109P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant L1109P is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 1730257.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools uniformly classify the substitution as benign: REVEL, PROVEAN, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores. No tool predicts pathogenicity. High‑accuracy assessments corroborate this: AlphaMissense‑Optimized indicates a benign effect, and the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports a likely benign outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability predictor combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the computational evidence overwhelmingly supports a benign classification, which does not contradict the ClinVar uncertain status. Thus, the variant is most likely benign.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignConflicting 2-5.313Likely Benign0.120Likely BenignLikely Benign0.151Likely Benign-0.52Neutral0.002Benign0.003Benign2.65Benign0.07Tolerated4.322-3-3-5.4-16.04
c.2711T>C
M904T
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M904T is listed in ClinVar (ID 1311496.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only AlphaMissense‑Default predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this conclusion does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.721Likely Benign0.668Likely PathogenicLikely Benign0.042Likely Benign-1.15Neutral0.277Benign0.103Benign2.78Benign0.18Tolerated3.775-1-1-2.6-30.09
c.3395C>A
S1132Y
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1132Y is listed in ClinVar as a benign alteration (ClinVar ID 845357.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN). Only polyPhen‑2 HumDiv predicts a pathogenic outcome, while AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence supports a benign classification, which aligns with the ClinVar status and does not contradict it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Benign 1-5.894Likely Benign0.392AmbiguousLikely Benign0.401Likely Benign-1.76Neutral0.500Possibly Damaging0.208Benign5.40Benign0.09Tolerated4.324-3-2-0.576.10
c.3405G>C
K1135N
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant K1135N is listed in ClinVar (ID 633521.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign), REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. In contrast, AlphaMissense‑Default and AlphaMissense‑Optimized both predict a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments further show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus (derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) remains Likely Benign. No Foldetta (FoldX‑MD/Rosetta stability) result is available for this variant. Overall, the majority of predictions support a benign classification, which does not contradict the current ClinVar “Uncertain” designation.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.715Likely Benign0.960Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.166Likely Benign-0.97Neutral0.411Benign0.321Benign5.43Benign0.07Tolerated4.322100.4-14.07
c.3502A>G
I1168V
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant I1168V is listed in ClinVar (ID 936001.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are PolyPhen‑2 HumDiv and PolyPhen‑2 HumVar. AlphaMissense‑Default is uncertain, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) reports a “Likely Benign” outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this consensus does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-3.263Likely Benign0.524AmbiguousLikely Benign0.363Likely Benign-0.14Neutral0.876Possibly Damaging0.643Possibly Damaging5.47Benign0.84Tolerated3.88343-0.3-14.03
c.2627C>T
S876L
2D
AISynGAP1 variant S876L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, ESM1b, FATHMM, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized, while pathogenic predictions arise from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), and SIFT. AlphaMissense‑Default remains uncertain. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts a benign effect; the SGM Consensus, derived from AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is inconclusive and therefore unavailable; Foldetta stability analysis is also unavailable. Overall, the majority of available predictions favor a benign impact, suggesting the variant is most likely benign. This conclusion does not conflict with the ClinVar uncertain status, which reflects the current lack of definitive evidence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 2-5.856Likely Benign0.489AmbiguousLikely Benign0.249Likely Benign-3.56Deleterious0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.57Benign0.05Affected3.775-2-34.626.08
c.2632A>G
T878A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant T878A is listed in ClinVar with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. All available in‑silico predictors agree on a benign effect: REVEL, PROVEAN, PolyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized all return benign scores, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) indicates “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy tools likewise support a benign outcome: AlphaMissense‑Optimized is benign, and the SGM‑Consensus is benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Based on the unanimous benign predictions, the variant is most likely benign, and this assessment does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.154Likely Benign0.081Likely BenignLikely Benign0.088Likely Benign-0.67Neutral0.003Benign0.006Benign2.73Benign0.18Tolerated3.775102.5-30.03
c.2635_2636delinsAA
A879K
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A879K is listed in ClinVar (ID 575856.0) as benign and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (Likely Benign). Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; a Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this consensus aligns with the ClinVar designation, with no contradiction.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignLikely Benign 1-5.877Likely Benign0.757Likely PathogenicLikely Benign-0.71Neutral0.969Probably Damaging0.593Possibly Damaging2.69Benign0.21Tolerated3.775-1-1-5.757.10
c.263T>C
V88A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant V88A is listed in ClinVar (ID 2656486.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and SIFT. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, is “Likely Benign.” High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as pathogenic, while the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote) is benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the balance of evidence favors a benign interpretation, which does not contradict the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.860Likely Benign0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.050Likely Benign-1.22Neutral0.053Benign0.008Benign3.75Benign0.00Affected4.32100-2.4-28.05
c.3494C>T
S1165L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant S1165L is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 225899.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign predictions come from REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic predictions arise from polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. Grouping by consensus, the benign‑predicted tools outnumber the pathogenic ones. High‑accuracy assessments further clarify the picture: the SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, leans toward benign (Likely Benign); AlphaMissense‑Optimized remains uncertain, and Foldetta data are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, aligning with the ClinVar uncertain status rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignConflicting 2-2.984Likely Benign0.793Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.166Likely Benign-2.01Neutral0.998Probably Damaging0.992Probably Damaging2.60Benign0.33Tolerated3.883-3-24.626.0810.1016/j.ajhg.2020.11.011
c.3487C>G
H1163D
2D
AISynGAP1 missense variant H1163D is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools show a split: benign calls come from REVEL, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM, while pathogenic calls come from PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. High‑accuracy assessments are inconclusive: AlphaMissense‑Optimized rates the variant as uncertain, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN) yields a tie and is therefore unavailable, and Foldetta folding‑stability analysis is not provided. With an equal number of benign and pathogenic predictions and no decisive high‑accuracy evidence, the variant remains ambiguous. Thus, it is most likely neither clearly benign nor pathogenic, and this uncertainty aligns with its ClinVar status of uncertain significance.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Uncertain 1-2.107Likely Benign0.949Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.476Likely Benign-2.60Deleterious0.991Probably Damaging0.991Probably Damaging5.44Benign0.31Tolerated3.8831-1-0.3-22.05
c.3484C>T
P1162S
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P1162S is listed in ClinVar (ID 2287942.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, SIFT, ESM1b, and FATHMM. Those that predict a pathogenic effect are PolyPhen‑2 HumDiv, PolyPhen‑2 HumVar, and AlphaMissense‑Default. The SGM‑Consensus, derived from a majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and Foldetta (a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of high‑accuracy and consensus predictions lean toward a benign impact. Thus, the variant is most likely benign, which is consistent with its ClinVar “Uncertain” designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-2.118Likely Benign0.913Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.215Likely Benign-1.93Neutral1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging2.73Benign0.55Tolerated3.8831-10.8-10.04
c.265C>G
P89A
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant P89A is listed in ClinVar (ID 1031674.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, and FATHMM. Tools that predict a pathogenic effect are SIFT and AlphaMissense‑Default. AlphaMissense‑Optimized is uncertain, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN) reports a “Likely Benign” outcome. Foldetta, a protein‑folding stability method combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs, has no available result for this variant. Overall, the majority of high‑confidence predictions indicate a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it. Thus, the variant is most likely benign based on current predictive evidence.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 2-5.778Likely Benign0.920Likely PathogenicAmbiguous0.095Likely Benign-2.47Neutral0.225Benign0.020Benign3.77Benign0.00Affected4.3211-13.4-26.04
c.3442A>T
M1148L
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant M1148L is listed in ClinVar (ID 1010061.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), ESM1b, FATHMM, AlphaMissense‑Default, and AlphaMissense‑Optimized. Only SIFT predicts a pathogenic outcome. The SGM‑Consensus, which aggregates AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN, reports a “Likely Benign” classification. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta stability analysis is unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign effect, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” designation rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-1.777Likely Benign0.093Likely BenignLikely Benign0.068Likely Benign-1.13Neutral0.016Benign0.016Benign2.62Benign0.00Affected4.322421.9-18.03
c.3304G>C
A1102P
2D
AIThe SynGAP1 missense variant A1102P is listed in ClinVar (ID 2789225.0) with an “Uncertain” status and is not reported in gnomAD. Prediction tools that agree on a benign effect include REVEL, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 (HumDiv and HumVar), SIFT, ESM1b, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, and the SGM‑Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, and PROVEAN). Only FATHMM predicts a pathogenic outcome. High‑accuracy assessments show AlphaMissense‑Optimized as benign and the SGM‑Consensus as likely benign; Foldetta results are unavailable. Overall, the majority of evidence points to a benign impact, and this is consistent with the ClinVar “Uncertain” classification rather than contradicting it.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely BenignUncertain 1-5.120Likely Benign0.077Likely BenignLikely Benign0.118Likely Benign-0.97Neutral0.000Benign0.002Benign2.26Pathogenic0.13Tolerated3.775-11-3.426.04
c.1367A>C
Q456P
2D
3DClick to see structure in 3D Viewer
AISynGAP1 missense variant Q456P is listed in ClinVar with an uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 2697090.0) and is not reported in gnomAD. Functional prediction tools cluster into two groups: benign predictions come from REVEL, SIFT, and FATHMM, whereas pathogenic predictions are made by FoldX, Rosetta, PROVEAN, polyPhen‑2 HumDiv, polyPhen‑2 HumVar, AlphaMissense‑Default, AlphaMissense‑Optimized, ESM1b, the SGM Consensus (majority vote of AlphaMissense‑Default, ESM1b, FATHMM, PROVEAN), and Foldetta. High‑accuracy methods specifically report pathogenicity: AlphaMissense‑Optimized predicts pathogenic, the SGM Consensus (majority vote) is pathogenic, and Foldetta (combining FoldX‑MD and Rosetta outputs) is pathogenic. No predictions are inconclusive. Overall, the preponderance of evidence indicates the variant is most likely pathogenic, which contradicts the current ClinVar uncertain status.

Disclaimer: This summary was generated using AI and should be interpreted alongside expert review.
Likely PathogenicGAPUncertain 1-15.250Likely Pathogenic0.993Likely PathogenicLikely Pathogenic0.469Likely Benign3.68Destabilizing0.28.43Destabilizing6.06Destabilizing0.82Ambiguous-5.66Deleterious1.000Probably Damaging0.999Probably Damaging3.34Benign0.07Tolerated3.3734-101.9-31.01

Found 757 rows. Show 200 rows per page. Page 1/4 |